-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.030339839 = product of:
0.121359356 = sum of:
0.121359356 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.121359356 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19604386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.055983268 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.02654736 = product of:
0.10618944 = sum of:
0.10618944 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10618944 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19604386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.055983268 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.03
0.02654736 = product of:
0.10618944 = sum of:
0.10618944 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10618944 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19604386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.055983268 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2