Search (78 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. McDonough, J.P.: SGML and USMARC standard : applying markup to bibliographic data (1998) 0.01 
    0.00806945 = product of:
  0.056486145 = sum of:
    0.056486145 = weight(_text_:digital in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056486145 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The recent increase in electronic publishing has led many in the library community to consider altering standards for bibliographic data to promote greater compatibility between digital works and their bibliographic representation. SGML has been prominently mentioned as a mechanism for encoding bibliographic data. Examines the problems and potential of applying SGML to to USMARC record standard, with a particular emphasis on issues of field order and repeatability, character set encoding, and obsolete fields
  2. Markup and metadata (1998) 0.01 
    0.00806945 = product of:
  0.056486145 = sum of:
    0.056486145 = weight(_text_:digital in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056486145 = score(doc=1835,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Digital publishing technologies. 3(1998) no.4, S.11-14
  3. German, L.: Bibliographic utilities (2009) 0.01 
    0.00806945 = product of:
  0.056486145 = sum of:
    0.056486145 = weight(_text_:digital in 3858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056486145 = score(doc=3858,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 3858, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3858)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    Digital unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044472. Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  4. Maxwell, R.L.: Bibliographic control (2009) 0.01 
    0.0075482656 = product of:
  0.052837856 = sum of:
    0.052837856 = weight(_text_:techniques in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052837856 = score(doc=3750,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.2920283 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic control is the process of creation, exchange, preservation, and use of data about information resources. Formal bibliographic control has been practiced for millennia, but modern techniques began to be developed and implemented in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. A series of cataloging codes characterized this period. These codes governed the creation of library catalogs, first in book form, then on cards, and finally in electronic formats, including MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC). The period was also characterized by the rise of shared cataloging programs, allowing the development of resource-saving copy cataloging procedures. Such programs were assisted by the development of cataloging networks such as OCLC and RLG. The twentieth century saw progress in the theory of bibliographic control, including the 1961 Paris Principles, culminating with the early twenty-first century Statement of International Cataloguing Principles and IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Toward the end of the period bibliographic control began to be applied to newly invented electronic media, as "metadata." Trends point toward continued development of collaborative and international approaches to bibliographic control.
  5. Lauro, A. Di: IDIN manual for the creation and management of a bibliographic database using Micro-ISIS (1988) 0.01 
    0.0074365106 = product of:
  0.05205557 = sum of:
    0.05205557 = weight(_text_:processing in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05205557 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Die UNESCO vertreibt kostenfrei die Software Micro-ISIS für PCs. Zur Anwendung in kleinen Dokumentationseinrichtungen unter dem Dach des International Development Information Network (IDIN) wurde ein eigenes IDIN-Format geschaffen, das unter dieser Software eingesetzt werden kann. Besonders berücksichtigt sind dabei unselbständige Werke und die Sacherschließung mit Hilfe des 'OECD Macrothesaurus for Information Processing in the Field of Economic and Social Development'. Das Format ist abgeleitet vom 'Common Communication Format (CCF)', das ebenfalls im Auftrag der Unesco entwickelt wurde. IDIN ist eine vereinfachte Version und hat eine andere Behandlung mehrteiliger Werke
  6. Khurshid, Z.: DMARC: an extended USMARC format (1997) 0.01 
    0.0074365106 = product of:
  0.05205557 = sum of:
    0.05205557 = weight(_text_:processing in 872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05205557 = score(doc=872,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 872, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=872)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    MARC, variantly known as LCMARC and USMARC, has been adopted as a bibliographic record exchange format by libraries the world over. To accomodate the unique requirements of automated systems, geographic regions, and scripts, the format has been modified to various degrees. There are also extensions to MARC which consist of additional content designations: fields, subfields, indicator values, and characters. While the USMARC records will fit into the extended format, the extended format's information will not fit into pure USMARC. DMARC (DOBIS MARC) is one of the extended formats of USMARC. Describes the structure of the DMARC format including content designation. EBCDIC, the internal processing of DOBIS and the support of Arabic text prepared by King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM). Discusses USMARC format integration and its impact on DOBIS/LIBIS
  7. DFG und Mellon-Foundation fördern internationalen Datenaustausch (2006) 0.01 
    0.0071324534 = product of:
  0.04992717 = sum of:
    0.04992717 = weight(_text_:digital in 5070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04992717 = score(doc=5070,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.3081681 = fieldWeight in 5070, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5070)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    "Der aktuelle Speicherort einer Publikation verliert angesichts der steigenden Zahl an digital vorliegenden und über das World Wide Weh verfügbaren Publikationen seine Bedeutung. Entscheidend für die Forschung sind Aufindbarkeit und schnelle Nutzungsmöglichkeit der Informationen. Global zu arbeiten, Daten, Informationen und Texte zu tauschen ist zur täglichen Routine für Wissenschaftler und Bibliothekare geworden. Deutschsprachige und ausländische Bibliotheken verwenden derzeit noch unterschiedliche Standards bei der Speicherung und dem Austausch von Katalogdaten. Die von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft und der Andrew W. Mellon Foundation geförderten Projekte verfolgen das Ziel, die Daten deutschsprachiger Bibliotheken weltweit sichtbar zu machen. Das Interesse von Wissenschaftlern ist nicht auf ihre jeweilige eigene nationale und kulturelle Umgebung beschränkt. Sie benötigen Informationen über Dokumente und Daten aus der ganzen Welt. Gleichzeitig wollen sie die eigenen Forschungsergebnisse in der internationalen Forschungsgemeinschaft zur Diskussion stellen. Sprachraumübergreifende Standards für Metadaten und deren reibungsloser gegenseitiger Austausch sind Voraussetzung für die wissenschaftliche Kommunikation und für den individuellen Erfolg des einzelnen Forschers. Die Deutsche Bibliothek pflegt seit vielen Jahren Kooperationsbeziehungen auf nationaler und internationaler Ebene. Dazu gehören die Entwicklung und Anwendung von gemeinsamen Regeln und Standards sowie Produktion und Vertrieb von bibliografischen Dienstleistungen und die Pflege kooperativ geführter Datenbanken, insbesondere für Normdaten. Einen weiteren Schwerpunkt bilden Entwicklung und Anwendung moderner Technologien für die Langzeitarchivierung der Bestände im Rahmen internationaler Kooperationen, unabhängig davon, ob die Publikationen auf Papier, Mikrofilm oder digital vorliegen."
  8. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01 
    0.0067455107 = product of:
  0.047218572 = sum of:
    0.047218572 = product of:
      0.094437145 = sum of:
        0.094437145 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094437145 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  9. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.006359728 = product of:
  0.044518095 = sum of:
    0.044518095 = product of:
      0.08903619 = sum of:
        0.08903619 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08903619 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  10. Miller, K.; Matthews, B.: Having the right connections : the LIMBER project (2001) 0.01 
    0.0060520875 = product of:
  0.042364612 = sum of:
    0.042364612 = weight(_text_:digital in 5933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042364612 = score(doc=5933,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 5933, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5933)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Journal of digital information. 1(2001) no.8
  11. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.0055647623 = product of:
  0.038953334 = sum of:
    0.038953334 = product of:
      0.07790667 = sum of:
        0.07790667 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07790667 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  12. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.01 
    0.0055647623 = product of:
  0.038953334 = sum of:
    0.038953334 = product of:
      0.07790667 = sum of:
        0.07790667 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07790667 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  13. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.01 
    0.0055647623 = product of:
  0.038953334 = sum of:
    0.038953334 = product of:
      0.07790667 = sum of:
        0.07790667 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07790667 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  14. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01 
    0.0055647623 = product of:
  0.038953334 = sum of:
    0.038953334 = product of:
      0.07790667 = sum of:
        0.07790667 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07790667 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  15. Manguinhas, H.; Freire, N.; Machado, J.; Borbinha, J.: Supporting multilingual bibliographic resource discovery with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (2012) 0.01 
    0.0050434056 = product of:
  0.03530384 = sum of:
    0.03530384 = weight(_text_:digital in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03530384 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    Beitrag eines Schwerpunktthemas: Semantic Web and Reasoning for Cultural Heritage and Digital Libraries: Vgl.: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/supporting-multilingual-bibliographic-resource-discovery-functional-requirements-bibliograph http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/sites/default/files/swj145_2.pdf.
  16. Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013) 0.01 
    0.0050434056 = product of:
  0.03530384 = sum of:
    0.03530384 = weight(_text_:digital in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03530384 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
  17. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.00 
    0.004769796 = product of:
  0.03338857 = sum of:
    0.03338857 = product of:
      0.06677714 = sum of:
        0.06677714 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06677714 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  18. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.00 
    0.0044970075 = product of:
  0.03147905 = sum of:
    0.03147905 = product of:
      0.0629581 = sum of:
        0.0629581 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0629581 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  19. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.00 
    0.0044970075 = product of:
  0.03147905 = sum of:
    0.03147905 = product of:
      0.0629581 = sum of:
        0.0629581 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0629581 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  20. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.00 
    0.0039748303 = product of:
  0.027823811 = sum of:
    0.027823811 = product of:
      0.055647623 = sum of:
        0.055647623 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055647623 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 58
  • d 15
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 69
  • el 5
  • s 5
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications