-
Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997)
0.02
0.023447776 = product of:
0.05861944 = sum of:
0.038846903 = product of:
0.077693805 = sum of:
0.077693805 = weight(_text_:problems in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077693805 = score(doc=873,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.5159344 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.019772539 = product of:
0.039545078 = sum of:
0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039545078 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The British Library have conformed their decision to go ahead with the harmonization programme between the US and UKMARC formats, and although the final date for the changeover is still not yet, they expect the whole process to be over in 2 years, with one further year after that when they will support UKMARC. Describes the progress made so far, and problems that remain to be solved
- Source
- LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
-
Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995)
0.02
0.023383325 = product of:
0.05845831 = sum of:
0.03399104 = product of:
0.06798208 = sum of:
0.06798208 = weight(_text_:problems in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06798208 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.4514426 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02446727 = product of:
0.04893454 = sum of:
0.04893454 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04893454 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Briefly summarizes the problems encountered when attempting to use the USMARC cataloguing format in US school libraries and describes the development of CEMARC format by the Northwest Ohio Educational Technology Foundation (NWOET), which addresses the main problems by: offering sata entry guidelines for a minimum USMARC standard in order to clarify inconsistencies in application; and by suggesting enhancements and new fields that go beyond the USMARC standard. Concludes with brief notes on early CEMARC implementation
- Date
- 11. 9.1996 19:22:20
- Source
- Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.02
0.0221726 = product of:
0.0554315 = sum of:
0.027468907 = product of:
0.054937813 = sum of:
0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054937813 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027962593 = product of:
0.055925187 = sum of:
0.055925187 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055925187 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper discuesses the goals and outcome of the OCLC/NCSA Metadata Workshop held March 1-3, 1995 in Dublin Ohio. The resulting proposed "Dublin Core" Metadata Elements Set is described briefly. An attempt is made to map the Dublin Core data elements to USMARC; problems and outstanding questions are noted.
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Reinke, U.: ¬Der Austausch terminologischer Daten (1993)
0.01
0.009461033 = product of:
0.047305163 = sum of:
0.047305163 = product of:
0.094610326 = sum of:
0.094610326 = weight(_text_:etc in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094610326 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.47875473 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Diplomarbeit at the University of Saarbrücken which contains the following topics: data exchange format; terminology management systems; terminological databases; terminological record; data elements; data categories; data fields, etc.: hard- and software-related difficulties for the structure of records; description of approaches for the development of an exchange format for terminological data (MATER, MicroMATER, NTRF, SGML); considerations concerning an SGML-like exchange format; perspectives
-
Recommandation 995 (1995)
0.01
0.009461033 = product of:
0.047305163 = sum of:
0.047305163 = product of:
0.094610326 = sum of:
0.094610326 = weight(_text_:etc in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094610326 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.47875473 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Text of a document produced by the French Librarians Association, Federation of Library Software Users and the Association of Directors of Departmental Lending Libraries, setting out standards for local data included in bibliographic notices in UNIMARC format. These are specifically intended for loan copies sent from central to branch libraries, for integration into the local catalogue. The subfields (MARC field 995) are: origin of document; bar code; classification code and loan details; details of contents, support etc; and notes on physical features
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.01
0.008388779 = product of:
0.041943893 = sum of:
0.041943893 = product of:
0.083887786 = sum of:
0.083887786 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083887786 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Graham, C.; Johnston, J.: Format integration and serials cataloging (1997)
0.01
0.006867227 = product of:
0.034336135 = sum of:
0.034336135 = product of:
0.06867227 = sum of:
0.06867227 = weight(_text_:problems in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06867227 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Outlines some goals which format integration has achieved, and also some new problems which it brings. Cataloguers therefore have a great deal to consider in formulating policies
-
Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.4: UNIMARC, some formats based on it and some other MARC formats (1995)
0.01
0.0067982078 = product of:
0.03399104 = sum of:
0.03399104 = product of:
0.06798208 = sum of:
0.06798208 = weight(_text_:problems in 3811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06798208 = score(doc=3811,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.4514426 = fieldWeight in 3811, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3811)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Discusses the problems associated with the requirements for international standards for the exchange of bibliographic records in machine readable form, including the roles of national bibliographies and national libraries; a lack of international cataloguing standards and subject control systems; language difficulties; character sets and codes, and non roman alphabets. Suggests that these problems lie behind the development of various MARC formats out of UNIMARC. In this final part of a 4 part article describes the formats for South Africa, Taiwan, Japan, Croatia and Germany and indicates the points of difference and the influence of local requirements
-
Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.4: UNIMARC, some formats based on it and some other MARC formats (1996)
0.01
0.0067982078 = product of:
0.03399104 = sum of:
0.03399104 = product of:
0.06798208 = sum of:
0.06798208 = weight(_text_:problems in 7191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06798208 = score(doc=7191,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.4514426 = fieldWeight in 7191, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7191)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Discusses some of the problems associated with the requirements and prospects for international standards for the exchange of bibliographic records in machine readable form, the various roles of national bibliographies and national libraries; the lack of international cataloguing standards and of an international subject control systems; language difficulties; character sets and codes, and non roman alphabets. Explains how these problems lie behind the development of various MARC formats out of UNIMARC. In this final part of a 4 part article describes the formats for South Africa, Taiwan, Japan, Croatia and Germany and indicates the points of difference and the influence of local requirements
-
Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998)
0.01
0.005931762 = product of:
0.02965881 = sum of:
0.02965881 = product of:
0.05931762 = sum of:
0.05931762 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05931762 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 2. 8.2001 16:22:33
-
Hein, M.: Aesthetics and quality in format conversion (1996)
0.01
0.0054937815 = product of:
0.027468907 = sum of:
0.027468907 = product of:
0.054937813 = sum of:
0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 4893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054937813 = score(doc=4893,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 4893, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4893)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The constant change of technology produces a shorter life cycle for electronic formats than for conventional formats. In libraries and archives, information may have a longer life cycle than elsewhere. The technical problems of electronic format conversion may become overwhelming. Discusses aesthetics and quality assurance issues
-
Gaschignard, J.-P.: UNIMARC et UNIMARC : attention aux contrefacons (1997)
0.01
0.0054937815 = product of:
0.027468907 = sum of:
0.027468907 = product of:
0.054937813 = sum of:
0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054937813 = score(doc=921,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- UNIMARC is widely used in French libraries for internal cataloguing, but in versions that differ significantly from the official IFLA form, while the BNF uses its own version for exporting bibliographic information. This situation has in part been created by software suppliers who produce modified versions for small libraries but without precisely detailing the variations. Problems will inevitably arise when such libraries change software or join cataloguing networks
-
McDonough, J.P.: SGML and USMARC standard : applying markup to bibliographic data (1998)
0.01
0.0054937815 = product of:
0.027468907 = sum of:
0.027468907 = product of:
0.054937813 = sum of:
0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054937813 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The recent increase in electronic publishing has led many in the library community to consider altering standards for bibliographic data to promote greater compatibility between digital works and their bibliographic representation. SGML has been prominently mentioned as a mechanism for encoding bibliographic data. Examines the problems and potential of applying SGML to to USMARC record standard, with a particular emphasis on issues of field order and repeatability, character set encoding, and obsolete fields
-
Willer, M.: Formats and cataloguing rules : developments for cataloguing electronic resources (1999)
0.01
0.0054937815 = product of:
0.027468907 = sum of:
0.027468907 = product of:
0.054937813 = sum of:
0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054937813 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Following a brief history of cataloguing and the MARC record format, describes current challenges in developing suitable international formats and cataloguing rules for dealing with electronic resources. Extensive references to the past and current literature provide an overview of the problems faced. Notes the role of the ISBD, Z39.50 protocol and the integration of Internet objects into the online catalogue
-
Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996)
0.00
0.004943135 = product of:
0.024715675 = sum of:
0.024715675 = product of:
0.04943135 = sum of:
0.04943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04943135 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 29. 9.1996 18:58:22
-
Simmons, P.: Preserving compatibility with standard data formats (1994)
0.00
0.0048070587 = product of:
0.024035294 = sum of:
0.024035294 = product of:
0.048070587 = sum of:
0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 7129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048070587 = score(doc=7129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 7129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Librarians in countries without well-established national bibliographic systems increasingly find themselves faced with the problem of establishing local formats for machine-readable cataloguing and for referral data. Often they lack the background and the resources - especially trained staff - either to adopt an existing MARC format or to develop their own. Such international formats as UNIMARC and CCF, despite widespread international use, present problems of their own; MARC formats are not practical for agencies that do not follow standard cataloguing rules, and CCF offers little guidance to agencies wishing to adopt it for local use. A number of techniques useful in adapting and implementing international and national standard formats are presented, with some guidelines for preserving compatibility with standards
-
Noordermeer, T.: UseMARCON, a user controlled generic MARC converter (1998)
0.00
0.0048070587 = product of:
0.024035294 = sum of:
0.024035294 = product of:
0.048070587 = sum of:
0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 5174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048070587 = score(doc=5174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 5174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5174)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- With 50 different MARC formats in use globally and 10 employed in European Union national libraries problems are created in the international supply of cataloguing data and the quality of records. UseMARCON is a cooperative project of Dutch, Portuguese, UK and German national libraries using software from Jouve Systems d'Information in France to produce a generic conversion program capable of translating bibliographic records in any ISO2709 format into any other ISO2709 format using UNIMARC as a switching format. Outlines what is required in the process of conversion; describes the functionality of the software; and lists the MARC formats with which UseMARCON can operate. The project was finished in 1997
-
Guenther, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme : implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1996)
0.00
0.0048070587 = product of:
0.024035294 = sum of:
0.024035294 = product of:
0.048070587 = sum of:
0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048070587 = score(doc=5578,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Potential uses for classification data in machine readable form and reasons for the development of a standard, the USMARC Format for Classification Data, which allows for classification data to interact with other USMARC bibliographic and authority data are discussed. The development, structure, content, and use of the standard is reviewed with implementation decisions for the Library of Congress Classification scheme noted. The author examines the implementation of USMARC classification at LC, the conversion of the schedules, and the functionality of the software being used. Problems in the effort are explored, and enhancements desired for the online classification system are considered.
-
Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information : papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College London, 3-18 August 1990 (1991)
0.00
0.0047577545 = product of:
0.023788773 = sum of:
0.023788773 = product of:
0.047577545 = sum of:
0.047577545 = weight(_text_:problems in 7884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047577545 = score(doc=7884,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.31594402 = fieldWeight in 7884, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7884)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- 31 papers consider the major international bodies concerned with standards and the problems associated with special forms and different scripts. The creation of bibliographic records including the role of national bibliographic agencies is considered. Standards for subject access and the impact of automation are also covered
- Content
- Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: TEMPLETON, R.: The Library Association's role in developing standards; HARRISON, H.P.: Special materials and problems: standards for audiovisual materials; ANDERSON, D.: Selections of bibliographic standards and the processes of standardization; GILCHRIST, A.: The standards jungle; BOURNE, R.: The IFLA UBCIM programme: standards in the changing world; ROBERTS, W.: The role of IFLA in framing and promoting bibliographic standards; HILL, M.W.: Standards for information handling: needs and dilemmas; JUSU-SHERIFF, G.: Standardization: an African viewpoint; BISWAS, S.C.: Standardization of bibliographic control in South Asia; CROUCHER, M.: The British National Bibliography: an historical perspective; BUCKLEY, B.J.: CD-ROM at the British Library; HOPKINSON, A.: Information transfer and exchange formats; HESELTINE, R.G.: Library automation in the 1990s: the open systems future; GRAVES, S.E.: Problems of serials control; ODDY, P.: Authority control in the local, national and international environment; MITCHELL, J.: Library co-operatives: bibliographic databases; BROWN, S.: Angl-American cataloguing rules; MORELELI-CACOURIS, M. u. M. SKEPASTIANU: Cataloguing practices in Greece; MUN, K.S.: Bibliographic description and information exchange in Southeast Asia: a survey; CURWEN, A.G.: International standard bibliographic description; HANCOCK-BEAULIEU, M.: Bibliographic standards and the online catalogue user; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Subject cataloguing and LCSH; AITCHISON, J.: Subject control: thesaurus construction standards; SWEENEY, R.: Dewey Decimal Classification: an international standard; McILWAINE, I.C.: Present role and future policy for UDC as a standard for subject control; BUXTON, A.B.: UDC in online systems; BUXTON, A.B.: International gateways; BUXTON, A.B.: Common command languages
-
Giordano, R.: ¬The documentation of electronic texts : using Text Encoding Initiative headers: an introduction (1994)
0.00
0.0041203364 = product of:
0.02060168 = sum of:
0.02060168 = product of:
0.04120336 = sum of:
0.04120336 = weight(_text_:problems in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04120336 = score(doc=866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Presents a general introduction to the form and functions of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) headers and explains their relationship to the MARC record. The TEI header's main strength is that it documents electronic texts in a standard exchange format that should be understandable to both librarian cataloguers and text encoders outside of librarianship. TEI gives encoders the ability to document the the electronic text itself, its source, its encoding principles, and revisions, as well as non bibliographic characteristics of the text that can support both scholarly analysis and retrieval. Its bibliographic descriptions can be loaded into standard remote bibliographic databases, which should make electronic texts as easy to find for researchers as texts in other media. Presents a brief overview of the TEI header, the file description and ways in which the TEI headers have counterparts in MARC, the Encoding Description, the Profile Description, the Revision Description, the size and complexity of the TEI header, and the use of the TEI header to support document retrieval and analysis, with notes on some of the prospects and problems
