-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.09
0.09240676 = product of:
0.16171181 = sum of:
0.057996564 = weight(_text_:systems in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057996564 = score(doc=562,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.4704818 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.021935713 = product of:
0.043871425 = sum of:
0.043871425 = weight(_text_:29 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043871425 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.060041167 = weight(_text_:library in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060041167 = score(doc=562,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.56927717 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.021738386 = product of:
0.04347677 = sum of:
0.04347677 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04347677 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:21:29
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching : a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters (2000)
0.06
0.057411227 = product of:
0.13395953 = sum of:
0.013046212 = product of:
0.026092423 = sum of:
0.026092423 = weight(_text_:science in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026092423 = score(doc=1183,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.036767554 = weight(_text_:library in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036767554 = score(doc=1183,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
0.08414577 = sum of:
0.05153819 = weight(_text_:applications in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05153819 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2918479 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
0.032607578 = weight(_text_:22 in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032607578 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The following discussion is in appreciation of the invaluable inspirations Pauline Cochrane, by her acumen and perspicacity, has implanted into my thinking regarding various applications of library and information science, especially those involving machine-readable records and subject categorization. It is indeed an honor for me at my age to be offered to contribute to Pauline's Festschrift when instead I should be concerned about my forthcoming obituary. In the following, I must give some Background to what formed my thinking before my involvement in the field and thus before I encountered Pauline.
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.05
0.051238667 = product of:
0.17933533 = sum of:
0.03714858 = weight(_text_:library in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03714858 = score(doc=2837,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.14218675 = sum of:
0.104144566 = weight(_text_:applications in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.104144566 = score(doc=2837,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.5897447 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.038042177 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038042177 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), its accompanying documentation and some of its applications. It reviews the MODS user guidelines provided by the Library of Congress and how they enable a user of the schema to consistently apply MODS as a metadata scheme. Because the schema itself could not fully document appropriate usage, the guidelines provide element definitions, history, relationships with other elements, usage conventions, and examples. Short descriptions of some MODS applications are given and a more detailed discussion of its use in the Library of Congress's Minerva project for Web archiving is given.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
-
UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994)
0.05
0.051093794 = product of:
0.089414135 = sum of:
0.02929879 = weight(_text_:systems in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02929879 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
0.010762575 = product of:
0.02152515 = sum of:
0.02152515 = weight(_text_:science in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02152515 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.030331684 = weight(_text_:library in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030331684 = score(doc=8779,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
0.019021088 = product of:
0.038042177 = sum of:
0.038042177 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038042177 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.04
0.041959755 = product of:
0.14685914 = sum of:
0.034664784 = weight(_text_:library in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034664784 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.11219436 = sum of:
0.06871759 = weight(_text_:applications in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06871759 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.38913056 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.04347677 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04347677 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.3, S.148-163
-
Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003)
0.03
0.03286947 = product of:
0.057521567 = sum of:
0.020927707 = weight(_text_:systems in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020927707 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.0076875538 = product of:
0.0153751075 = sum of:
0.0153751075 = weight(_text_:science in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0153751075 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.015319815 = weight(_text_:library in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015319815 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.013586491 = product of:
0.027172983 = sum of:
0.027172983 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027172983 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- Catalogs have for centuries been the main tool that enabled users to search for items in a library by author, title, or subject. A catalog can be interpreted as a set of bibliographic records, where each record acts as a surrogate for a publication. Every record describes a specific publication and contains the data that is used to create the indexes of search systems and the information that is presented to the user. Bibliographic records are often captured and exchanged by the use of the MARC format. Although there are numerous rdquodialectsrdquo of the MARC format in use, they are usually crafted on the same basis and are interoperable with each other -to a certain extent. The data model of a MARC-based catalog, however, is rdquo[...] extremely non-normalized with excessive replication of datardquo [1]. For instance, a literary work that exists in numerous editions and translations is likely to yield a large result set because each edition or translation is represented by an individual record, that is unrelated to other records that describe the same work.
