Search (113 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.04
    0.035981983 = product of:
      0.071963966 = sum of:
        0.071963966 = sum of:
          0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021913894 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
          0.0066538225 = weight(_text_:a in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0066538225 = score(doc=7683,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
          0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04339625 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
    Type
    a
  2. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.03
    0.032067478 = product of:
      0.064134955 = sum of:
        0.064134955 = product of:
          0.096202426 = sum of:
            0.009409925 = weight(_text_:a in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009409925 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
            0.0867925 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0867925 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
    Type
    a
  3. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.03
    0.027770028 = product of:
      0.055540055 = sum of:
        0.055540055 = product of:
          0.08331008 = sum of:
            0.013171151 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013171151 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
            0.07013893 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07013893 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
    Type
    a
  4. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.02
    0.02290534 = product of:
      0.04581068 = sum of:
        0.04581068 = product of:
          0.06871602 = sum of:
            0.0067213746 = weight(_text_:a in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067213746 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
            0.061994642 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061994642 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46
    Type
    a
  5. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.02
    0.020922288 = product of:
      0.041844577 = sum of:
        0.041844577 = product of:
          0.062766865 = sum of:
            0.013171151 = weight(_text_:a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013171151 = score(doc=562,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
            0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049595714 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
    Type
    a
  6. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.02
    0.019066695 = product of:
      0.03813339 = sum of:
        0.03813339 = product of:
          0.05720008 = sum of:
            0.007604368 = weight(_text_:a in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604368 = score(doc=132,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
            0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049595714 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  7. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.02
    0.018614804 = product of:
      0.03722961 = sum of:
        0.03722961 = product of:
          0.05584441 = sum of:
            0.012448162 = weight(_text_:a in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012448162 = score(doc=2425,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
            0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339625 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The FRBR model is by many considered to be an important contribution to the next generation of bibliographic catalogues, but a major challenge for the library community is how to use this model on already existing MARC-based bibliographic catalogues. This problem requires a solution for the interpretation and conversion of MARC records, and a tool for this kind of conversion is developed as a part of the Norwegian BIBSYS FRBR project. The tool is based on a systematic approach to the interpretation and conversion process and is designed to be adaptable to the rules applied in different catalogues.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
    Type
    a
  8. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.02
    0.016683359 = product of:
      0.033366717 = sum of:
        0.033366717 = product of:
          0.050050072 = sum of:
            0.0066538225 = weight(_text_:a in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0066538225 = score(doc=6523,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
            0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339625 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
    Type
    a
  9. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.02
    0.015691716 = product of:
      0.031383432 = sum of:
        0.031383432 = product of:
          0.04707515 = sum of:
            0.009878363 = weight(_text_:a in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009878363 = score(doc=302,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
            0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037196785 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  10. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Organizing audiovisual and electronic resources for access : a cataloging guide (2000) 0.02
    0.015210776 = product of:
      0.030421551 = sum of:
        0.030421551 = product of:
          0.045632325 = sum of:
            0.037566677 = weight(_text_:m in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037566677 = score(doc=5754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
            0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00806565 = score(doc=5754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  11. Ferguson, B.: MARC/AACR2/authority control tagging : a blitz cataloging workbook (2005) 0.02
    0.015210776 = product of:
      0.030421551 = sum of:
        0.030421551 = product of:
          0.045632325 = sum of:
            0.037566677 = weight(_text_:m in 4602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037566677 = score(doc=4602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 4602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4602)
            0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 4602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00806565 = score(doc=4602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4602)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  12. Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004) 0.01
    0.014727281 = product of:
      0.029454563 = sum of:
        0.029454563 = product of:
          0.044181842 = sum of:
            0.006985058 = weight(_text_:a in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006985058 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
            0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037196785 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic relationships have taken on even greater importance in the context of ongoing efforts to integrate concepts from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) into cataloging codes and database structures. In MARC 21, the linking entry fields are a major mechanism for expressing relationships between bibliographic records. Taxonomies of bibliographic relationships have been proposed by Tillett, with an extension by Smiraglia, and in FRBR itself. The present exercise is to provide a detailed bidirectional mapping of the MARC 21 linking fields to these two schemes. The correspondence of the Tillett taxonomic divisions to the MARC categorization of the linking fields as chronological, horizontal, or vertical is examined as well. Application of the findings to MARC format development and system functionality is discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  13. Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003) 0.01
    0.01404782 = product of:
      0.02809564 = sum of:
        0.02809564 = product of:
          0.04214346 = sum of:
            0.01114614 = weight(_text_:a in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01114614 = score(doc=2422,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.21126054 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
            0.030997321 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030997321 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogs have for centuries been the main tool that enabled users to search for items in a library by author, title, or subject. A catalog can be interpreted as a set of bibliographic records, where each record acts as a surrogate for a publication. Every record describes a specific publication and contains the data that is used to create the indexes of search systems and the information that is presented to the user. Bibliographic records are often captured and exchanged by the use of the MARC format. Although there are numerous rdquodialectsrdquo of the MARC format in use, they are usually crafted on the same basis and are interoperable with each other -to a certain extent. The data model of a MARC-based catalog, however, is rdquo[...] extremely non-normalized with excessive replication of datardquo [1]. For instance, a literary work that exists in numerous editions and translations is likely to yield a large result set because each edition or translation is represented by an individual record, that is unrelated to other records that describe the same work.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
    Type
    a
  14. Croissant, C.R.: MARC21 und die anglo-amerikanische Katalogisierungspraxis (2004) 0.01
    0.013743203 = product of:
      0.027486406 = sum of:
        0.027486406 = product of:
          0.04122961 = sum of:
            0.004032825 = weight(_text_:a in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004032825 = score(doc=1764,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
            0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037196785 = score(doc=1764,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 8.2004 21:22:06
    Type
    a
  15. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.01
    0.013500927 = product of:
      0.027001854 = sum of:
        0.027001854 = product of:
          0.04050278 = sum of:
            0.00950546 = weight(_text_:a in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00950546 = score(doc=154,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
            0.030997321 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030997321 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Encoded Archival Description (EAD) has provided a new way to approach manuscript and archival collection representation. A review of previous representational practices and problems highlights the benefits of using EAD. This new approach should be considered a partner rather than an adversary in the access providing process. Technological capabilities now allow for multiple metadata schemas to be employed in the creation of the finding aid. Crosswalks allow for MARC records to be generated from the detailed encoding of an EAD finding aid. In the process of creating these crosswalks and detailed encoding, EAD has generated more changes in traditional processes and procedures than originally imagined. The North Carolina State University (NCSU) Libraries sought to test the process of crosswalking EAD to MARC, investigating how this process used technology as well as changed physical procedures. By creating a complex and indepth EAD template for finding aids, with accompanying related encoding analogs embedded within the element structure, MARC records were generated that required minor editing and revision for inclusion in the NCSU Libraries OPAC. The creation of this bridge between EAD and MARC has stimulated theoretical discussions about the role of collaboration, technology, and expertise in the ongoing struggle to maximize access to our collections. While this study is a only a first attempt at harnessing this potential, a presentation of the tensions, struggles, and successes provides illumination to some of the larger issues facing special collections today.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  16. Meßmer, G.; Müller, M.: Standards in der Formalerschließung gedruckter und elektronischer Ressourcen (2015) 0.01
    0.012675646 = product of:
      0.025351292 = sum of:
        0.025351292 = product of:
          0.038026936 = sum of:
            0.031305563 = weight(_text_:m in 1143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031305563 = score(doc=1143,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 1143, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1143)
            0.0067213746 = weight(_text_:a in 1143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067213746 = score(doc=1143,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1143, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1143)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  17. Behrens-Neumann, R.: Aus der 56. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 23. April 2009 in Wien : ein Bericht (2009) 0.01
    0.01145267 = product of:
      0.02290534 = sum of:
        0.02290534 = product of:
          0.03435801 = sum of:
            0.0033606873 = weight(_text_:a in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0033606873 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
            0.030997321 = weight(_text_:22 in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030997321 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 13:11:01
    Type
    a
  18. Chapman, L.: How to catalogue : a practical manual using AACR2 and Library of Congress (1990) 0.01
    0.010882939 = product of:
      0.021765878 = sum of:
        0.021765878 = product of:
          0.032648817 = sum of:
            0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02504445 = score(doc=6081,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
            0.007604368 = weight(_text_:a in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604368 = score(doc=6081,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A practical manual describing standard procedures in cataloguing using AACR2 1988 revision and LoC cataloguing data
    Type
    m
  19. Witt, M.; Leresche, F.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : cataloguing practice in France (1995) 0.01
    0.010882939 = product of:
      0.021765878 = sum of:
        0.021765878 = product of:
          0.032648817 = sum of:
            0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02504445 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
            0.007604368 = weight(_text_:a in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604368 = score(doc=3081,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the French reaction. Covers the entities considered for cataloguing; elements for identifying a document; access points; and authority records. Considers whether it is possible to reduce redundancies among the elements contained in bibliographic records caused by overlapping between the ISBD description, the access points and the coded information; and whether OPACs can be developed to present clearly to users various entities from the most general level to the most specific level
    Type
    a
  20. Willer, M.: Formats and cataloguing rules : developments for cataloguing electronic resources (1999) 0.01
    0.010882939 = product of:
      0.021765878 = sum of:
        0.021765878 = product of:
          0.032648817 = sum of:
            0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02504445 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
            0.007604368 = weight(_text_:a in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604368 = score(doc=2932,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Following a brief history of cataloguing and the MARC record format, describes current challenges in developing suitable international formats and cataloguing rules for dealing with electronic resources. Extensive references to the past and current literature provide an overview of the problems faced. Notes the role of the ISBD, Z39.50 protocol and the integration of Internet objects into the online catalogue
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

  • e 54
  • d 50
  • f 2
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 101
  • m 11
  • s 6
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…