Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. He, Q.: ¬A study of the strength indexes in co-word analysis (2000) 0.01
    0.006406525 = product of:
      0.019219575 = sum of:
        0.019219575 = weight(_text_:in in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019219575 = score(doc=111,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.27051896 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Co-word analysis is a technique for detecting the knowledge structure of scientific literature and mapping the dynamics in a research field. It is used to count the co-occurrences of term pairs, compute the strength between term pairs, and map the research field by inserting terms and their linkages into a graphical structure according to the strength values. In previous co-word studies, there are two indexes used to measure the strength between term pairs in order to identify the major areas in a research field - the inclusion index (I) and the equivalence index (E). This study will conduct two co-word analysis experiments using the two indexes, respectively, and compare the results from the two experiments. The results show, due to the difference in their computation, index I is more likely to identify general subject areas in a research field while index E is more likely to identify subject areas at more specific levels
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.7
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al