-
Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995)
0.08
0.08145301 = product of:
0.122179516 = sum of:
0.024176367 = weight(_text_:of in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024176367 = score(doc=5100,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.09800315 = sum of:
0.028005775 = weight(_text_:science in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028005775 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.06999737 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06999737 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Briefly summarizes the problems encountered when attempting to use the USMARC cataloguing format in US school libraries and describes the development of CEMARC format by the Northwest Ohio Educational Technology Foundation (NWOET), which addresses the main problems by: offering sata entry guidelines for a minimum USMARC standard in order to clarify inconsistencies in application; and by suggesting enhancements and new fields that go beyond the USMARC standard. Concludes with brief notes on early CEMARC implementation
- Date
- 11. 9.1996 19:22:20
- Imprint
- Kalamazoo, MI : International Association of School Librarianship
- Source
- Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
-
Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997)
0.07
0.07408862 = product of:
0.11113293 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=1757,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.088573016 = sum of:
0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0320066 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Computers play an important role in the development of bibliographic databases. Exchange formats are needed for the generation and exchange of bibliographic data at different levels: international, national, regional and local. Discusses the formats available at national and international level such as the International Standard Exchange Format (ISO 2709); the various MARC formats and the Common Communication Format (CCF). Work on Indian standards involving the Bureau of Indian Standards, the National Information System for Science and Technology (NISSAT) and other institutions proceeds only slowly
- Source
- DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.07
0.06968352 = product of:
0.10452528 = sum of:
0.015952265 = weight(_text_:of in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015952265 = score(doc=4414,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.088573016 = sum of:
0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0320066 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 32(1995) no.3, S.i-iv
-
UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994)
0.07
0.06907657 = product of:
0.10361485 = sum of:
0.026113462 = weight(_text_:of in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026113462 = score(doc=8779,freq=14.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
0.07750139 = sum of:
0.028005775 = weight(_text_:science in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028005775 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049495615 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
-
Radwanski, A.: Rozwoj formatu MARC (1996)
0.04
0.037275564 = product of:
0.055913344 = sum of:
0.027630134 = weight(_text_:of in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027630134 = score(doc=3052,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
0.028283209 = product of:
0.056566417 = sum of:
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the origins of the MARC format and its development connected with the proceedings of the Library of Congress and the British Library. Presents 2 standards: ISO 2709 and ISBD. Focuses on national and international formats elaborated in the 1970s and 1980s, including UNIMARC (1975) and CCF (1984). Outlines the prospects and directions of MARC format development, that is, integration of the format and implementing MARC in the network environment
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 20:34:37
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Development of the MARC format
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.03
0.034185637 = product of:
0.051278453 = sum of:
0.011279955 = weight(_text_:of in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011279955 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.039998498 = product of:
0.079996996 = sum of:
0.079996996 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079996996 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper discuesses the goals and outcome of the OCLC/NCSA Metadata Workshop held March 1-3, 1995 in Dublin Ohio. The resulting proposed "Dublin Core" Metadata Elements Set is described briefly. An attempt is made to map the Dublin Core data elements to USMARC; problems and outstanding questions are noted.
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990)
0.03
0.031880446 = product of:
0.047820665 = sum of:
0.019537456 = weight(_text_:of in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019537456 = score(doc=484,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.028283209 = product of:
0.056566417 = sum of:
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses how archivists use the MARC AMC format to exchange information about archival materials. The paper explains the modifications that MARC AMC introduced to the MARC bibliographic formats; gives examples of a record in generic USMARC AMC, RLIN AMC, and OCLC AMC; and considers the possible impact of format integration. The paper concludes with some thoughts about the changes that MARC AMC is causing in the archival profession.
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 14:22:51
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Describing Archival Materials: The Use of the MARC AMC Format
-
Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996)
0.03
0.031211808 = product of:
0.046817712 = sum of:
0.022069903 = weight(_text_:of in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022069903 = score(doc=7683,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
0.024747808 = product of:
0.049495615 = sum of:
0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049495615 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
- Footnote
- Presentation given as part of the OCLC Office of Research Distinguished Seminar Series Jan 1997
- Source
- OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
-
Coetzee, H.S.: Development of SAMARC : South African format for the exchange of machine readable bibliographic descriptions (1997)
0.03
0.029088955 = product of:
0.04363343 = sum of:
0.027630134 = weight(_text_:of in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027630134 = score(doc=889,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.0160033 = product of:
0.0320066 = sum of:
0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0320066 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The first edition of 'SAMARC: South African format for the exchange of machine readable descriptions' was published in 1982. Since then a number of important developments in various fields made it essential that the format be updated and revised. A draft second edition was made available in 1993 and the SAMARC manual was published in 1995 by the State Library. In Apr 1997 it was however decided by the South African library community to change to USMARC
- Source
- South African journal of library and information science. 65(1997) no.3, S.139-150
-
Choudhury, B.K.; Padhee, B.K.: Analytical study of CCC and AACR2, 1988 Revision : structure, features and principles (1996)
0.03
0.02907518 = product of:
0.043612767 = sum of:
0.02960988 = weight(_text_:of in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02960988 = score(doc=666,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.0140028875 = product of:
0.028005775 = sum of:
0.028005775 = weight(_text_:science in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028005775 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the structure of the Classified Catalogue Code (CCC) and AACR2 and briefly explaind the contents of different chapters. Enumerates the features of both schemes and analyzes the lacuna found in both the codes with regard to various features. Examines some of the canons as strictly followed by CCC and justifies their impact on AACR2 in determining the choice of access points and in rendering the entries. Points to the drawbacks of both codes and suggests revisions for international cataloguing. Identifies the influences of Dr. S.R. Ranganathan on AACR
- Source
- Herald of library science. 35(1996) nos.3/4, S.165-175
-
Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994)
0.03
0.02871291 = product of:
0.043069363 = sum of:
0.0330673 = weight(_text_:of in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0330673 = score(doc=3033,freq=44.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40518725 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
44.0 = termFreq=44.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.010002062 = product of:
0.020004123 = sum of:
0.020004123 = weight(_text_:science in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020004123 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this paper I describe a conceptual design of a bibliographic retrieval system that enables more thourough control of bibliographic entities. A bibliographic entity has 2 components: the intellectual work and the physical item. Users searching bibliographic retrieval systems generally do not search for a specific item, but are willing to retrieve one of several alternative manifestations of a work. However, contemporary bibliographic retrieval systems are based solely on the descriptions of items. Works are described only implcitly by collocating descriptions of items. This method has resulted in a tool that does not include important descriptive attributes of the work, e.g. information regarding its history, its genre, or its bibliographic relationships. A bibliographic relationship is an association between 2 bibliographic entities. A system evaluation methodology wasused to create a conceptual schema for a bibliographic retrieval system. The model is based upon an analysis of data elements in the USMARC Formats for Bibliographic Data. The conceptual schema describes a database comprising 2 separate files of bibliographic descriptions, one of works and the other of items. Each file consists of individual descriptive surrogates of their respective entities. the specific data content of each file is defined by a data dictionary. Data elements used in the description of bibliographic works reflect the nature of works as intellectual and linguistic objects. The descriptive elements of bibliographic items describe the physical properties of bibliographic entities. Bibliographic relationships constitute the logical strucutre of the database
- Source
- Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al
-
Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996)
0.03
0.025804028 = product of:
0.038706042 = sum of:
0.0139582325 = weight(_text_:of in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0139582325 = score(doc=6523,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.024747808 = product of:
0.049495615 = sum of:
0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049495615 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.02
0.01999925 = product of:
0.05999775 = sum of:
0.05999775 = product of:
0.1199955 = sum of:
0.1199955 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1199955 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998)
0.01
0.014141604 = product of:
0.042424813 = sum of:
0.042424813 = product of:
0.084849626 = sum of:
0.084849626 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084849626 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 2. 8.2001 16:22:33
-
Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996)
0.01
0.011784671 = product of:
0.03535401 = sum of:
0.03535401 = product of:
0.07070802 = sum of:
0.07070802 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07070802 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 9.1996 18:58:22
-
Curwen, A.G.; Kirk, C.: Application of UNIMARC to multinational databases : feasibility study (1999)
0.01
0.0113968495 = product of:
0.034190547 = sum of:
0.034190547 = weight(_text_:of in 4079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034190547 = score(doc=4079,freq=24.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 4079, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4079)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The Bayerische Staatsbibliothek acting on behalf of the Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL) was responsible for the preparation of this report under a contract agreed with the Commission of the European Communities Directorate General XIII as part of their Libraries Programme. The report considers the feasibility of the application of UNIMARC to multinational databases, and was based on a comparison of machine-readable bibliographic records in the UNIMARC format from 6 different national sources. Some are conversions from other formats, while others are 'native' UNIMARC records. The records are of books of the hand press period, that is, from the time of Gutenberg to about 1830
-
Martin, L.M.: Viewing the field : a literature review and survey of the use of USMARC AMC in US academic archives (1994)
0.01
0.011279955 = product of:
0.033839863 = sum of:
0.033839863 = weight(_text_:of in 2395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033839863 = score(doc=2395,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.41465375 = fieldWeight in 2395, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2395)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of the literature survey of USMARC AMC (USMARC Archives and Manuscript Control) and the results of a 1992 survey of 200 archivists, which show that there has been a dramatic increase in the use of USMARC AMC in the computerized cataloguing of archives in recent years. These results demonstrate clearly that USMARC AMC has 'come of age'
-
Ede, S.: LandMARC decision (1997)
0.01
0.011279955 = product of:
0.033839863 = sum of:
0.033839863 = weight(_text_:of in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033839863 = score(doc=93,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Provides an update of developments in the process of harmonization of the MARC formats used in the USA, Canada and the USA. Sets out the aims of the MARC Harmonization Coordinating Committee
-
Desrichard, Y.: ¬Les formats et normes de catalogage : evolutions et perspectives (1998)
0.01
0.011279955 = product of:
0.033839863 = sum of:
0.033839863 = weight(_text_:of in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033839863 = score(doc=2535,freq=32.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The work of Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of Anglo-American Cataloguing rules gave rise to a confernce in Toronto, Canada, in Oct 1997. some contributors elaborated on prepared texts about precise points concerning the evolution of rules in general, and those of the AACR in particular. The evolution of the notion of the catalogue and that of the practice of cataloguing were the focus of contributions and debates at an electronic forum set up specially for the occasion. Synthesizes the topics discussed including: hypertext navigation within the body of catalogues or documents, the creation of metadata included in the electronic documents themselves, the evolution of the notion of authority, and the advent of a set of universal characters permitting liberation from the problems of transliteration
-
Guenther, R.S.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification in the USMARC format (1994)
0.01
0.010911653 = product of:
0.032734957 = sum of:
0.032734957 = weight(_text_:of in 8864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032734957 = score(doc=8864,freq=22.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 8864, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8864)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The paper reviews the development of the USMARC Format for Classification Data, a standard for communication of classification data in machine-readable form. It considers the uses for online classification schedules, both for technical services and reference functions and gives an overview of the format specification details of data elements used and of the structure of the records. The paper describes an experiment conducted at the Library of Congress to test the format as well as the development of the classification database encompassing the LCC schedules. Features of the classification system are given. The LoC will complete its conversion of the LCC in mid-1995