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; vol.2769
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
-
Salgáné, M.M.: Our electronic era and bibliographic informations computer-related bibliographic data formats, metadata formats and BDML (2005)
0.03
0.032218043 = product of:
0.075175434 = sum of:
0.033484332 = weight(_text_:systems in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033484332 = score(doc=3005,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
0.024511702 = weight(_text_:library in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024511702 = score(doc=3005,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
0.017179398 = product of:
0.034358796 = sum of:
0.034358796 = weight(_text_:applications in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034358796 = score(doc=3005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.19456528 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Using new communication technologies libraries must face continuously new questions, possibilities and expectations. This study discusses library-related aspects of our electronic era and how computer-related data formats affect bibliographic dataprocessing to give a summary of the most important results. First bibliographic formats for the exchange of bibliographic and related information in the machine-readable form between different types of computer systems were created more than 30 years ago. The evolution of information technologies leads to the improvement of computer systems. In addition to the development of computers and media types Internet has a great influence on data structure as well. Since the introduction of MARC bibliographic format, technology of data exchange between computers and between different computer systems has reached a very sophisticated stage and has contributed to the creation of new standards in this field. Today libraries work with this new infrastructure that induces many challenges. One of the most significant challenges is moving from a relatively homogenous bibliographic environment to a diverse one. Despite these challenges such changes are achievable and necessary to exploit possibilities of new metadata and technologies like the Internet and XML (Extensible Markup Language). XML is an open standard, a universal language for data on the Web. XML is nearly six-years-old standard designed for the description and computer-based management of (semi)-structured data and structured texts. XML gives developers the power to deliver structured data from a wide variety of applications and it is also an ideal format from server-to-server transfer of structured data. XML also isn't limited for Internet use and is an especially valuable tool in the field of library. In fact, XML's main strength - organizing information - makes it perfect for exchanging data between different systems. Tools that work with the XML can be used to process XML records without incurring additional costs associated with one's own software development. In addition, XML is also a suitable format for library web services. The Department of Computer-related Graphic Design and Library and Information Sciences of Debrecen University launched the BDML (Bibliographic Description Markup Language) development project in order to standardize bibliogrphic description with the help of XML.
-
Lam, K.-T.: XML and global name access control (2002)
0.03
0.031562172 = product of:
0.07364506 = sum of:
0.041434746 = weight(_text_:systems in 963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041434746 = score(doc=963,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 963, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=963)
0.010762575 = product of:
0.02152515 = sum of:
0.02152515 = weight(_text_:science in 963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02152515 = score(doc=963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=963)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02144774 = weight(_text_:library in 963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02144774 = score(doc=963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=963)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Ki-Tat is the Head of Systems, Hong Kong University of Science & Technology Library, Hong Kong. In his article, Ki-Tat discusses why MARC21 is ideal for Anglo-American names, but not suitable for non-Latin names. He provides three suggestions: making 1XX field repeatable, improving linking capability between related forms of a name by avoiding the subfield 6 in tag 880, and adding a subfield to store language script used in each tag field. Ki-Tat also stresses that encoding MARC in XML provides possibility to expand "authority control" to "access control". Lastly, he illustrates a method of using SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) technology to provide name access control globally.
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 18(2002) no.2, S.88-95
-
Keith, C.: Using XSLT to manipulate MARC metadata (2004)
0.03
0.03146982 = product of:
0.11014436 = sum of:
0.025998589 = weight(_text_:library in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025998589 = score(doc=4747,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
0.08414577 = sum of:
0.05153819 = weight(_text_:applications in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05153819 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2918479 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
0.032607578 = weight(_text_:22 in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032607578 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the MARCXML architecture implemented at the Library of Congress. It gives an overview of the component pieces of the architecture, including the MARCXML schema and the MARCXML toolkit, while giving a brief tutorial on their use. Several different applications of the architecture and tools are discussed to illustrate the features of the toolkit being developed thus far. Nearly any metadata format can take advantage of the features of the toolkit, and the process of the toolkit enabling a new format is discussed. Finally, this paper intends to foster new ideas with regards to the transformation of descriptive metadata, especially using XML tools. In this paper the following conventions will be used: MARC21 will refer to MARC 21 records in the ISO 2709 record structure used today; MARCXML will refer to MARC 21 records in an XML structure.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.122-130
-
Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004)
0.03
0.03139658 = product of:
0.07325868 = sum of:
0.02511325 = weight(_text_:systems in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02511325 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.03184164 = weight(_text_:library in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03184164 = score(doc=4752,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.016303789 = product of:
0.032607578 = sum of:
0.032607578 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032607578 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
-
Snow, M.: Visual depictions and the use of MARC : a view from the trenches of slide librarianship (1989)
0.03
0.029900407 = product of:
0.06976762 = sum of:
0.02929879 = weight(_text_:systems in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02929879 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
0.02144774 = weight(_text_:library in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02144774 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
0.019021088 = product of:
0.038042177 = sum of:
0.038042177 = weight(_text_:22 in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038042177 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. The only way to get bibliographic records on to campus on-line library catalogues, and slide records on the national bibliographic utilities, is through the use of MARC. Discusses the importance of having individual slide and photograph records on the national bibliographic utilities, and considers the obstacles which currently make this difficult. Discusses mapping to MARC from data base management systems.
