Search (80 results, page 4 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Bian, G.-W.; Chen, H.-H.: Cross-language information access to multilingual collections on the Internet (2000) 0.00 
    0.0031237355 = product of:
  0.012494942 = sum of:
    0.012494942 = product of:
      0.024989884 = sum of:
        0.024989884 = weight(_text_:22 in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024989884 = score(doc=4436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030740997 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    16. 2.2000 14:22:39
  2. Lorenz, S.: Konzeption und prototypische Realisierung einer begriffsbasierten Texterschließung (2006) 0.00 
    0.0031237355 = product of:
  0.012494942 = sum of:
    0.012494942 = product of:
      0.024989884 = sum of:
        0.024989884 = weight(_text_:22 in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024989884 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030740997 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2015 9:17:30
  3. Bird, S.; Dale, R.; Dorr, B.; Gibson, B.; Joseph, M.; Kan, M.-Y.; Lee, D.; Powley, B.; Radev, D.; Tan, Y.F.: ¬The ACL Anthology Reference Corpus : a reference dataset for bibliographic research in computational linguistics (2008) 0.00 
    0.0029743724 = product of:
  0.011897489 = sum of:
    0.011897489 = weight(_text_:m in 2804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011897489 = score(doc=2804,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.15552804 = fieldWeight in 2804, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2804)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  4. Rötzer, F.: Computer ergooglen die Bedeutung von Worten (2005) 0.00 
    0.0029322833 = product of:
  0.011729133 = sum of:
    0.011729133 = product of:
      0.023458267 = sum of:
        0.023458267 = weight(_text_:da in 3385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023458267 = score(doc=3385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1475006 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030740997 = queryNorm
            0.15903844 = fieldWeight in 3385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3385)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    "Wie könnten Computer Sprache lernen und dabei auch die Bedeutung von Worten sowie die Beziehungen zwischen ihnen verstehen? Dieses Problem der Semantik stellt eine gewaltige, bislang nur ansatzweise bewältigte Aufgabe dar, da Worte und Wortverbindungen oft mehrere oder auch viele Bedeutungen haben, die zudem vom außersprachlichen Kontext abhängen. Die beiden holländischen (Ein künstliches Bewusstsein aus einfachen Aussagen (1)). Paul Vitanyi (2) und Rudi Cilibrasi vom Nationalen Institut für Mathematik und Informatik (3) in Amsterdam schlagen eine elegante Lösung vor: zum Nachschlagen im Internet, der größten Datenbank, die es gibt, wird einfach Google benutzt. Objekte wie eine Maus können mit ihren Namen "Maus" benannt werden, die Bedeutung allgemeiner Begriffe muss aus ihrem Kontext gelernt werden. Ein semantisches Web zur Repräsentation von Wissen besteht aus den möglichen Verbindungen, die Objekte und ihre Namen eingehen können. Natürlich können in der Wirklichkeit neue Namen, aber auch neue Bedeutungen und damit neue Verknüpfungen geschaffen werden. Sprache ist lebendig und flexibel. Um einer Künstlichen Intelligenz alle Wortbedeutungen beizubringen, müsste mit der Hilfe von menschlichen Experten oder auch vielen Mitarbeitern eine riesige Datenbank mit den möglichen semantischen Netzen aufgebaut und dazu noch ständig aktualisiert werden. Das aber müsste gar nicht notwendig sein, denn mit dem Web gibt es nicht nur die größte und weitgehend kostenlos benutzbare semantische Datenbank, sie wird auch ständig von zahllosen Internetnutzern aktualisiert. Zudem gibt es Suchmaschinen wie Google, die Verbindungen zwischen Worten und damit deren Bedeutungskontext in der Praxis in ihrer Wahrscheinlichkeit quantitativ mit der Angabe der Webseiten, auf denen sie gefunden wurden, messen.
