Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Will, L.D.; Cochard, N.: ¬The BS8723 thesaurus data model and exchange format, and its relationship to SKOS (2008) 0.05 
    0.047981266 = product of:
  0.23990633 = sum of:
    0.23990633 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 6051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23990633 = score(doc=6051,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        1.0108609 = fieldWeight in 6051, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6051)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Will, L.D.: UML model : as given in British Standard Draft for Development DD8723-5:2008 (2008) 0.03 
    0.03392788 = product of:
  0.1696394 = sum of:
    0.1696394 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 7636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1696394 = score(doc=7636,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.7147866 = fieldWeight in 7636, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7636)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.022266502 = product of:
  0.111332506 = sum of:
    0.111332506 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111332506 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  4. ISO 25964 Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies (2008) 0.02 
    0.02181078 = product of:
  0.109053895 = sum of:
    0.109053895 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.109053895 = score(doc=1169,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.45950568 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    T.1: Today's thesauri are mostly electronic tools, having moved on from the paper-based era when thesaurus standards were first developed. They are built and maintained with the support of software and need to integrate with other software, such as search engines and content management systems. Whereas in the past thesauri were designed for information professionals trained in indexing and searching, today there is a demand for vocabularies that untrained users will find to be intuitive. ISO 25964 makes the transition needed for the world of electronic information management. However, part 1 retains the assumption that human intellect is usually involved in the selection of indexing terms and in the selection of search terms. If both the indexer and the searcher are guided to choose the same term for the same concept, then relevant documents will be retrieved. This is the main principle underlying thesaurus design, even though a thesaurus built for human users may also be applied in situations where computers make the choices. Efficient exchange of data is a vital component of thesaurus management and exploitation. Hence the inclusion in this standard of recommendations for exchange formats and protocols. Adoption of these will facilitate interoperability between thesaurus management systems and the other computer applications, such as indexing and retrieval systems, that will utilize the data. Thesauri are typically used in post-coordinate retrieval systems, but may also be applied to hierarchical directories, pre-coordinate indexes and classification systems. Increasingly, thesaurus applications need to mesh with others, such as automatic categorization schemes, free-text search systems, etc. Part 2 of ISO 25964 describes additional types of structured vocabulary and gives recommendations to enable interoperation of the vocabularies at all stages of the information storage and retrieval process.
    T.2: The ability to identify and locate relevant information among vast collections and other resources is a major and pressing challenge today. Several different types of vocabulary are in use for this purpose. Some of the most widely used vocabularies were designed a hundred years ago and have been evolving steadily. A different generation of vocabularies is now emerging, designed to exploit the electronic media more effectively. A good understanding of the previous generation is still essential for effective access to collections indexed with them. An important object of ISO 25964 as a whole is to support data exchange and other forms of interoperability in circumstances in which more than one structured vocabulary is applied within one retrieval system or network. Sometimes one vocabulary has to be mapped to another, and it is important to understand both the potential and the limitations of such mappings. In other systems, a thesaurus is mapped to a classification scheme, or an ontology to a thesaurus. Comprehensive interoperability needs to cover the whole range of vocabulary types, whether young or old. Concepts in different vocabularies are related only in that they have the same or similar meaning. However, the meaning can be found in a number of different aspects within each particular type of structured vocabulary: - within terms or captions selected in different languages; - in the notation assigned indicating a place within a larger hierarchy; - in the definition, scope notes, history notes and other notes that explain the significance of that concept; and - in explicit relationships to other concepts or entities within the same vocabulary. In order to create mappings from one structured vocabulary to another it is first necessary to understand, within the context of each different type of structured vocabulary, the significance and relative importance of each of the different elements in defining the meaning of that particular concept. ISO 25964-1 describes the key characteristics of thesauri along with additional advice on best practice. ISO 25964-2 focuses on other types of vocabulary and does not attempt to cover all aspects of good practice. It concentrates on those aspects which need to be understood if one of the vocabularies is to work effectively alongside one or more of the others. Recognizing that a new standard cannot be applied to some existing vocabularies, this part of ISO 25964 provides informative description alongside the recommendations, the aim of which is to enable users and system developers to interpret and implement the existing vocabularies effectively. The remainder of ISO 25964-2 deals with the principles and practicalities of establishing mappings between vocabularies.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.01948319 = product of:
  0.09741595 = sum of:
    0.09741595 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09741595 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  6. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.02 
    0.01948319 = product of:
  0.09741595 = sum of:
    0.09741595 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09741595 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  7. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.02 
    0.01948319 = product of:
  0.09741595 = sum of:
    0.09741595 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09741595 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  8. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02 
    0.01948319 = product of:
  0.09741595 = sum of:
    0.09741595 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09741595 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  9. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02 
    0.015744796 = product of:
  0.078723975 = sum of:
    0.078723975 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078723975 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  10. Miller, K.; Matthews, B.: Having the right connections : the LIMBER project (2001) 0.01 
    0.014540519 = product of:
  0.072702594 = sum of:
    0.072702594 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.072702594 = score(doc=5933,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 5933, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5933)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    As with any journey, you have to make the right connections if you want to reach your desired destination. The goal in the LIMBER project is to facilitate cross-European data analysis independent of domain, resource, language and vocabulary. The paper describes the expertise, associations, standards and architecture underlying the project deliverables designed to achieve the project's ambitious aims. - Limber (Language Independent Metadata Browsing of European Resources) is an EU (European Union) IST (Information Societies Technology) funded project that seeks to address the problems of linguistic and discipline boundaries, which, within a more integrated European environment, are becoming increasingly important. Decision-makers, researchers and journalists need to be provided with a broader, comparative picture of society across the continent; with the social science information often required to be correlated with information from domains such as environmental science, geography and health. This cross-discipline interoperability will be provided via a uniform metadata description. In addition, the provision of multilingual user interfaces and the controlled vocabulary of a multi-lingual thesaurus will make these datasets globally accessible in a range of end-user natural languages
  11. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.01 
    0.013916564 = product of:
  0.06958282 = sum of:
    0.06958282 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06958282 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46
  12. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.01 
    0.011133251 = product of:
  0.055666253 = sum of:
    0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055666253 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  13. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.01 
    0.011133251 = product of:
  0.055666253 = sum of:
    0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055666253 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
  14. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.01 
    0.011133251 = product of:
  0.055666253 = sum of:
    0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055666253 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  15. Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004) 0.01 
    0.011133251 = product of:
  0.055666253 = sum of:
    0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055666253 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
  16. Jacobs, J.W.; Summers, E.; Ankersen, E.: Cyril: expanding the horizons of MARC21 (2004) 0.01 
    0.011133251 = product of:
  0.055666253 = sum of:
    0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055666253 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.8-17
  17. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.01 
    0.011133251 = product of:
  0.055666253 = sum of:
    0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055666253 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001) 0.01 
    0.011133251 = product of:
  0.055666253 = sum of:
    0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055666253 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:22:30
  19. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01 
    0.011133251 = product of:
  0.055666253 = sum of:
    0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055666253 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.01 
    0.011133251 = product of:
  0.055666253 = sum of:
    0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055666253 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174

Authors

Languages

  • e 29
  • d 11

Types

  • a 38
  • el 3
  • s 3
  • b 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes