Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Data Mining"
  • × theme_ss:"Visualisierung"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kraker, P.; Kittel, C,; Enkhbayar, A.: Open Knowledge Maps : creating a visual interface to the world's scientific knowledge based on natural language processing (2016) 0.00
    0.002311782 = product of:
      0.01155891 = sum of:
        0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01155891 = score(doc=3205,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The goal of Open Knowledge Maps is to create a visual interface to the world's scientific knowledge. The base for this visual interface consists of so-called knowledge maps, which enable the exploration of existing knowledge and the discovery of new knowledge. Our open source knowledge mapping software applies a mixture of summarization techniques and similarity measures on article metadata, which are iteratively chained together. After processing, the representation is saved in a database for use in a web visualization. In the future, we want to create a space for collective knowledge mapping that brings together individuals and communities involved in exploration and discovery. We want to enable people to guide each other in their discovery by collaboratively annotating and modifying the automatically created maps.
    Type
    a
  2. Maaten, L. van den; Hinton, G.: Visualizing non-metric similarities in multiple maps (2012) 0.00
    0.002311782 = product of:
      0.01155891 = sum of:
        0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 3884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01155891 = score(doc=3884,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 3884, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3884)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Techniques for multidimensional scaling visualize objects as points in a low-dimensional metric map. As a result, the visualizations are subject to the fundamental limitations of metric spaces. These limitations prevent multidimensional scaling from faithfully representing non-metric similarity data such as word associations or event co-occurrences. In particular, multidimensional scaling cannot faithfully represent intransitive pairwise similarities in a visualization, and it cannot faithfully visualize "central" objects. In this paper, we present an extension of a recently proposed multidimensional scaling technique called t-SNE. The extension aims to address the problems of traditional multidimensional scaling techniques when these techniques are used to visualize non-metric similarities. The new technique, called multiple maps t-SNE, alleviates these problems by constructing a collection of maps that reveal complementary structure in the similarity data. We apply multiple maps t-SNE to a large data set of word association data and to a data set of NIPS co-authorships, demonstrating its ability to successfully visualize non-metric similarities.
    Type
    a
  3. Wattenberg, M.; Viégas, F.; Johnson, I.: How to use t-SNE effectively (2016) 0.00
    0.001541188 = product of:
      0.00770594 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 3887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=3887,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3887, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3887)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Although extremely useful for visualizing high-dimensional data, t-SNE plots can sometimes be mysterious or misleading. By exploring how it behaves in simple cases, we can learn to use it more effectively. We'll walk through a series of simple examples to illustrate what t-SNE diagrams can and cannot show. The t-SNE technique really is useful-but only if you know how to interpret it.
    Type
    a
  4. Maaten, L. van den: Accelerating t-SNE using Tree-Based Algorithms (2014) 0.00
    9.5356145E-4 = product of:
      0.004767807 = sum of:
        0.004767807 = weight(_text_:a in 3886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004767807 = score(doc=3886,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3886, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3886)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a