  5. Sprachtechnologie, mobile Kommunikation und linguistische Ressourcen : Beiträge zur GLDV Tagung 2005 in Bonn (2005) 0.00 
    0.0027321356 = product of:
  0.010928542 = sum of:
    0.010928542 = weight(_text_:m in 3578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010928542 = score(doc=3578,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.14286163 = fieldWeight in 3578, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3578)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Karel Pala: The Balkanet Experience - Peter M. Kruse/Andre Nauloks/Dietmar Rösner/Manuela Kunze: Clever Search: A WordNet Based Wrapper for Internet Search Engines - Rosmary Stegmann/Wolfgang Woerndl: Using GermaNet to Generate Individual Customer Profiles - Ingo Glöckner/Sven Hartrumpf/Rainer Osswald: From GermaNet Glosses to Formal Meaning Postulates -Aljoscha Burchardt/ Katrin Erk/Anette Frank: A WordNet Detour to FrameNet - Daniel Naber: OpenThesaurus: ein offenes deutsches Wortnetz - Anke Holler/Wolfgang Grund/Heinrich Petith: Maschinelle Generierung assoziativer Termnetze für die Dokumentensuche - Stefan Bordag/Hans Friedrich Witschel/Thomas Wittig: Evaluation of Lexical Acquisition Algorithms - Iryna Gurevych/Hendrik Niederlich: Computing Semantic Relatedness of GermaNet Concepts - Roland Hausser: Turn-taking als kognitive Grundmechanik der Datenbanksemantik - Rodolfo Delmonte: Parsing Overlaps - Melanie Twiggs: Behandlung des Passivs im Rahmen der Datenbanksemantik- Sandra Hohmann: Intention und Interaktion - Anmerkungen zur Relevanz der Benutzerabsicht - Doris Helfenbein: Verwendung von Pronomina im Sprecher- und Hörmodus - Bayan Abu Shawar/Eric Atwell: Modelling turn-taking in a corpus-trained chatbot - Barbara März: Die Koordination in der Datenbanksemantik - Jens Edlund/Mattias Heldner/Joakim Gustafsson: Utterance segmentation and turn-taking in spoken dialogue systems - Ekaterina Buyko: Numerische Repräsentation von Textkorpora für Wissensextraktion - Bernhard Fisseni: ProofML - eine Annotationssprache für natürlichsprachliche mathematische Beweise - Iryna Schenk: Auflösung der Pronomen mit Nicht-NP-Antezedenten in spontansprachlichen Dialogen - Stephan Schwiebert: Entwurf eines agentengestützten Systems zur Paradigmenbildung - Ingmar Steiner: On the analysis of speech rhythm through acoustic parameters - Hans Friedrich Witschel: Text, Wörter, Morpheme - Möglichkeiten einer automatischen Terminologie-Extraktion.
    Language
    m
    Type
    m
  6. Stede, M.: Lexicalization in natural language generation (2002) 0.00 
    0.0026289986 = product of:
  0.010515994 = sum of:
    0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 4245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010515994 = score(doc=4245,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4245, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4245)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  7. Aljlayl, M.; Frieder, O.; Grossman, D.: On bidirectional English-Arabic search (2002) 0.00 
    0.0026289986 = product of:
  0.010515994 = sum of:
    0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 5227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010515994 = score(doc=5227,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 5227, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5227)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  8. Fattah, M. Abdel; Ren, F.: English-Arabic proper-noun transliteration-pairs creation (2008) 0.00 
    0.0026289986 = product of:
  0.010515994 = sum of:
    0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 1999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010515994 = score(doc=1999,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 1999, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1999)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  9. Vilares, J.; Alonso, M.A.; Vilares, M.: Extraction of complex index terms in non-English IR : a shallow parsing based approach (2008) 0.00 
    0.0026289986 = product of:
  0.010515994 = sum of:
    0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 2107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010515994 = score(doc=2107,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 2107, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2107)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  10. Helbig, H.: Wissensverarbeitung und die Semantik der natürlichen Sprache : Wissensrepräsentation mit MultiNet (2008) 0.00 
    0.0026289986 = product of:
  0.010515994 = sum of:
    0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010515994 = score(doc=2731,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    m
  11. Witschel, H.F.: Terminologie-Extraktion : Möglichkeiten der Kombination statistischer uns musterbasierter Verfahren (2004) 0.00 
    0.0026289986 = product of:
  0.010515994 = sum of:
    0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010515994 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    m
  12. Jurafsky, D.; Martin, J.H.: Speech and language processing : ani ntroduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics and speech recognition (2009) 0.00 
    0.0026289986 = product of:
  0.010515994 = sum of:
    0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 1081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010515994 = score(doc=1081,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 1081, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1081)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    m
  13. Rindflesch, T.C.; Fizsman, M.: The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing : interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text (2003) 0.00 
    0.0026289986 = product of:
  0.010515994 = sum of:
    0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 2097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010515994 = score(doc=2097,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 2097, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2097)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  14. Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.00 
    0.0026025756 = product of:
  0.010410302 = sum of:
    0.010410302 = weight(_text_:m in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010410302 = score(doc=5089,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13608703 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
    Type
    m
  15. Heyer, G.; Quasthoff, U.; Wittig, T.: Text Mining : Wissensrohstoff Text. Konzepte, Algorithmen, Ergebnisse (2006) 0.00 
    0.0021031988 = product of:
  0.008412795 = sum of:
    0.008412795 = weight(_text_:m in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008412795 = score(doc=5218,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    m
  16. Thiel, M.: Bedingt wahrscheinliche Syntaxbäume (2006) 0.00 
    0.0021031988 = product of:
  0.008412795 = sum of:
    0.008412795 = weight(_text_:m in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008412795 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  17. Rösener, C.: ¬Die Stecknadel im Heuhaufen : Natürlichsprachlicher Zugang zu Volltextdatenbanken (2005) 0.00 
    0.0021031988 = product of:
  0.008412795 = sum of:
    0.008412795 = weight(_text_:m in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008412795 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    m
  18. Semantic role universals and argument linking : theoretical, typological, and psycholinguistic perspectives (2006) 0.00 
    0.0021031988 = product of:
  0.008412795 = sum of:
    0.008412795 = weight(_text_:m in 3670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008412795 = score(doc=3670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 3670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3670)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    m
  19. Yang, C.C.; Luk, J.: Automatic generation of English/Chinese thesaurus based on a parallel corpus in laws (2003) 0.00 
    0.0018221791 = product of:
  0.0072887163 = sum of:
    0.0072887163 = product of:
      0.014577433 = sum of:
        0.014577433 = weight(_text_:22 in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014577433 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030740997 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The information available in languages other than English in the World Wide Web is increasing significantly. According to a report from Computer Economics in 1999, 54% of Internet users are English speakers ("English Will Dominate Web for Only Three More Years," Computer Economics, July 9, 1999, http://www.computereconomics. com/new4/pr/pr990610.html). However, it is predicted that there will be only 60% increase in Internet users among English speakers verses a 150% growth among nonEnglish speakers for the next five years. By 2005, 57% of Internet users will be non-English speakers. A report by CNN.com in 2000 showed that the number of Internet users in China had been increased from 8.9 million to 16.9 million from January to June in 2000 ("Report: China Internet users double to 17 million," CNN.com, July, 2000, http://cnn.org/2000/TECH/computing/07/27/ china.internet.reut/index.html). According to Nielsen/ NetRatings, there was a dramatic leap from 22.5 millions to 56.6 millions Internet users from 2001 to 2002. China had become the second largest global at-home Internet population in 2002 (US's Internet population was 166 millions) (Robyn Greenspan, "China Pulls Ahead of Japan," Internet.com, April 22, 2002, http://cyberatias.internet.com/big-picture/geographics/article/0,,5911_1013841,00. html). All of the evidences reveal the importance of crosslingual research to satisfy the needs in the near future. Digital library research has been focusing in structural and semantic interoperability in the past. Searching and retrieving objects across variations in protocols, formats and disciplines are widely explored (Schatz, B., & Chen, H. (1999). Digital libraries: technological advances and social impacts. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, February, 32(2), 45-50.; Chen, H., Yen, J., & Yang, C.C. (1999). International activities: development of Asian digital libraries. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, 32(2), 48-49.). However, research in crossing language boundaries, especially across European languages and Oriental languages, is still in the initial stage. In this proposal, we put our focus an cross-lingual semantic interoperability by developing automatic generation of a cross-lingual thesaurus based an English/Chinese parallel corpus. When the searchers encounter retrieval problems, Professional librarians usually consult the thesaurus to identify other relevant vocabularies. In the problem of searching across language boundaries, a cross-lingual thesaurus, which is generated by co-occurrence analysis and Hopfield network, can be used to generate additional semantically relevant terms that cannot be obtained from dictionary. In particular, the automatically generated cross-lingual thesaurus is able to capture the unknown words that do not exist in a dictionary, such as names of persons, organizations, and events. Due to Hong Kong's unique history background, both English and Chinese are used as official languages in all legal documents. Therefore, English/Chinese cross-lingual information retrieval is critical for applications in courts and the government. In this paper, we develop an automatic thesaurus by the Hopfield network based an a parallel corpus collected from the Web site of the Department of Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government. Experiments are conducted to measure the precision and recall of the automatic generated English/Chinese thesaurus. The result Shows that such thesaurus is a promising tool to retrieve relevant terms, especially in the language that is not the same as the input term. The direct translation of the input term can also be retrieved in most of the cases.
  20. Conceptual structures : logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.00 
    0.0015773991 = product of:
  0.0063095964 = sum of:
    0.0063095964 = weight(_text_:m in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0063095964 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.0824812 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    m

Authors

Languages

  • e 49
  • d 31
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 52
  • m 24
  • s 10
  • el 7
  • x 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications