Search (286 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11 
    0.1132482 = sum of:
  0.061899725 = product of:
    0.2475989 = sum of:
      0.2475989 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2475989 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4405533 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.051348478 = product of:
    0.07702272 = sum of:
      0.034780107 = weight(_text_:j in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034780107 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.04224261 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04224261 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Schwarz, C.: THESYS: Thesaurus Syntax System : a fully automatic thesaurus building aid (1988) 0.07 
    0.065736964 = product of:
  0.13147393 = sum of:
    0.13147393 = sum of:
      0.02480663 = weight(_text_:h in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02480663 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
      0.05738425 = weight(_text_:j in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05738425 = score(doc=1361,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
      0.049283046 = weight(_text_:22 in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049283046 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 1.1999 10:22:07
    Source
    Wissensorganisation im Wandel: Dezimalklassifikation - Thesaurusfragen - Warenklassifikation. Proc. 11. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Aachen, 29.6.-1.7.1987. Hrsg.: H.-J. Hermes u. J. Hölzl
  3. Bager, J.: ¬Die Text-KI ChatGPT schreibt Fachtexte, Prosa, Gedichte und Programmcode (2023) 0.07 
    0.0655237 = product of:
  0.1310474 = sum of:
    0.1310474 = sum of:
      0.028350435 = weight(_text_:h in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028350435 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
      0.046373475 = weight(_text_:j in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046373475 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
      0.056323484 = weight(_text_:22 in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056323484 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29.12.2022 18:22:55
    Source
    c't. 2023, H.1, S.46- [https://www.heise.de/select/ct/2023/1/2233908274346530870]
  4. Wu, H.; He, J.; Pei, Y.: Scientific impact at the topic level : a case study in computational linguistics (2010) 0.06 
    0.06446995 = sum of:
  0.020880999 = product of:
    0.083523996 = sum of:
      0.083523996 = weight(_text_:authors in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083523996 = score(doc=4103,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.043588948 = product of:
    0.06538342 = sum of:
      0.02480663 = weight(_text_:h in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02480663 = score(doc=4103,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
      0.04057679 = weight(_text_:j in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04057679 = score(doc=4103,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    In this article, we propose to apply the topic model and topic-level eigenfactor (TEF) algorithm to assess the relative importance of academic entities including articles, authors, journals, and conferences. Scientific impact is measured by the biased PageRank score toward topics created by the latent topic model. The TEF metric considers the impact of an academic entity in multiple granular views as well as in a global view. Experiments on a computational linguistics corpus show that the method is a useful and promising measure to assess scientific impact.
  5. Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.06 
    0.057919823 = sum of:
  0.0104404995 = product of:
    0.041761998 = sum of:
      0.041761998 = weight(_text_:authors in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041761998 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.047479324 = product of:
    0.07121898 = sum of:
      0.017540935 = weight(_text_:h in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017540935 = score(doc=5089,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.13586831 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.05367805 = weight(_text_:j in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05367805 = score(doc=5089,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.32509267 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures - Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000) brings together a wide range of researchers and practitioners working with conceptual structures. During the last few years, the ICCS conference series has considerably widened its scope on different kinds of conceptual structures, stimulating research across domain boundaries. We hope that this stimulation is further enhanced by ICCS 2000 joining the long tradition of conferences in Darmstadt with extensive, lively discussions. This volume consists of contributions presented at ICCS 2000, complementing the volume "Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues" (B. Ganter, G.W. Mineau (Eds.), LNAI 1867, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2000). It contains submissions reviewed by the program committee, and position papers. We wish to express our appreciation to all the authors of submitted papers, to the general chair, the program chair, the editorial board, the program committee, and to the additional reviewers for making ICCS 2000 a valuable contribution in the knowledge processing research field. Special thanks go to the local organizers for making the conference an enjoyable and inspiring event. We are grateful to Darmstadt University of Technology, the Ernst Schröder Center for Conceptual Knowledge Processing, the Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Land Hessen, and NaviCon GmbH for their generous support
    Content
    Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
  6. Somers, H.: Example-based machine translation : Review article (1999) 0.05 
    0.049393117 = product of:
  0.098786235 = sum of:
    0.098786235 = product of:
      0.14817935 = sum of:
        0.04961326 = weight(_text_:h in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04961326 = score(doc=6672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
        0.09856609 = weight(_text_:22 in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09856609 = score(doc=6672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  7. Baayen, R.H.; Lieber, H.: Word frequency distributions and lexical semantics (1997) 0.05 
    0.049393117 = product of:
  0.098786235 = sum of:
    0.098786235 = product of:
      0.14817935 = sum of:
        0.04961326 = weight(_text_:h in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04961326 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
        0.09856609 = weight(_text_:22 in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09856609 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    28. 2.1999 10:48:22
  8. Hutchins, J.: From first conception to first demonstration : the nascent years of machine translation, 1947-1954. A chronology (1997) 0.04 
    0.042790398 = product of:
  0.085580796 = sum of:
    0.085580796 = product of:
      0.1283712 = sum of:
        0.05796684 = weight(_text_:j in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05796684 = score(doc=1463,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
        0.07040435 = weight(_text_:22 in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07040435 = score(doc=1463,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  9. Monnerjahn, P.: Vorsprung ohne Technik : Übersetzen: Computer und Qualität (2000) 0.04 
    0.042336956 = product of:
  0.08467391 = sum of:
    0.08467391 = product of:
      0.12701087 = sum of:
        0.04252565 = weight(_text_:h in 5429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04252565 = score(doc=5429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 5429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5429)
        0.08448522 = weight(_text_:22 in 5429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08448522 = score(doc=5429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5429)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    c't. 2000, H.22, S.230-231
  10. Snajder, J.: Distributional semantics of multi-word expressions (2013) 0.04 
    0.039138515 = product of:
  0.07827703 = sum of:
    0.07827703 = product of:
      0.11741554 = sum of:
        0.035438046 = weight(_text_:h in 2868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035438046 = score(doc=2868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 2868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2868)
        0.081977494 = weight(_text_:j in 2868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081977494 = score(doc=2868,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.4964838 = fieldWeight in 2868, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2868)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Folien einer Präsentation anlässlich COST Action IC1207 PARSEME Meeting, Warsaw, September 16, 2013. Vgl. den Beitrag: Snajder, J., P. Almic: Modeling semantic compositionality of Croatian multiword expressions. In: Informatica. 39(2015) H.3, S.301-309.
  11. Krause, J.: Was leisten informationslinguistische Komponenten von Referenz-Retrievalsystemen für Massendaten? : Von der 'Pragmatik im Computer' zur Pragmatikanalyse als Designgrundlage (1986) 0.04 
    0.037361957 = product of:
  0.074723914 = sum of:
    0.074723914 = product of:
      0.112085864 = sum of:
        0.04252565 = weight(_text_:h in 7395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04252565 = score(doc=7395,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 7395, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7395)
        0.069560215 = weight(_text_:j in 7395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069560215 = score(doc=7395,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 7395, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7395)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1986, Freiburg, 8.-10.10.1986: Bedarfsorientierte Fachinformation: Methoden und Techniken am Arbeitsplatz. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  12. Rolland, M.T.: Sprachverarbeitung durch Logotechnik : Sprachtheorie, Methodik, Anwendungen (1994) 0.04 
    0.037361957 = product of:
  0.074723914 = sum of:
    0.074723914 = product of:
      0.112085864 = sum of:
        0.04252565 = weight(_text_:h in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04252565 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
        0.069560215 = weight(_text_:j in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069560215 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Nachrichten für Dokumentation 46(1995) H.2, S.130-132 (E. Lutterbeck); Knowledge organization 23(1996) no.3, S.147-156 (Ausführliche Rezension als eigener Beitrag von J. Heinrichs)
  13. Deventer, J.P. van; Kruger, C.J.; Johnson, R.D.: Delineating knowledge management through lexical analysis : a retrospective (2015) 0.04 
    0.03583681 = sum of:
  0.027622968 = product of:
    0.11049187 = sum of:
      0.11049187 = weight(_text_:authors in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11049187 = score(doc=3807,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.46641657 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.008213841 = product of:
    0.024641523 = sum of:
      0.024641523 = weight(_text_:22 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024641523 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose Academic authors tend to define terms that meet their own needs. Knowledge Management (KM) is a term that comes to mind and is examined in this study. Lexicographical research identified KM terms used by authors from 1996 to 2006 in academic outlets to define KM. Data were collected based on strict criteria which included that definitions should be unique instances. From 2006 onwards, these authors could not identify new unique instances of definitions with repetitive usage of such definition instances. Analysis revealed that KM is directly defined by People (Person and Organisation), Processes (Codify, Share, Leverage, and Process) and Contextualised Content (Information). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach The aim of this paper is to add to the body of knowledge in the KM discipline and supply KM practitioners and scholars with insight into what is commonly regarded to be KM so as to reignite the debate on what one could consider as KM. The lexicon used by KM scholars was evaluated though the application of lexicographical research methods as extended though Knowledge Discovery and Text Analysis methods. Findings By simplifying term relationships through the application of lexicographical research methods, as extended though Knowledge Discovery and Text Analysis methods, it was found that KM is directly defined by People (Person and Organisation), Processes (Codify, Share, Leverage, Process) and Contextualised Content (Information). One would therefore be able to indicate that KM, from an academic point of view, refers to people processing contextualised content.
    Research limitations/implications In total, 42 definitions were identified spanning a period of 11 years. This represented the first use of KM through the estimated apex of terms used. From 2006 onwards definitions were used in repetition, and all definitions that were considered to repeat were therefore subsequently excluded as not being unique instances. All definitions listed are by no means complete and exhaustive. The definitions are viewed outside the scope and context in which they were originally formulated and then used to review the key concepts in the definitions themselves. Social implications When the authors refer to the aforementioned discussion of KM content as well as the presentation of the method followed in this paper, the authors may have a few implications for future research in KM. First the research validates ideas presented by the OECD in 2005 pertaining to KM. It also validates that through the evolution of KM, the authors ended with a description of KM that may be seen as a standardised description. If the authors as academics and practitioners, for example, refer to KM as the same construct and/or idea, it has the potential to speculatively, distinguish between what KM may or may not be. Originality/value By simplifying the term used to define KM, by focusing on the most common definitions, the paper assist in refocusing KM by reconsidering the dimensions that is the most common in how it has been defined over time. This would hopefully assist in reigniting discussions about KM and how it may be used to the benefit of an organisation.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  14. Yang, C.C.; Luk, J.: Automatic generation of English/Chinese thesaurus based on a parallel corpus in laws (2003) 0.04 
    0.03543729 = product of:
  0.07087458 = sum of:
    0.07087458 = sum of:
      0.017540935 = weight(_text_:h in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017540935 = score(doc=1616,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.13586831 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
      0.028692124 = weight(_text_:j in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028692124 = score(doc=1616,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.17376934 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
      0.024641523 = weight(_text_:22 in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024641523 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The information available in languages other than English in the World Wide Web is increasing significantly. According to a report from Computer Economics in 1999, 54% of Internet users are English speakers ("English Will Dominate Web for Only Three More Years," Computer Economics, July 9, 1999, http://www.computereconomics. com/new4/pr/pr990610.html). However, it is predicted that there will be only 60% increase in Internet users among English speakers verses a 150% growth among nonEnglish speakers for the next five years. By 2005, 57% of Internet users will be non-English speakers. A report by CNN.com in 2000 showed that the number of Internet users in China had been increased from 8.9 million to 16.9 million from January to June in 2000 ("Report: China Internet users double to 17 million," CNN.com, July, 2000, http://cnn.org/2000/TECH/computing/07/27/ china.internet.reut/index.html). According to Nielsen/ NetRatings, there was a dramatic leap from 22.5 millions to 56.6 millions Internet users from 2001 to 2002. China had become the second largest global at-home Internet population in 2002 (US's Internet population was 166 millions) (Robyn Greenspan, "China Pulls Ahead of Japan," Internet.com, April 22, 2002, http://cyberatias.internet.com/big-picture/geographics/article/0,,5911_1013841,00. html). All of the evidences reveal the importance of crosslingual research to satisfy the needs in the near future. Digital library research has been focusing in structural and semantic interoperability in the past. Searching and retrieving objects across variations in protocols, formats and disciplines are widely explored (Schatz, B., & Chen, H. (1999). Digital libraries: technological advances and social impacts. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, February, 32(2), 45-50.; Chen, H., Yen, J., & Yang, C.C. (1999). International activities: development of Asian digital libraries. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, 32(2), 48-49.). However, research in crossing language boundaries, especially across European languages and Oriental languages, is still in the initial stage. In this proposal, we put our focus an cross-lingual semantic interoperability by developing automatic generation of a cross-lingual thesaurus based an English/Chinese parallel corpus. When the searchers encounter retrieval problems, Professional librarians usually consult the thesaurus to identify other relevant vocabularies. In the problem of searching across language boundaries, a cross-lingual thesaurus, which is generated by co-occurrence analysis and Hopfield network, can be used to generate additional semantically relevant terms that cannot be obtained from dictionary. In particular, the automatically generated cross-lingual thesaurus is able to capture the unknown words that do not exist in a dictionary, such as names of persons, organizations, and events. Due to Hong Kong's unique history background, both English and Chinese are used as official languages in all legal documents. Therefore, English/Chinese cross-lingual information retrieval is critical for applications in courts and the government. In this paper, we develop an automatic thesaurus by the Hopfield network based an a parallel corpus collected from the Web site of the Department of Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government. Experiments are conducted to measure the precision and recall of the automatic generated English/Chinese thesaurus. The result Shows that such thesaurus is a promising tool to retrieve relevant terms, especially in the language that is not the same as the input term. The direct translation of the input term can also be retrieved in most of the cases.
  15. Kuhlmann, U.; Monnerjahn, P.: Sprache auf Knopfdruck : Sieben automatische Übersetzungsprogramme im Test (2000) 0.04 
    0.0352808 = product of:
  0.0705616 = sum of:
    0.0705616 = product of:
      0.1058424 = sum of:
        0.035438046 = weight(_text_:h in 5428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035438046 = score(doc=5428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 5428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5428)
        0.07040435 = weight(_text_:22 in 5428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07040435 = score(doc=5428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5428)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    c't. 2000, H.22, S.220-229
  16. Ali, C.B.; Haddad, H.; Slimani, Y.: Multi-word terms selection for information retrieval (2022) 0.03 
    0.031739883 = sum of:
  0.025833542 = product of:
    0.103334166 = sum of:
      0.103334166 = weight(_text_:authors in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.103334166 = score(doc=900,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.005906341 = product of:
    0.017719023 = sum of:
      0.017719023 = weight(_text_:h in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017719023 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051964227 = queryNorm
          0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose A number of approaches and algorithms have been proposed over the years as a basis for automatic indexing. Many of these approaches suffer from precision inefficiency at low recall. The choice of indexing units has a great impact on search system effectiveness. The authors dive beyond simple terms indexing to propose a framework for multi-word terms (MWT) filtering and indexing. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, the authors rely on ranking MWT to filter them, keeping the most effective ones for the indexing process. The proposed model is based on filtering MWT according to their ability to capture the document topic and distinguish between different documents from the same collection. The authors rely on the hypothesis that the best MWT are those that achieve the greatest association degree. The experiments are carried out with English and French languages data sets. Findings The results indicate that this approach achieved precision enhancements at low recall, and it performed better than more advanced models based on terms dependencies. Originality/value Using and testing different association measures to select MWT that best describe the documents to enhance the precision in the first retrieved documents.
  17. Ludwig, B.; Reischer, J.: Informationslinguistik in Regensburg (2012) 0.03 
    0.03131081 = product of:
  0.06262162 = sum of:
    0.06262162 = product of:
      0.09393243 = sum of:
        0.028350435 = weight(_text_:h in 555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028350435 = score(doc=555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=555)
        0.06558199 = weight(_text_:j in 555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06558199 = score(doc=555,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.39718705 = fieldWeight in 555, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=555)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2012.63.issue-5/iwp-2012-0065/iwp-2012-0065.xml?format=INT.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.5, S.292-296
  18. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.03 
    0.030949863 = product of:
  0.061899725 = sum of:
    0.061899725 = product of:
      0.2475989 = sum of:
        0.2475989 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2475989 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4405533 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  19. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.03 
    0.030274346 = product of:
  0.060548693 = sum of:
    0.060548693 = product of:
      0.09082304 = sum of:
        0.021262825 = weight(_text_:h in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021262825 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
        0.069560215 = weight(_text_:j in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069560215 = score(doc=6386,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.5, S.251-262
  20. Godby, J.: WordSmith research project bridges gap between tokens and indexes (1998) 0.03 
    0.029953279 = product of:
  0.059906557 = sum of:
    0.059906557 = product of:
      0.089859836 = sum of:
        0.04057679 = weight(_text_:j in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04057679 = score(doc=4729,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
        0.049283046 = weight(_text_:22 in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049283046 = score(doc=4729,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051964227 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1998, no.234, Jul/Aug, S.22-24

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 231
  • m 32
  • el 22
  • s 18
  • x 6
  • d 3
  • p 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications