Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × type_ss:"m"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. SGML und XML : Anwendungen und Perspektiven (1999) 0.02
    0.017527513 = product of:
      0.10516508 = sum of:
        0.036060948 = weight(_text_:buch in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036060948 = score(doc=1392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10028592 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
        0.030661702 = weight(_text_:und in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030661702 = score(doc=1392,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.6413702 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
        0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004365201 = score(doc=1392,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
        0.030661702 = weight(_text_:und in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030661702 = score(doc=1392,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.6413702 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
        0.0034155329 = weight(_text_:s in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034155329 = score(doc=1392,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14564252 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    SGML und XML sind fundamentale Konzepte der heutigen und künftigen Speicherung, Verarbeitung und Verbreitung langlebiger Informationen, gerade im Hinblick auf die weltweite Vernetzung durch das Internet. Ausgehend von den technischen und ökonomischen Herausforderungen unserer Informationsgesellschaft, stellen die Autoren die wichtigen Entwicklungen dar und berichten über aktuelle Projekte mit SGML- und XML-Anwendungen in der Praxis. Das Buch wendet sich an das Management informationsverarbeitender und -produzierender Unternehmen, an die Technik-Verantwortlichen und SGML-/XML-Anwender sowie an Studierende informationsverarbeitender Fächer und der Informatik.
    Content
    Einführungen (Zukunft und Vergangenheit).- Charles Goldfarb: SGML-Philosophie und Zukunft.- Pam Genussa: SGML/XML und IETM.- Manfred Krüger: SGML - Der lange Weg.- Praxis heute.Zeitung/Zeitschrift.- Nachschlagewerke.- Technische Dokumentation.- Praxis - morgen.- Register.- Literatur.- Autorenliste.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: nfd 50(1999) H.6, S.372 (I. Macherius)
    Pages
    380 S
    Type
    s
  2. Wolters, C.: Wie muß man seine Daten formulieren bzw. strukturieren, damit ein Computer etwas Vernünftiges damit anfangen kann? : Mit einem Glossar von Carlos Saro (1991) 0.01
    0.010281582 = product of:
      0.061689492 = sum of:
        0.014807926 = weight(_text_:und in 4013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014807926 = score(doc=4013,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.3097467 = fieldWeight in 4013, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4013)
        0.0043204287 = weight(_text_:in in 4013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0043204287 = score(doc=4013,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14725187 = fieldWeight in 4013, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4013)
        0.02662638 = weight(_text_:einzelnen in 4013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02662638 = score(doc=4013,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1139978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23356925 = fieldWeight in 4013, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4013)
        0.014807926 = weight(_text_:und in 4013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014807926 = score(doc=4013,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.3097467 = fieldWeight in 4013, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4013)
        0.0011268335 = weight(_text_:s in 4013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0011268335 = score(doc=4013,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 4013, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4013)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    Die Dokumentationsabteilung im Institut für Museumskunde der Staatlichen Museen Preußischer Kulturbesitz (IfM) hat die Aufgabe, bundesweit Museen und museale Einrichtungen bei der Einführung der Informationstechnik mit Rat und Tat zu unterstützen. Hierbei arbeitet sie mit dem Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum für Informationstechnik Berlin (ZIB) zusammen. Diese Aktivitäten liegen im Bereich einer professionell durchgeführten Rationalisierung; Computerisierung ist nicht Selbstzweck, sondern eine Möglichkeit, ohnehin durchzuführende Arbeiten in puncto Zeit und Kosten effizienter zu gestalten bzw. Dinge durchzuführen, für die man beim Einsatz konventioneller Methoden weder die Zeit noch das Geld hätte. Mit der Vermittlung der hierfür notwendigen Kenntnisse und Fertigkeiten ist ein kleines Institut wie das IfM wegen des rapide ansteigenden Beratungsbedarfs der Museen heute noch weit überfordert. Wir konzentrieren daher unsere Aktivitäten auf eine Zusammenarbeit mit den für die Museumsbetreuung zuständigen Einrichtungen in den Bundesländern. Wir haben die Hoffnung, daß mehr und mehr Bundesländer für diese Aufgabe eigene Dienstleistungsangebote entwickeln werden. Bevor das erreicht ist, versucht das HM interessierten Museen zumindest eine "Hilfe zur Selbsthilfe" anzubieten; auch wenn dieses oder jenes Bundesland noch nicht in der Lage ist, seine Museen auf diesem Gebiet professionell zu beraten, soll es einzelnen Museen zumindest erleichtert werden, sich hier selber schlau zu machen. Zum Inhalt: Zur Zeit der Großrechner waren sich noch alle Beteiligten darüber einig, daß man für den Einsatz der Informationstechnik professioneller Hilfe bedarf. Man war bereit, sich den Anforderungen der Maschine anzupassen, man versuchte, sich "computergerecht" zu verhalten. Die Einführung leicht zu bedienender und leistungsstarker Computer im Bürobereich hat diese Arbeitsbedingungen aber grundlegend verändert. Auch Leute, die von Computer noch nichts verstehen, können heute in wenigen Tagen lernen, mit Programmen für "Textverarbeitung" ganz selbstverständlich umzugehen. Sie erwarten daher, daß das bei einem Einsatz des Computers für die Inventarisierung genauso problemlos sei. Von einer solchen Benutzerfreundlichkeit der Programme sind wir im deutschen Museumswesen aber noch weit entfernt. Das hat einen einfachen Grund: In die eben erwähnten einfach zu handhabenden Programme wurde inzwischen hunderte oder gar tausende von "Mannjahren" investiert; ein erheblicher Teil dieser Mittel diente dazu, den Computer den spezifischen Bedürfnissen bestimmter Arbeitsplätze anzupassen, bzw. die daran arbeitenden Mitarbeiter auszubilden. Bis das auch für das Museum gilt, wird wohl noch einige Zeit vergehen; dieser Markt ist zu klein, als daß sich solche Investitionen auf rein kommerzieller Basis kurzfristig auszahlen könnten. Das Institut für Museumskunde versucht hier Hilfestellung zu geben. Das vorliegende Heft 33 der "Materialien" ist aus Beratungen und Kursen hervorgegangen. Es versucht, die für die Einführung der Informationstechnik im Museum unabdingbaren grundlegenden Computerkenntnisse für Museumsleute in Form eines Lern- und Lesebuchs zu vermitteln. Es schließt damit an Heft 30 (Jane Sunderland und Leonore Sarasan, Was muß man alles tun, um den Computer im Museum erfolgreich einzusetzen?) direkt an und soll zusammen mit ihm benutzt werden.
    Pages
    133 S
  3. Manuel Unimarc : format bibliographique (1999) 0.00
    0.0044771186 = product of:
      0.06715678 = sum of:
        0.06377628 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 4083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06377628 = score(doc=4083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10186133 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.6261088 = fieldWeight in 4083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4083)
        0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 4083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033805002 = score(doc=4083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4083)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Editor
    Federation Internationale des Associations des Bibliothécaires et des Bibliothèques, IFLA universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC Programme, Deutsche Bibliothek, Frankfurt am Main
    Pages
    IX,427 S
  4. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.00
    0.002760662 = product of:
      0.02760662 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
        0.00478075 = weight(_text_:s in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00478075 = score(doc=6077,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
        0.017534448 = product of:
          0.035068896 = sum of:
            0.035068896 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035068896 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library review 48(1999) nos.3/4, S.204-205 (K.V. Trickey)
    Pages
    281 S
  5. Eversberg, B.: Was sind und was sollen bibliothekarische Datenformate (1994) 0.00
    0.002623047 = product of:
      0.02623047 = sum of:
        0.011706693 = weight(_text_:und in 1742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011706693 = score(doc=1742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 1742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1742)
        0.011706693 = weight(_text_:und in 1742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011706693 = score(doc=1742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 1742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1742)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 1742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=1742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 1742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1742)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Pages
    IV,182 S. + Diskette
  6. Chapman, L.: How to catalogue : a practical manual using AACR2 and Library of Congress (1990) 0.00
    0.0015820917 = product of:
      0.015820917 = sum of:
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=6081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
        0.010039635 = product of:
          0.030118903 = sum of:
            0.030118903 = weight(_text_:l in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030118903 = score(doc=6081,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=6081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    A practical manual describing standard procedures in cataloguing using AACR2 1988 revision and LoC cataloguing data
    Pages
    96 S
  7. Hagler, R.: ¬The bibliographic record and information technology (1991) 0.00
    7.8339124E-4 = product of:
      0.011750868 = sum of:
        0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061733257 = score(doc=899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
        0.0055775414 = weight(_text_:s in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055775414 = score(doc=899,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 53(1992) S.86-88 (E.A. Franco)
    Pages
    331 S
  8. Format integration and its effect on cataloging, training, and systems (1993) 0.00
    7.4310816E-4 = product of:
      0.011146622 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=67,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
        0.005855199 = weight(_text_:s in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005855199 = score(doc=67,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24967289 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information technology and libraries 13(1994) no.1, S.78-79 (K.L. Walter)
    Pages
    109 S
    Type
    s
  9. Setting the record straight : understanding the MARC format (1993) 0.00
    5.79343E-4 = product of:
      0.008690145 = sum of:
        0.0069998945 = weight(_text_:in in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069998945 = score(doc=2327,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=2327,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    MARC is an acronym for Machine Readable Catalogue or Cataloguing. This general description, howcver, is rather misleading as MARC is neither a kind of catalogue nor a method of cataloguing. In fact, MARC is a Standardformat for representing bibliographic information for handling by computer. While the MARC format was primarily designed to serve the needs of libraries, the concept has since been embraced by the wider information community as a convenient way of storing and exchanging bibliographic data. The original MARC format was developed at the Library of Congress in 1965-6 leading to a pilot project, known as MARC I, which had the aim of investigating the feasibility of producing machine-readable catalogue data. Similar work was in progress in the United Kingdom whcre the Council of the British National Bibliography had set up the BNB MARC Project with the rennt of examining the use of machine-readable data in producing the printed British National Bibliography (BNB). These parallel developments led to Anglo-American co-operation an the MARC 11 project which was initiated in 1968. MARC II was to prove instrumental in defining the concept of MARC as a communications format.
