Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Lehmann, K.-D.: ¬Die Mühen der Ebenen : Regelwerke - Datenformate - Kommunikationsschnittstellen (1997) 0.03 
    0.02848234 = product of:
  0.12104995 = sum of:
    0.01626061 = weight(_text_:und in 7715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01626061 = score(doc=7715,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 7715, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7715)
    0.03288817 = product of:
      0.06577634 = sum of:
        0.06577634 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 7715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06577634 = score(doc=7715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 7715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7715)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.06577634 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 7715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06577634 = score(doc=7715,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 7715, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7715)
    0.006124827 = weight(_text_:in in 7715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006124827 = score(doc=7715,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 7715, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7715)
  0.23529412 = coord(4/17)
    Footnote
    Überarbeitete Fassung des Vortrags zur Sitzung der Sektion IV des DBV am 5.3.97 in Hamburg
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 44(1997) H.3, S.229-240
  2. Hädrich, G.: Unreglementierte Gedanken zur Weiterentwicklung des Regelwerks für die alphabetische Katalogisierung (1996) 0.02 
    0.023661055 = product of:
  0.1340793 = sum of:
    0.018970713 = weight(_text_:und in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018970713 = score(doc=5426,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
    0.038369533 = product of:
      0.076739065 = sum of:
        0.076739065 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076739065 = score(doc=5426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.076739065 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.076739065 = score(doc=5426,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
  0.1764706 = coord(3/17)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 43(1996) H.5, S.471-486
  3. Krischker, U.: Formale Analyse von Dokumenten (1997) 0.01 
    0.009286075 = product of:
  0.05262109 = sum of:
    0.022995977 = weight(_text_:und in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022995977 = score(doc=3925,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
    0.006124827 = weight(_text_:in in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006124827 = score(doc=3925,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
    0.023500286 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023500286 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09407886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
  0.1764706 = coord(3/17)
    Abstract
    Die formale Analyse von Dokumenten ist seit alters her eine der Hauptaufgaben der Bibliotheken und Archive, in neuerer Zeit auch der Dokumentationsstellen. Die gesammelten und ausgewerteten Dokumente müssen identifizierbar und wieder auffindbar sein. Die formale Analyse bietet die Möglichkeit, die formalen Charakteristika von Dokumenten zu beschreiben. Damit können die Dokumente unter mehreren, aber immer den formal gleichen Such- und Ordnungsmerkmalen in Katalogen, Datenbanken, Bibliographien o.ä. nachgewiesen werden. Hierzu werden nach festgelegten Regeln die verschiedenen formalen Charakteristika zu "Auswertungselementen" zusammengefaßt, die jeweils eine sinnvoll nicht weiter zu unterteilende Klasse zusammengehöriger Charakteristika bilden (z.B. ist ein Datum, bestehend aus Tag, Monat, Jahr nicht weiter zu unterteilen und bildet deshalb ein Auswertungselement). Alle bei der formalen Analyse ermittelten Auswertungselemente für die Beschreibung eines Dokumentes werden in festgelegter Form und Reihenfolge niedergeschrieben. Aus der vollständigen Menge von Auswertungselementen wird nur ein bestimmter Teil als Ordnungs- oder Suchmerkmale ausgewählt. Das Ergebnis der formalen Analyse wird gemeinhin "Titelaufnahme" oder "Fundstelle" oder "Zitat" genannt.
    Footnote
    Allgemeine, d.h. nicht ausschließlich an bibliothekarischen Anwendungsbereichen orientierte, Darstellung der formalen Erfassung und bibliographischen Beschreibung von Dokumenten verschiedenster Typen.
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 4. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a
  4. Meßmer, G.: Brauchen wir noch Regelwerke und Datenformate? : Thesen zu einer Reform des Regelwerks für die Alphabetische Katalogisierung (1999) 0.00 
    0.0031537765 = product of:
  0.0268071 = sum of:
    0.023234284 = weight(_text_:und in 2524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023234284 = score(doc=2524,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 2524, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2524)
    0.0035728158 = weight(_text_:in in 2524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0035728158 = score(doc=2524,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 2524, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2524)
  0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
    Abstract
    Der provokante Titel war gleichzeitig Name und Programm einer gut besuchten Po-diumsdiskussion der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek, angeregt durch die Bestrebungen, die Katalogisierungsregeln in Deutschland zu reformieren. Die Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer der Podiumsrunde machten mit ihren Diskussionsbeiträgen schnell klar, daß die Frage nur rhetorisch gemeint sein konnte. Unumstritten ist der Zwang zu Veränderungen, bewirkt durch den technischen Fortschritt einerseits und den Kostendruck andererseits. Bei der Frage, welche Veränderungen notwendig sind, gingen die Meinungen allerdings ziemlich auseinander. Aus dem sich rege an der Diskussion beteiligenden Auditorium kam Kritik an den Normdateien, speziell der Personen-namendatei (PND) und vor allem an der Gemeinsamen Körperschaftsdatei (GKD) als dem arbeitsaufwendigsten und teuersten Katalogisierungsinstrument überhaupt.
  5. Krischker, U.: Formale Analyse (Erfassung) von Dokumenten (1990) 0.00 
    0.0030310624 = product of:
  0.025764031 = sum of:
    0.021680813 = weight(_text_:und in 1535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021680813 = score(doc=1535,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1535, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1535)
    0.004083218 = weight(_text_:in in 1535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004083218 = score(doc=1535,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 1535, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1535)
  0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
    Abstract
    Die formale Analyse von Dokumenten ist komplex und vielschichtig. Um sie beschreiben zu können, muß sie unter verschiedenen Gesichtspunkten betrachtet werden. Zu untersuchen ist, welchen Zweck die formale Analyse erfüllen soll, wem sie nützt und wer sie durchführt, welche Methoden zur Verfügung stehen, welche technischen Hilfsmittel eingesetzt werden können bzw. welche Verfahren es beim Einsatz von Datenverarbeitungsanlagen gibt.
    Footnote
    Allgemeine, d.h. nicht ausschließlich an bibliothekarischen Anwendungsbereichen orientierte, Darstellung der formalen Erfassung und bibliographischen Beschreibung von Dokumenten verschiedenster Typen.
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
  6. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.00 
    0.002332762 = product of:
  0.019828476 = sum of:
    0.00798906 = weight(_text_:in in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00798906 = score(doc=6523,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
    0.011839416 = product of:
      0.023678832 = sum of:
        0.023678832 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023678832 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08743035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
    Abstract
    Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  7. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.00 
    0.0018132038 = product of:
  0.015412232 = sum of:
    0.0035728158 = weight(_text_:in in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0035728158 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
    0.011839416 = product of:
      0.023678832 = sum of:
        0.023678832 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023678832 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08743035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11764706 = coord(2/17)
    Abstract
    The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
  8. Fattahi, R.: ¬A uniform approach to the indexing of cataloguing data in online library systems (1997) 0.00 
    5.4042594E-4 = product of:
  0.009187241 = sum of:
    0.009187241 = weight(_text_:in in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009187241 = score(doc=131,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.27051896 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Argues that in library cataloguing and for optional functionality of bibliographic records the indexing of fields and subfields should follow a uniform approach. This would maintain effectiveness in searching, retrieval and display of bibliographic information both within systems and between systems. However, a review of different postings to the AUTOCAT and USMARC discussion lists indicates that the indexing and tagging of cataloguing data do not, at present, follow a consistent approach in online library systems. If the rationale of cataloguing principles is to bring uniformity in bibliographic description and effectiveness in access, they should also address the question of uniform approaches to the indexing of cataloguing data. In this context and in terms of the identification and handling of data elements, cataloguing standards (codes, MARC formats and the Z39.50 standard) should be brought closer, in that they should provide guidelines for the designation of data elements for machine readable records
  9. Wool, G.J.; Austhof, B.: Cataloguing standards and machine translation : a study of reformatted ISBD records in an online catalog (1993) 0.00 
    4.803786E-4 = product of:
  0.008166436 = sum of:
    0.008166436 = weight(_text_:in in 7321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008166436 = score(doc=7321,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 7321, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7321)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Labelled bibliographic display screens in online catalogues can repackage records created for card catalogues in ways that restructure the records, redefine data categories and contexts, and add or omit selected categories of data. Reports on a study of the impact of automated display on catalogue records in a medium-sized research library by comparing the card and online version of 1.005 records created according to the ISBD conventions
  10. Heaney, M.: Object-oriented cataloging (1995) 0.00 
    4.203313E-4 = product of:
  0.0071456316 = sum of:
    0.0071456316 = weight(_text_:in in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071456316 = score(doc=3339,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Catalogues have evolved from lists of physical items present in particular libraries into computerized access and retrieval tools for works dispersed across local and national boundaries. Works themselves are no longer constrained by physical form yet cataloguing rules have not evolved in parallel with these developments. Reanalyzes the nature of works and their publication in an approach based on object oriented modelling and demonstrates the advantages to be gained thereby. Suggests a strategic plan to enable an organic transformation to be made from current MARC based cataloguing to object oriented cataloguing. Proposes major revisions of MARC in order to allow records to maximize the benefits of both computerized databases and high speed data networks. This will involve a fundamental shift away from the AACR philosophy of description of, plus access to, physical items
  11. Madison, O.M.A.: Standards in light of new technologies : functional requirements for bibliographic records (1999) 0.00 
    4.203313E-4 = product of:
  0.0071456316 = sum of:
    0.0071456316 = weight(_text_:in in 4182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071456316 = score(doc=4182,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4182, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4182)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
  12. Tillett, B.: Cataloguing rules and conceptual models for the electronic environment (1995) 0.00 
    4.160201E-4 = product of:
  0.0070723416 = sum of:
    0.0070723416 = weight(_text_:in in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070723416 = score(doc=5754,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Offers the conceptual modelling technique as a means of analysing the future of library cataloguing with regard to cataloguing rules and MARC formats. Discusses the evolution of publishing technology and introduces the conceptual model that the IFLA is preparing in its study of the functional requirements of bibliographic records. Considers the purpose of cataloguing rules and how they have evolved in response to changes in technologies. Examines the future of cataloguing with future rules and alternative communication formats
  13. Fattahi, R.: Anglo American Cataloguing Rules in an online environment : a literature review (1995) 0.00 
    4.0280976E-4 = product of:
  0.0068477658 = sum of:
    0.0068477658 = weight(_text_:in in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0068477658 = score(doc=596,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    As a standard set of rules, AACR2 has received much attention in the literature of descriptive cataloguing. Considers that despite this extensive literature, an important aspect of the code, namely its relevance to the online environment, has not received much attention, particularly in terms of empirical research. Notes however that there is a general criticism that AACR2, being based on manual systems, does not correspond effectively to the online environment. From a review of the literature concludes that while the advent of online catalogues has changed both the internal structure and external appearance of library catalogues, a mojority of writers consider that radical changes in the code are impossible and undesirable in the near future, owing to various factors such as the belief that that MARC format is not conductive to radical change and the large size of existing catalogues created according to the current rules
  14. Provansal, A.: Neuf mois après (1997) 0.00 
    3.640176E-4 = product of:
  0.006188299 = sum of:
    0.006188299 = weight(_text_:in in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006188299 = score(doc=917,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Electronic documents are creating new services and generating new demands, with consequent impacts on the means of transmitting knowledge, international standards and democratisation of access. Universal bibliographic control depends on common rules for bibliographic description and format to ensure compatibility and exchange. In addition to ISBN and UNIMARC for cataloguing, Z39.50 allows searching of heterogeneous databases and SGML makes cataloguing in publication a reality. Such developments must be based on knowledge of what users want and their real search and consultation practices, not what the system devisers have the technology to create
    Content
    Presentation given at a French Librarians Association study day on 'The future of cataloguing / Catalogues of the future', held in June 1996 at the BNF
  15. Riemer, J.J.: Adding 856 Fields to authority records : rationale and implications (1998) 0.00 
    3.640176E-4 = product of:
  0.006188299 = sum of:
    0.006188299 = weight(_text_:in in 3715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006188299 = score(doc=3715,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 3715, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3715)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Discusses ways of applying MARC Field 856 (Electronic Location and Access) to authority records in online union catalogues. In principle, each catalogue site location can be treated as the electronic record of the work concerned and the MARC Field 856 can then refer to this location as if it were referring to the location of a primary record. Although URLs may become outdated, the fact that they are located in specifically defined MARC Fields makes the data contained amenable to the same link maintenance software ae used for the electronic records themselves. Includes practical examples of typical union catalogue records incorporating MARC Field 856
  16. Giordano, R.: ¬The documentation of electronic texts : using Text Encoding Initiative headers: an introduction (1994) 0.00 
    3.6028394E-4 = product of:
  0.006124827 = sum of:
    0.006124827 = weight(_text_:in in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006124827 = score(doc=866,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Presents a general introduction to the form and functions of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) headers and explains their relationship to the MARC record. The TEI header's main strength is that it documents electronic texts in a standard exchange format that should be understandable to both librarian cataloguers and text encoders outside of librarianship. TEI gives encoders the ability to document the the electronic text itself, its source, its encoding principles, and revisions, as well as non bibliographic characteristics of the text that can support both scholarly analysis and retrieval. Its bibliographic descriptions can be loaded into standard remote bibliographic databases, which should make electronic texts as easy to find for researchers as texts in other media. Presents a brief overview of the TEI header, the file description and ways in which the TEI headers have counterparts in MARC, the Encoding Description, the Profile Description, the Revision Description, the size and complexity of the TEI header, and the use of the TEI header to support document retrieval and analysis, with notes on some of the prospects and problems
  17. Eliot, J.: MARC and OPAC systems : discussion document (1994) 0.00 
    3.3967898E-4 = product of:
  0.0057745427 = sum of:
    0.0057745427 = weight(_text_:in in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0057745427 = score(doc=10,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    A discussion document produced following a meeting the Users of Book Industry Standards (UBIS) Bibliographic Standards Working Group at the University of London as part of a project to consider the Survey on the use of UK-MARC by Russell Sweeney published in 1991 by the British Library National Bibliographic Service. Considers the suitability, or otherwise, of the UKMARC format for use in OPACs. Summarizes the issues involved, discussing: the UKMARC exchange format, tagging and coding structure (record complexity, analytical entries, non filing indicators), data content (statements of responsibility, main versus added entry) and records standards
  18. Witt, M.; Leresche, F.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : cataloguing practice in France (1995) 0.00 
    3.3967898E-4 = product of:
  0.0057745427 = sum of:
    0.0057745427 = weight(_text_:in in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0057745427 = score(doc=3081,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Discusses the French reaction. Covers the entities considered for cataloguing; elements for identifying a document; access points; and authority records. Considers whether it is possible to reduce redundancies among the elements contained in bibliographic records caused by overlapping between the ISBD description, the access points and the coded information; and whether OPACs can be developed to present clearly to users various entities from the most general level to the most specific level
  19. Ede, S.: Fitness for purpose : the future evolution of bibliographic records and their delivery (1995) 0.00 
    3.3967898E-4 = product of:
  0.0057745427 = sum of:
    0.0057745427 = weight(_text_:in in 3086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0057745427 = score(doc=3086,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3086, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3086)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Uses some of the bibliographic records initiatives in which the British Library is involved to illustrate the developments in bibliographic records and their provision. Traces past experiences and covers: efforts at enhancing content, expanding coverage, format simplification, and international exchange. Outlines the aims of the CoBRA initiative and the National Bibliographic Database
  20. Kartus, E.: Beyond MARC : is it really possible? (1995) 0.00 
    3.3967898E-4 = product of:
  0.0057745427 = sum of:
    0.0057745427 = weight(_text_:in in 5753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0057745427 = score(doc=5753,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5753, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5753)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    In their attempts to make materials more accessible, librarians are making catalogue entries unnecessarily complicated. Discusses the current scenario where catalogues appear to contain much information that is irrelevant to users. Provides an example of a future scenario where one composite catalogue record replaces a number of unitary records. Asks why the information that publishers have in machine readable form cannot be used with current technology to help simplify the entry

Authors

Languages

  • e 23
  • d 5
  • f 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 28
  • m 3
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications