Search (375 results, page 4 of 19)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Lahary, D.: UNIMARC as a cataloguing format in France (1999) 0.00
    0.0027415988 = product of:
      0.0054831975 = sum of:
        0.0054831975 = product of:
          0.010966395 = sum of:
            0.010966395 = weight(_text_:a in 6024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010966395 = score(doc=6024,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 6024, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6024)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Matoria, R.K.; Upadhyay, P.K.: Migration of data from one library management system to another : a case study in India (2004) 0.00
    0.0027415988 = product of:
      0.0054831975 = sum of:
        0.0054831975 = product of:
          0.010966395 = sum of:
            0.010966395 = weight(_text_:a in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010966395 = score(doc=4200,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  3. Garden, A.: ¬L'avenir des formats de données (2001) 0.00
    0.0027415988 = product of:
      0.0054831975 = sum of:
        0.0054831975 = product of:
          0.010966395 = sum of:
            0.010966395 = weight(_text_:a in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010966395 = score(doc=4202,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  4. Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994) 0.00
    0.002590567 = product of:
      0.005181134 = sum of:
        0.005181134 = product of:
          0.010362268 = sum of:
            0.010362268 = weight(_text_:a in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010362268 = score(doc=3033,freq=28.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.23833402 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
                  5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                    28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper I describe a conceptual design of a bibliographic retrieval system that enables more thourough control of bibliographic entities. A bibliographic entity has 2 components: the intellectual work and the physical item. Users searching bibliographic retrieval systems generally do not search for a specific item, but are willing to retrieve one of several alternative manifestations of a work. However, contemporary bibliographic retrieval systems are based solely on the descriptions of items. Works are described only implcitly by collocating descriptions of items. This method has resulted in a tool that does not include important descriptive attributes of the work, e.g. information regarding its history, its genre, or its bibliographic relationships. A bibliographic relationship is an association between 2 bibliographic entities. A system evaluation methodology wasused to create a conceptual schema for a bibliographic retrieval system. The model is based upon an analysis of data elements in the USMARC Formats for Bibliographic Data. The conceptual schema describes a database comprising 2 separate files of bibliographic descriptions, one of works and the other of items. Each file consists of individual descriptive surrogates of their respective entities. the specific data content of each file is defined by a data dictionary. Data elements used in the description of bibliographic works reflect the nature of works as intellectual and linguistic objects. The descriptive elements of bibliographic items describe the physical properties of bibliographic entities. Bibliographic relationships constitute the logical strucutre of the database
    Type
    a
  5. Stephens, O.: Introduction to OpenRefine (2014) 0.00
    0.0024924895 = product of:
      0.004984979 = sum of:
        0.004984979 = product of:
          0.009969958 = sum of:
            0.009969958 = weight(_text_:a in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009969958 = score(doc=2884,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    OpenRefine is described as a tool for working with 'messy' data - but what does this mean? It is probably easiest to describe the kinds of data OpenRefine is good at working with and the sorts of problems it can help you solve. OpenRefine is most useful where you have data in a simple tabular format but with internal inconsistencies either in data formats, or where data appears, or in terminology used. It can help you: Get an overview of a data set Resolve inconsistencies in a data set Help you split data up into more granular parts Match local data up to other data sets Enhance a data set with data from other sources Some common scenarios might be: 1. Where you want to know how many times a particular value appears in a column in your data. 2. Where you want to know how values are distributed across your whole data set. 3. Where you have a list of dates which are formatted in different ways, and want to change all the dates in the list to a single common date format.
  6. Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching : a review of Pauline Cochrane's Thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters (2016) 0.00
    0.002477056 = product of:
      0.004954112 = sum of:
        0.004954112 = product of:
          0.009908224 = sum of:
            0.009908224 = weight(_text_:a in 2698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009908224 = score(doc=2698,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 2698, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching: a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters. In: Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science 2000. S.46-58. Vgl.: DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2015.1116359.
    Type
    a
  7. Studwell, W.E.; Rast, E.K.: Format integration and spatial data : a preliminary view (1993) 0.00
    0.0023983994 = product of:
      0.004796799 = sum of:
        0.004796799 = product of:
          0.009593598 = sum of:
            0.009593598 = weight(_text_:a in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009593598 = score(doc=6698,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Provides a brief history and explains the principle of format integration. Gives 2 examples of monographic map records taken from the OCLC database. Explains significant or substantial differences between the present fixed fields and the projected fields for both these examples
    Type
    a
  8. Information transfer and exchange formats (1991) 0.00
    0.0023983994 = product of:
      0.004796799 = sum of:
        0.004796799 = product of:
          0.009593598 = sum of:
            0.009593598 = weight(_text_:a in 7891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009593598 = score(doc=7891,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 7891, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Editor
    Hopkinson, A.
    Source
    Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
    Type
    a
  9. Hollis, R.; Brunelle, B.S.: Developing a common user interface for information searching (1995) 0.00
    0.0023983994 = product of:
      0.004796799 = sum of:
        0.004796799 = product of:
          0.009593598 = sum of:
            0.009593598 = weight(_text_:a in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009593598 = score(doc=3364,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the debate over a Common User Interface for databases, across various hardware platforms and operating systems, for both CD-ROM and online searching of bibliographic and full text databases. Discusses the implementation and further development of Z39.50 as an international standard for structured bibliographic data
    Type
    a
  10. Graham, C.; Johnston, J.: Format integration and serials cataloging (1997) 0.00
    0.0023983994 = product of:
      0.004796799 = sum of:
        0.004796799 = product of:
          0.009593598 = sum of:
            0.009593598 = weight(_text_:a in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009593598 = score(doc=663,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines some goals which format integration has achieved, and also some new problems which it brings. Cataloguers therefore have a great deal to consider in formulating policies
    Footnote
    Report of a workshop held at the North American Serials Interest Group, Inc., 11th annual conference, 20-23 Jun 96
    Type
    a
  11. Campos, F.M.; Lopes, M.I.; Galvao, R.M.: MARC formats and their use : an overview (1995) 0.00
    0.002374294 = product of:
      0.004748588 = sum of:
        0.004748588 = product of:
          0.009497176 = sum of:
            0.009497176 = weight(_text_:a in 3338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009497176 = score(doc=3338,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 3338, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3338)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on work carried out as part of a feasibility study for UseMARCON (User Controlled Generic MARC Converter); a European Community funded project to develop a toolbox capable of converting bibliographic records from any MARC format into any other MARC format through a central conversion format. Reviews the use of MARC formats as internal or cataloguing formats or an exchange formats available in tape magnetic tape services. Special attention is paid to the actual us and use trends of UNIMARC, with particular reference to the role of UNIMARC as a new stage in the evolution of MARC formats, devised to improve and facilitate the exchange of bibliographic information between different systems
    Type
    a
  12. McCallum, S.H.: MARCXML sampler (2005) 0.00
    0.002374294 = product of:
      0.004748588 = sum of:
        0.004748588 = product of:
          0.009497176 = sum of:
            0.009497176 = weight(_text_:a in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009497176 = score(doc=4361,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    At the IFLA conference in Glasgow, three years ago, the Information Technology Section organized a workshop on metadata. At that workshop MARCXML was presented, along with plans and expectations for its use. This paper is an update to that report. It reviews the development of an XML schema for MARC 21 and the MARCXML tool kit of transformations. The close relationship of MARCXML to the recent ISO standards work associated with MARC in XML is described. Sketches of interesting applications follow with uses that range from MARCXML as a switching format to a maintenance tool to a record communication format for new XML-based protocols.
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
    Type
    a
  13. Standards: back to the future? : Proceedings of a workshop on the future of bibliographic standards (1993) 0.00
    0.0023499418 = product of:
      0.0046998835 = sum of:
        0.0046998835 = product of:
          0.009399767 = sum of:
            0.009399767 = weight(_text_:a in 7527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009399767 = score(doc=7527,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 7527, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7527)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of documentation 50(1994) no.2, S.158-160 (A. Hopkinson)
  14. Nichols introduces MARCit (1998) 0.00
    0.0023499418 = product of:
      0.0046998835 = sum of:
        0.0046998835 = product of:
          0.009399767 = sum of:
            0.009399767 = weight(_text_:a in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009399767 = score(doc=1438,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the release of MARCit, a software package that enables the cataloguing of Internet resources into MARC format bibliographic records
    Type
    a
  15. Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996) 0.00
    0.0023499418 = product of:
      0.0046998835 = sum of:
        0.0046998835 = product of:
          0.009399767 = sum of:
            0.009399767 = weight(_text_:a in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009399767 = score(doc=3008,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Medeiros, N.: Making room for MARC in a Dublin Core world (1999) 0.00
    0.0023499418 = product of:
      0.0046998835 = sum of:
        0.0046998835 = product of:
          0.009399767 = sum of:
            0.009399767 = weight(_text_:a in 350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009399767 = score(doc=350,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 350, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=350)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  17. METS: an overview & tutorial : Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard (METS) (2001) 0.00
    0.0023499418 = product of:
      0.0046998835 = sum of:
        0.0046998835 = product of:
          0.009399767 = sum of:
            0.009399767 = weight(_text_:a in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009399767 = score(doc=1323,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Maintaining a library of digital objects of necessaryy requires maintaining metadata about those objects. The metadata necessary for successful management and use of digital objeets is both more extensive than and different from the metadata used for managing collections of printed works and other physical materials. While a library may record descriptive metadata regarding a book in its collection, the book will not dissolve into a series of unconnected pages if the library fails to record structural metadata regarding the book's organization, nor will scholars be unable to evaluate the book's worth if the library fails to note that the book was produced using a Ryobi offset press. The Same cannot be said for a digital version of the saure book. Without structural metadata, the page image or text files comprising the digital work are of little use, and without technical metadata regarding the digitization process, scholars may be unsure of how accurate a reflection of the original the digital version provides. For internal management purposes, a library must have access to appropriate technical metadata in order to periodically refresh and migrate the data, ensuring the durability of valuable resources.
  18. Simmons, P.: Microcomputer software for ISO 2709 record conversion (1989) 0.00
    0.0022155463 = product of:
      0.0044310926 = sum of:
        0.0044310926 = product of:
          0.008862185 = sum of:
            0.008862185 = weight(_text_:a in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008862185 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  19. Mackenzie Owen, J.S.: Format incompatibility and the exchange of bibliographic information : a comparative study (1976) 0.00
    0.0022155463 = product of:
      0.0044310926 = sum of:
        0.0044310926 = product of:
          0.008862185 = sum of:
            0.008862185 = weight(_text_:a in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008862185 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Dierickx, H. (Bearb.); Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): UNISIST reference manual for machine-readable bibliographic description (1986) 0.00
    0.0022155463 = product of:
      0.0044310926 = sum of:
        0.0044310926 = product of:
          0.008862185 = sum of:
            0.008862185 = weight(_text_:a in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008862185 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 337
  • m 17
  • el 14
  • s 10
  • b 2
  • l 2
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…