Search (92 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.13 
    0.13023704 = product of:
  0.3255926 = sum of:
    0.24912545 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24912545 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.076467164 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.076467164 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  2. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.10 
    0.101430275 = product of:
  0.25357568 = sum of:
    0.11975816 = weight(_text_:7 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11975816 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5124177 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
    0.13381752 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13381752 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 34(2000) H.7/8, S.1185-1186
  3. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.10 
    0.09767778 = product of:
  0.24419445 = sum of:
    0.18684408 = weight(_text_:objects in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18684408 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
    0.057350367 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057350367 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  4. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.05 
    0.050715137 = product of:
  0.12678784 = sum of:
    0.05987908 = weight(_text_:7 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05987908 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
    0.06690876 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06690876 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    7. 1.1997 17:34:09
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  5. Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004) 0.05 
    0.050715137 = product of:
  0.12678784 = sum of:
    0.05987908 = weight(_text_:7 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05987908 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
    0.06690876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06690876 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
  6. METS: an overview & tutorial : Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard (METS) (2001) 0.04 
    0.037368815 = product of:
  0.18684408 = sum of:
    0.18684408 = weight(_text_:objects in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18684408 = score(doc=1323,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Maintaining a library of digital objects of necessaryy requires maintaining metadata about those objects. The metadata necessary for successful management and use of digital objeets is both more extensive than and different from the metadata used for managing collections of printed works and other physical materials. While a library may record descriptive metadata regarding a book in its collection, the book will not dissolve into a series of unconnected pages if the library fails to record structural metadata regarding the book's organization, nor will scholars be unable to evaluate the book's worth if the library fails to note that the book was produced using a Ryobi offset press. The Same cannot be said for a digital version of the saure book. Without structural metadata, the page image or text files comprising the digital work are of little use, and without technical metadata regarding the digitization process, scholars may be unsure of how accurate a reflection of the original the digital version provides. For internal management purposes, a library must have access to appropriate technical metadata in order to periodically refresh and migrate the data, ensuring the durability of valuable resources.
  7. Willer, M.: Formats and cataloguing rules : developments for cataloguing electronic resources (1999) 0.04 
    0.035231657 = product of:
  0.17615828 = sum of:
    0.17615828 = weight(_text_:objects in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17615828 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Following a brief history of cataloguing and the MARC record format, describes current challenges in developing suitable international formats and cataloguing rules for dealing with electronic resources. Extensive references to the past and current literature provide an overview of the problems faced. Notes the role of the ISBD, Z39.50 protocol and the integration of Internet objects into the online catalogue
  8. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03 
    0.03244227 = product of:
  0.16221136 = sum of:
    0.16221136 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16221136 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  9. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03 
    0.030586867 = product of:
  0.15293433 = sum of:
    0.15293433 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15293433 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  10. Syré, L.: AACR2: Stellungnahme der AG Regionalbibliographie (2002) 0.03 
    0.028980082 = product of:
  0.072450206 = sum of:
    0.03421662 = weight(_text_:7 in 841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03421662 = score(doc=841,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.14640506 = fieldWeight in 841, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=841)
    0.038233582 = weight(_text_:22 in 841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038233582 = score(doc=841,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 841, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=841)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    "Die Mitglieder der Arbeitsgruppe Regionalbibliographie in der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Regionalbibliotheken (DBV Sektion 4) haben auf ihrer Jahrestagung am 22. und 23. April 2002 in Bautzen einen etwaigen Umstieg von RAK auf AACR2 beraten und sich einstimmig dagegen ausgesprochen. - Begründung - Der personelle, technische und finanzielle Aufwand für den Umstieg wäre für die Landes- und Regionalbibliographien gewaltig. Diejenigen Bibliographien, die ihre eigenen Datenbanken unterhalten, müssten diese sowohl vollständig EDV-technisch (z.B. hinsichtlich des Datenformats) anpassen als auch sämtliche Änderungen (z.B. bei Zeitschriftenaufnahmen, bei der Ansetzung von Körperschaften) nachführen. Dies ist umso schwerwiegender, als nicht alle Bibliographie- Datenbanken über entsprechende eigene Normdateien verfügen. Alle Landes- und Regionalbibliographien, also auch diejenigen, die in die Verbunddatenbanken integriert sind, wären überdies vom zusätzlichen Schulungsaufwand für das neue Regelwerk sowie von Revisionsarbeiten an den Normdateien betroffen. Weitere Nachteile wären Inkonsistenzen im Datenbestand bzw. Qualitätsverluste bei der Konvertierung der Altdaten. Diesen schwerwiegenden Nachteilen steht kein ersichtlicher Vorteil bei Erstellung oder Benutzung der Landes- und Regionalbibliographien gegenüber: Der Rationalisierungseffekt ist unbedeutend, da in Regionalbibliographien ganz überwiegend unselbstständige deutschsprachige Titel verzeichnet werden, für die keine Katalogisate aus AACR-Ländern genutzt werden können. Auch für die Benutzer der Datenbanken steht keine Verbesserung der Rechercheergebnisse zu erwarten. Die Landes- und Regionalbibliographien sehen sich derzeit einer Vielzahl von Aufgaben und neuen Herausforderungen gegenüber, die sie mit bestenfalls stagnierendem Personalstand zu erfüllen haben: Neben einer stetig wachsenden Titelzahl sind dies z.B. die neuen Publikationsformen im WWW, der Aufbau eines gemeinsamen Suchinstruments ("Virtuelle Deutsche Landesbibliographie° in KVK-Technik) und die Integration der noch konventionell vorliegenden älteren Bibliographienachweise in die Datenbanken. In dieser Situation wäre es kontraproduktiv, wenn enorme Ressourcen für einen Regelwerks- und Formatwechsel ohne praktischen Nutzen abgezogen würden. Die AG Regionalbibliographie lehnt daher einen Umstieg auf AACR2 ab. Sie empfiehlt stattdessen, das bestehende Regelwerk weiterzuentwickeln sowie alternative und zeitgemäße Methoden zu erarbeiten, um die internationale Zusammenarbeit zu verbessern (z.B. durch das Projekt "Virtuelle internationale Normdatei")."
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 36(2002) H.7, S.893-894
  11. Dierickx, H. (Bearb.); Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): UNISIST reference manual for machine-readable bibliographic description (1986) 0.03 
    0.027373297 = product of:
  0.13686648 = sum of:
    0.13686648 = weight(_text_:7 in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13686648 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5856202 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 1.2002 9:31:23
  12. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: ¬2. MAB-Expertengespräch in Der Deutschen Bibliothek (1995) 0.03 
    0.027373297 = product of:
  0.13686648 = sum of:
    0.13686648 = weight(_text_:7 in 8379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13686648 = score(doc=8379,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5856202 = fieldWeight in 8379, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8379)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 7(1995) H.1, S.46-49
  13. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: Neue MAB-Formatversion MAB2 endgültig verabschiedet (1995) 0.03 
    0.027373297 = product of:
  0.13686648 = sum of:
    0.13686648 = weight(_text_:7 in 2365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13686648 = score(doc=2365,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5856202 = fieldWeight in 2365, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2365)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 7(1995) H.3, S.28
  14. MAB2 : Maschinelles Austauschformat für Bibliotheken (1995) 0.03 
    0.027373297 = product of:
  0.13686648 = sum of:
    0.13686648 = weight(_text_:7 in 4298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13686648 = score(doc=4298,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5856202 = fieldWeight in 4298, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4298)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Isbn
    3-922051-70-7
  15. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03 
    0.026763504 = product of:
  0.13381752 = sum of:
    0.13381752 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13381752 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  16. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.03 
    0.026763504 = product of:
  0.13381752 = sum of:
    0.13381752 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13381752 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  17. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.03 
    0.026763504 = product of:
  0.13381752 = sum of:
    0.13381752 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13381752 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  18. Oehlschläger, S.: Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme : Aus der 46. Sitzung am 21. und 22. April 2004 im Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg in Konstanz (2004) 0.03 
    0.025357569 = product of:
  0.06339392 = sum of:
    0.02993954 = weight(_text_:7 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02993954 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.12810442 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
    0.03345438 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03345438 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 38(2004) H.7/8, S.905-926
  19. Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): Implementation notes for users of the Common Communication Format for bibliographic information (CCF/B) (1993) 0.02 
    0.023951633 = product of:
  0.11975816 = sum of:
    0.11975816 = weight(_text_:7 in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11975816 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5124177 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Series
    PGI-93/WS/7
  20. Madison, O.M.A.: Standards in light of new technologies : functional requirements for bibliographic records (1999) 0.02 
    0.023951633 = product of:
  0.11975816 = sum of:
    0.11975816 = weight(_text_:7 in 4182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11975816 = score(doc=4182,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5124177 = fieldWeight in 4182, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4182)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 28(1999) no.1, S.7-10

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 57
  • d 31
  • sp 2
  • pl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 78
  • m 5
  • s 5
  • b 2
  • el 2
  • r 2
  • l 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes