-
Simmons, P.: Microcomputer software for ISO 2709 record conversion (1989)
0.05
0.053524166 = product of:
0.08028625 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
0.052049287 = product of:
0.10409857 = sum of:
0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10409857 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Microcomputers for information management. 6(1989), S.197-205
-
Snow, M.: Visual depictions and the use of MARC : a view from the trenches of slide librarianship (1989)
0.03
0.03156708 = product of:
0.094701245 = sum of:
0.094701245 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. The only way to get bibliographic records on to campus on-line library catalogues, and slide records on the national bibliographic utilities, is through the use of MARC. Discusses the importance of having individual slide and photograph records on the national bibliographic utilities, and considers the obstacles which currently make this difficult. Discusses mapping to MARC from data base management systems.
- Date
- 4.12.1995 22:51:36
-
Avram, H.D.: Machine-readable cataloging (MARC) (1988)
0.01
0.00941232 = product of:
0.02823696 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 1277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=1277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1277)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.43, [=Suppl.8]
-
Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989)
0.01
0.009363452 = product of:
0.028090354 = sum of:
0.028090354 = product of:
0.056180708 = sum of:
0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056180708 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 4.12.1995 22:40:20
-
Simmons, P.: Converting UNIMARC records to CCF (1989)
0.00
0.0035296201 = product of:
0.01058886 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 2515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=2515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2515)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- One of the primary goals of Unesco's Common Communication Format (CCF) has been to maintain compatibility between two major information communities: libraries; and abstracting and indexing organisations. While abstracting and indexing organisations do not follow any single standard for description or the structure and encoding of machine records, libraries have clearly defined standards and practices. Among CCF-using organisations are some that wish to incorporate records produced by national bibliographic agencies, especially national libraries, into their own data bases. They need the ability to convert UNIMARC records to CCF. To accomplish this they require a source of records, a computer to process them, a computer programm designed for record conversion and a table or instructions laying out the specific way in which each UNIMARC data element is to be processed in the course of conversion to CCF. Examines the factors to be considered in planning a table that would be sufficiently detailed to accomplish record conversion, and outlines problems that might be encountered.
