Search (139 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08
    0.083622836 = sum of:
      0.062348425 = product of:
        0.2493937 = sum of:
          0.2493937 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2493937 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4437468 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021274412 = product of:
        0.042548824 = sum of:
          0.042548824 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042548824 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Lezius, W.; Rapp, R.; Wettler, M.: ¬A morphology-system and part-of-speech tagger for German (1996) 0.07
    0.06714136 = product of:
      0.13428272 = sum of:
        0.13428272 = sum of:
          0.063368015 = weight(_text_:r in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063368015 = score(doc=1693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
          0.07091471 = weight(_text_:22 in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07091471 = score(doc=1693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2015 9:37:18
  3. Hammwöhner, R.: TransRouter revisited : Decision support in the routing of translation projects (2000) 0.06
    0.056185715 = product of:
      0.11237143 = sum of:
        0.11237143 = sum of:
          0.06273113 = weight(_text_:r in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06273113 = score(doc=5483,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.3620595 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
          0.049640294 = weight(_text_:22 in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049640294 = score(doc=5483,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10.12.2000 18:22:35
    Source
    Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
  4. Basili, R.; Pazienza, M.T.; Velardi, P.: ¬An empirical symbolic approach to natural language processing (1996) 0.05
    0.053713087 = product of:
      0.107426174 = sum of:
        0.107426174 = sum of:
          0.05069441 = weight(_text_:r in 6753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05069441 = score(doc=6753,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 6753, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6753)
          0.056731764 = weight(_text_:22 in 6753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056731764 = score(doc=6753,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6753, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6753)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  5. Schneider, R.: Web 3.0 ante portas? : Integration von Social Web und Semantic Web (2008) 0.05
    0.04699895 = product of:
      0.0939979 = sum of:
        0.0939979 = sum of:
          0.04435761 = weight(_text_:r in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04435761 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
          0.049640294 = weight(_text_:22 in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049640294 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 10:38:28
  6. Deventer, J.P. van; Kruger, C.J.; Johnson, R.D.: Delineating knowledge management through lexical analysis : a retrospective (2015) 0.04
    0.040233277 = sum of:
      0.027823202 = product of:
        0.11129281 = sum of:
          0.11129281 = weight(_text_:authors in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11129281 = score(doc=3807,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.46641657 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.012410074 = product of:
        0.024820147 = sum of:
          0.024820147 = weight(_text_:22 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024820147 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Academic authors tend to define terms that meet their own needs. Knowledge Management (KM) is a term that comes to mind and is examined in this study. Lexicographical research identified KM terms used by authors from 1996 to 2006 in academic outlets to define KM. Data were collected based on strict criteria which included that definitions should be unique instances. From 2006 onwards, these authors could not identify new unique instances of definitions with repetitive usage of such definition instances. Analysis revealed that KM is directly defined by People (Person and Organisation), Processes (Codify, Share, Leverage, and Process) and Contextualised Content (Information). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach The aim of this paper is to add to the body of knowledge in the KM discipline and supply KM practitioners and scholars with insight into what is commonly regarded to be KM so as to reignite the debate on what one could consider as KM. The lexicon used by KM scholars was evaluated though the application of lexicographical research methods as extended though Knowledge Discovery and Text Analysis methods. Findings By simplifying term relationships through the application of lexicographical research methods, as extended though Knowledge Discovery and Text Analysis methods, it was found that KM is directly defined by People (Person and Organisation), Processes (Codify, Share, Leverage, Process) and Contextualised Content (Information). One would therefore be able to indicate that KM, from an academic point of view, refers to people processing contextualised content.
    Research limitations/implications In total, 42 definitions were identified spanning a period of 11 years. This represented the first use of KM through the estimated apex of terms used. From 2006 onwards definitions were used in repetition, and all definitions that were considered to repeat were therefore subsequently excluded as not being unique instances. All definitions listed are by no means complete and exhaustive. The definitions are viewed outside the scope and context in which they were originally formulated and then used to review the key concepts in the definitions themselves. Social implications When the authors refer to the aforementioned discussion of KM content as well as the presentation of the method followed in this paper, the authors may have a few implications for future research in KM. First the research validates ideas presented by the OECD in 2005 pertaining to KM. It also validates that through the evolution of KM, the authors ended with a description of KM that may be seen as a standardised description. If the authors as academics and practitioners, for example, refer to KM as the same construct and/or idea, it has the potential to speculatively, distinguish between what KM may or may not be. Originality/value By simplifying the term used to define KM, by focusing on the most common definitions, the paper assist in refocusing KM by reconsidering the dimensions that is the most common in how it has been defined over time. This would hopefully assist in reigniting discussions about KM and how it may be used to the benefit of an organisation.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. Wettler, M.; Rapp, R.; Ferber, R.: Freie Assoziationen und Kontiguitäten von Wörtern in Texten (1993) 0.04
    0.035846364 = product of:
      0.07169273 = sum of:
        0.07169273 = product of:
          0.14338546 = sum of:
            0.14338546 = weight(_text_:r in 2140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14338546 = score(doc=2140,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.8275646 = fieldWeight in 2140, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2140)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.03
    0.031174213 = product of:
      0.062348425 = sum of:
        0.062348425 = product of:
          0.2493937 = sum of:
            0.2493937 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2493937 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4437468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  9. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.03
    0.028365882 = product of:
      0.056731764 = sum of:
        0.056731764 = product of:
          0.11346353 = sum of:
            0.11346353 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11346353 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  10. Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.03
    0.026198965 = sum of:
      0.010516182 = product of:
        0.042064726 = sum of:
          0.042064726 = weight(_text_:authors in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042064726 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.015682783 = product of:
        0.031365566 = sum of:
          0.031365566 = weight(_text_:r in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031365566 = score(doc=5089,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.18102975 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures - Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000) brings together a wide range of researchers and practitioners working with conceptual structures. During the last few years, the ICCS conference series has considerably widened its scope on different kinds of conceptual structures, stimulating research across domain boundaries. We hope that this stimulation is further enhanced by ICCS 2000 joining the long tradition of conferences in Darmstadt with extensive, lively discussions. This volume consists of contributions presented at ICCS 2000, complementing the volume "Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues" (B. Ganter, G.W. Mineau (Eds.), LNAI 1867, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2000). It contains submissions reviewed by the program committee, and position papers. We wish to express our appreciation to all the authors of submitted papers, to the general chair, the program chair, the editorial board, the program committee, and to the additional reviewers for making ICCS 2000 a valuable contribution in the knowledge processing research field. Special thanks go to the local organizers for making the conference an enjoyable and inspiring event. We are grateful to Darmstadt University of Technology, the Ernst Schröder Center for Conceptual Knowledge Processing, the Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Land Hessen, and NaviCon GmbH for their generous support
    Content
    Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
  11. Rapp, R.: Text-Detektor : Fehlertolerantes Retrieval ganz einfach (1997) 0.03
    0.025347205 = product of:
      0.05069441 = sum of:
        0.05069441 = product of:
          0.10138882 = sum of:
            0.10138882 = weight(_text_:r in 3918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10138882 = score(doc=3918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 3918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. McMahon, J.G.; Smith, F.J.: Improved statistical language model performance with automatic generated word hierarchies (1996) 0.02
    0.024820147 = product of:
      0.049640294 = sum of:
        0.049640294 = product of:
          0.09928059 = sum of:
            0.09928059 = weight(_text_:22 in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09928059 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.217-248
  13. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.02
    0.024820147 = product of:
      0.049640294 = sum of:
        0.049640294 = product of:
          0.09928059 = sum of:
            0.09928059 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09928059 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  14. Somers, H.: Example-based machine translation : Review article (1999) 0.02
    0.024820147 = product of:
      0.049640294 = sum of:
        0.049640294 = product of:
          0.09928059 = sum of:
            0.09928059 = weight(_text_:22 in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09928059 = score(doc=6672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  15. New tools for human translators (1997) 0.02
    0.024820147 = product of:
      0.049640294 = sum of:
        0.049640294 = product of:
          0.09928059 = sum of:
            0.09928059 = weight(_text_:22 in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09928059 = score(doc=1179,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  16. Baayen, R.H.; Lieber, H.: Word frequency distributions and lexical semantics (1997) 0.02
    0.024820147 = product of:
      0.049640294 = sum of:
        0.049640294 = product of:
          0.09928059 = sum of:
            0.09928059 = weight(_text_:22 in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09928059 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 2.1999 10:48:22
  17. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.02
    0.024820147 = product of:
      0.049640294 = sum of:
        0.049640294 = product of:
          0.09928059 = sum of:
            0.09928059 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09928059 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  18. Bakar, Z.A.; Sembok, T.M.T.; Yusoff, M.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness using spelling-correction and string-similarity matching methods on Malay texts (2000) 0.02
    0.023282895 = product of:
      0.04656579 = sum of:
        0.04656579 = product of:
          0.09313158 = sum of:
            0.09313158 = weight(_text_:r in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09313158 = score(doc=4804,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.537519 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article evaluates the effectiveness of spelling-correction and string-similarity matching methods in retrieving similar words in a Maly dictionary associated with a set of query words. The spelling-correction techniques used are SPEEDCOP, Soundex, Davidson, Phonic, and Hartlib. 2 dynamic-programming methods that measure longest common subsequence and edit-cost-distance are used. Several search combinations od query and doctionary words are performed in the experiments, the best being one that stems both query and dictionary words using an existing Malay stemming algorithm. the retrieval effectivness (E) and retrieved and relevant (R&R) mean measure are calculated from weighted combination of recall and precision values. Results from these experiments are then compared with available diagram, a string-similarity method. The best R&R and E results are given by using diagram. Editcost-distances produce the best E results, and both dynamic-programming methods rank second in finding R&R mean measures
  19. Warner, A.J.: ¬The role of linguistic analysis in full-text retrieval (1994) 0.02
    0.022178805 = product of:
      0.04435761 = sum of:
        0.04435761 = product of:
          0.08871522 = sum of:
            0.08871522 = weight(_text_:r in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08871522 = score(doc=2992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Challenges in indexing electronic text and images. Ed.: R. Fidel et al
  20. Leemakers, R.: ¬The functional treatment of parsing (19??) 0.02
    0.022178805 = product of:
      0.04435761 = sum of:
        0.04435761 = product of:
          0.08871522 = sum of:
            0.08871522 = weight(_text_:r in 5294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08871522 = score(doc=5294,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 5294, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5294)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

  • e 95
  • d 41
  • m 3
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 107
  • m 17
  • el 16
  • s 13
  • p 3
  • x 2
  • d 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications