Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Lupovici, C.: ¬L'¬information secondaire du document primaire : format MARC ou SGML? (1997) 0.01
    0.006538931 = product of:
      0.032694653 = sum of:
        0.023567477 = weight(_text_:web in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023567477 = score(doc=892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
        0.009127174 = product of:
          0.027381519 = sum of:
            0.027381519 = weight(_text_:29 in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027381519 = score(doc=892,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Secondary information, e.g. MARC based bibliographic records, comprises structured data for identifying, tagging, retrieving and management of primary documents. SGML, the standard format for coding content and structure of primary documents, was introduced in 1986 as a publishing tool but is now being applied to bibliographic records. SGML now comprises standard definitions (DTD) for books, serials, articles and mathematical formulae. A simplified version (HTML) is used for Web pages. Pilot projects to develop SGML as a standard for bibliographic exchange include the Dublin Core, listing 13 descriptive elements for Internet documents; the French GRISELI programme using SGML for exchanging grey literature and US experiments on reformatting USMARC for use with SGML-based records
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  2. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01
    0.0051920693 = product of:
      0.051920693 = sum of:
        0.051920693 = product of:
          0.07788104 = sum of:
            0.039116457 = weight(_text_:29 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039116457 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
            0.038764577 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038764577 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  3. Holt, B.: Presentation of UNIMARC on the Web : new fields, including the one for electronic resources (1999) 0.00
    0.004040139 = product of:
      0.040401388 = sum of:
        0.040401388 = weight(_text_:web in 6020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040401388 = score(doc=6020,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 6020, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6020)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
  4. Michard, A.; Pham Dac, D.: Description of collections and encyclopedias on the Web using XML (1998) 0.00
    0.0038090795 = product of:
      0.038090795 = sum of:
        0.038090795 = weight(_text_:web in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038090795 = score(doc=3493,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloguing artworks relies on the availability of classification schemes, often represented by hierarchical thesauri. Comments on the limitations of current practices and tools and proposes a new approach for the cooperative production of multilingual and multicultural classification schemes exploiting some features of the oncoming Extensible Markup Language based Web
  5. Horah, J.L.: from cards to the Web : ¬The evolution of a library database (1998) 0.00
    0.0028568096 = product of:
      0.028568096 = sum of:
        0.028568096 = weight(_text_:web in 4842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028568096 = score(doc=4842,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 4842, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4842)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    The Jack Brause Library at New York University (NYU) is a special library supporting the curriculum of NYU's Real Estate Institute. The Jack Brause Library (JBL) Real estate Periodical Index was established in 1990 and draws on the library's collection of over 140 real estate periodicals. Describes the conversion of the JBL Index from a 3x5 card index to an online resource. The database was originally created using Rbase for DOS but this quickly became obsolete and in 1993 was replaced with InMagic. In 1997 the JBL Index was made available on NYU's telnet catalogue, BobCat, and the Internet database catalogue, BobCatPlus. The transition of InMagic data to USMARC formatted records involved a 3-step process: data normalization; adding value; and data recording. The Index has been operational through telnet since May 1997 and installing it onto the Web became functional in Oct 1997
  6. Willner, E.: Preparing data for the Web with SGML/XML (1998) 0.00
    0.0026934259 = product of:
      0.026934259 = sum of:
        0.026934259 = weight(_text_:web in 2894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026934259 = score(doc=2894,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2894, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2894)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
  7. Cantrall, D.: From MARC to Mosaic : progressing toward data interchangeability at the Oregon State Archives (1994) 0.00
    0.0023567479 = product of:
      0.023567477 = sum of:
        0.023567477 = weight(_text_:web in 8470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023567477 = score(doc=8470,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 8470, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8470)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Explains the technology used by the Oregon State Archives to relaize the goal of data interchangeability given the prescribed nature of the MARC format. Describes an emergent model of learning and information delivery focusing on the example of World Wide Web, accessed most often by the software client Mosaic, which is the fastest growing segment of the Internet information highway. Also describes The Data Magician, a flexible program which allows for many combinations of input and output formats, and will read unconventional formats such as MARC communications format. Oregon State Archives, using Mosaic and The Data Magician, are consequently able to present valuable electronic information to a variety of users
  8. Oeltjen, W.: Dokumentenstrukturen manipulieren und visualisieren : über das Arbeiten mit der logischen Struktur (1998) 0.00
    0.0023567479 = product of:
      0.023567477 = sum of:
        0.023567477 = weight(_text_:web in 6616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023567477 = score(doc=6616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 6616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6616)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Thema dieses Beitrages sind Dokumentenstrukturen und zwar aus zwei Blickrichtungen: aus der Sicht der Autoren, die ein Dokument mit Computerunterstützung erstellen und die Dokumentenstruktur manipulieren und aus der Sicht der Lesenden, die ein Dokument lesen und die Struktur des Dokumentes wahrnehmen. Bei der Dokumentenstruktur wird unterschieden zwischen der logischen Struktur und der grafischen Struktur eines Dokumentes. Diese Trennung ermöglicht das Manipulieren und Visualisieren der logischen Struktur. Welche Bedeutung das für die Autoren und für die Benutzenden des Dokumentes hat, soll in dem Beitrag u.a. am Beispiel der Auszeichnungssprache HTML, der Dokumentenbeschreibungssprache des World-Wide Web, erörtert werden
  9. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.00
    0.002192856 = product of:
      0.02192856 = sum of:
        0.02192856 = product of:
          0.065785676 = sum of:
            0.065785676 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065785676 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  10. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: ¬2. MAB-Expertengespräch (1995) 0.00
    0.002086211 = product of:
      0.02086211 = sum of:
        0.02086211 = product of:
          0.06258633 = sum of:
            0.06258633 = weight(_text_:29 in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06258633 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.2, S. 322-327
  11. Beaudiquez, M.: ¬L'¬avenir des formats de communication (1996) 0.00
    0.0020200694 = product of:
      0.020200694 = sum of:
        0.020200694 = weight(_text_:web in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020200694 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Over the last decade, the gap between North and South in relation to formats has increasingly limited development of international programmes such as UBC and UAP. At present the need to review formats in the light of network developments such as the Internet is urgent. Presentations covered the Web, limitations of traditional formats eg. MARC, Internet formats eg. Z39.50 and SGML, and multimedia formats, with examples of prototypes for converting traditional systems to international standards. The Internet has defined a new field of action for librarians. It is essential that developing countries share the experience of industrialised countries, with support from governments and collaboration from international organisations, in ensuring harmonious progress to universal compatibility
  12. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: Neue MAB-Formatversion MAB2 endgültig verabschiedet (1995) 0.00
    0.0018254347 = product of:
      0.018254347 = sum of:
        0.018254347 = product of:
          0.054763038 = sum of:
            0.054763038 = weight(_text_:29 in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054763038 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.9, S.1428-1446
  13. Schwarz, I.; Umstätter, W.: Zum Prinzip der Objektdarstellung in SGML (1998) 0.00
    0.0016833913 = product of:
      0.016833913 = sum of:
        0.016833913 = weight(_text_:web in 6617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016833913 = score(doc=6617,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 6617, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6617)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Semantische Thesauri sind dazu geeignet, Wissen zu strukturieren. Der vorliegende Beitrag soll unter anderem deutlich machen, daß die SGML (Standard Generalized Markup Language) ein mögliches Instrument zum Aufbau semantischer Thesauri ist. Die SGML ist eine Metasprache, die geeignet ist, Texte in natürlicher Sprache mit Strukturen zu versehen, die das Erkennen des Informationsgehaltes eines Dokuments erleichtern. Zugleich wird damit unter anderem die Voraussetzung dafür geschaffen, Volltextindexierungen in einer Weise vorzunehmen, wie dies bislang nicht möglich war. Die rasant zunehmende Bedeutung der SGML, liegt zweifellos an der bekanntesten Document Type Definition (DTD) im Rahmen der SGML, der Hypertext Markup Language (HTML), wie wir sie im WWW (World Wide Web) des Internet in Anwendung finden. Darüber hinaus erfüllt SGML je nach DTD die Bedingungen, die Objektorientiertheit unserer natürlichen Sprache mit ihren definierbaren Begriffen sinnvoll zu unterstützen und beispielsweise mit Hilfe der objektorientierten Programmiersprache JAVA zu verarbeiten. Besonders hervorzuheben ist die sich damit verändernde Publikationsform bei wissensbasierten Texten, in denen SGML-Dokumente nicht mehr nur für sich zu betrachten sind, wie Zeitschriftenaufsätze oder Bücher, sondern die darüber hinaus in Form von Wissenselementen in einer Daten- und Wissensbank organisiert und recherchiert werden können
  14. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.00
    0.0014619039 = product of:
      0.014619039 = sum of:
        0.014619039 = product of:
          0.043857116 = sum of:
            0.043857116 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043857116 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  15. Bourne, R.: Common MARC, or vivent les differences? (1996) 0.00
    0.001303882 = product of:
      0.01303882 = sum of:
        0.01303882 = product of:
          0.039116457 = sum of:
            0.039116457 = weight(_text_:29 in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039116457 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Library review. 45(1996) no.2, S.25-29
  16. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.00
    0.0012791659 = product of:
      0.012791659 = sum of:
        0.012791659 = product of:
          0.038374975 = sum of:
            0.038374975 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038374975 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  17. Gaschignard, J.-P.: UNIMARC et UNIMARC : attention aux contrefacons (1997) 0.00
    0.0010431055 = product of:
      0.010431055 = sum of:
        0.010431055 = product of:
          0.031293165 = sum of:
            0.031293165 = weight(_text_:29 in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031293165 = score(doc=921,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  18. Katic, T.: Retrospective cataloguing of Croatian older books in UNIMARC (1997) 0.00
    0.0010431055 = product of:
      0.010431055 = sum of:
        0.010431055 = product of:
          0.031293165 = sum of:
            0.031293165 = weight(_text_:29 in 1644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031293165 = score(doc=1644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1644)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    29. 7.1998 13:42:01
  19. Lahary, D.: Recommandations pour l'exchange de donnees d'exemplaires en format UNIMARC : un document de reference (1998) 0.00
    0.0010431055 = product of:
      0.010431055 = sum of:
        0.010431055 = product of:
          0.031293165 = sum of:
            0.031293165 = weight(_text_:29 in 4620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031293165 = score(doc=4620,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4620, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4620)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  20. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.00
    0.0010337222 = product of:
      0.010337221 = sum of:
        0.010337221 = product of:
          0.031011663 = sum of:
            0.031011663 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031011663 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included