Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Chen, L.; Fang, H.: ¬An automatic method for ex-tracting innovative ideas based on the Scopus® database (2019) 0.00
    0.004425438 = product of:
      0.017701752 = sum of:
        0.017701752 = product of:
          0.035403505 = sum of:
            0.035403505 = weight(_text_:organization in 5310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035403505 = score(doc=5310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 5310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5310)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 46(2019) no.3, S.171-186
  2. Moohebat, M.; Raj, R.G.; Kareem, S.B.A.; Thorleuchter, D.: Identifying ISI-indexed articles by their lexical usage : a text analysis approach (2015) 0.00
    0.0036413912 = product of:
      0.014565565 = sum of:
        0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 1664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014565565 = score(doc=1664,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1664, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1664)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This research creates an architecture for investigating the existence of probable lexical divergences between articles, categorized as Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) and non-ISI, and consequently, if such a difference is discovered, to propose the best available classification method. Based on a collection of ISI- and non-ISI-indexed articles in the areas of business and computer science, three classification models are trained. A sensitivity analysis is applied to demonstrate the impact of words in different syntactical forms on the classification decision. The results demonstrate that the lexical domains of ISI and non-ISI articles are distinguishable by machine learning techniques. Our findings indicate that the support vector machine identifies ISI-indexed articles in both disciplines with higher precision than do the Naïve Bayesian and K-Nearest Neighbors techniques.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.3, S.501-511
  3. Radev, D.R.; Joseph, M.T.; Gibson, B.; Muthukrishnan, P.: ¬A bibliometric and network analysis of the field of computational linguistics (2016) 0.00
    0.0030039945 = product of:
      0.012015978 = sum of:
        0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012015978 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.3, S.683-706
  4. Levin, M.; Krawczyk, S.; Bethard, S.; Jurafsky, D.: Citation-based bootstrapping for large-scale author disambiguation (2012) 0.00
    0.0021457102 = product of:
      0.008582841 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=246)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.1030-1047