Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Concise UNIMARC Classification Format : Draft 5 (20000125) (2000) 0.03
    0.03091624 = product of:
      0.06183248 = sum of:
        0.06183248 = product of:
          0.12366496 = sum of:
            0.12366496 = weight(_text_:services in 4421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12366496 = score(doc=4421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.6490128 = fieldWeight in 4421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.bl.uk/services/bsds/marc/unimarc.html
  2. Miller, D.R.: XML: Libraries' strategic opportunity (2001) 0.01
    0.009661325 = product of:
      0.01932265 = sum of:
        0.01932265 = product of:
          0.0386453 = sum of:
            0.0386453 = weight(_text_:services in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0386453 = score(doc=1467,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    XML (eXtensible Markup Language) is fast gaining favor as the universal format for data and document exchange -- in effect becoming the lingua franca of the Information Age. Currently, "library information" is at a particular disadvantage on the rapidly evolving World Wide Web. Why? Despite libraries'explorations of web catalogs, scanning projects, digital data repositories, and creation of web pages galore, there remains a digital divide. The core of libraries' data troves are stored in proprietary formats of integrated library systems (ILS) and in the complex and arcane MARC formats -- both restricted chiefly to the province of technical services and systems librarians. Even they are hard-pressed to extract and integrate this wealth of data with resources from outside this rarefied environment. Segregation of library information underlies many difficulties: producing standard bibliographic citations from MARC data, automatically creating new materials lists (including new web resources) on a particular topic, exchanging data with our vendors, and even migrating from one ILS to another. Why do we continue to hobble our potential by embracing these self-imposed limitations? Most ILSs began in libraries, which soon recognized the pitfalls of do-it-yourself solutions. Thus, we wisely anticipated the necessity for standards. However, with the advent of the web, we soon found "our" collections and a flood of new resources appearing in digital format on opposite sides of the divide. If we do not act quickly to integrate library resources with mainstream web resources, we are in grave danger of becoming marginalized
  3. BIBFRAME Model Overview (2013) 0.01
    0.009661325 = product of:
      0.01932265 = sum of:
        0.01932265 = product of:
          0.0386453 = sum of:
            0.0386453 = weight(_text_:services in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0386453 = score(doc=763,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative is an undertaking by the Library of Congress and the community to better accommodate future needs of the library community. A major focus of the initiative will be to determine a transition path for the MARC 21 exchange format to more Web based, Linked Data standards. Zepheira and The Library of Congress are working together to develop a Linked Data model, vocabulary and enabling tools / services for supporting this Initiative. BIBFRAME.ORG is a central hub for this effort.