- Date
- 4.12.1995 22:51:36
-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.03
0.029900407 = product of:
0.06976762 = sum of:
0.02929879 = weight(_text_:systems in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02929879 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.02144774 = weight(_text_:library in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02144774 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.019021088 = product of:
0.038042177 = sum of:
0.038042177 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038042177 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
-
Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004)
0.03
0.029222485 = product of:
0.0681858 = sum of:
0.021935713 = product of:
0.043871425 = sum of:
0.043871425 = weight(_text_:29 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043871425 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024511702 = weight(_text_:library in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024511702 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
0.021738386 = product of:
0.04347677 = sum of:
0.04347677 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04347677 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:29:32
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
-
Zapounidou, S.; Sfakakis, M.; Papatheodorou, C.: Library data integration : towards BIBFRAME mapping to EDM (2014)
0.03
0.027538452 = product of:
0.09638458 = sum of:
0.0513537 = sum of:
0.018450128 = weight(_text_:science in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018450128 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.03290357 = weight(_text_:29 in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03290357 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.045030877 = weight(_text_:library in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045030877 = score(doc=1589,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.42695788 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Integration of library data into the Linked Data environment is a key issue in libraries and is approached on the basis of interoperability between library data conceptual models. Achieving interoperability for different representations of the same or related entities between the library and cultural heritage domains shall enhance rich bibliographic data reusability and support the development of new data-driven information services. This paper aims to contribute to the desired interoperability by attempting to map core semantic paths between the BIBFRAME and EDM conceptual models. BIBFRAME is developed by the Library of Congress to support transformation of legacy library data in MARC format into linked data. EDM is the model developed for and used in the Europeana Cultural Heritage aggregation portal.
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 478
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
-
USMARC format for classification data : including guidelines for content designation (1991)
0.03
0.026754994 = product of:
0.09364247 = sum of:
0.050746992 = weight(_text_:systems in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050746992 = score(doc=4372,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.41167158 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
0.04289548 = weight(_text_:library in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04289548 = score(doc=4372,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Format specifications for the communication of MARC classification records, which may be used in online public catalog retrieval systems, in systems to maintain and develop classification schedules, and in online systems for library classifiers. Defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes, and codes values) that identify the data elements in the records. Developed to support the 2 major US classification schemes: Library of Congress Classification and Dewey Decimal Classification, but also lets you communicate other classification schemes. Includes a glossary of classification terms and full record examples of LCC, DDC, NLM classification and UDC
- Editor
- Library of Congress
- Imprint
- Washington : Library of Congress
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.026428623 = product of:
0.09250018 = sum of:
0.049023405 = weight(_text_:library in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049023405 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.04347677 = product of:
0.08695354 = sum of:
0.08695354 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08695354 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995)
0.03
0.025332943 = product of:
0.0591102 = sum of:
0.010762575 = product of:
0.02152515 = sum of:
0.02152515 = weight(_text_:science in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02152515 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02144774 = weight(_text_:library in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02144774 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.026899882 = product of:
0.053799763 = sum of:
0.053799763 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053799763 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Date
- 11. 9.1996 19:22:20
- Source
- Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.03
0.025092931 = product of:
0.05855017 = sum of:
0.012300085 = product of:
0.02460017 = sum of:
0.02460017 = weight(_text_:science in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02460017 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024511702 = weight(_text_:library in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024511702 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.021738386 = product of:
0.04347677 = sum of:
0.04347677 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04347677 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 32(1995) no.3, S.i-iv
-
Format integration and its effect on cataloging, training, and systems (1993)
0.02
0.024855444 = product of:
0.08699405 = sum of:
0.0502265 = weight(_text_:systems in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0502265 = score(doc=67,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
0.036767554 = weight(_text_:library in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036767554 = score(doc=67,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Series
- ALCTS papers on library technical services and collections; no.4
-
Fattahi, R.: ¬A uniform approach to the indexing of cataloguing data in online library systems (1997)
0.02
0.024855444 = product of:
0.08699405 = sum of:
0.0502265 = weight(_text_:systems in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0502265 = score(doc=131,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.036767554 = weight(_text_:library in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036767554 = score(doc=131,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Argues that in library cataloguing and for optional functionality of bibliographic records the indexing of fields and subfields should follow a uniform approach. This would maintain effectiveness in searching, retrieval and display of bibliographic information both within systems and between systems. However, a review of different postings to the AUTOCAT and USMARC discussion lists indicates that the indexing and tagging of cataloguing data do not, at present, follow a consistent approach in online library systems. If the rationale of cataloguing principles is to bring uniformity in bibliographic description and effectiveness in access, they should also address the question of uniform approaches to the indexing of cataloguing data. In this context and in terms of the identification and handling of data elements, cataloguing standards (codes, MARC formats and the Z39.50 standard) should be brought closer, in that they should provide guidelines for the designation of data elements for machine readable records
- Source
- Library review. 46(1997) no.5, S.339-343
