-
Parker, V.: MARC tags for cataloging cartographic materials (1999)
0.03
0.031166047 = product of:
0.14544155 = sum of:
0.04758225 = weight(_text_:classification in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04758225 = score(doc=5317,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05027704 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.04758225 = weight(_text_:classification in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04758225 = score(doc=5317,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 27(1999) nos.1/2, S.5-9
-
Leazer, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographic relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog : an examination of serials (1996)
0.03
0.031138109 = product of:
0.14531118 = sum of:
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5579,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
0.07869602 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07869602 = score(doc=5579,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6732516 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5579,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Evaluates current research into bibliographic relationships sparked off by B.B. Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (LRTS 35(1991) no.4, S.393-405) and R.P. Smiraglia's taxonomy of the derivative bibliographic relationship (PhD dissertation, Chicago Univ., Graduate Library School, 1992). These researches provide the context for a discussion of recent research and standards work. Reevaluates research on the sequential relationship drawn from work conducted on periodicals and the implications of that research is applied to cataloguing system design. Evaluates the conceptual designs proposed by researchers such as G.H. Leazer and M. Gorman's and uses them in a critique of the USMARC format for bibliographic description
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.205-220
-
Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996)
0.03
0.02952891 = product of:
0.10335118 = sum of:
0.042009152 = weight(_text_:subject in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042009152 = score(doc=6523,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.014238005 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
-
Giordano, R.: ¬The documentation of electronic texts : using Text Encoding Initiative headers: an introduction (1994)
0.02
0.016010279 = product of:
0.112071946 = sum of:
0.05224943 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05224943 = score(doc=866,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
0.059822515 = product of:
0.11964503 = sum of:
0.11964503 = weight(_text_:texts in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11964503 = score(doc=866,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.72685444 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Presents a general introduction to the form and functions of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) headers and explains their relationship to the MARC record. The TEI header's main strength is that it documents electronic texts in a standard exchange format that should be understandable to both librarian cataloguers and text encoders outside of librarianship. TEI gives encoders the ability to document the the electronic text itself, its source, its encoding principles, and revisions, as well as non bibliographic characteristics of the text that can support both scholarly analysis and retrieval. Its bibliographic descriptions can be loaded into standard remote bibliographic databases, which should make electronic texts as easy to find for researchers as texts in other media. Presents a brief overview of the TEI header, the file description and ways in which the TEI headers have counterparts in MARC, the Encoding Description, the Profile Description, the Revision Description, the size and complexity of the TEI header, and the use of the TEI header to support document retrieval and analysis, with notes on some of the prospects and problems
-
Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996)
0.01
0.009144248 = product of:
0.06400973 = sum of:
0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04977173 = score(doc=7683,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
0.014238005 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
- Source
- OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
-
Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994)
0.01
0.0071824347 = product of:
0.10055408 = sum of:
0.10055408 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10055408 = score(doc=3033,freq=32.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.86024934 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- In this paper I describe a conceptual design of a bibliographic retrieval system that enables more thourough control of bibliographic entities. A bibliographic entity has 2 components: the intellectual work and the physical item. Users searching bibliographic retrieval systems generally do not search for a specific item, but are willing to retrieve one of several alternative manifestations of a work. However, contemporary bibliographic retrieval systems are based solely on the descriptions of items. Works are described only implcitly by collocating descriptions of items. This method has resulted in a tool that does not include important descriptive attributes of the work, e.g. information regarding its history, its genre, or its bibliographic relationships. A bibliographic relationship is an association between 2 bibliographic entities. A system evaluation methodology wasused to create a conceptual schema for a bibliographic retrieval system. The model is based upon an analysis of data elements in the USMARC Formats for Bibliographic Data. The conceptual schema describes a database comprising 2 separate files of bibliographic descriptions, one of works and the other of items. Each file consists of individual descriptive surrogates of their respective entities. the specific data content of each file is defined by a data dictionary. Data elements used in the description of bibliographic works reflect the nature of works as intellectual and linguistic objects. The descriptive elements of bibliographic items describe the physical properties of bibliographic entities. Bibliographic relationships constitute the logical strucutre of the database
-
Madison, O.M.A.: Standards in light of new technologies : functional requirements for bibliographic records (1999)
0.01
0.0071102474 = product of:
0.09954346 = sum of:
0.09954346 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09954346 = score(doc=4182,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.8516034 = fieldWeight in 4182, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4182)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 28(1999) no.1, S.7-10
-
Riemer, J.J.: Adding 856 Fields to authority records : rationale and implications (1998)
0.01
0.0067291465 = product of:
0.047104023 = sum of:
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 3715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=3715,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 3715, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3715)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 3715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=3715,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 3715, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3715)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 26(1998) no.2, S.5-9
-
Tillett, B.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : theoretical and practical foundations (1995)
0.01
0.006220171 = product of:
0.08708239 = sum of:
0.08708239 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08708239 = score(doc=3084,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7449978 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- The study covers the full range of functions for the bibliographic record in its widest sense. Discusses theoretical and practical aspects, methodology and the future
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.3, S.43-44
-
Frias, J.A.: ¬La estructura conceptual del registro bibliografico : una revision (1996)
0.01
0.006157655 = product of:
0.08620717 = sum of:
0.08620717 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08620717 = score(doc=4618,freq=12.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.73751014 = fieldWeight in 4618, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4618)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- It is assumed that the conceptual structure of bibliographic records is based on the knowledge of user needs. In applying the entity-relationship model to the library catalogue the authority file and bibliographic records can be viewed as attributes, and the links between records and elements as relationships. Outlines the bibliographic relationships of the UNIMARC format, the analysis of hierarchical relationships carried out by Goosens and Mazur-Rzesos, and the typology of bibliographic documents established by McCallum. Presents 7 types of relationships developed by Tillet and gives results of an empirical study carried out to establish the extent and features of bibliographic relationships in the computerized catalogue of the Library of Congress
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: The conceptual structure of the bibliographic record
-
Fattahi, R.: Anglo American Cataloguing Rules in an online environment : a literature review (1995)
0.01
0.00576784 = product of:
0.04037488 = sum of:
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.25-50
-
Parent, I.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : an Anglo-American perspective (1995)
0.01
0.005745948 = product of:
0.08044326 = sum of:
0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08044326 = score(doc=3080,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Presents a view on the work of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Study Group on behalf of the Anglo-American cataloguing tradition. The study is examining the fundamental aspects of record design using the entity-attribute-relationship model to link data elements to the function that a user can perform while accessing a bibliographic record. The data and functions are being linked by UNIMARC fields
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.3, S.46-47
-
Ede, S.: Fitness for purpose : the future evolution of bibliographic records and their delivery (1995)
0.01
0.005745948 = product of:
0.08044326 = sum of:
0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08044326 = score(doc=3086,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 3086, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3086)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Uses some of the bibliographic records initiatives in which the British Library is involved to illustrate the developments in bibliographic records and their provision. Traces past experiences and covers: efforts at enhancing content, expanding coverage, format simplification, and international exchange. Outlines the aims of the CoBRA initiative and the National Bibliographic Database
-
Spangen, I.C.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : Nordic and German reactions to the functional requirements study (1995)
0.01
0.005078748 = product of:
0.07110247 = sum of:
0.07110247 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07110247 = score(doc=3083,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.3, S.47-48
-
Functional requirements for bibliographic records : Final report (1998)
0.01
0.005078748 = product of:
0.07110247 = sum of:
0.07110247 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07110247 = score(doc=6418,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Editor
- IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
-
Calk, J.; Persing, B.: From catalog card to MARC : USMARC bibliographic self defence (1998)
0.01
0.005027704 = product of:
0.070387855 = sum of:
0.070387855 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070387855 = score(doc=3198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 3198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3198)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
-
Witt, M.; Leresche, F.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : cataloguing practice in France (1995)
0.00
0.0049761366 = product of:
0.06966591 = sum of:
0.06966591 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06966591 = score(doc=3081,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5959982 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses the French reaction. Covers the entities considered for cataloguing; elements for identifying a document; access points; and authority records. Considers whether it is possible to reduce redundancies among the elements contained in bibliographic records caused by overlapping between the ISBD description, the access points and the coded information; and whether OPACs can be developed to present clearly to users various entities from the most general level to the most specific level
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.3, S.49-50
-
Estivill, A.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : comments on the study (1995)
0.00
0.0049761366 = product of:
0.06966591 = sum of:
0.06966591 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06966591 = score(doc=3082,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5959982 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Reviews traditional catalogue and bibliographic functions and is expanded to included databases and machine readable records. Structured databases support 4 functions: finding, relating, choice and displaying. The relating and display functions of today's catalogues have not been successfully achieved. Discusses the relating and displaying functions and the study's contributions to their improvement
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.3, S.44-45
-
¬The core bibliographic record for music and sound recordings (1998)
0.00
0.0049761366 = product of:
0.06966591 = sum of:
0.06966591 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06966591 = score(doc=3801,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5959982 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Describes the background to the creation of a core bibliographic record for music and sound recordings, provides a definition of a core bibliographic record and presents the core record for printed and manuscript music and the core record for sound recordings which were prepared by the International Association of Music Libraries, Archives and Documentation Centres Working Group in Perugia, 1-6 Sep 1996
-
Nichols introduces MARCit (1998)
0.00
0.0043094605 = product of:
0.060332447 = sum of:
0.060332447 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060332447 = score(doc=1438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Reports the release of MARCit, a software package that enables the cataloguing of Internet resources into MARC format bibliographic records
