-
Wongthontham, P.; Abu-Salih, B.: Ontology-based approach for semantic data extraction from social big data : state-of-the-art and research directions (2018)
0.02
0.02441524 = product of:
0.09766096 = sum of:
0.09766096 = weight(_text_:social in 4097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09766096 = score(doc=4097,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.52868325 = fieldWeight in 4097, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4097)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A challenge of managing and extracting useful knowledge from social media data sources has attracted much attention from academic and industry. To address this challenge, semantic analysis of textual data is focused in this paper. We propose an ontology-based approach to extract semantics of textual data and define the domain of data. In other words, we semantically analyse the social data at two levels i.e. the entity level and the domain level. We have chosen Twitter as a social channel challenge for a purpose of concept proof. Domain knowledge is captured in ontologies which are then used to enrich the semantics of tweets provided with specific semantic conceptual representation of entities that appear in the tweets. Case studies are used to demonstrate this approach. We experiment and evaluate our proposed approach with a public dataset collected from Twitter and from the politics domain. The ontology-based approach leverages entity extraction and concept mappings in terms of quantity and accuracy of concept identification.
-
Mohr, J.W.; Bogdanov, P.: Topic models : what they are and why they matter (2013)
0.01
0.01220762 = product of:
0.04883048 = sum of:
0.04883048 = weight(_text_:social in 1142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04883048 = score(doc=1142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 1142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1142)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- We provide a brief, non-technical introduction to the text mining methodology known as "topic modeling." We summarize the theory and background of the method and discuss what kinds of things are found by topic models. Using a text corpus comprised of the eight articles from the special issue of Poetics on the subject of topic models, we run a topic model on these articles, both as a way to introduce the methodology and also to help summarize some of the ways in which social and cultural scientists are using topic models. We review some of the critiques and debates over the use of the method and finally, we link these developments back to some of the original innovations in the field of content analysis that were pioneered by Harold D. Lasswell and colleagues during and just after World War II.
-
Jäger, L.: Von Big Data zu Big Brother (2018)
0.00
0.003138204 = product of:
0.012552816 = sum of:
0.012552816 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = weight(_text_:22 in 5234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025105633 = score(doc=5234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5234)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2018 11:33:49
