-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.19
0.19426394 = product of:
0.25901857 = sum of:
0.062105697 = product of:
0.18631709 = sum of:
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.010595793 = product of:
0.031787377 = sum of:
0.031787377 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031787377 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.12
0.12421139 = product of:
0.24842279 = sum of:
0.062105697 = product of:
0.18631709 = sum of:
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012)
0.10
0.09845644 = product of:
0.19691288 = sum of:
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.010595793 = product of:
0.031787377 = sum of:
0.031787377 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031787377 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
- Date
- 10. 1.2013 19:22:47
-
Conceptual structures : logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000 (2000)
0.04
0.040819366 = product of:
0.16327746 = sum of:
0.16327746 = weight(_text_:logic in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16327746 = score(doc=691,freq=24.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.6924164 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Computer scientists create models of a perceived reality. Through AI techniques, these models aim at providing the basic support for emulating cognitive behavior such as reasoning and learning, which is one of the main goals of the Al research effort. Such computer models are formed through the interaction of various acquisition and inference mechanisms: perception, concept learning, conceptual clustering, hypothesis testing, probabilistic inference, etc., and are represented using different paradigms tightly linked to the processes that use them. Among these paradigms let us cite: biological models (neural nets, genetic programming), logic-based models (first-order logic, modal logic, rule-based systems), virtual reality models (object systems, agent systems), probabilistic models (Bayesian nets, fuzzy logic), linguistic models (conceptual dependency graphs, language-based rep resentations), etc. One of the strengths of the Conceptual Graph (CG) theory is its versatility in terms of the representation paradigms under which it falls. It can be viewed and therefore used, under different representation paradigms, which makes it a popular choice for a wealth of applications. Its full coupling with different cognitive processes lead to the opening of the field toward related research communities such as the Description Logic, Formal Concept Analysis, and Computational Linguistic communities. We now see more and more research results from one community enrich the other, laying the foundations of common philosophical grounds from which a successful synergy can emerge. ICCS 2000 embodies this spirit of research collaboration. It presents a set of papers that we believe, by their exposure, will benefit the whole community. For instance, the technical program proposes tracks on Conceptual Ontologies, Language, Formal Concept Analysis, Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures, and Formal Semantics, with some papers on pragmatism and human related aspects of computing. Never before was the program of ICCS formed by so heterogeneously rooted theories of knowledge representation and use. We hope that this swirl of ideas will benefit you as much as it already has benefited us while putting together this program
- Content
- Concepts and Language: The Role of Conceptual Structure in Human Evolution (Keith Devlin) - Concepts in Linguistics - Concepts in Natural Language (Gisela Harras) - Patterns, Schemata, and Types: Author Support through Formalized Experience (Felix H. Gatzemeier) - Conventions and Notations for Knowledge Representation and Retrieval (Philippe Martin) - Conceptual Ontology: Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics (John F. Sowa) - Pragmatically Yours (Mary Keeler) - Conceptual Modeling for Distributed Ontology Environments (Deborah L. McGuinness) - Discovery of Class Relations in Exception Structured Knowledge Bases (Hendra Suryanto, Paul Compton) - Conceptual Graphs: Perspectives: CGs Applications: Where Are We 7 Years after the First ICCS ? (Michel Chein, David Genest) - The Engineering of a CC-Based System: Fundamental Issues (Guy W. Mineau) - Conceptual Graphs, Metamodeling, and Notation of Concepts (Olivier Gerbé, Guy W. Mineau, Rudolf K. Keller) - Knowledge Representation and Reasonings: Based on Graph Homomorphism (Marie-Laure Mugnier) - User Modeling Using Conceptual Graphs for Intelligent Agents (James F. Baldwin, Trevor P. Martin, Aimilia Tzanavari) - Towards a Unified Querying System of Both Structured and Semi-structured Imprecise Data Using Fuzzy View (Patrice Buche, Ollivier Haemmerlé) - Formal Semantics of Conceptual Structures: The Extensional Semantics of the Conceptual Graph Formalism (Guy W. Mineau) - Semantics of Attribute Relations in Conceptual Graphs (Pavel Kocura) - Nested Concept Graphs and Triadic Power Context Families (Susanne Prediger) - Negations in Simple Concept Graphs (Frithjof Dau) - Extending the CG Model by Simulations (Jean-François Baget) - Contextual Logic and Formal Concept Analysis: Building and Structuring Description Logic Knowledge Bases: Using Least Common Subsumers and Concept Analysis (Franz Baader, Ralf Molitor) - On the Contextual Logic of Ordinal Data (Silke Pollandt, Rudolf Wille) - Boolean Concept Logic (Rudolf Wille) - Lattices of Triadic Concept Graphs (Bernd Groh, Rudolf Wille) - Formalizing Hypotheses with Concepts (Bernhard Ganter, Sergei 0. Kuznetsov) - Generalized Formal Concept Analysis (Laurent Chaudron, Nicolas Maille) - A Logical Generalization of Formal Concept Analysis (Sébastien Ferré, Olivier Ridoux) - On the Treatment of Incomplete Knowledge in Formal Concept Analysis (Peter Burmeister, Richard Holzer) - Conceptual Structures in Practice: Logic-Based Networks: Concept Graphs and Conceptual Structures (Peter W. Eklund) - Conceptual Knowledge Discovery and Data Analysis (Joachim Hereth, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille, Uta Wille) - CEM - A Conceptual Email Manager (Richard Cole, Gerd Stumme) - A Contextual-Logic Extension of TOSCANA (Peter Eklund, Bernd Groh, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille) - A Conceptual Graph Model for W3C Resource Description Framework (Olivier Corby, Rose Dieng, Cédric Hébert) - Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures: Computing with Conceptual Structures (Bernhard Ganter) - Symmetry and the Computation of Conceptual Structures (Robert Levinson) An Introduction to SNePS 3 (Stuart C. Shapiro) - Composition Norm Dynamics Calculation with Conceptual Graphs (Aldo de Moor) - From PROLOG++ to PROLOG+CG: A CG Object-Oriented Logic Programming Language (Adil Kabbaj, Martin Janta-Polczynski) - A Cost-Bounded Algorithm to Control Events Generalization (Gaël de Chalendar, Brigitte Grau, Olivier Ferret)
-
Hess, M.: ¬An incrementally extensible document retrieval system based on linguistic and logical principles (1992)
0.03
0.033328876 = product of:
0.1333155 = sum of:
0.1333155 = weight(_text_:logic in 2413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1333155 = score(doc=2413,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56535566 = fieldWeight in 2413, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2413)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Most natural language based document retrieval systems use the syntax structures of constituent phrases of documents as index terms. Many of these systems also attempt to reduce the syntactic variability of natural language by some normalisation procedure applied to these syntax structures. However, the retrieval performance of such systems remains fairly disappointing. Some systems therefore use a meaning representation language to index and retrieve documents. In this paper, a system is presented that uses Horn Clause Logic as meaning representation language, employs advanced techniques from Natural Language Processing to achieve incremental extensibility, and uses methods from Logic Programming to achieve robustness in the face of insufficient data. An Incrementally Extensible Document Retrieval System Based on Linguistic and Logical Principles.
-
Sembok, T.M.T.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: SILOL: a simple logical-linguistic document retrieval system (1990)
0.03
0.031422764 = product of:
0.12569106 = sum of:
0.12569106 = weight(_text_:logic in 6684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12569106 = score(doc=6684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.5330224 = fieldWeight in 6684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6684)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes a system called SILOL which is based on a logical-linguistic model of document retrieval systems. SILOL uses a shallow semantic translation of natural language texts into a first order predicate representation in performing a document indexing and retrieval process. Some preliminary experiments have been carried out to test the retrieval effectiveness of this system. The results obtained show improvements in the level of retrieval effectiveness, which demonstrate that the approach of using a semantic theory of natural language and logic in document retrieval systems is a valid one
-
Prasad, A.R.D.; Kar, B.B.: Parsing Boolean search expression using definite clause grammars (1994)
0.03
0.031422764 = product of:
0.12569106 = sum of:
0.12569106 = weight(_text_:logic in 8188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12569106 = score(doc=8188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.5330224 = fieldWeight in 8188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8188)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Briefly discusses the role of search languages in information retrieval and broadly groups the search languages into 4 categories. Explains the idea of definite clause grammars and demonstrates how parsers for Boolean logic-based search languages can easily be developed. Presents a partial Prolog code of the parser that was used in an object-oriented bibliographic database management system
-
Pritchard-Schoch, T.: Natural language comes of age (1993)
0.03
0.031422764 = product of:
0.12569106 = sum of:
0.12569106 = weight(_text_:logic in 2570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12569106 = score(doc=2570,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.5330224 = fieldWeight in 2570, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2570)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses natural languages and the natural language implementations of Westlaw's full-text legal documents, Westlaw Is Natural. Natural language is not aritificial intelligence but a hybrid of linguistics, mathematics and statistics. Provides 3 classes of retrieval models. Explains how Westlaw processes an English query. Assesses WIN. Covers WIN enhancements; the natural language features of Congressional Quarterly's Washington Alert using a document for a query; the personal librarian front end search software and Dowquest from Dow Jones news/retrieval. Conmsiders whether natural language encourages fuzzy thinking and whether Boolean logic will still be needed
-
Kracht, M.: Mathematical linguistics (2002)
0.02
0.023567071 = product of:
0.094268285 = sum of:
0.094268285 = weight(_text_:logic in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094268285 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.3997668 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This book studies language(s) and linguistic theories from a mathematical point of view. Starting with ideas already contained in Montague's work, it develops the mathematical foundations of present day linguistics. It equips the reader with all the background necessary to understand and evaluate theories as diverse as Montague Grammar, Categorial Grammar, HPSG and GB. The mathematical tools are mainly from universal algebra and logic, but no particular knowledge is presupposed beyond a certain mathematical sophistication that is in any case needed in order to fruitfully work within these theories. The presentation focuses an abstract mathematical structures and their computational properties, but plenty of examples from different natural languages are provided to illustrate the main concepts and results. In contrast to books devoted to so-called formal language theory, languages are seen here as semiotic systems, that is, as systems of signs. A language sign correlates form with meaning. Using the principle of compositionality it is possible to gain substantial insight into the interaction between form and meaning in natural languages.
-
¬The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective (2002)
0.02
0.019639226 = product of:
0.0785569 = sum of:
0.0785569 = weight(_text_:logic in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0785569 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.333139 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: Types of relationships: CRUDE, D.A.: Hyponymy and its varieties; FELLBAUM, C.: On the semantics of troponymy; PRIBBENOW, S.: Meronymic relationships: from classical mereology to complex part-whole relations; KHOO, C. u.a.: The many facets of cause-effect relation - Pt.2: Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning: GREEN, R.: Internally-structured conceptual models in cognitive semantics; HOVY, E.: Comparing sets of semantic relations in ontologies; GUARINO, N., C. WELTY: Identity and subsumption; JOUIS; C.: Logic of relationships - Pt.3: Applications of relationships: EVENS, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval; KHOO, C., S.H. MYAENG: Identifying semantic relations in text for information retrieval and information extraction; McCRAY, A.T., O. BODENREICHER: A conceptual framework for the biiomedical domain; HETZLER, B.: Visual analysis and exploration of relationships
-
SIGIR'92 : Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (1992)
0.01
0.013747458 = product of:
0.054989833 = sum of:
0.054989833 = weight(_text_:logic in 6671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054989833 = score(doc=6671,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.2331973 = fieldWeight in 6671, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6671)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- HARMAN, D.: Relevance feedback revisited; AALBERSBERG, I.J.: Incremental relevance feedback; TAGUE-SUTCLIFFE, J.: Measuring the informativeness of a retrieval process; LEWIS, D.D.: An evaluation of phrasal and clustered representations on a text categorization task; BLOSSEVILLE, M.J., G. HÉBRAIL, M.G. MONTEIL u. N. PÉNOT: Automatic document classification: natural language processing, statistical analysis, and expert system techniques used together; MASAND, B., G. LINOFF u. D. WALTZ: Classifying news stories using memory based reasoning; KEEN, E.M.: Term position ranking: some new test results; CROUCH, C.J. u. B. YANG: Experiments in automatic statistical thesaurus construction; GREFENSTETTE, G.: Use of syntactic context to produce term association lists for text retrieval; ANICK, P.G. u. R.A. FLYNN: Versioning of full-text information retrieval system; BURKOWSKI, F.J.: Retrieval activities in a database consisting of heterogeneous collections; DEERWESTER, S.C., K. WACLENA u. M. LaMAR: A textual object management system; NIE, J.-Y.:Towards a probabilistic modal logic for semantic-based information retrieval; WANG, A.W., S.K.M. WONG u. Y.Y. YAO: An analysis of vector space models based on computational geometry; BARTELL, B.T., G.W. COTTRELL u. R.K. BELEW: Latent semantic indexing is an optimal special case of multidimensional scaling; GLAVITSCH, U. u. P. SCHÄUBLE: A system for retrieving speech documents; MARGULIS, E.L.: N-Poisson document modelling; HESS, M.: An incrementally extensible document retrieval system based on linguistics and logical principles; COOPER, W.S., F.C. GEY u. D.P. DABNEY: Probabilistic retrieval based on staged logistic regression; FUHR, N.: Integration of probabilistic fact and text retrieval; CROFT, B., L.A. SMITH u. H. TURTLE: A loosely-coupled integration of a text retrieval system and an object-oriented database system; DUMAIS, S.T. u. J. NIELSEN: Automating the assignement of submitted manuscripts to reviewers; GOST, M.A. u. M. MASOTTI: Design of an OPAC database to permit different subject searching accesses; ROBERTSON, A.M. u. P. WILLETT: Searching for historical word forms in a database of 17th century English text using spelling correction methods; FAX, E.A., Q.F. CHEN u. L.S. HEATH: A faster algorithm for constructing minimal perfect hash functions; MOFFAT, A. u. J. ZOBEL: Parameterised compression for sparse bitmaps; GRANDI, F., P. TIBERIO u. P. Zezula: Frame-sliced patitioned parallel signature files; ALLEN, B.: Cognitive differences in end user searching of a CD-ROM index; SONNENWALD, D.H.: Developing a theory to guide the process of designing information retrieval systems; CUTTING, D.R., J.O. PEDERSEN, D. KARGER, u. J.W. TUKEY: Scatter/ Gather: a cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections; CHALMERS, M. u. P. CHITSON: Bead: Explorations in information visualization; WILLIAMSON, C. u. B. SHNEIDERMAN: The dynamic HomeFinder: evaluating dynamic queries in a real-estate information exploring system
-
Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000)
0.01
0.013747458 = product of:
0.054989833 = sum of:
0.054989833 = weight(_text_:logic in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054989833 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.2331973 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
-
Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987)
0.01
0.007063862 = product of:
0.028255448 = sum of:
0.028255448 = product of:
0.08476634 = sum of:
0.08476634 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08476634 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
-
McMahon, J.G.; Smith, F.J.: Improved statistical language model performance with automatic generated word hierarchies (1996)
0.01
0.0061808797 = product of:
0.024723519 = sum of:
0.024723519 = product of:
0.07417055 = sum of:
0.07417055 = weight(_text_:22 in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07417055 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.217-248
-
Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991)
0.01
0.0061808797 = product of:
0.024723519 = sum of:
0.024723519 = product of:
0.07417055 = sum of:
0.07417055 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07417055 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 11:52:22
-
Somers, H.: Example-based machine translation : Review article (1999)
0.01
0.0061808797 = product of:
0.024723519 = sum of:
0.024723519 = product of:
0.07417055 = sum of:
0.07417055 = weight(_text_:22 in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07417055 = score(doc=6672,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
New tools for human translators (1997)
0.01
0.0061808797 = product of:
0.024723519 = sum of:
0.024723519 = product of:
0.07417055 = sum of:
0.07417055 = weight(_text_:22 in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07417055 = score(doc=1179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
Baayen, R.H.; Lieber, H.: Word frequency distributions and lexical semantics (1997)
0.01
0.0061808797 = product of:
0.024723519 = sum of:
0.024723519 = product of:
0.07417055 = sum of:
0.07417055 = weight(_text_:22 in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07417055 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 28. 2.1999 10:48:22
-
¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023)
0.01
0.0061808797 = product of:
0.024723519 = sum of:
0.024723519 = product of:
0.07417055 = sum of:
0.07417055 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07417055 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 27. 1.2023 16:22:55
-
Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999)
0.01
0.0052978965 = product of:
0.021191586 = sum of:
0.021191586 = product of:
0.06357475 = sum of:
0.06357475 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06357475 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 15. 3.2000 10:22:37
