Search (84 results, page 2 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Holt, B.: Presentation of UNIMARC on the Web : new fields, including the one for electronic resources (1999) 0.01 
    0.0074667614 = product of:
  0.05973409 = sum of:
    0.05973409 = weight(_text_:web in 6020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05973409 = score(doc=6020,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 6020, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6020)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
  2. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The USMARC Format for Classification Data : development and implementation (1992) 0.01 
    0.007157246 = product of:
  0.028628984 = sum of:
    0.011522634 = weight(_text_:information in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011522634 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
    0.01710635 = product of:
      0.0342127 = sum of:
        0.0342127 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0342127 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards for representing bibliographic and related information in machine-readable form. It provides a summary of the fields in the format, and considers the prospects for its implementation.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The development and implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1992) 0.01 
    0.007157246 = product of:
  0.028628984 = sum of:
    0.011522634 = weight(_text_:information in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011522634 = score(doc=8865,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
    0.01710635 = product of:
      0.0342127 = sum of:
        0.0342127 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0342127 = score(doc=8865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 11(1992) no.2, S.120-131
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  4. Mueller, C.J.; Whittaker, M.A.: What is this thing called MARC(S)? (1990) 0.01 
    0.007157246 = product of:
  0.028628984 = sum of:
    0.011522634 = weight(_text_:information in 3588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011522634 = score(doc=3588,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3588, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3588)
    0.01710635 = product of:
      0.0342127 = sum of:
        0.0342127 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0342127 = score(doc=3588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3588)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Contribution to an issue devoted to serials and reference services. Familiarity with the basic elements of the MARC format and their effect on the display and retrieval of bibliographic data is an essential element of public service in those libraries with MARC-based on-line catalogues. Describes the components of a MARC record. To successfully retrieve the information sought from an on-line catalogue, the catalogue user must know whether it is in an indexed field and, if so, must be familiar with the search strategies required by the system.
  5. Michard, A.; Pham Dac, D.: Description of collections and encyclopedias on the Web using XML (1998) 0.01 
    0.0070397304 = product of:
  0.056317843 = sum of:
    0.056317843 = weight(_text_:web in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056317843 = score(doc=3493,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Cataloguing artworks relies on the availability of classification schemes, often represented by hierarchical thesauri. Comments on the limitations of current practices and tools and proposes a new approach for the cooperative production of multilingual and multicultural classification schemes exploiting some features of the oncoming Extensible Markup Language based Web
  6. Heaney, M.: Object-oriented cataloging (1995) 0.01 
    0.0062625906 = product of:
  0.025050363 = sum of:
    0.010082305 = weight(_text_:information in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010082305 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
    0.014968057 = product of:
      0.029936114 = sum of:
        0.029936114 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029936114 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Catalogues have evolved from lists of physical items present in particular libraries into computerized access and retrieval tools for works dispersed across local and national boundaries. Works themselves are no longer constrained by physical form yet cataloguing rules have not evolved in parallel with these developments. Reanalyzes the nature of works and their publication in an approach based on object oriented modelling and demonstrates the advantages to be gained thereby. Suggests a strategic plan to enable an organic transformation to be made from current MARC based cataloguing to object oriented cataloguing. Proposes major revisions of MARC in order to allow records to maximize the benefits of both computerized databases and high speed data networks. This will involve a fundamental shift away from the AACR philosophy of description of, plus access to, physical items
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 14(1995) no.3, S.135-153
  7. Eversberg, B.: Was sind und was sollen bibliothekarische Datenformate (1994) 0.01 
    0.0062223016 = product of:
  0.049778413 = sum of:
    0.049778413 = weight(_text_:web in 1742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049778413 = score(doc=1742,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1742, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1742)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Footnote
    Neuere Ausgaben nur über die Web-Seite: http://www.allegro-c.de/allegro/formate/formate.htm
  8. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01 
    0.0060790726 = product of:
  0.04863258 = sum of:
    0.04863258 = product of:
      0.09726516 = sum of:
        0.09726516 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09726516 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  9. Hanssen, H.M.: Hvad er der nu med formatet : skel det vaere dansk eller internationalt? (1996) 0.01 
    0.006041871 = product of:
  0.048334967 = sum of:
    0.048334967 = weight(_text_:world in 94) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048334967 = score(doc=94,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 94, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=94)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Although the revised danMARC format, danMARC2 was ready early 95, it is still uncertain if it will be used. Doubts have been expressed about the usefulness of national formats and several research libraries prefer speedy transition to USMARC. Attempts are being made to harmonise the most important MARC formats in use in the English-speaking world, but it is as yet uncertain how this MARC standard will turn out and USMARC cannot directly be applied as Danish format. Meantime the Z39.50 protocol can be used. Formats will change rapidly, and whatever choice is made is unlikely to last many years. With the future for IMARC still uncertain MARC2 is the only realistic way forward
  10. Fattahi, R.: ¬A uniform approach to the indexing of cataloguing data in online library systems (1997) 0.01 
    0.0053679347 = product of:
  0.021471739 = sum of:
    0.008641975 = weight(_text_:information in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008641975 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
    0.012829763 = product of:
      0.025659526 = sum of:
        0.025659526 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025659526 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Argues that in library cataloguing and for optional functionality of bibliographic records the indexing of fields and subfields should follow a uniform approach. This would maintain effectiveness in searching, retrieval and display of bibliographic information both within systems and between systems. However, a review of different postings to the AUTOCAT and USMARC discussion lists indicates that the indexing and tagging of cataloguing data do not, at present, follow a consistent approach in online library systems. If the rationale of cataloguing principles is to bring uniformity in bibliographic description and effectiveness in access, they should also address the question of uniform approaches to the indexing of cataloguing data. In this context and in terms of the identification and handling of data elements, cataloguing standards (codes, MARC formats and the Z39.50 standard) should be brought closer, in that they should provide guidelines for the designation of data elements for machine readable records
  11. Horah, J.L.: from cards to the Web : ¬The evolution of a library database (1998) 0.01 
    0.005279798 = product of:
  0.042238384 = sum of:
    0.042238384 = weight(_text_:web in 4842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042238384 = score(doc=4842,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 4842, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4842)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    The Jack Brause Library at New York University (NYU) is a special library supporting the curriculum of NYU's Real Estate Institute. The Jack Brause Library (JBL) Real estate Periodical Index was established in 1990 and draws on the library's collection of over 140 real estate periodicals. Describes the conversion of the JBL Index from a 3x5 card index to an online resource. The database was originally created using Rbase for DOS but this quickly became obsolete and in 1993 was replaced with InMagic. In 1997 the JBL Index was made available on NYU's telnet catalogue, BobCat, and the Internet database catalogue, BobCatPlus. The transition of InMagic data to USMARC formatted records involved a 3-step process: data normalization; adding value; and data recording. The Index has been operational through telnet since May 1997 and installing it onto the Web became functional in Oct 1997
  12. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.00 
    0.0042985533 = product of:
  0.034388427 = sum of:
    0.034388427 = product of:
      0.06877685 = sum of:
        0.06877685 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06877685 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  13. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.00 
    0.004052715 = product of:
  0.03242172 = sum of:
    0.03242172 = product of:
      0.06484344 = sum of:
        0.06484344 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06484344 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  14. Beaudiquez, M.: ¬L'¬avenir des formats de communication (1996) 0.00 
    0.0037333807 = product of:
  0.029867046 = sum of:
    0.029867046 = weight(_text_:web in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029867046 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Over the last decade, the gap between North and South in relation to formats has increasingly limited development of international programmes such as UBC and UAP. At present the need to review formats in the light of network developments such as the Internet is urgent. Presentations covered the Web, limitations of traditional formats eg. MARC, Internet formats eg. Z39.50 and SGML, and multimedia formats, with examples of prototypes for converting traditional systems to international standards. The Internet has defined a new field of action for librarians. It is essential that developing countries share the experience of industrialised countries, with support from governments and collaboration from international organisations, in ensuring harmonious progress to universal compatibility
  15. ISO 2709: Format for information exchange (1996) 0.00 
    0.003600823 = product of:
  0.028806584 = sum of:
    0.028806584 = weight(_text_:information in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028806584 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
  16. Information transfer and exchange formats (1991) 0.00 
    0.003600823 = product of:
  0.028806584 = sum of:
    0.028806584 = weight(_text_:information in 7891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028806584 = score(doc=7891,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 7891, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7891)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Describes international standard exchange formats for bibliographic information transfer. Outlines their common and differing features. Describes: UNIMARC, UNISIST Reference manual and UNECSO Common Communication Format
    Source
    Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  17. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.00 
    0.0035821279 = product of:
  0.028657023 = sum of:
    0.028657023 = product of:
      0.057314046 = sum of:
        0.057314046 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057314046 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  18. USMARC format for community information : including guidelines for content designation (1993) 0.00 
    0.0028806585 = product of:
  0.023045268 = sum of:
    0.023045268 = weight(_text_:information in 8044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023045268 = score(doc=8044,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042302497 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 8044, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8044)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    The latest format. Features specifications for inputting and communicating community information - i.e., information about non-bibliographic resources (programs, services, organizations, individuals, one-time and ongoing events) that fulfill a community's information needs. Defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes and codes values) that identify the data elements in the records. Includes full record examples showing how records are coded
  19. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.00 
    0.0028657021 = product of:
  0.022925617 = sum of:
    0.022925617 = product of:
      0.045851234 = sum of:
        0.045851234 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045851234 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
  20. Radwanski, A.: Rozwoj formatu MARC (1996) 0.00 
    0.0028657021 = product of:
  0.022925617 = sum of:
    0.022925617 = product of:
      0.045851234 = sum of:
        0.045851234 = weight(_text_:22 in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045851234 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:34:37

Authors

Languages

  • e 67
  • d 8
  • f 6
  • da 1
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 66
  • m 11
  • s 4
  • ? 1
  • el 1
  • l 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes