Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

0.03867105 = product of:
  0.0773421 = sum of:
    0.0773421 = product of:
      0.1546842 = sum of:
        0.1546842 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1546842 = score(doc=4104,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 4104, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4104)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

With the rapid development of Web 2.0, online reviews have become extremely valuable sources for mining customers' opinions. Fine-grained opinion mining has attracted more and more attention of both applied and theoretical research. In this article, the authors study how to automatically mine product features and opinions from multiple review sources. Specifically, they propose an integration strategy to solve the issue. Within the integration strategy, the authors mine domain knowledge from semistructured reviews and then exploit the domain knowledge to assist product feature extraction and sentiment orientation identification from unstructured reviews. Finally, feature-opinion tuples are generated. Experimental results on real-world datasets show that the proposed approach is effective.

0.033146612 = product of:
  0.066293225 = sum of:
    0.066293225 = product of:
      0.13258645 = sum of:
        0.13258645 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13258645 = score(doc=2912,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 2912, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2912)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Presents a heuristic, attribute-based, noise-tolerant data mining program, HCV (Version 2.0), absed on the newly-developed extension matrix approach. Gives a simple example of attribute-based induction to show the difference between the rules in variable-valued logic produced by HCV, the decision tree generated by C4.5 and the decision tree's decompiled rules by C4.5 rules. Outlines the extension matrix approach for data mining. Describes the HCV algorithm in detail. Outlines techniques developed and implemented in the HCV program for noise handling and discretization of continuous domains respectively. Follows these with a performance comparison of HCV with famous ID3-like algorithms including C4.5 and C4.5 rules on a collection of standard databases including the famous MONK's problems

0.033146612 = product of:
  0.066293225 = sum of:
    0.066293225 = product of:
      0.13258645 = sum of:
        0.13258645 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13258645 = score(doc=3144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini

0.028196158 = product of:
  0.056392316 = sum of:
    0.056392316 = product of:
      0.11278463 = sum of:
        0.11278463 = weight(_text_:22 in 4577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11278463 = score(doc=4577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4577)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

2. 4.2000 18:01:22

0.027622178 = product of:
  0.055244356 = sum of:
    0.055244356 = product of:
      0.11048871 = sum of:
        0.11048871 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11048871 = score(doc=1286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.320393 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

With the rapid growth of Web 2.0, community question answering (CQA) has become a prevalent information seeking channel, in which users form interactive communities by posting questions and providing answers. Communities may evolve over time, because of changes in users' interests, activities, and new users joining the network. To better understand user interactions in CQA communities, it is necessary to analyze the community structures and track community evolution over time. Existing work in CQA focuses on question searching or content quality detection, and the important problems of community extraction and evolutionary pattern detection have not been studied. In this article, we propose a probabilistic community model (PCM) to extract overlapping community structures and capture their evolution patterns in CQA. The empirical results show that our algorithm appears to improve the community extraction quality. We show empirically, using the iPhone data set, that interesting community evolution patterns can be discovered, with each evolution pattern reflecting the variation of users' interests over time. Our analysis suggests that individual users could benefit to gain comprehensive information from tracking the transition of products. We also show that the communities provide a decision-making basis for business.

0.026246116 = product of:
  0.05249223 = sum of:
    0.05249223 = product of:
      0.1574767 = sum of:
        0.1574767 = weight(_text_:objects in 3884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1574767 = score(doc=3884,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 3884, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3884)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Techniques for multidimensional scaling visualize objects as points in a low-dimensional metric map. As a result, the visualizations are subject to the fundamental limitations of metric spaces. These limitations prevent multidimensional scaling from faithfully representing non-metric similarity data such as word associations or event co-occurrences. In particular, multidimensional scaling cannot faithfully represent intransitive pairwise similarities in a visualization, and it cannot faithfully visualize "central" objects. In this paper, we present an extension of a recently proposed multidimensional scaling technique called t-SNE. The extension aims to address the problems of traditional multidimensional scaling techniques when these techniques are used to visualize non-metric similarities. The new technique, called multiple maps t-SNE, alleviates these problems by constructing a collection of maps that reveal complementary structure in the similarity data. We apply multiple maps t-SNE to a large data set of word association data and to a data set of NIPS co-authorships, demonstrating its ability to successfully visualize non-metric similarities.

0.024745075 = product of:
  0.04949015 = sum of:
    0.04949015 = product of:
      0.14847045 = sum of:
        0.14847045 = weight(_text_:objects in 6625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14847045 = score(doc=6625,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 6625, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6625)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Offers a data mining approach based on machine learning classification methods to the problem of automated cataloguing of online databases of digital images resulting from sky surveys. The SKICAT system automates the reduction and analysis of 3 terabytes of images expected to contain about 2 billion sky objects. It offers a solution to problems associated with the analysis of large data sets in science

0.024168136 = product of:
  0.04833627 = sum of:
    0.04833627 = product of:
      0.09667254 = sum of:
        0.09667254 = weight(_text_:22 in 6783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09667254 = score(doc=6783,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6783, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6783)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

A special issue of selected papers from the Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD'97), held Singapore, 22-23 Feb 1997

0.022097742 = product of:
  0.044195484 = sum of:
    0.044195484 = product of:
      0.08839097 = sum of:
        0.08839097 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08839097 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.2563144 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Text mining applications have experienced tremendous advances because of web 2.0 and social networking applications. Recent advances in hardware and software technology have lead to a number of unique scenarios where text mining algorithms are learned. Mining Text Data introduces an important niche in the text analytics field, and is an edited volume contributed by leading international researchers and practitioners focused on social networks & data mining. This book contains a wide swath in topics across social networks & data mining. Each chapter contains a comprehensive survey including the key research content on the topic, and the future directions of research in the field. There is a special focus on Text Embedded with Heterogeneous and Multimedia Data which makes the mining process much more challenging. A number of methods have been designed such as transfer learning and cross-lingual mining for such cases. Mining Text Data simplifies the content, so that advanced-level students, practitioners and researchers in computer science can benefit from this book. Academic and corporate libraries, as well as ACM, IEEE, and Management Science focused on information security, electronic commerce, databases, data mining, machine learning, and statistics are the primary buyers for this reference book.

0.021651939 = product of:
  0.043303877 = sum of:
    0.043303877 = product of:
      0.12991163 = sum of:
        0.12991163 = weight(_text_:objects in 3886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12991163 = score(doc=3886,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3886, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3886)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The paper investigates the acceleration of t-SNE-an embedding technique that is commonly used for the visualization of high-dimensional data in scatter plots-using two tree-based algorithms. In particular, the paper develops variants of the Barnes-Hut algorithm and of the dual-tree algorithm that approximate the gradient used for learning t-SNE embeddings in O(N*logN). Our experiments show that the resulting algorithms substantially accelerate t-SNE, and that they make it possible to learn embeddings of data sets with millions of objects. Somewhat counterintuitively, the Barnes-Hut variant of t-SNE appears to outperform the dual-tree variant.

0.018558806 = product of:
  0.03711761 = sum of:
    0.03711761 = product of:
      0.11135283 = sum of:
        0.11135283 = weight(_text_:objects in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11135283 = score(doc=4482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper presents an approach for performing knowledge discovery in texts through qualitative and quantitative analyses of high-level textual characteristics. Instead of applying mining techniques on attribute values, terms or keywords extracted from texts, the discovery process works over conceptss identified in texts. Concepts represent real world events and objects, and they help the user to understand ideas, trends, thoughts, opinions and intentions present in texts. The approach combines a quasi-automatic categorisation task (for qualitative analysis) with a mining process (for quantitative analysis). The goal is to find new and useful knowledge inside a textual collection through the use of mining techniques applied over concepts (representing text content). In this paper, an application of the approach to medical records of a psychiatric hospital is presented. The approach helps physicians to extract knowledge about patients and diseases. This knowledge may be used for epidemiological studies, for training professionals and it may be also used to support physicians to diagnose and evaluate diseases.

0.016112091 = product of:
  0.032224182 = sum of:
    0.032224182 = product of:
      0.064448364 = sum of:
        0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064448364 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22.11.1998 18:57:22

0.016112091 = product of:
  0.032224182 = sum of:
    0.032224182 = product of:
      0.064448364 = sum of:
        0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 4261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064448364 = score(doc=4261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 7.2002 19:22:06

0.016112091 = product of:
  0.032224182 = sum of:
    0.032224182 = product of:
      0.064448364 = sum of:
        0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064448364 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information systems. 22(1997) nos.5/6, S.333-347

0.015465672 = product of:
  0.030931344 = sum of:
    0.030931344 = product of:
      0.09279403 = sum of:
        0.09279403 = weight(_text_:objects in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09279403 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Documents discussing public affairs, common themes, interesting products, and so on, are reported and distributed on the Web. Positive and negative opinions embedded in documents are useful references and feedbacks for governments to improve their services, for companies to market their products, and for customers to purchase their objects. Web opinion mining aims to extract, summarize, and track various aspects of subjective information on the Web. Mining subjective information enables traditional information retrieval (IR) systems to retrieve more data from human viewpoints and provide information with finer granularity. Opinion extraction identifies opinion holders, extracts the relevant opinion sentences, and decides their polarities. Opinion summarization recognizes the major events embedded in documents and summarizes the supportive and the nonsupportive evidence. Opinion tracking captures subjective information from various genres and monitors the developments of opinions from spatial and temporal dimensions. To demonstrate and evaluate the proposed opinion mining algorithms, news and bloggers' articles are adopted. Documents in the evaluation corpora are tagged in different granularities from words, sentences to documents. In the experiments, positive and negative sentiment words and their weights are mined on the basis of Chinese word structures. The f-measure is 73.18% and 63.75% for verbs and nouns, respectively. Utilizing the sentiment words mined together with topical words, we achieve f-measure 62.16% at the sentence level and 74.37% at the document level.

0.015465672 = product of:
  0.030931344 = sum of:
    0.030931344 = product of:
      0.09279403 = sum of:
        0.09279403 = weight(_text_:objects in 3888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09279403 = score(doc=3888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 3888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3888)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

We present a new technique called "t-SNE" that visualizes high-dimensional data by giving each datapoint a location in a two or three-dimensional map. The technique is a variation of Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (Hinton and Roweis, 2002) that is much easier to optimize, and produces significantly better visualizations by reducing the tendency to crowd points together in the center of the map. t-SNE is better than existing techniques at creating a single map that reveals structure at many different scales. This is particularly important for high-dimensional data that lie on several different, but related, low-dimensional manifolds, such as images of objects from multiple classes seen from multiple viewpoints. For visualizing the structure of very large data sets, we show how t-SNE can use random walks on neighborhood graphs to allow the implicit structure of all of the data to influence the way in which a subset of the data is displayed. We illustrate the performance of t-SNE on a wide variety of data sets and compare it with many other non-parametric visualization techniques, including Sammon mapping, Isomap, and Locally Linear Embedding. The visualizations produced by t-SNE are significantly better than those produced by the other techniques on almost all of the data sets.

0.014098079 = product of:
  0.028196158 = sum of:
    0.028196158 = product of:
      0.056392316 = sum of:
        0.056392316 = weight(_text_:22 in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056392316 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information systems. 22(1997) nos.5/6, S.349-385

0.012084068 = product of:
  0.024168136 = sum of:
    0.024168136 = product of:
      0.04833627 = sum of:
        0.04833627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04833627 = score(doc=1383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2008 14:46:06

0.010070057 = product of:
  0.020140113 = sum of:
    0.020140113 = product of:
      0.040280227 = sum of:
        0.040280227 = weight(_text_:22 in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040280227 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2013 19:43:01

0.010070057 = product of:
  0.020140113 = sum of:
    0.020140113 = product of:
      0.040280227 = sum of:
        0.040280227 = weight(_text_:22 in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040280227 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.1, S.13-22