Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Hädrich, G.: Unreglementierte Gedanken zur Weiterentwicklung des Regelwerks für die alphabetische Katalogisierung (1996) 0.08
    0.079520874 = product of:
      0.36579603 = sum of:
        0.01790758 = weight(_text_:und in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01790758 = score(doc=5426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
        0.036219276 = product of:
          0.07243855 = sum of:
            0.07243855 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07243855 = score(doc=5426,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.07243855 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07243855 = score(doc=5426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
        0.11961532 = weight(_text_:katalogisierung in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11961532 = score(doc=5426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13500103 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.8860326 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
        0.11961532 = weight(_text_:katalogisierung in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11961532 = score(doc=5426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13500103 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.8860326 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
      0.2173913 = coord(5/23)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 43(1996) H.5, S.471-486
  2. Meßmer, G.: Brauchen wir noch Regelwerke und Datenformate? : Thesen zu einer Reform des Regelwerks für die Alphabetische Katalogisierung (1999) 0.03
    0.025573406 = product of:
      0.14704709 = sum of:
        0.021932216 = weight(_text_:und in 2524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021932216 = score(doc=2524,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 2524, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2524)
        0.05980766 = weight(_text_:katalogisierung in 2524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05980766 = score(doc=2524,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13500103 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.4430163 = fieldWeight in 2524, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2524)
        0.05980766 = weight(_text_:katalogisierung in 2524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05980766 = score(doc=2524,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13500103 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.4430163 = fieldWeight in 2524, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2524)
        0.005499561 = product of:
          0.010999122 = sum of:
            0.010999122 = weight(_text_:1 in 2524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010999122 = score(doc=2524,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 2524, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2524)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.17391305 = coord(4/23)
    
    Abstract
    Der provokante Titel war gleichzeitig Name und Programm einer gut besuchten Po-diumsdiskussion der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek, angeregt durch die Bestrebungen, die Katalogisierungsregeln in Deutschland zu reformieren. Die Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer der Podiumsrunde machten mit ihren Diskussionsbeiträgen schnell klar, daß die Frage nur rhetorisch gemeint sein konnte. Unumstritten ist der Zwang zu Veränderungen, bewirkt durch den technischen Fortschritt einerseits und den Kostendruck andererseits. Bei der Frage, welche Veränderungen notwendig sind, gingen die Meinungen allerdings ziemlich auseinander. Aus dem sich rege an der Diskussion beteiligenden Auditorium kam Kritik an den Normdateien, speziell der Personen-namendatei (PND) und vor allem an der Gemeinsamen Körperschaftsdatei (GKD) als dem arbeitsaufwendigsten und teuersten Katalogisierungsinstrument überhaupt.
    Source
    Bibliotheksforum Bayern. 27(1999) H.1, S.74-77
  3. Lehmann, K.-D.: ¬Die Mühen der Ebenen : Regelwerke - Datenformate - Kommunikationsschnittstellen (1997) 0.01
    0.014150171 = product of:
      0.10848464 = sum of:
        0.015349354 = weight(_text_:und in 7715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015349354 = score(doc=7715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 7715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7715)
        0.031045094 = product of:
          0.06209019 = sum of:
            0.06209019 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 7715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06209019 = score(doc=7715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 7715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06209019 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 7715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06209019 = score(doc=7715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 7715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7715)
      0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 44(1997) H.3, S.229-240
  4. Krischker, U.: Formale Analyse von Dokumenten (1997) 0.01
    0.0063289185 = product of:
      0.07278256 = sum of:
        0.021707265 = weight(_text_:und in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021707265 = score(doc=3925,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
        0.051075295 = product of:
          0.10215059 = sum of:
            0.10215059 = weight(_text_:titelaufnahme in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10215059 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19056913 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.53602904 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Die formale Analyse von Dokumenten ist seit alters her eine der Hauptaufgaben der Bibliotheken und Archive, in neuerer Zeit auch der Dokumentationsstellen. Die gesammelten und ausgewerteten Dokumente müssen identifizierbar und wieder auffindbar sein. Die formale Analyse bietet die Möglichkeit, die formalen Charakteristika von Dokumenten zu beschreiben. Damit können die Dokumente unter mehreren, aber immer den formal gleichen Such- und Ordnungsmerkmalen in Katalogen, Datenbanken, Bibliographien o.ä. nachgewiesen werden. Hierzu werden nach festgelegten Regeln die verschiedenen formalen Charakteristika zu "Auswertungselementen" zusammengefaßt, die jeweils eine sinnvoll nicht weiter zu unterteilende Klasse zusammengehöriger Charakteristika bilden (z.B. ist ein Datum, bestehend aus Tag, Monat, Jahr nicht weiter zu unterteilen und bildet deshalb ein Auswertungselement). Alle bei der formalen Analyse ermittelten Auswertungselemente für die Beschreibung eines Dokumentes werden in festgelegter Form und Reihenfolge niedergeschrieben. Aus der vollständigen Menge von Auswertungselementen wird nur ein bestimmter Teil als Ordnungs- oder Suchmerkmale ausgewählt. Das Ergebnis der formalen Analyse wird gemeinhin "Titelaufnahme" oder "Fundstelle" oder "Zitat" genannt.
    Footnote
    Allgemeine, d.h. nicht ausschließlich an bibliothekarischen Anwendungsbereichen orientierte, Darstellung der formalen Erfassung und bibliographischen Beschreibung von Dokumenten verschiedenster Typen.
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 4. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a
  5. Madison, O.M.A.: Standards in light of new technologies : functional requirements for bibliographic records (1999) 0.00
    0.0031164065 = product of:
      0.035838675 = sum of:
        0.015555107 = product of:
          0.031110214 = sum of:
            0.031110214 = weight(_text_:1 in 4182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031110214 = score(doc=4182,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.53735995 = fieldWeight in 4182, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4182)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.020283569 = product of:
          0.040567137 = sum of:
            0.040567137 = weight(_text_:international in 4182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040567137 = score(doc=4182,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.5159926 = fieldWeight in 4182, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4182)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    1. 7.1996 21:26:02
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 28(1999) no.1, S.7-10
  6. Krischker, U.: Formale Analyse (Erfassung) von Dokumenten (1990) 0.00
    0.0023261756 = product of:
      0.026751019 = sum of:
        0.020465806 = weight(_text_:und in 1535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020465806 = score(doc=1535,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1535, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1535)
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 1535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=1535,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 1535, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1535)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Die formale Analyse von Dokumenten ist komplex und vielschichtig. Um sie beschreiben zu können, muß sie unter verschiedenen Gesichtspunkten betrachtet werden. Zu untersuchen ist, welchen Zweck die formale Analyse erfüllen soll, wem sie nützt und wer sie durchführt, welche Methoden zur Verfügung stehen, welche technischen Hilfsmittel eingesetzt werden können bzw. welche Verfahren es beim Einsatz von Datenverarbeitungsanlagen gibt.
    Footnote
    Allgemeine, d.h. nicht ausschließlich an bibliothekarischen Anwendungsbereichen orientierte, Darstellung der formalen Erfassung und bibliographischen Beschreibung von Dokumenten verschiedenster Typen.
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
  7. Provansal, A.: Neuf mois après (1997) 0.00
    0.0018625357 = product of:
      0.02141916 = sum of:
        0.011277375 = product of:
          0.02255475 = sum of:
            0.02255475 = weight(_text_:29 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02255475 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010141784 = product of:
          0.020283569 = sum of:
            0.020283569 = weight(_text_:international in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020283569 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic documents are creating new services and generating new demands, with consequent impacts on the means of transmitting knowledge, international standards and democratisation of access. Universal bibliographic control depends on common rules for bibliographic description and format to ensure compatibility and exchange. In addition to ISBN and UNIMARC for cataloguing, Z39.50 allows searching of heterogeneous databases and SGML makes cataloguing in publication a reality. Such developments must be based on knowledge of what users want and their real search and consultation practices, not what the system devisers have the technology to create
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  8. Ede, S.: Fitness for purpose : the future evolution of bibliographic records and their delivery (1995) 0.00
    0.0015544195 = product of:
      0.017875824 = sum of:
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 3086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=3086,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 3086, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3086)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011590611 = product of:
          0.023181222 = sum of:
            0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 3086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023181222 = score(doc=3086,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 3086, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3086)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Uses some of the bibliographic records initiatives in which the British Library is involved to illustrate the developments in bibliographic records and their provision. Traces past experiences and covers: efforts at enhancing content, expanding coverage, format simplification, and international exchange. Outlines the aims of the CoBRA initiative and the National Bibliographic Database
    Source
    Catalogue and index. 1995, no.116, S.1-3
  9. Willer, M.: Formats and cataloguing rules : developments for cataloguing electronic resources (1999) 0.00
    0.0015544195 = product of:
      0.017875824 = sum of:
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011590611 = product of:
          0.023181222 = sum of:
            0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023181222 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Following a brief history of cataloguing and the MARC record format, describes current challenges in developing suitable international formats and cataloguing rules for dealing with electronic resources. Extensive references to the past and current literature provide an overview of the problems faced. Notes the role of the ISBD, Z39.50 protocol and the integration of Internet objects into the online catalogue
    Source
    Program. 33(1999) no.1, S.41-55
  10. ¬The core bibliographic record for music and sound recordings (1998) 0.00
    0.0015544195 = product of:
      0.017875824 = sum of:
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=3801,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011590611 = product of:
          0.023181222 = sum of:
            0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023181222 = score(doc=3801,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the background to the creation of a core bibliographic record for music and sound recordings, provides a definition of a core bibliographic record and presents the core record for printed and manuscript music and the core record for sound recordings which were prepared by the International Association of Music Libraries, Archives and Documentation Centres Working Group in Perugia, 1-6 Sep 1996
  11. Spangen, I.C.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : Nordic and German reactions to the functional requirements study (1995) 0.00
    6.299246E-4 = product of:
      0.014488265 = sum of:
        0.014488265 = product of:
          0.02897653 = sum of:
            0.02897653 = weight(_text_:international in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02897653 = score(doc=3083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.36856616 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.3, S.47-48
  12. Tillett, B.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : theoretical and practical foundations (1995) 0.00
    6.299246E-4 = product of:
      0.014488265 = sum of:
        0.014488265 = product of:
          0.02897653 = sum of:
            0.02897653 = weight(_text_:international in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02897653 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.36856616 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.3, S.43-44
  13. Parent, I.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : an Anglo-American perspective (1995) 0.00
    5.0393963E-4 = product of:
      0.011590611 = sum of:
        0.011590611 = product of:
          0.023181222 = sum of:
            0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023181222 = score(doc=3080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.3, S.46-47
  14. Witt, M.; Leresche, F.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : cataloguing practice in France (1995) 0.00
    5.0393963E-4 = product of:
      0.011590611 = sum of:
        0.011590611 = product of:
          0.023181222 = sum of:
            0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023181222 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.3, S.49-50
  15. Estivill, A.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : comments on the study (1995) 0.00
    5.0393963E-4 = product of:
      0.011590611 = sum of:
        0.011590611 = product of:
          0.023181222 = sum of:
            0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023181222 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.3, S.44-45
  16. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.00
    4.8590987E-4 = product of:
      0.011175927 = sum of:
        0.011175927 = product of:
          0.022351854 = sum of:
            0.022351854 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022351854 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  17. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.00
    4.8590987E-4 = product of:
      0.011175927 = sum of:
        0.011175927 = product of:
          0.022351854 = sum of:
            0.022351854 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022351854 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
  18. Parker, V.: MARC tags for cataloging cartographic materials (1999) 0.00
    3.415876E-4 = product of:
      0.007856515 = sum of:
        0.007856515 = product of:
          0.01571303 = sum of:
            0.01571303 = weight(_text_:1 in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01571303 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 27(1999) nos.1/2, S.5-9
  19. Hopkins, J.: USMARC as metadata shell (1999) 0.00
    2.7327013E-4 = product of:
      0.0062852125 = sum of:
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.55-68