Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Information transfer and exchange formats (1991) 0.01 
    0.0059490725 = product of:
  0.02379629 = sum of:
    0.02379629 = weight(_text_:information in 7891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02379629 = score(doc=7891,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 7891, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7891)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Describes international standard exchange formats for bibliographic information transfer. Outlines their common and differing features. Describes: UNIMARC, UNISIST Reference manual and UNECSO Common Communication Format
    Source
    Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  2. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.01 
    0.005828877 = product of:
  0.023315508 = sum of:
    0.023315508 = weight(_text_:information in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023315508 = score(doc=4414,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 32(1995) no.3, S.i-iv
  3. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.01 
    0.0055089183 = product of:
  0.022035673 = sum of:
    0.022035673 = weight(_text_:information in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022035673 = score(doc=6523,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
  4. Chowdhury, G.G.: Record formats for integrated databases : a review and comparison (1996) 0.01 
    0.0055089183 = product of:
  0.022035673 = sum of:
    0.022035673 = weight(_text_:information in 7679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022035673 = score(doc=7679,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 7679, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7679)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the issues involved in the development of data formats for computerized information retrieval systems. Integrated databases capable of holding both bibliographic and factual information, in a single database structure, are more convenient for searching and retrieval by end users. Several bibliographic formats have been developed and are used for these bibliographic control puposes. Reviews features of 6 major bibliographic formats: USMARC, UKMARC, UNIMARC, CCF, MIBIS and ABNCD are reviewed. Only 2 formats: CCF and ABNCD are capable of holding both bibliographic and factual information and supporting the design of integrated databases. The comparison suggests that, while CCF makes more detailed provision for bibliographic information, ABNCD makes better provision for factual information such as profiles of institutions, information systems, projects and human experts
    Source
    Information development. 12(1996) no.4, S.218-223
  5. Süle, G.: ¬Die Vereinheitlichung von Datenformaten im internationalen Bereich (1991) 0.00 
    0.004164351 = product of:
  0.016657405 = sum of:
    0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 4418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016657405 = score(doc=4418,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4418, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4418)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Wissenschaftliche Information im europäischen Rahmen: 23. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB / Sektion 5 im DBV, 13.-16.3.1991 in München
  6. Cantrall, D.: From MARC to Mosaic : progressing toward data interchangeability at the Oregon State Archives (1994) 0.00 
    0.003606434 = product of:
  0.014425736 = sum of:
    0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 8470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014425736 = score(doc=8470,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 8470, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8470)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Explains the technology used by the Oregon State Archives to relaize the goal of data interchangeability given the prescribed nature of the MARC format. Describes an emergent model of learning and information delivery focusing on the example of World Wide Web, accessed most often by the software client Mosaic, which is the fastest growing segment of the Internet information highway. Also describes The Data Magician, a flexible program which allows for many combinations of input and output formats, and will read unconventional formats such as MARC communications format. Oregon State Archives, using Mosaic and The Data Magician, are consequently able to present valuable electronic information to a variety of users
  7. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.00 
    0.003606434 = product of:
  0.014425736 = sum of:
    0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014425736 = score(doc=7683,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
  8. Lupovici, C.: ¬L'¬information secondaire du document primaire : format MARC ou SGML? (1997) 0.00 
    0.003606434 = product of:
  0.014425736 = sum of:
    0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014425736 = score(doc=892,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Secondary information, e.g. MARC based bibliographic records, comprises structured data for identifying, tagging, retrieving and management of primary documents. SGML, the standard format for coding content and structure of primary documents, was introduced in 1986 as a publishing tool but is now being applied to bibliographic records. SGML now comprises standard definitions (DTD) for books, serials, articles and mathematical formulae. A simplified version (HTML) is used for Web pages. Pilot projects to develop SGML as a standard for bibliographic exchange include the Dublin Core, listing 13 descriptive elements for Internet documents; the French GRISELI programme using SGML for exchanging grey literature and US experiments on reformatting USMARC for use with SGML-based records
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Secondary information on primary documents: MARC or SGML format?
  9. Hopkinson, A.: International data exchange : a question of formats (1992) 0.00 
    0.0033653039 = product of:
  0.013461215 = sum of:
    0.013461215 = weight(_text_:information in 6951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013461215 = score(doc=6951,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 6951, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6951)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Paper presented at the International Symposium on Information Technology; Standards for biliographic control, Bangkok, Thailand, 4-8 Sept 89. Reviews the 3 formats for the international exchange of bibliographic data: UNIMARC, UNISIST Reference Manual, and UNESCO's Common Communication Format (CCF) and describes the origins, technical features and typical users for all 3 formats. Selection of the most appropriate format depends upon whether users participate in a library network, are employed by technical institutes, or need to exchange information with both types of organization
  10. Hein, M.: Aesthetics and quality in format conversion (1996) 0.00 
    0.0033653039 = product of:
  0.013461215 = sum of:
    0.013461215 = weight(_text_:information in 4893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013461215 = score(doc=4893,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4893, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4893)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The constant change of technology produces a shorter life cycle for electronic formats than for conventional formats. In libraries and archives, information may have a longer life cycle than elsewhere. The technical problems of electronic format conversion may become overwhelming. Discusses aesthetics and quality assurance issues
    Source
    Electronic documents and information: from preservation to access; Festschrift in honor of Patricia Battin. 18th International Symposium, 23.-26.10.1995. Ed.: A.H. Helal et al
  11. Kartus, E.: Beyond MARC : is it really possible? (1995) 0.00 
    0.0033653039 = product of:
  0.013461215 = sum of:
    0.013461215 = weight(_text_:information in 5753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013461215 = score(doc=5753,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5753, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5753)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In their attempts to make materials more accessible, librarians are making catalogue entries unnecessarily complicated. Discusses the current scenario where catalogues appear to contain much information that is irrelevant to users. Provides an example of a future scenario where one composite catalogue record replaces a number of unitary records. Asks why the information that publishers have in machine readable form cannot be used with current technology to help simplify the entry
  12. Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997) 0.00 
    0.0033653039 = product of:
  0.013461215 = sum of:
    0.013461215 = weight(_text_:information in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013461215 = score(doc=1757,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Computers play an important role in the development of bibliographic databases. Exchange formats are needed for the generation and exchange of bibliographic data at different levels: international, national, regional and local. Discusses the formats available at national and international level such as the International Standard Exchange Format (ISO 2709); the various MARC formats and the Common Communication Format (CCF). Work on Indian standards involving the Bureau of Indian Standards, the National Information System for Science and Technology (NISSAT) and other institutions proceeds only slowly
    Source
    DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
  13. Willner, E.: Preparing data for the Web with SGML/XML (1998) 0.00 
    0.0033653039 = product of:
  0.013461215 = sum of:
    0.013461215 = weight(_text_:information in 2894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013461215 = score(doc=2894,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2894, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2894)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    To solve the problem of information loss caused by format changes requires 1 more conversion to be made, i.e. to SGML or XML. Describes the 2 formats and discusses the conversion issues involved. The sooner conversion to SGML or XML is commenced the better for the organization and if necessary, outside facilities can be called upon to provide the expertise
    Source
    Information today. 15(1998) no.5, S.54
  14. Studwell, W.E.; Rast, E.K.: Format integration and spatial data : a preliminary view (1993) 0.00 
    0.0029745363 = product of:
  0.011898145 = sum of:
    0.011898145 = weight(_text_:information in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011898145 = score(doc=6698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Western Association of Map Libraries information bulletin. 24(1993) no.3, S.186-188
  15. Hollis, R.; Brunelle, B.S.: Developing a common user interface for information searching (1995) 0.00 
    0.0029745363 = product of:
  0.011898145 = sum of:
    0.011898145 = weight(_text_:information in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011898145 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  16. McKercher, B.; Chang, P.X.: ¬A comparison of USMARC and UNIMARC for system design (1995) 0.00 
    0.0029446408 = product of:
  0.011778563 = sum of:
    0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011778563 = score(doc=2627,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Provides a background to the development of the MINISIS relational database management system. The new MINISIS will offer a forms-based 4GL application development environment for building an integrated library system at the heart of which will be the catalogue database. Describes the research on the the database structure involving a comparison between USMARC and UNIMARC. Covers the worldwide use of the 2 systems. Discusses differences in field/subfield content designation; differences in field attributes; access points; linking entries, related fields; control information numbers and codes; USMARC format integration and linkage to other languages and holdings information; linkage with other MARC files; and considerations regarding systems design
  17. Durand, J.J.: Making your MARC (1997) 0.00 
    0.0029446408 = product of:
  0.011778563 = sum of:
    0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011778563 = score(doc=871,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 871, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=871)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Addresses some of the questions raised by school library media specialists but intended to help all those whose last cataloguing course was taken in library school before the technological revolution to make the most of the MARC record format. Covers necessary cataloguing tools and basic information needed to create an accurate MARC record, as well as successful additional information and some expectations of its future iuses. Emphasizes the importance of accurate MARC records if the online catalogue is to meet user needs, and be able to be merged with other catalogues. Also notes the MARC record's usefulness in streamlining activities such as circulation, use statistics, overdue notices, holding reports, bibliographies and inventories
  18. Bourdon, F.: Qu'est-ce qu'un format d'autorité? (1997) 0.00 
    0.0029446408 = product of:
  0.011778563 = sum of:
    0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011778563 = score(doc=902,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Authority records complement bibliographic records, providing cataloguers with essential subject heading and related information. At present there is no international format standard comparable to ISBD for bibliographic records, though IFLA and the International Archives Council have set up working groups. The essential data form comprises of subject heading, structure, homonyms, with supplementary supporting information. In France MARC formats are most widely used, e.g. UNIMARC(A) for authority records and (B) for bibliographic. The National Library (BNF) is introducing new cataloguing software based on the reorganisation of its authotity files, using integrated INTERMARC. As an experiments, readers will for the first time have access to authority files, thus enriching, completing and clarifying the bibliographic records
  19. Brownrigg, E.; Butler, B.: ¬An electronic library communications format : a definition and development proposal for MARC III (1990) 0.00 
    0.0029446408 = product of:
  0.011778563 = sum of:
    0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 2326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011778563 = score(doc=2326,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2326, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2326)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Memex Research Institute has proposed a research project to describe in machine-readable form all the information needed to create electronic "books" in a standard communications format. Two kinds of extended computer file formats employing the MARC structure will be defined: Access Formats that take into consideration the many existing index and abstract system formats and their associated databases; and Document Formats that provide for storage, representation, transmission, and display of machine-readabie works in text or image form. The formats that emerge can be employed by libraries, publishers, information utilities, and computer users worldwide to convert printed works to electronic forms or to create original works in electric format, and thus foment the creation of networked electronic library collections.
  20. Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994) 0.00 
    0.0025760243 = product of:
  0.010304097 = sum of:
    0.010304097 = weight(_text_:information in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010304097 = score(doc=3033,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In this paper I describe a conceptual design of a bibliographic retrieval system that enables more thourough control of bibliographic entities. A bibliographic entity has 2 components: the intellectual work and the physical item. Users searching bibliographic retrieval systems generally do not search for a specific item, but are willing to retrieve one of several alternative manifestations of a work. However, contemporary bibliographic retrieval systems are based solely on the descriptions of items. Works are described only implcitly by collocating descriptions of items. This method has resulted in a tool that does not include important descriptive attributes of the work, e.g. information regarding its history, its genre, or its bibliographic relationships. A bibliographic relationship is an association between 2 bibliographic entities. A system evaluation methodology wasused to create a conceptual schema for a bibliographic retrieval system. The model is based upon an analysis of data elements in the USMARC Formats for Bibliographic Data. The conceptual schema describes a database comprising 2 separate files of bibliographic descriptions, one of works and the other of items. Each file consists of individual descriptive surrogates of their respective entities. the specific data content of each file is defined by a data dictionary. Data elements used in the description of bibliographic works reflect the nature of works as intellectual and linguistic objects. The descriptive elements of bibliographic items describe the physical properties of bibliographic entities. Bibliographic relationships constitute the logical strucutre of the database
    Imprint
    Oxford : Learned Information
    Source
    Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al

Authors

Languages

Themes