Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × type_ss:"s"
  1. Cataloging and classification standards and rules (1996) 0.04
    0.040553328 = product of:
      0.081106655 = sum of:
        0.081106655 = product of:
          0.16221331 = sum of:
            0.16221331 = weight(_text_:r.s in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16221331 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32660374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359253 = queryNorm
                0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: McCALLUM, S.: What makes a standard?; HOLLEY, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographical control; STERN, B.: Internationalizing the rules in AACR2: adopting and translating AACR2 for use in non-Anglo-American and non-English-speaking cataloging environments; GUILES, K., R. EWALD u. B. TILLETT: The evolution of LCRIs: from de facto standards to ?; SPICHER, K.M.: The development of the MARC format; THOMAS, S.E.: The core bibliographic record and the program for cooperative cataloging; PALOWITCH, C. u. L. HOROWITZ: Meta-information structures for networked information resources; KUHAGEN, J.A.: Standards for name and series authority records; WILLIAMSON, N.: Standards and rules for subject access; GUENTHER, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme: implementation of the USMARC Format for Classification Data; LEAZER, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographical relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog: an examination of serials
  2. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.023624744 = product of:
      0.04724949 = sum of:
        0.04724949 = product of:
          0.09449898 = sum of:
            0.09449898 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09449898 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15265362 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359253 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  3. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.020671653 = product of:
      0.041343305 = sum of:
        0.041343305 = product of:
          0.08268661 = sum of:
            0.08268661 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08268661 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15265362 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359253 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  4. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.020671653 = product of:
      0.041343305 = sum of:
        0.041343305 = product of:
          0.08268661 = sum of:
            0.08268661 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08268661 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15265362 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359253 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  5. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.01
    0.010335826 = product of:
      0.020671653 = sum of:
        0.020671653 = product of:
          0.041343305 = sum of:
            0.041343305 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041343305 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15265362 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359253 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)