-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.02
0.017042633 = product of:
0.06817053 = sum of:
0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037798867 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.03037167 = product of:
0.06074334 = sum of:
0.06074334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06074334 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.02
0.016302295 = product of:
0.06520918 = sum of:
0.04910217 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04910217 = score(doc=4748,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.3771894 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.01610701 = product of:
0.03221402 = sum of:
0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03221402 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004)
0.01
0.01404969 = product of:
0.05619876 = sum of:
0.040091753 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040091753 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30797386 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.01610701 = product of:
0.03221402 = sum of:
0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03221402 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
-
Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003)
0.01
0.011708075 = product of:
0.0468323 = sum of:
0.033409793 = weight(_text_:libraries in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033409793 = score(doc=154,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.25664487 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.013422508 = product of:
0.026845016 = sum of:
0.026845016 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026845016 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Encoded Archival Description (EAD) has provided a new way to approach manuscript and archival collection representation. A review of previous representational practices and problems highlights the benefits of using EAD. This new approach should be considered a partner rather than an adversary in the access providing process. Technological capabilities now allow for multiple metadata schemas to be employed in the creation of the finding aid. Crosswalks allow for MARC records to be generated from the detailed encoding of an EAD finding aid. In the process of creating these crosswalks and detailed encoding, EAD has generated more changes in traditional processes and procedures than originally imagined. The North Carolina State University (NCSU) Libraries sought to test the process of crosswalking EAD to MARC, investigating how this process used technology as well as changed physical procedures. By creating a complex and indepth EAD template for finding aids, with accompanying related encoding analogs embedded within the element structure, MARC records were generated that required minor editing and revision for inclusion in the NCSU Libraries OPAC. The creation of this bridge between EAD and MARC has stimulated theoretical discussions about the role of collaboration, technology, and expertise in the ongoing struggle to maximize access to our collections. While this study is a only a first attempt at harnessing this potential, a presentation of the tensions, struggles, and successes provides illumination to some of the larger issues facing special collections today.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Nichols introduces MARCit (1998)
0.01
0.0070872875 = product of:
0.0566983 = sum of:
0.0566983 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0566983 = score(doc=1438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Advanced technology libraries. 27(1998) no.2, S.10-11
-
Wu, C.-J.: Mapping the Dublin Core to the Chinese MARC (1998)
0.01
0.005906073 = product of:
0.047248583 = sum of:
0.047248583 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047248583 = score(doc=6269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 6269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6269)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Discusses how to map the Dublin Core to the Chinese MARC that is used by most of the libraries in Taiwan
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.01
0.0056946883 = product of:
0.045557506 = sum of:
0.045557506 = product of:
0.09111501 = sum of:
0.09111501 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09111501 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013)
0.00
0.0043570166 = product of:
0.034856133 = sum of:
0.034856133 = weight(_text_:studies in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034856133 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.00
0.0037964587 = product of:
0.03037167 = sum of:
0.03037167 = product of:
0.06074334 = sum of:
0.06074334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06074334 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Zapounidou, S.; Sfakakis, M.; Papatheodorou, C.: Library data integration : towards BIBFRAME mapping to EDM (2014)
0.00
0.0035436437 = product of:
0.02834915 = sum of:
0.02834915 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02834915 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Integration of library data into the Linked Data environment is a key issue in libraries and is approached on the basis of interoperability between library data conceptual models. Achieving interoperability for different representations of the same or related entities between the library and cultural heritage domains shall enhance rich bibliographic data reusability and support the development of new data-driven information services. This paper aims to contribute to the desired interoperability by attempting to map core semantic paths between the BIBFRAME and EDM conceptual models. BIBFRAME is developed by the Library of Congress to support transformation of legacy library data in MARC format into linked data. EDM is the model developed for and used in the Europeana Cultural Heritage aggregation portal.
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.00
0.0026845017 = product of:
0.021476014 = sum of:
0.021476014 = product of:
0.042952027 = sum of:
0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042952027 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004)
0.00
0.0026845017 = product of:
0.021476014 = sum of:
0.021476014 = product of:
0.042952027 = sum of:
0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042952027 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.00
0.0026845017 = product of:
0.021476014 = sum of:
0.021476014 = product of:
0.042952027 = sum of:
0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042952027 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.00
0.0026845017 = product of:
0.021476014 = sum of:
0.021476014 = product of:
0.042952027 = sum of:
0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042952027 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.00
0.002348939 = product of:
0.018791512 = sum of:
0.018791512 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037583023 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.00
0.002348939 = product of:
0.018791512 = sum of:
0.018791512 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037583023 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
-
Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004)
0.00
0.002348939 = product of:
0.018791512 = sum of:
0.018791512 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037583023 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
-
Keith, C.: Using XSLT to manipulate MARC metadata (2004)
0.00
0.0020133762 = product of:
0.01610701 = sum of:
0.01610701 = product of:
0.03221402 = sum of:
0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03221402 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.122-130
