-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.06
0.06258967 = product of:
0.14604256 = sum of:
0.04461906 = weight(_text_:processing in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04461906 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.084729224 = weight(_text_:digital in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084729224 = score(doc=4748,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.016694285 = product of:
0.03338857 = sum of:
0.03338857 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03338857 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004)
0.06
0.055476323 = product of:
0.12944475 = sum of:
0.059912607 = weight(_text_:digital in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059912607 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.052837856 = weight(_text_:techniques in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052837856 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.2920283 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.016694285 = product of:
0.03338857 = sum of:
0.03338857 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03338857 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.03
0.029183578 = product of:
0.10214252 = sum of:
0.07988347 = weight(_text_:digital in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07988347 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.493069 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.022259047 = product of:
0.044518095 = sum of:
0.044518095 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044518095 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Cranefield, S.: Networked knowledge representation and exchange using UML and RDF (2001)
0.03
0.028994557 = product of:
0.101480946 = sum of:
0.05205557 = weight(_text_:processing in 5896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05205557 = score(doc=5896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 5896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5896)
0.04942538 = weight(_text_:digital in 5896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04942538 = score(doc=5896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 5896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5896)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper proposes the use of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) as a language for modelling ontologies for Web resources and the knowledge contained within them. To provide a mechanism for serialising and processing object diagrams representing knowledge, a pair of XSI-T stylesheets have been developed to map from XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) encodings of class diagrams to corresponding RDF schemas and to Java classes representing the concepts in the ontologies. The Java code includes methods for marshalling and unmarshalling object-oriented information between in-memory data structures and RDF serialisations of that information. This provides a convenient mechanism for Java applications to share knowledge on the Web
- Source
- Journal of digital information. 1(2001) no.8
-
Smith, J.K.; Cunningham, R.L.; Sarapata, S.P.: MARC to ENC MARC : bringing the collection forward (2004)
0.02
0.023673033 = product of:
0.16571122 = sum of:
0.16571122 = sum of:
0.12675789 = weight(_text_:mathematics in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12675789 = score(doc=2844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25945482 = queryWeight, product of:
6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.48855478 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
0.038953334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038953334 = score(doc=2844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This paper will describe the way in which the USMARC cataloging schema is used at the Eisenhower National Clearing-house (ENC). Discussion will include how ENC MARC extensions were developed for cataloging mathematics and science curriculum resources, and how the ENC workflow is integrated into the cataloging interface. The discussion will conclude with a historical look at the in-house data transfer from ENC MARC to the current production of IEEE LOM XML encoding for record sharing and OAI compliance, required under the NSDL project guidelines.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.28-39
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.02
0.023357468 = product of:
0.08175113 = sum of:
0.05949208 = weight(_text_:processing in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05949208 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.022259047 = product of:
0.044518095 = sum of:
0.044518095 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044518095 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.02
0.020437783 = product of:
0.071532235 = sum of:
0.05205557 = weight(_text_:processing in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05205557 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.019476667 = product of:
0.038953334 = sum of:
0.038953334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038953334 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
-
Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006)
0.02
0.0196863 = product of:
0.068902045 = sum of:
0.04942538 = weight(_text_:digital in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04942538 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.019476667 = product of:
0.038953334 = sum of:
0.038953334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038953334 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
McCallum, S.H.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1975-2007 (2009)
0.02
0.01687397 = product of:
0.059058897 = sum of:
0.042364612 = weight(_text_:digital in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042364612 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
0.016694285 = product of:
0.03338857 = sum of:
0.03338857 = weight(_text_:22 in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03338857 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Content
- Digital unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044392, Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:38
-
Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011)
0.02
0.01687397 = product of:
0.059058897 = sum of:
0.042364612 = weight(_text_:digital in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042364612 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.016694285 = product of:
0.03338857 = sum of:
0.03338857 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03338857 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Guenther, R.; McCallum, S.: New metadata standards for digital resources : MODS and METS (2003)
0.01
0.014121537 = product of:
0.09885076 = sum of:
0.09885076 = weight(_text_:digital in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09885076 = score(doc=1250,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.61014175 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Metadata has taken an a new took with the advent of XML and digital resources. XML provides a new versatile structure for tagging and packaging metadata as the rapid proliferation of digital resources demands both rapidly produced descriptive data and the encoding of more types of metadata. Two emerging standards are attempting to harness these developments for library needs. The first is the Metadata Object and Description Schema (MODS), a MARC-compatible XML schema for encoding descriptive data. The second standard is the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS), a highly flexible XML schema for packaging the descriptive metadata and various other important types of metadata needed to assure the use and preservation of digital resources.
-
Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003)
0.01
0.014061642 = product of:
0.049215745 = sum of:
0.03530384 = weight(_text_:digital in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03530384 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.013911906 = product of:
0.027823811 = sum of:
0.027823811 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027823811 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
-
METS: an overview & tutorial : Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard (METS) (2001)
0.01
0.013532878 = product of:
0.09473014 = sum of:
0.09473014 = weight(_text_:digital in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09473014 = score(doc=1323,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.58470786 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Maintaining a library of digital objects of necessaryy requires maintaining metadata about those objects. The metadata necessary for successful management and use of digital objeets is both more extensive than and different from the metadata used for managing collections of printed works and other physical materials. While a library may record descriptive metadata regarding a book in its collection, the book will not dissolve into a series of unconnected pages if the library fails to record structural metadata regarding the book's organization, nor will scholars be unable to evaluate the book's worth if the library fails to note that the book was produced using a Ryobi offset press. The Same cannot be said for a digital version of the saure book. Without structural metadata, the page image or text files comprising the digital work are of little use, and without technical metadata regarding the digitization process, scholars may be unsure of how accurate a reflection of the original the digital version provides. For internal management purposes, a library must have access to appropriate technical metadata in order to periodically refresh and migrate the data, ensuring the durability of valuable resources.
-
Document markup (1997)
0.01
0.012104175 = product of:
0.084729224 = sum of:
0.084729224 = weight(_text_:digital in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084729224 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Digital publishing technologies. 2(1997) no.4, S.10-16
-
Chen, Y.-N.: ¬An FRBR-based approach for transforming MARC records into linked data (2018)
0.01
0.011411925 = product of:
0.07988347 = sum of:
0.07988347 = weight(_text_:digital in 4799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07988347 = score(doc=4799,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.493069 = fieldWeight in 4799, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4799)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Simmons, P.: Preserving compatibility with standard data formats (1994)
0.01
0.008806311 = product of:
0.06164417 = sum of:
0.06164417 = weight(_text_:techniques in 7129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06164417 = score(doc=7129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.3406997 = fieldWeight in 7129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7129)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Librarians in countries without well-established national bibliographic systems increasingly find themselves faced with the problem of establishing local formats for machine-readable cataloguing and for referral data. Often they lack the background and the resources - especially trained staff - either to adopt an existing MARC format or to develop their own. Such international formats as UNIMARC and CCF, despite widespread international use, present problems of their own; MARC formats are not practical for agencies that do not follow standard cataloguing rules, and CCF offers little guidance to agencies wishing to adopt it for local use. A number of techniques useful in adapting and implementing international and national standard formats are presented, with some guidelines for preserving compatibility with standards
-
Miller, D.R.: XML: Libraries' strategic opportunity (2001)
0.01
0.008735436 = product of:
0.061148047 = sum of:
0.061148047 = weight(_text_:digital in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061148047 = score(doc=1467,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.37742734 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- XML (eXtensible Markup Language) is fast gaining favor as the universal format for data and document exchange -- in effect becoming the lingua franca of the Information Age. Currently, "library information" is at a particular disadvantage on the rapidly evolving World Wide Web. Why? Despite libraries'explorations of web catalogs, scanning projects, digital data repositories, and creation of web pages galore, there remains a digital divide. The core of libraries' data troves are stored in proprietary formats of integrated library systems (ILS) and in the complex and arcane MARC formats -- both restricted chiefly to the province of technical services and systems librarians. Even they are hard-pressed to extract and integrate this wealth of data with resources from outside this rarefied environment. Segregation of library information underlies many difficulties: producing standard bibliographic citations from MARC data, automatically creating new materials lists (including new web resources) on a particular topic, exchanging data with our vendors, and even migrating from one ILS to another. Why do we continue to hobble our potential by embracing these self-imposed limitations? Most ILSs began in libraries, which soon recognized the pitfalls of do-it-yourself solutions. Thus, we wisely anticipated the necessity for standards. However, with the advent of the web, we soon found "our" collections and a flood of new resources appearing in digital format on opposite sides of the divide. If we do not act quickly to integrate library resources with mainstream web resources, we are in grave danger of becoming marginalized
-
Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.1: the emergence and divergence of MARC (1995)
0.01
0.00806945 = product of:
0.056486145 = sum of:
0.056486145 = weight(_text_:digital in 3813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056486145 = score(doc=3813,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 3813, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3813)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Surveys the evolution and development of MARC formats for the digital encoding of bibliographic data from their beginnings in 1968 at the Library of Congress to the present time, with particular emphasis on the development of 17 national formats. Examines the reasons for the divergence of MARC formats from each other as well as the early and recent trends in the development of national MARC formats
-
Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.1: the emergence and divergence of MARC (1996)
0.01
0.00806945 = product of:
0.056486145 = sum of:
0.056486145 = weight(_text_:digital in 6726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056486145 = score(doc=6726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 6726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6726)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Surveys the evolution and development of MARC formats for the digital encoding of bibliographic data from their beginnings in 1968 at the Library of Congress to the present time, with particular emphasis on the development of 17 national formats. Examines the reasons for the divergence of MARC formats from each other as well as the early and recent trends in the development of national MARC formats
-
Blake, P.: Taking HTML to the next level : XML allows you to define your own language (1997)
0.01
0.00806945 = product of:
0.056486145 = sum of:
0.056486145 = weight(_text_:digital in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056486145 = score(doc=229,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.04107254 = queryNorm
0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Digital publishing strategies. 1(1997) no.12, S.14-15
