-
McBride, J.L.: Faceted subject access for music through USMARC : a case for linked fields (2000)
0.01
0.007842129 = product of:
0.031368516 = sum of:
0.031368516 = product of:
0.06273703 = sum of:
0.06273703 = weight(_text_:aspects in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06273703 = score(doc=5403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The USMARC Format for Bibliographic Description contains three fields (045, 047, and 048) designed to facilitate subject access to music materials. The fields cover three of the main aspects of subject description for music: date of composition, form or genre, and number of instruments or voices, respectively. The codes are rarely used for subject access, because of the difficulty of coding them and because false drops would result in retrieval of bibliographic records where more than one musical work is present, a situation that occurs frequently with sound recordings. It is proposed that the values of the fields be converted to natural language and that subfield 8 be used to link all access fields in a bibliographic record for greater precision in retrieval. This proposal has implications beyond music cataloging, especially for metadata and any bibliographic records describing materials containing many works and subjects.
-
Doerr, M.; Gradmann, S.; Hennicke, S.; Isaac, A.; Meghini, C.; Van de Sompel, H.: ¬The Europeana Data Model (EDM) (2010)
0.01
0.007842129 = product of:
0.031368516 = sum of:
0.031368516 = product of:
0.06273703 = sum of:
0.06273703 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06273703 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The Europeana Data Model (EDM) is a new approach towards structuring and representing data delivered to Europeana by the various contributing cultural heritage institutions. The model aims at greater expressivity and flexibility in comparison to the current Europeana Semantic Elements (ESE), which it is destined to replace. The design principles underlying the EDM are based on the core principles and best practices of the Semantic Web and Linked Data efforts to which Europeana wants to contribute. The model itself builds upon established standards like RDF(S), OAI-ORE, SKOS, and Dublin Core. It acts as a common top-level ontology which retains original data models and information perspectives while at the same time enabling interoperability. The paper elaborates on the aforementioned aspects and the design principles which drove the development of the EDM.
-
Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995)
0.01
0.007766659 = product of:
0.031066636 = sum of:
0.031066636 = product of:
0.06213327 = sum of:
0.06213327 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06213327 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 11. 9.1996 19:22:20
- Source
- Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
-
ISO 25964 Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies (2008)
0.01
0.0067914836 = product of:
0.027165934 = sum of:
0.027165934 = product of:
0.05433187 = sum of:
0.05433187 = weight(_text_:aspects in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05433187 = score(doc=1169,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.25948527 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- T.2: The ability to identify and locate relevant information among vast collections and other resources is a major and pressing challenge today. Several different types of vocabulary are in use for this purpose. Some of the most widely used vocabularies were designed a hundred years ago and have been evolving steadily. A different generation of vocabularies is now emerging, designed to exploit the electronic media more effectively. A good understanding of the previous generation is still essential for effective access to collections indexed with them. An important object of ISO 25964 as a whole is to support data exchange and other forms of interoperability in circumstances in which more than one structured vocabulary is applied within one retrieval system or network. Sometimes one vocabulary has to be mapped to another, and it is important to understand both the potential and the limitations of such mappings. In other systems, a thesaurus is mapped to a classification scheme, or an ontology to a thesaurus. Comprehensive interoperability needs to cover the whole range of vocabulary types, whether young or old. Concepts in different vocabularies are related only in that they have the same or similar meaning. However, the meaning can be found in a number of different aspects within each particular type of structured vocabulary: - within terms or captions selected in different languages; - in the notation assigned indicating a place within a larger hierarchy; - in the definition, scope notes, history notes and other notes that explain the significance of that concept; and - in explicit relationships to other concepts or entities within the same vocabulary. In order to create mappings from one structured vocabulary to another it is first necessary to understand, within the context of each different type of structured vocabulary, the significance and relative importance of each of the different elements in defining the meaning of that particular concept. ISO 25964-1 describes the key characteristics of thesauri along with additional advice on best practice. ISO 25964-2 focuses on other types of vocabulary and does not attempt to cover all aspects of good practice. It concentrates on those aspects which need to be understood if one of the vocabularies is to work effectively alongside one or more of the others. Recognizing that a new standard cannot be applied to some existing vocabularies, this part of ISO 25964 provides informative description alongside the recommendations, the aim of which is to enable users and system developers to interpret and implement the existing vocabularies effectively. The remainder of ISO 25964-2 deals with the principles and practicalities of establishing mappings between vocabularies.
-
Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 4.12.1995 22:40:20
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
-
McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
-
Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
-
Radwanski, A.: Rozwoj formatu MARC (1996)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 20:34:37
-
Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
-
Jacobs, J.W.; Summers, E.; Ankersen, E.: Cyril: expanding the horizons of MARC21 (2004)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.8-17
-
Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 14:22:51
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994)
0.01
0.005491857 = product of:
0.021967428 = sum of:
0.021967428 = product of:
0.043934856 = sum of:
0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043934856 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
