-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.02
0.02014326 = product of:
0.08057304 = sum of:
0.06319319 = sum of:
0.028117962 = weight(_text_:system in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028117962 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.03507523 = weight(_text_:29 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03507523 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.017379852 = product of:
0.034759704 = sum of:
0.034759704 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034759704 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:21:29
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
Oehlschläger, S.: Aus der 48. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 12. und 13. November 2004 in Göttingen (2005)
0.01
0.0108186975 = product of:
0.02884986 = sum of:
0.011462449 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011462449 = score(doc=3556,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.11816074 = fieldWeight in 3556, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3556)
0.0043934314 = product of:
0.008786863 = sum of:
0.008786863 = weight(_text_:system in 3556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008786863 = score(doc=3556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.08699492 = fieldWeight in 3556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3556)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01299398 = product of:
0.02598796 = sum of:
0.02598796 = weight(_text_:etc in 3556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02598796 = score(doc=3556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.14961085 = fieldWeight in 3556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3556)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Content
- Die Deutsche Bibliothek Retrieval von Content In dem Projekt wird angestrebt, Verfahren zu entwickeln und einzuführen, die automatisch und ohne intellektuelle Bearbeitung für das Content-Retrieval ausreichend Sucheinstiege bieten. Dabei kann es sich um die Suche nach Inhalten von Volltexten, digitalen Abbildern, Audiofiles, Videofiles etc. von in Der Deutschen Bibliothek archivierten digitalen Ressourcen oder digitalen Surrogaten archivierter analoger Ressourcen (z. B. OCR-Ergebnisse) handeln. Inhalte, die in elektronischer Form vorhanden sind, aber dem InternetBenutzer Der Deutschen Bibliothek bisher nicht oder nur eingeschränkt zur Verfügung stehen, sollen in möglichst großem Umfang und mit möglichst großem Komfort nutzbar gemacht werden. Darüber hinaus sollen Inhalte benutzt werden, die für ein in ILTIS katalogisiertes Objekt beschreibenden Charakter haben, um auf das beschriebene Objekt zu verweisen. Die höchste Priorität liegt dabei auf der Erschließung von Inhalten in Textformaten. In einem ersten Schritt wurde der Volltext aller Zeitschriften, die im Projekt "Exilpresse digital" digitalisiert wurden, für eine erweiterte Suche genutzt. In einem nächsten Schritt soll die PSI-Software für die Volltextindexierung von Abstracts evaluiert werden. MILOS Mit dem Einsatz von MILOS eröffnet sich die Möglichkeit, nicht oder wenig sachlich erschlossene Bestände automatisch mit ergänzenden Inhaltserschließungsinformationen zu versehen, der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf der Freitext-Indexierung. Das bereits in einigen Bibliotheken eingesetzte System, das inzwischen von Der Deutschen Bibliothek für Deutschland lizenziert wurde, wurde in eine UNIX-Version überführt und angepasst. Inzwischen wurde nahezu der gesamte Bestand rückwirkend behandelt, die Daten werden im Gesamt-OPAC für die Recherche zur Verfügung stehen. Die in einer XMLStruktur abgelegten Indexeinträge werden dabei vollständig indexiert und zugänglich gemacht. Ein weiterer Entwicklungsschritt wird in dem Einsatz von MILOS im Online-Verfahren liegen.
-
Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004)
0.01
0.005894781 = product of:
0.023579124 = sum of:
0.010544236 = product of:
0.021088472 = sum of:
0.021088472 = weight(_text_:system in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021088472 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013034889 = product of:
0.026069777 = sum of:
0.026069777 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026069777 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic relationships have taken on even greater importance in the context of ongoing efforts to integrate concepts from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) into cataloging codes and database structures. In MARC 21, the linking entry fields are a major mechanism for expressing relationships between bibliographic records. Taxonomies of bibliographic relationships have been proposed by Tillett, with an extension by Smiraglia, and in FRBR itself. The present exercise is to provide a detailed bidirectional mapping of the MARC 21 linking fields to these two schemes. The correspondence of the Tillett taxonomic divisions to the MARC categorization of the linking fields as chronological, horizontal, or vertical is examined as well. Application of the findings to MARC format development and system functionality is discussed.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Wiesenmüller, H.: Von Fröschen und Strategen : Ein kleiner Leitfaden zur AACR2-Debatte (2002)
0.00
0.003898194 = product of:
0.031185552 = sum of:
0.031185552 = product of:
0.062371105 = sum of:
0.062371105 = weight(_text_:etc in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062371105 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.35906604 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Zu den bestbesuchten Veranstaltungen des diesjährigen Bibliothekartages in Augsburg gehörte die Diskussion um die Reform der Formalerschließung. Ganz offensichtlich spielt die Katalogisierung - trotz Internet, Digitalisierung, Dublin Core etc. - im täglichen Geschäft nach wie vor eine bedeutende Rolle. Die Debatte um Regelwerke und Datenformate wird jedenfalls mit großem Ernst und Engagement geführt. Doch die Diskussion droht mittlerweile unübersichtlich zu werden, fachliche Argumente, technische Erfordernisse und bibliothekspolitische Positionen gehen munter durcheinander.
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.00
0.0038018425 = product of:
0.03041474 = sum of:
0.03041474 = product of:
0.06082948 = sum of:
0.06082948 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06082948 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
-
McBride, J.L.: Faceted subject access for music through USMARC : a case for linked fields (2000)
0.00
0.0034387347 = product of:
0.027509877 = sum of:
0.027509877 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027509877 = score(doc=5403,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- The USMARC Format for Bibliographic Description contains three fields (045, 047, and 048) designed to facilitate subject access to music materials. The fields cover three of the main aspects of subject description for music: date of composition, form or genre, and number of instruments or voices, respectively. The codes are rarely used for subject access, because of the difficulty of coding them and because false drops would result in retrieval of bibliographic records where more than one musical work is present, a situation that occurs frequently with sound recordings. It is proposed that the values of the fields be converted to natural language and that subfield 8 be used to link all access fields in a bibliographic record for greater precision in retrieval. This proposal has implications beyond music cataloging, especially for metadata and any bibliographic records describing materials containing many works and subjects.
-
Oehlschläger, S.: Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme : Aus der 46. Sitzung am 21. und 22. April 2004 im Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg in Konstanz (2004)
0.00
0.0034386222 = product of:
0.013754489 = sum of:
0.0061508045 = product of:
0.012301609 = sum of:
0.012301609 = weight(_text_:system in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012301609 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.1217929 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007603685 = product of:
0.01520737 = sum of:
0.01520737 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01520737 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Content
- "Die verbundübergreifende Fernleihe für Monografien steht kurz vor ihrer flächendeckenden Einführung. Voraussetzung hierfür ist ein funktionierendes Online-Fernleih-System in jedem Verbund. Dies ist prototypisch realisiert. Die Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme geht davon aus, dass ab dem 1. Januar 2005 der Echtbetrieb aufgenommen werden kann und die Leistungen nach der neuen Leihverkehrsordnung abgerechnet werden können. Zur Klärung von Detailfragen trifft sich im Juni die Arbeitsgruppe Verbundübergreifende Fernleihe. Bereits in der letzten Sitzung wurde festgelegt, dass die jeweiligen Bibliotheken über die Festlegung des Leitwegs entscheiden sollen, und die Verbundzentralen nur dann eingreifen werden, wenn Probleme entstehen sollten. Die individuelle Leitwegsteuerung, sowohl innerhalb des Verbundes als auch bei der Festlegung der Reihenfolge der anzugehenden Verbünde hat in einigen Verbünden hohe Priorität. Traditionell gewachsene Beziehungen müssen von den Bestellsystemen abgebildet werden können. Eine lokale Zusammenarbeit wird auch über Verbundgrenzen hinaus möglich sein. Im Hinblick auf die Verrechnung verbundübergreifender Fernleihen haben sich die Verbünde auf einen einheitlichen Verrechnungszeitraum geeinigt. Voraussetzung ist außerdem, dass die Unterhaltsträger die notwendigen Rahmenbedingungen für die Abrechnung schaffen und die neue Leihverkehrsordnung in allen Bundesländern rechtzeitig in Kraft gesetzt wird."
-
Deifel, R.: Offener Brief der Sektion 6 des Deutschen Bibliotheksverbandes (2002)
0.00
0.0032883026 = product of:
0.02630642 = sum of:
0.02630642 = product of:
0.05261284 = sum of:
0.05261284 = weight(_text_:29 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05261284 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 29. 9.2002 18:43:44
-
IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code, 3. Report from the 3rd IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code : Cairo, Egypt, 2005 (2006)
0.00
0.0031002415 = product of:
0.024801932 = sum of:
0.024801932 = product of:
0.049603865 = sum of:
0.049603865 = weight(_text_:29 in 2313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049603865 = score(doc=2313,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.43971092 = fieldWeight in 2313, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2313)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 14:20:29
- Series
- IFLA series on bibliographic control; vol. 29
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.00
0.0030723528 = product of:
0.024578823 = sum of:
0.024578823 = product of:
0.049157646 = sum of:
0.049157646 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049157646 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003)
0.00
0.0027156018 = product of:
0.021724815 = sum of:
0.021724815 = product of:
0.04344963 = sum of:
0.04344963 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04344963 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 22. 3.2016 12:15:46
-
Kushwoh, S.S.; Gautam, J.N.; Singh, R.: Migration from CDS / ISIS to KOHA : a case study of data conversion from CCF to MARC 21 (2009)
0.00
0.002282894 = product of:
0.018263152 = sum of:
0.018263152 = product of:
0.036526304 = sum of:
0.036526304 = weight(_text_:system in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036526304 = score(doc=2279,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.36163113 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Standards are important for quality and interoperability in any system. Bibliographic record creation standards such as MARC 21 (Machine Readable Catalogue), CCF (Common Communication Format), UNIMARC (Universal MARC) and their local variations, are in practice all across the library community. ILMS (Integrated Library Management Systems) are using these standards for the design of databases and the creation of bibliographic records. Their use is important for uniformity of the system and bibliographic data, but there are problems when a library wants to switch over from one system to another using different standards. This paper discusses migration from one record standard to another, mapping of data and related issues. Data exported from CDS/ISIS CCF based records to KOHA MARC 21 based records are discussed as a case study. This methodology, with few modifications, can be applied for migration of data in other bibliographicformats too. Freeware tools can be utilized for migration.
-
IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code, 2. Report from the 2nd IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code : Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2004 (2005)
0.00
0.0021922018 = product of:
0.017537614 = sum of:
0.017537614 = product of:
0.03507523 = sum of:
0.03507523 = weight(_text_:29 in 3865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03507523 = score(doc=3865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3865)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 14:20:29
-
IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code, 5. Report from the 5th IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code : Pretoria, South Africa, 2007 = Rapport de la 5ème Réunion d'Experts de l'IFLA sur un Code International de Catalogage (2008)
0.00
0.0021922018 = product of:
0.017537614 = sum of:
0.017537614 = product of:
0.03507523 = sum of:
0.03507523 = weight(_text_:29 in 2311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03507523 = score(doc=2311,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2311, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2311)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 14:20:29
-
IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code, 4. Report from the 4th IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code : Seoul, Korea, 2006 (2007)
0.00
0.0021922018 = product of:
0.017537614 = sum of:
0.017537614 = product of:
0.03507523 = sum of:
0.03507523 = weight(_text_:29 in 2314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03507523 = score(doc=2314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2314)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 14:20:29
-
Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004)
0.00
0.0021724815 = product of:
0.017379852 = sum of:
0.017379852 = product of:
0.034759704 = sum of:
0.034759704 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034759704 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006)
0.00
0.0019009212 = product of:
0.01520737 = sum of:
0.01520737 = product of:
0.03041474 = sum of:
0.03041474 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03041474 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Chandrakar, R.: Mapping CCF to MARC21 : an experimental approach (2001)
0.00
0.0018639751 = product of:
0.014911801 = sum of:
0.014911801 = product of:
0.029823601 = sum of:
0.029823601 = weight(_text_:system in 5437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029823601 = score(doc=5437,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 5437, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this article is to raise and address a number of issues pertaining to the conversion of Common Communication Format (CCF) into MARC21. In this era of global resource sharing, exchange of bibliographic records from one system to another is imperative in today's library communities. Instead of using a single standard to create machine-readable catalogue records, more than 20 standards have emerged and are being used by different institutions. Because of these variations in standards, sharing of resources and transfer of data from one system to another among the institutions locally and globally has become a significant problem. Addressing this problem requires keeping in mind that countries such as India and others in southeast Asia are using the CCF as a standard for creating bibliographic cataloguing records. This paper describes a way to map the bibliographic catalogue records from CCF to MARC21, although 100% mapping is not possible. In addition, the paper describes an experimental approach that enumerates problems that may occur during the mapping of records/exchanging of records and how these problems can be overcome.
-
Hoffmann, L.: Erste Projektergebnisse "Umstieg auf internationale Formate und Regelwerke (MARC21, AACR)" (2003)
0.00
0.0017573726 = product of:
0.014058981 = sum of:
0.014058981 = product of:
0.028117962 = sum of:
0.028117962 = weight(_text_:system in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028117962 = score(doc=1955,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- In den Verbünden sind derzeit die beiden Bibliothekssysteme ALEPH 500 und PICA im Einsatz. In beiden Fällen handelt es sich um Systeme von international operierenden Herstellern. Beide Systeme sind MARC basiert und mussten an MAB2 angepasst werden. Der Südwestdeutsche Bibliotheksverbund (SWB) steht als einziger Verbund vor der Entscheidung für ein neues System. Der Österreichische Bibliothekenverbund (ÖBV) war Erstnutzer des Systems ALEPH 500 im deutschsprachigen Raum. Aus seiner Sicht waren die Anpassungen an das Datenhaltungskonzept sowie die Einführung der hierarchischen Strukturen am aufwändigsten. Die Nachnutzer Bibliotheks-Verbund Bayern (BVB), das Hochschulbibliothekszentrum des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (HBZ) und der Kooperative Bibliotheksverbund Berlin-Brandenburg (KOBV) konnten die Anpassungen an das MAB2-Format einkaufen, die für den ÖBV vorgenommen worden sind. In allen Verbünden musste ALEPH 500 an die jeweiligen Verbundmodelle und Verbundfunktionalitäten angepasst werden. Für das PICA-System fielen Anpassungen an die MAB2-Struktur beim Erstanwender Gemeinsamer Bibliotheksverbund der Länder Bremen, Hamburg, MecklenburgVorpommern, Niedersachsen, SachsenAnhalt, Schleswig-Holstein und Thüringen (GBV) an, das Hessische Bibliotheks-Informationssystem (HeBIS) als Nachnutzer konnte die Anpassungen übernehmen. Der SWB löst zurzeit sein System ab. Die MARC/MAB-Kompatibilität ist in der Ausschreibung gefordert. Der Aufwand für die Anpassungen an das MAB2-Format konnten in den meisten Fällen nicht spezifiziert werden, da sie nicht von den Anpassungen an die jeweiligen Verbundmodelle zu trennen sind. Zur Bewertung eines Formatumstiegs ist es von großer Bedeutung, ob MAB als Austausch- und Katalogisierungsformat oder nur als Austauschformat mit einer eigenen abweichenden Katalogisierungsoberfläche eingesetzt wird. In den ALEPH-Verbünden BVB, HBZ und ÖVB ist MAB2 auch Intern- und Katalogisierungsformat. Im KOBV wird in den Lokalsystemen mit eigenen Katalogisierungsoberflächen katalogisiert. In den PICA-Verbünden ist MAB2 ausschließlich Austauschformat. Im neuen System des SWB soll MAB2 nur Austauschformat sein. Die PICA-Verbünde sehen einen Formatumstieg als eher unproblematisch an. Da Austausch- und Internformat unabhängig voneinander sind, wirkt sich eine Änderung des Austauschformats auf das Internformat und auf die Katalogisierungsoberfläche kaum aus. Für den Entwurf von Umstiegsszenarien ist die Möglichkeit einzubeziehen, dass möglicherweise nicht alle Bibliotheken gleichzeitig umsteigen können.
-
Croissant, C.R.: MARC21 und die anglo-amerikanische Katalogisierungspraxis (2004)
0.00
0.0016293611 = product of:
0.013034889 = sum of:
0.013034889 = product of:
0.026069777 = sum of:
0.026069777 = weight(_text_:22 in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026069777 = score(doc=1764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 13. 8.2004 21:22:06
