-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.08
0.083073884 = sum of:
0.061939135 = product of:
0.24775654 = sum of:
0.24775654 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24775654 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44083378 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021134753 = product of:
0.042269506 = sum of:
0.042269506 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042269506 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Wanner, L.: Lexical choice in text generation and machine translation (1996)
0.06
0.064482816 = product of:
0.12896563 = sum of:
0.12896563 = sum of:
0.07260629 = weight(_text_:l in 8521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07260629 = score(doc=8521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 8521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8521)
0.056359343 = weight(_text_:22 in 8521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359343 = score(doc=8521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
Luo, L.; Ju, J.; Li, Y.-F.; Haffari, G.; Xiong, B.; Pan, S.: ChatRule: mining logical rules with large language models for knowledge graph reasoning (2023)
0.04
0.040301763 = product of:
0.080603525 = sum of:
0.080603525 = sum of:
0.04537893 = weight(_text_:l in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04537893 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.03522459 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03522459 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 23.11.2023 19:07:22
-
Deventer, J.P. van; Kruger, C.J.; Johnson, R.D.: Delineating knowledge management through lexical analysis : a retrospective (2015)
0.04
0.03996916 = sum of:
0.027640555 = product of:
0.11056222 = sum of:
0.11056222 = weight(_text_:authors in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11056222 = score(doc=3807,freq=14.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.46641657 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.012328606 = product of:
0.024657212 = sum of:
0.024657212 = weight(_text_:22 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024657212 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose Academic authors tend to define terms that meet their own needs. Knowledge Management (KM) is a term that comes to mind and is examined in this study. Lexicographical research identified KM terms used by authors from 1996 to 2006 in academic outlets to define KM. Data were collected based on strict criteria which included that definitions should be unique instances. From 2006 onwards, these authors could not identify new unique instances of definitions with repetitive usage of such definition instances. Analysis revealed that KM is directly defined by People (Person and Organisation), Processes (Codify, Share, Leverage, and Process) and Contextualised Content (Information). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach The aim of this paper is to add to the body of knowledge in the KM discipline and supply KM practitioners and scholars with insight into what is commonly regarded to be KM so as to reignite the debate on what one could consider as KM. The lexicon used by KM scholars was evaluated though the application of lexicographical research methods as extended though Knowledge Discovery and Text Analysis methods. Findings By simplifying term relationships through the application of lexicographical research methods, as extended though Knowledge Discovery and Text Analysis methods, it was found that KM is directly defined by People (Person and Organisation), Processes (Codify, Share, Leverage, Process) and Contextualised Content (Information). One would therefore be able to indicate that KM, from an academic point of view, refers to people processing contextualised content.
Research limitations/implications In total, 42 definitions were identified spanning a period of 11 years. This represented the first use of KM through the estimated apex of terms used. From 2006 onwards definitions were used in repetition, and all definitions that were considered to repeat were therefore subsequently excluded as not being unique instances. All definitions listed are by no means complete and exhaustive. The definitions are viewed outside the scope and context in which they were originally formulated and then used to review the key concepts in the definitions themselves. Social implications When the authors refer to the aforementioned discussion of KM content as well as the presentation of the method followed in this paper, the authors may have a few implications for future research in KM. First the research validates ideas presented by the OECD in 2005 pertaining to KM. It also validates that through the evolution of KM, the authors ended with a description of KM that may be seen as a standardised description. If the authors as academics and practitioners, for example, refer to KM as the same construct and/or idea, it has the potential to speculatively, distinguish between what KM may or may not be. Originality/value By simplifying the term used to define KM, by focusing on the most common definitions, the paper assist in refocusing KM by reconsidering the dimensions that is the most common in how it has been defined over time. This would hopefully assist in reigniting discussions about KM and how it may be used to the benefit of an organisation.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Guthrie, L.; Pustejovsky, J.; Wilks, Y.; Slator, B.M.: ¬The role of lexicons in natural language processing (1996)
0.03
0.031765252 = product of:
0.063530505 = sum of:
0.063530505 = product of:
0.12706101 = sum of:
0.12706101 = weight(_text_:l in 6825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12706101 = score(doc=6825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.6147977 = fieldWeight in 6825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6825)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.03
0.030969568 = product of:
0.061939135 = sum of:
0.061939135 = product of:
0.24775654 = sum of:
0.24775654 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24775654 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44083378 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Bowker, L.; Ciro, J.B.: Machine translation and global research : towards improved machine translation literacy in the scholarly community (2019)
0.03
0.03009117 = sum of:
0.011939597 = product of:
0.04775839 = sum of:
0.04775839 = weight(_text_:authors in 5970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04775839 = score(doc=5970,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 5970, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5970)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.018151572 = product of:
0.036303144 = sum of:
0.036303144 = weight(_text_:l in 5970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036303144 = score(doc=5970,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.17565648 = fieldWeight in 5970, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5970)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In the global research community, English has become the main language of scholarly publishing in many disciplines. At the same time, online machine translation systems have become increasingly easy to access and use. Is this a researcher's match made in heaven, or the road to publication perdition? Here Lynne Bowker and Jairo Buitrago Ciro introduce the concept of machine translation literacy, a new kind of literacy for scholars and librarians in the digital age. For scholars, they explain how machine translation works, how it is (or could be) used for scholarly communication, and how both native and non-native English-speakers can write in a translation-friendly way in order to harness its potential. Native English speakers can continue to write in English, but expand the global reach of their research by making it easier for their peers around the world to access and understand their works, while non-native English speakers can write in their mother tongues, but leverage machine translation technology to help them produce draft publications in English. For academic librarians, the authors provide a framework for supporting researchers in all disciplines as they grapple with producing translation-friendly texts and using machine translation for scholarly communication - a form of support that will only become more important as campuses become increasingly international and as universities continue to strive to excel on the global stage. Machine Translation and Global Research is a must-read for scientists, researchers, students, and librarians eager to maximize the global reach and impact of any form of scholarly work.
-
Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987)
0.03
0.028179672 = product of:
0.056359343 = sum of:
0.056359343 = product of:
0.11271869 = sum of:
0.11271869 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11271869 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
-
Alonge, A.; Calzolari, N.; Vossen, P.; Bloksma, L.; Castellon, I.; Marti, M.A.; Peters, W.: ¬The linguistic design of the EuroWordNet database (1998)
0.03
0.027227357 = product of:
0.054454714 = sum of:
0.054454714 = product of:
0.10890943 = sum of:
0.10890943 = weight(_text_:l in 6440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10890943 = score(doc=6440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 6440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rodriguez, H.; Climent, S.; Vossen, P.; Bloksma, L.; Peters, W.; Alonge, A.; Bertagna, F.; Roventini, A.: ¬The top-down strategy for building EuroWordNet : vocabulary coverage, base concept and top ontology (1998)
0.03
0.027227357 = product of:
0.054454714 = sum of:
0.054454714 = product of:
0.10890943 = sum of:
0.10890943 = weight(_text_:l in 6441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10890943 = score(doc=6441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 6441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6441)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Vossen, P.; Bloksma, L.; Alonge, A.; Marinai, E.; Peters, C.; Catellon, I.; Marti, M.A.; Rigau, G.: Compatibility in interpretation of relations in EuroWordNet (1998)
0.03
0.027227357 = product of:
0.054454714 = sum of:
0.054454714 = product of:
0.10890943 = sum of:
0.10890943 = weight(_text_:l in 6442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10890943 = score(doc=6442,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 6442, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6442)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
McMahon, J.G.; Smith, F.J.: Improved statistical language model performance with automatic generated word hierarchies (1996)
0.02
0.024657212 = product of:
0.049314424 = sum of:
0.049314424 = product of:
0.09862885 = sum of:
0.09862885 = weight(_text_:22 in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09862885 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.217-248
-
Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991)
0.02
0.024657212 = product of:
0.049314424 = sum of:
0.049314424 = product of:
0.09862885 = sum of:
0.09862885 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09862885 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 11:52:22
-
Somers, H.: Example-based machine translation : Review article (1999)
0.02
0.024657212 = product of:
0.049314424 = sum of:
0.049314424 = product of:
0.09862885 = sum of:
0.09862885 = weight(_text_:22 in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09862885 = score(doc=6672,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
New tools for human translators (1997)
0.02
0.024657212 = product of:
0.049314424 = sum of:
0.049314424 = product of:
0.09862885 = sum of:
0.09862885 = weight(_text_:22 in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09862885 = score(doc=1179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
Baayen, R.H.; Lieber, H.: Word frequency distributions and lexical semantics (1997)
0.02
0.024657212 = product of:
0.049314424 = sum of:
0.049314424 = product of:
0.09862885 = sum of:
0.09862885 = weight(_text_:22 in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09862885 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 2.1999 10:48:22
-
¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023)
0.02
0.024657212 = product of:
0.049314424 = sum of:
0.049314424 = product of:
0.09862885 = sum of:
0.09862885 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09862885 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 1.2023 16:22:55
-
Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999)
0.02
0.021134753 = product of:
0.042269506 = sum of:
0.042269506 = product of:
0.08453901 = sum of:
0.08453901 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08453901 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 15. 3.2000 10:22:37
-
Boleda, G.; Evert, S.: Multiword expressions : a pain in the neck of lexical semantics (2009)
0.02
0.021134753 = product of:
0.042269506 = sum of:
0.042269506 = product of:
0.08453901 = sum of:
0.08453901 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08453901 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 3.2013 14:56:22
-
Monnerjahn, P.: Vorsprung ohne Technik : Übersetzen: Computer und Qualität (2000)
0.02
0.021134753 = product of:
0.042269506 = sum of:
0.042269506 = product of:
0.08453901 = sum of:
0.08453901 = weight(_text_:22 in 5429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08453901 = score(doc=5429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5429)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- c't. 2000, H.22, S.230-231
