Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Chen, Y.-N.: ¬An FRBR-based approach for transforming MARC records into linked data (2018) 0.03 
    0.032164264 = product of:
  0.12061599 = sum of:
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 4799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=4799,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4799, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4799)
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 4799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=4799,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4799, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4799)
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 4799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=4799,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4799, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4799)
    0.009260627 = weight(_text_:in in 4799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009260627 = score(doc=4799,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 4799, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4799)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Date
    18. 1.2019 18:23:40
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.16
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  2. Bernstein, S.: MARC reborn : migrating MARC fixed field metadata into the variable fields (2016) 0.03 
    0.0317111 = product of:
  0.11891663 = sum of:
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
    0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00756127 = score(doc=2631,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Despite calls over the past decade and a half for MARC to be replaced with an encoding standard that is more in keeping with current metadata practices, the current standard has evolved in such a way as to render many of the arguments by those who call for its demise moot. A further revision to the standard is proposed to address the one remaining problem with MARC so as to allow it to better serve the needs of information seekers for years to come.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 54(2016) no.1, S.23-38
  3. Miller, E.; Ogbuji, U.: Linked data design for the visible library (2015) 0.02 
    0.023783326 = product of:
  0.089187466 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 2773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=2773,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2773, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2773)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 2773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=2773,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2773, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2773)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 2773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=2773,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2773, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2773)
    0.005670953 = weight(_text_:in in 2773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005670953 = score(doc=2773,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2773, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2773)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    In response to libraries' frustration over their rich resources being invisible on the web, Zepheira, at the request of the Library of Congress, created BIBFRAME, a bibliographic metadata framework for cataloging. The model replaces MARC records with linked data, promoting resource visibility through a rich network of links. In place of formal taxonomies, a small but extensible vocabulary streamlines metadata efforts. Rather than using a unique bibliographic record to describe one item, BIBFRAME draws on the Dublin Core and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) to generate formalized descriptions of Work, Instance, Authority and Annotation as well as associations between items. Zepheira trains librarians to transform MARC records to BIBFRAME resources and adapt the vocabulary for specialized needs, while subject matter experts and technical experts manage content, site design and usability. With a different approach toward data modeling and metadata, previously invisible resources gain visibility through linking.
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.23-29
  4. Mensing, P.: Planung und Durchführung von Digitalisierungsprojekten am Beispiel nicht-textueller Materialien (2010) 0.02 
    0.023026917 = product of:
  0.08635093 = sum of:
    0.023236183 = weight(_text_:und in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023236183 = score(doc=3577,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3206851 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.026801376 = weight(_text_:zur in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026801376 = score(doc=3577,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.26624742 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008103048 = score(doc=3577,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.028210325 = weight(_text_:der in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028210325 = score(doc=3577,freq=40.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.38630107 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
            40.0 = termFreq=40.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Im Jahr 2007 hat die GWLB gemeinsam mit der HAAB, der Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg und mehreren Stiftungen die Königliche Gartenbibliothek Herrenhausen erworben. Neben den textuellen Materialien enthält die Bibliothek auch viele nicht-textuelle Materialien wie Herbarien, Zeichnungen und auch Gouachen mit Abbildungen von Obstsorten aus der ehemaligen Obstbaumplantage. Diese Gouachen in Mappen liegend bei der GWLB aufbewahrt. Die einzelnen Blätter tragen keine Titel, sondern sind am unteren Rand mit Bleistift durchnummeriert. Ohne die beigefügte ebenfalls durchnummerierte Liste mit Sortennamen ist keine eindeutige Zuordnung und die Nutzung somit nur eingeschränkt möglich. Die Überlegung zu einer digitalen Präsentation liegt daher nahe, denn "der ungehinderte Zugang zu elektronischen wissenschaftlich relevanten Publikationen von jedem Ort aus und zu jeder Zeit spielt in der digitalen Informationsgesellschaft eine immer bedeutendere Rolle." Oder um es drastischer zu formulieren: "Was nicht im Web ist, ist nicht in der Welt". Bevor jedoch mit der Digitalisierung begonnen werden kann, müssen einige Fragen vorab geklärt werden. Im Folgenden werden Kriterien, die bei der Planung und Durchführung von Digitalisierungsprojekten zu beachten sind, behandelt.
    Content
    Darin auch: "2.7 Erschließung der Digitalisate Die formale Erschließung von gedruckten Beständen wird in Deutschland nach RAK-WB bzw. RAK-OB durchgeführt. Im Gegensatz zu Druckwerken, die meist alle wichtigen Informationen selbst enthalten (Impressum), sind in oder an Kunstwerken und Bildern meist keine Angaben wie Autor, Künstler oder Entstehungsjahr zu finden. Für die Formalerfassung von Nichtbuchmaterialien sind in Deutschland die "Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung von Nichtbuchmaterialien" anzuwenden (RAK-NBM), eine Erweiterung der o.g. RAK. Zur Erschließung von Kunstwerken wurde seit den 70er Jahren des 20. Jhds. die Marburger-Index-Datenbank (MIDAS) entwickelt, die auf dem AKL, ICONCLASS und auch RAK aufbaut. MIDAS findet hauptsächlich in Museen Anwendung, konnte sich aber aufgrund der nicht verbindlichen Nutzung nicht durchsetzen. Ebenfalls aus dem Museumsbereich stammt CIDOC CRM, das seit 2006 ISO-zertifiziert ist (ISO 21127:2006) und der Datenfeldkatalog zur Grundinventarisation. Um die inhaltliche Erschließung von Bibliotheksbeständen einheitlich gestalten zu können, wurde die Schlagwortnormdatei entwickelt. Diese Datei ist universell ausgerichtet und ist daher für Spezialgebiete nicht tief genug ausgearbeitet. Im kunsthistorischen Bereich sind daher außerdem u.a. der AA und der AGM von Bedeutung. Als Klassifizierungssystem steht ICONCLASS zur Verfügung. Bei der inhaltlichen Erschließung ist darauf zu achten, dass irrelevante Informationen nicht zur unnötigen Vergrößerung des Kataloges führen. Um durchgängig eine größtmögliche Nutzerorientierung bieten zu können, sollten die gewünschten Prioritäten der Erschließung in einer Richtlinie festgehalten werden. Zur Interpretation von Bildern wurde von Panofsky ein 3-Stufen-Modell entwickelt, dass sich in prä- oder vor-ikonografische, ikonografische Beschreibung und ikonologische Interpretation unterteilen lässt. In der ersten Stufe werden nur die dargestellten Dinge oder Personen skizziert, ohne ihre Bedeutung zueinander zu interpretieren. Dies erfolgt erst in der zweiten Stufe. Hier wird das Ahema des Kunstwerkes allerdings ohne weitere Deutung benannt. In der dritten Stufe wird schließlich geklärt, warum dieses Werk so geschaffen wurde und nicht anders.
    2.8 Metadaten und Austauschformate . . .
  5. Suominen, O.; Hyvönen, N.: From MARC silos to Linked Data silos? (2017) 0.02 
    0.021810908 = product of:
  0.0817909 = sum of:
    0.010645939 = weight(_text_:und in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010645939 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
    0.035589006 = weight(_text_:zur in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035589006 = score(doc=3732,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3535446 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
    0.00694547 = weight(_text_:in in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00694547 = score(doc=3732,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
    0.028610492 = weight(_text_:der in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028610492 = score(doc=3732,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3917808 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Seit einiger Zeit stellen Bibliotheken ihre bibliografischen Metadadaten verstärkt offen in Form von Linked Data zur Verfügung. Dabei kommen jedoch ganz unterschiedliche Modelle für die Strukturierung der bibliografischen Daten zur Anwendung. Manche Bibliotheken verwenden ein auf FRBR basierendes Modell mit mehreren Schichten von Entitäten, während andere flache, am Datensatz orientierte Modelle nutzen. Der Wildwuchs bei den Datenmodellen erschwert die Nachnutzung der bibliografischen Daten. Im Ergebnis haben die Bibliotheken die früheren MARC-Silos nur mit zueinander inkompatiblen Linked-Data-Silos vertauscht. Deshalb ist es häufig schwierig, Datensets miteinander zu kombinieren und nachzunutzen. Kleinere Unterschiede in der Datenmodellierung lassen sich zwar durch Schema Mappings in den Griff bekommen, doch erscheint es fraglich, ob die Interoperabilität insgesamt zugenommen hat. Der Beitrag stellt die Ergebnisse einer Studie zu verschiedenen veröffentlichten Sets von bibliografischen Daten vor. Dabei werden auch die unterschiedlichen Modelle betrachtet, um bibliografische Daten als RDF darzustellen, sowie Werkzeuge zur Erzeugung von entsprechenden Daten aus dem MARC-Format. Abschließend wird der von der Finnischen Nationalbibliothek verfolgte Ansatz behandelt.
  6. Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013) 0.02 
    0.020741977 = product of:
  0.07778241 = sum of:
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
    0.008185315 = weight(_text_:in in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008185315 = score(doc=677,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
    Date
    23. 3.2013 12:26:02
    Series
    Advances in information science
  7. Springer: Neues Online-Tool zum Herunterladen (2011) 0.01 
    0.013949421 = product of:
  0.069747105 = sum of:
    0.017564904 = weight(_text_:und in 4716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017564904 = score(doc=4716,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 4716, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4716)
    0.023971878 = weight(_text_:zur in 4716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023971878 = score(doc=4716,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23813893 = fieldWeight in 4716, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4716)
    0.028210325 = weight(_text_:der in 4716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028210325 = score(doc=4716,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.38630107 = fieldWeight in 4716, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4716)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Springer hat ein neues elektronisches Service-Tool entwickelt, mit dem Bibliothekare und Dokumentare eine ganze Reihe sogenannter MARC Records oder eBook-Titellisten herunterladen können. Sie sind auf die unterschiedlichen Anforderungen der Bibliothekare zugeschnitten. Der Wissenschaftsverlag kann damit verbesserte bibliografische Metadaten nutzerfreundlich anbieten.
    Content
    "Mit nur wenigen Klicks können die einzelnen Listen der fachgebietsbezogenen Springer eBook-Sammlungen mit den gewünschten bibliografischen Angaben heruntergeladen werden. Das neue Online-Tool ist unter www.springer.com/marc zu finden. Neben den MARC Records können die Bibliothekare die komplette oder eine individuell zusammengestellte Liste zu den Springer-eBooks auswählen. Jeder Eintrag einer solchen Liste enthält die wesentlichen bibliografischen Angaben sowie die URL zu dem entsprechenden Buch, das sich auf der Plattform von SpringerLink befindet. Springer ist der größte eBookVerlag im wissenschaftlichen STM-Bereich. Die Inhalte von Büchern und Zeitschriften werden den Nutzern über SpringerLink zur Verfügung gestellt."
  8. Birkner, M.: VuFind an der AK Bibliothek Wien (2015) 0.01 
    0.0119241495 = product of:
  0.059620745 = sum of:
    0.027772553 = weight(_text_:und in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027772553 = score(doc=1833,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
    0.0066161114 = weight(_text_:in in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066161114 = score(doc=1833,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
    0.02523208 = weight(_text_:der in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02523208 = score(doc=1833,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel geht es um die bisherigen Tests der AK Bibliothek Wien mit dem Discovery System VuFind. Es handelt sich um eine mögliche Alternative zu Primo, einer weit verbreiteten proprietären Suchlösung an österreichsischen Bibliotheken. Nach einem kurzen technischen Überblick wird beschrieben, welche Entwicklungen und Anpassungen vorgenommen werden mussten, um eine Kompatibilität zwischen VuFind und den in der AK Bibliothek vorherrschenden Bedingungen zu schaffen. Dabei wird näher auf die Verarbeitung des Datenformats MAB2 sowie die Schnittstellen zum Bibliothekssystem Aleph und dem Bibliotheks-Repository eingegangen. Die ersten Ergebnisse werden präsentiert und noch zu lösende Probleme angesprochen. Zudem wird ein Ausblick auf zukünftige Vorhaben gegeben.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 68(2015) H.1, S.79-90
  9. Barckow, A.: Bücherhallen Hamburg stellten auf MARC21 um : ambitioniertes Projekt realisiert / Einführung von GND und RDA bereits in Arbeit (2012) 0.01 
    0.0099597825 = product of:
  0.049798913 = sum of:
    0.02509272 = weight(_text_:und in 148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02509272 = score(doc=148,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 148, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=148)
    0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066832816 = score(doc=148,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 148, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=148)
    0.018022915 = weight(_text_:der in 148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018022915 = score(doc=148,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 148, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=148)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Die Bücherhallen Hamburg haben im Oktober des vergangenen Jahres als eine der ersten Öffentlichen Bibliotheken im deutschsprachigen Raum Katalog und Erwerbungsdatenbank auf MARC 21 umgestellt.
  10. Meßmer, G.; Müller, M.: Standards in der Formalerschließung gedruckter und elektronischer Ressourcen (2015) 0.01 
    0.008489886 = product of:
  0.04244943 = sum of:
    0.017743232 = weight(_text_:und in 1143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017743232 = score(doc=1143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 1143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1143)
    0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 1143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066832816 = score(doc=1143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1143)
    0.018022915 = weight(_text_:der in 1143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018022915 = score(doc=1143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 1143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1143)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
  11. Aslanidi, M.; Papadakis, I.; Stefanidakis, M.: Name and title authorities in the music domain : alignment of UNIMARC authorities format with RDA (2018) 0.00 
    0.0024584248 = product of:
  0.018438185 = sum of:
    0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008103048 = score(doc=5178,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
    0.010335136 = product of:
      0.031005409 = sum of:
        0.031005409 = weight(_text_:22 in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031005409 = score(doc=5178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    This article discusses and highlights alignment issues that arise between UNIMARC Authorities Format and Resource Description and Access (RDA) regarding the creation of name and title authorities for musical works and creators. More specifically, RDA, as an implementation of the FRAD model, is compared with the UNIMARC Authorities Format (Updates 2012 and 2016) in an effort to highlight various cases where the discovery of equivalent fields between the two standards is not obvious. The study is envisioned as a first step in an ongoing process of working with the UNIMARC community throughout RDA's advancement and progression regarding the entities [musical] Work and Names.
    Date
    19. 3.2019 12:17:22
  12. Aalberg, T.; Zumer, M.: ¬The value of MARC data, or, challenges of frbrisation (2013) 0.00 
    6.6832814E-4 = product of:
  0.010024922 = sum of:
    0.010024922 = weight(_text_:in in 1769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010024922 = score(doc=1769,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 1769, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1769)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Bibliographic records should now be used in innovative end-user applications that enable users to learn about, discover and exploit available content, and this information should be interpreted and reused also beyond the library domain. New conceptual models such as FRBR offer the foundation for such developments. The main motivation for this research is to contribute to the adoption of the FRBR model in future bibliographic standards and systems, by analysing limitations in existing bibliographic information and looking for short- and long-term solutions that can improve the data quality in terms of expressing the FRBR model. Design/methodology/approach - MARC records in three collections (BIBSYS catalogue, Slovenian National Bibliography and BTJ catalogue) were first analysed by looking at statistics of field and subfield usage to determine common patterns that express FRBR. Based on this, different rules for interpreting the information were developed. Finally typical problems/errors found in MARC records were analysed. Findings - Different types of FRBR entity-relationship structures that typically can be found in bibliographic records are identified. Problems related to interpreting these from bibliographic records are analyzed. Frbrisation of consistent and complete MARC records is relatively successful, particularly if all entities are systematically described and relationships among them are clearly indicated. Research limitations/implications - Advanced matching was not used for clustering of identical entities. Practical implications - Cataloguing guidelines are proposed to enable better frbrisation of MARC records in the interim period, before new formats are developed and implemented. Originality/value - This is the first in depth analysis of manifestations embodying several expressions and of works and agents as subjects.
  13. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.00 
    5.9057923E-4 = product of:
  0.008858688 = sum of:
    0.008858688 = product of:
      0.026576065 = sum of:
        0.026576065 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026576065 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Beall, J.; Mitchell, J.S.: History of the representation of the DDC in the MARC Classification Format (2010) 0.00 
    5.456877E-4 = product of:
  0.008185315 = sum of:
    0.008185315 = weight(_text_:in in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008185315 = score(doc=3568,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    This article explores the history of the representation of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) in the Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC) formats, with a special emphasis on the development of the MARC classification format. Until 2009, the format used to represent the DDC has been a proprietary one that predated the development of the MARC classification format. The need to replace the current editorial support system, the desire to deliver DDC data in a variety of formats to support different uses, and the increasingly global context of editorial work with translation partners around the world prompted the Dewey editorial team, along with OCLC research and development colleagues, to rethink the underlying representation of the DDC and choose the MARC 21 formats for classification and authority data. The discussion is framed with quotes from the writings of Nancy J. Williamson, whose analysis of the content of the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) schedules played a key role in shaping the original MARC classification format.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem special issue: Is there a catalog in your future? Celebrating Nancy J. Williamson: Scholar, educator, colleague, mentor
  15. Manguinhas, H.; Freire, N.; Machado, J.; Borbinha, J.: Supporting multilingual bibliographic resource discovery with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (2012) 0.00 
    5.456877E-4 = product of:
  0.008185315 = sum of:
    0.008185315 = weight(_text_:in in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008185315 = score(doc=133,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    This paper describes an experiment exploring the hypothesis that innovative application of the Functional Require-ments for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) principles can complement traditional bibliographic resource discovery systems in order to improve the user experience. A specialized service was implemented that, when given a plain list of results from a regular online catalogue, was able to process, enrich and present that list in a more relevant way for the user. This service pre-processes the records of a traditional online catalogue in order to build a semantic structure following the FRBR model. The service also explores web search features that have been revolutionizing the way users conceptualize resource discovery, such as relevance ranking and metasearching. This work was developed in the context of the TELPlus project. We processed nearly one hundred thousand bibliographic and authority records, in multiple languages, and originating from twelve European na-tional libraries. This paper describes the architecture of the service and the main challenges faced, especially concerning the extraction and linking of the relevant FRBR entities from the bibliographic metadata produced by the libraries. The service was evaluated by end users, who filled out a questionnaire after using a traditional online catalogue and the new service, both with the same bibliographic collection. The analysis of the results supports the hypothesis that FRBR can be implemented for re-source discovery in a non-intrusive way, reusing the data of any existing traditional bibliographic system.
  16. Zapounidou, S.; Sfakakis, M.; Papatheodorou, C.: Library data integration : towards BIBFRAME mapping to EDM (2014) 0.00 
    5.346625E-4 = product of:
  0.008019937 = sum of:
    0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008019937 = score(doc=1589,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    Integration of library data into the Linked Data environment is a key issue in libraries and is approached on the basis of interoperability between library data conceptual models. Achieving interoperability for different representations of the same or related entities between the library and cultural heritage domains shall enhance rich bibliographic data reusability and support the development of new data-driven information services. This paper aims to contribute to the desired interoperability by attempting to map core semantic paths between the BIBFRAME and EDM conceptual models. BIBFRAME is developed by the Library of Congress to support transformation of legacy library data in MARC format into linked data. EDM is the model developed for and used in the Europeana Cultural Heritage aggregation portal.
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 478
  17. Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching : a review of Pauline Cochrane's Thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters (2016) 0.00 
    5.040847E-4 = product of:
  0.00756127 = sum of:
    0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 2698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00756127 = score(doc=2698,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2698, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2698)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Content
    Vgl.: Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching: a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters. In: Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science 2000. S.46-58. Vgl.: DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2015.1116359.
  18. Galvão, R.M.: UNIMARC format relevance : maintenance or replacement? (2018) 0.00 
    4.410741E-4 = product of:
  0.0066161114 = sum of:
    0.0066161114 = weight(_text_:in in 5163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066161114 = score(doc=5163,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 5163, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5163)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    This article presents an empirical study focused on a qualitative analysis of the UNIMARC format. An analysis of the structural quality of the data provided by the format is evaluated to determine its current suitability for meeting the requirements and trends in data architecture for the information network and the Semantic Web. Driven by a set of quality characteristics that identify weaknesses in the data schema that cannot be bridged by simply converting data to MARC XML or RDF/XML, we conclude that the UNIMARC format is not compliant with the current metadata schema desiderata and must be replaced.
  19. Xu, A.; Hess, K.; Akerman, L.: From MARC to BIBFRAME 2.0 : Crosswalks (2018) 0.00 
    3.8585952E-4 = product of:
  0.0057878923 = sum of:
    0.0057878923 = weight(_text_:in in 5172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0057878923 = score(doc=5172,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 5172, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5172)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    One of the big challenges facing academic libraries today is to increase the relevance of the libraries to their user communities. If the libraries can increase the visibility of their resources on the open web, it will increase the chances of the libraries to reach to their user communities via the user's first search experience. BIBFRAME and library Linked Data will enable libraries to publish their resources in a way that the Web understands, consume Linked Data to enrich their resources relevant to the libraries' user communities, and visualize networks across collections. However, one of the important steps for transitioning to BIBFRAME and library Linked Data involves crosswalks, mapping MARC fields and subfields across data models and performing necessary data reformatting to be in compliance with the specifications of the new model, which is currently BIBFRAME 2.0. This article looks into how the Library of Congress has mapped library bibliographic data from the MARC format to the BIBFRAME 2.0 model and vocabulary published and updated since April 2016, available from http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/index.html based on the recently released conversion specifications and converter, developed by the Library of Congress with input from many community members. The BIBFRAME 2.0 standard and conversion tools will enable libraries to transform bibliographic data from MARC into BIBFRAME 2.0, which introduces a Linked Data model as the improved method of bibliographic control for the future, and make bibliographic information more useful within and beyond library communities.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Heft: 'Setting standards to work and live by: A memorial Festschrift for Valerie Bross'.
  20. Boehr, D.L.; Bushman, B.: Preparing for the future : National Library of Medicine's® project to add MeSH® RDF URIs to its bibliographic and authority records (2018) 0.00 
    2.6733126E-4 = product of:
  0.0040099686 = sum of:
    0.0040099686 = weight(_text_:in in 5173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0040099686 = score(doc=5173,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 5173, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5173)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Heft: 'Setting standards to work and live by: A memorial Festschrift for Valerie Bross'.

Authors

Languages

  • e 14
  • d 6

Types

Themes