    Pages
    9 S
  10. Gredley, E.; Hopkinson, A.: Exchanging bibliographic data (1990) 0.00
    4.8177355E-4 = product of:
      0.0072266026 = sum of:
        0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 6070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004409519 = score(doc=6070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 6070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6070)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 6070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=6070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 6070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6070)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    An explanation of MARC, its structure, content and application, particularly in the international context
    Pages
    312 S
  11. Functional requirements for bibliographic records : Final report (1998) 0.00
    4.8177355E-4 = product of:
      0.0072266026 = sum of:
        0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004409519 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Content
    Liegt inzwischen auch in deutscher Übersetzung vor: Funktionelle Anforderungen an bibliografische Datensätze
    Pages
    VIII, 144 S
  12. Curwen, A.G.; Kirk, C.: Application of UNIMARC to multinational databases : feasibility study (1999) 0.00
    3.3724142E-4 = product of:
      0.005058621 = sum of:
        0.0030866629 = weight(_text_:in in 4079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0030866629 = score(doc=4079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 4079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4079)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 4079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=4079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4079)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    The Bayerische Staatsbibliothek acting on behalf of the Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL) was responsible for the preparation of this report under a contract agreed with the Commission of the European Communities Directorate General XIII as part of their Libraries Programme. The report considers the feasibility of the application of UNIMARC to multinational databases, and was based on a comparison of machine-readable bibliographic records in the UNIMARC format from 6 different national sources. Some are conversions from other formats, while others are 'native' UNIMARC records. The records are of books of the hand press period, that is, from the time of Gutenberg to about 1830
    Pages
    XI,140 S
  13. Hagler, R.: ¬The bibliographic record and information technology (1997) 0.00
    1.6264443E-4 = product of:
      0.0048793326 = sum of:
        0.0048793326 = weight(_text_:s in 6175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048793326 = score(doc=6175,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20806074 = fieldWeight in 6175, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6175)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Footnote
    Rez.: Library resources and technical services 42(1998) no.1, S.71-73 (D. CannCasciato); Reference and user services quarterly 37(1997) no.2, S.235-236 (E. McGrath)
    Pages
    394 S
  14. UNIMARC manual bibliographic format (1994) 0.00
    1.5024448E-4 = product of:
      0.004507334 = sum of:
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 8716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=8716,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 8716, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8716)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Pages
    IV,496 S
  15. CCF/B: The Common Communication Format for bibliographic information (1992) 0.00
    1.3146391E-4 = product of:
      0.003943917 = sum of:
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 8713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=8713,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 8713, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8713)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Pages
    193 S
  16. CCF/F: The Common Communication Format for factual information (1992) 0.00
    1.3146391E-4 = product of:
      0.003943917 = sum of:
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 2269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=2269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2269)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Pages
    127 S
  17. Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): Implementation notes for users of the Common Communication Format for bibliographic information (CCF/B) (1993) 0.00
    1.3146391E-4 = product of:
      0.003943917 = sum of:
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Pages
    V,63 S
  18. Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): Implementation notes for users of the Common Communication Format for factual information (CCF/F) (1993) 0.00
    1.3146391E-4 = product of:
      0.003943917 = sum of:
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Pages
    V,49 S
  19. UNIMARC / Authorities : Universal format for authorities. Recommended by the IFLA Steering Group on a UNIMARC format for authorities (1991) 0.00
    9.390279E-5 = product of:
      0.0028170836 = sum of:
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 7548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=7548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 7548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7548)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Pages
    80 S
  20. Reinke, U.: ¬Der Austausch terminologischer Daten (1993) 0.00
    7.512224E-5 = product of:
      0.002253667 = sum of:
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Pages
    148 S