Search (89 results, page 4 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.4: UNIMARC, some formats based on it and some other MARC formats (1995) 0.01
    0.008839957 = product of:
      0.044199787 = sum of:
        0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 3811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044199787 = score(doc=3811,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 3811, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3811)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library review. 44(1995) no.7, S.8-33
  2. Curwen, A.G.; Kirk, C.: Application of UNIMARC to multinational databases : feasibility study (1999) 0.01
    0.008839957 = product of:
      0.044199787 = sum of:
        0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 4079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044199787 = score(doc=4079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 4079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4079)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    7. 6.1997 12:49:09
  3. Frias, J.A.: ¬La estructura conceptual del registro bibliografico : una revision (1996) 0.01
    0.008839957 = product of:
      0.044199787 = sum of:
        0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 4618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044199787 = score(doc=4618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 4618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4618)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    It is assumed that the conceptual structure of bibliographic records is based on the knowledge of user needs. In applying the entity-relationship model to the library catalogue the authority file and bibliographic records can be viewed as attributes, and the links between records and elements as relationships. Outlines the bibliographic relationships of the UNIMARC format, the analysis of hierarchical relationships carried out by Goosens and Mazur-Rzesos, and the typology of bibliographic documents established by McCallum. Presents 7 types of relationships developed by Tillet and gives results of an empirical study carried out to establish the extent and features of bibliographic relationships in the computerized catalogue of the Library of Congress
  4. Conklin, C.E.: Australia: The ABN, ANB, AUSMARC and the National Library (1988) 0.01
    0.008839957 = product of:
      0.044199787 = sum of:
        0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044199787 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    7. 1.2007 17:25:29
  5. Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching : a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters (2000) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  6. Keith, C.: Using XSLT to manipulate MARC metadata (2004) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.122-130
  7. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  8. Andresen, L.: After MARC - what then? (2004) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=4751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4751)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.40-51
  9. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  10. Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Croissant, C.R.: MARC21 und die anglo-amerikanische Katalogisierungspraxis (2004) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=1764,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 8.2004 21:22:06
  12. McCallum, S.H.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1975-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:38
  13. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Martin, P.: Conventions and notations for knowledge representation and retrieval (2000) 0.01
    0.0075771073 = product of:
      0.037885536 = sum of:
        0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 5070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037885536 = score(doc=5070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 5070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5070)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Much research has focused on the problem of knowledge accessibility, sharing and reuse. Specific languages (e.g. KIF, CG, RDF) and ontologies have been proposed. Common characteristics, conventions or ontological distinctions are beginning to emerge. Since knowledge providers (humans and software agents) must follow common conventions for the knowledge to be widely accessed and re-used, we propose lexical, structural, semantic and ontological conventions based on various knowledge representation projects and our own research. These are minimal conventions that can be followed by most and cover the most common knowledge representation cases. However, agreement and refinements are still required. We also show that a notation can be both readable and expressive by quickly presenting two new notations -- Formalized English (FE) and Frame-CG (FCG) - derived from the CG linear form [9] and Frame-Logics [4]. These notations support the above conventions, and are implemented in our Web-based knowledge representation and document indexation tool, WebKB¹ [7]
  15. Wiesenmüller, H.: Von Fröschen und Strategen : Ein kleiner Leitfaden zur AACR2-Debatte (2002) 0.01
    0.0075771073 = product of:
      0.037885536 = sum of:
        0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037885536 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    BuB. 54(2002) H.7/8, S.466-470
  16. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. MacCallum, S.H.: Harmonization of USMARC, CANMARC, and UKMARC (2000) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  19. Behrens-Neumann, R.: Aus der 56. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 23. April 2009 in Wien : ein Bericht (2009) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 13:11:01
  20. IFLA-CDNL Alliance for Bibliographic Standards (ICABS) (2003) 0.01
    0.0063142553 = product of:
      0.031571276 = sum of:
        0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031571276 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Während des Weltkongresses Bibliothek und Information, der 69. IFLA-Generalkonferenz, 2003 in Berlin wurde mit der IFLA-CDNL Alliance for Bibliographic Standards (ICABS) ein neues strategisches Vorhaben für bibliografische Standards ins Leben gerufen. Die feierliche Unterzeichnung fand am 7. August 2003 statt. Mit ICABS streben die National Library of Australia, die Library of Congress, die British Library, die Koninklijke Bibliotheek und Die Deutsche Bibliothek gemeinsam mit der National Library of Portugal, der IFLA und der Conference of Directors of National Libraries (CDNL) die Fortsetzung der Koordination und Unterstützung von Schlüsselaktivitäten im Bereich der bibliografischen und der Ressourcen-Kontrolle sowie damit zusammenhängender Formatstandards an. Wichtige Ziele hierbei sind insbesondere - bereits existierende Standards und Konzepte aus dem Bereich der bibliografischen und der Ressourcen-Kontrolle zu pflegen, für sie zu werben und sie zu harmonisieren, - Strategien für bibliografische und Ressourcen-Kontrolle zu entwickeln und für neue und empfohlene Konventionen zu werben, sowie das Verständnis von Themen zu vertiefen, die mit der Langzeitarchivierung elektronischer Ressourcen zusammenhängen. Das IFLA-Programm Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC (UBCIM), das bei Der Deutschen Bibliothek angesiedelt war, endete im Februar 2003 mit dem Eintritt der bisherigen Leiterin Marie-France Plassard in den Ruhestand. Die verantwortlichen IFLA-Gremien eruierten bereits in den Vorjahren Möglichkeiten, wie die Betreuung des Formates UNIMARC und die Fortführung eines Programms, das sich mit der universellen bibliografischen Kontrolle beschäftigt, sichergestellt werden könnten. Die portugiesische Nationalbibliothek hat nunmehr zu Beginn diesen Jahres die Pflege und Entwicklung von UNIMARC sowie die Herausgabe der Publikation »International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control« (ICBC) übernommen.

Years

Languages

  • e 54
  • d 31
  • sp 2
  • pl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 76
  • m 5
  • s 5
  • b 2
  • r 2
  • el 1
  • l 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…