-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.10
0.10221383 = sum of:
0.069989644 = product of:
0.20996892 = sum of:
0.20996892 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20996892 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.032224182 = product of:
0.064448364 = sum of:
0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064448364 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004)
0.08
0.076660365 = sum of:
0.05249223 = product of:
0.1574767 = sum of:
0.1574767 = weight(_text_:objects in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1574767 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.024168136 = product of:
0.04833627 = sum of:
0.04833627 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04833627 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
-
Xu, A.; Hess, K.; Akerman, L.: From MARC to BIBFRAME 2.0 : Crosswalks (2018)
0.07
0.06766024 = product of:
0.13532048 = sum of:
0.13532048 = product of:
0.27064097 = sum of:
0.27064097 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 5172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27064097 = score(doc=5172,freq=12.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.7847994 = fieldWeight in 5172, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- One of the big challenges facing academic libraries today is to increase the relevance of the libraries to their user communities. If the libraries can increase the visibility of their resources on the open web, it will increase the chances of the libraries to reach to their user communities via the user's first search experience. BIBFRAME and library Linked Data will enable libraries to publish their resources in a way that the Web understands, consume Linked Data to enrich their resources relevant to the libraries' user communities, and visualize networks across collections. However, one of the important steps for transitioning to BIBFRAME and library Linked Data involves crosswalks, mapping MARC fields and subfields across data models and performing necessary data reformatting to be in compliance with the specifications of the new model, which is currently BIBFRAME 2.0. This article looks into how the Library of Congress has mapped library bibliographic data from the MARC format to the BIBFRAME 2.0 model and vocabulary published and updated since April 2016, available from http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/index.html based on the recently released conversion specifications and converter, developed by the Library of Congress with input from many community members. The BIBFRAME 2.0 standard and conversion tools will enable libraries to transform bibliographic data from MARC into BIBFRAME 2.0, which introduces a Linked Data model as the improved method of bibliographic control for the future, and make bibliographic information more useful within and beyond library communities.
- Object
- BIBFRAME 2.0
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.03
0.03417891 = product of:
0.06835782 = sum of:
0.06835782 = product of:
0.13671564 = sum of:
0.13671564 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13671564 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.032224182 = product of:
0.064448364 = sum of:
0.064448364 = product of:
0.12889673 = sum of:
0.12889673 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12889673 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.028196158 = product of:
0.056392316 = sum of:
0.056392316 = product of:
0.11278463 = sum of:
0.11278463 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11278463 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000)
0.03
0.028196158 = product of:
0.056392316 = sum of:
0.056392316 = product of:
0.11278463 = sum of:
0.11278463 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11278463 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 8.2000 19:22:35
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.03
0.028196158 = product of:
0.056392316 = sum of:
0.056392316 = product of:
0.11278463 = sum of:
0.11278463 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11278463 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.03
0.028196158 = product of:
0.056392316 = sum of:
0.056392316 = product of:
0.11278463 = sum of:
0.11278463 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11278463 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
METS: an overview & tutorial : Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard (METS) (2001)
0.03
0.026246116 = product of:
0.05249223 = sum of:
0.05249223 = product of:
0.1574767 = sum of:
0.1574767 = weight(_text_:objects in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1574767 = score(doc=1323,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Maintaining a library of digital objects of necessaryy requires maintaining metadata about those objects. The metadata necessary for successful management and use of digital objeets is both more extensive than and different from the metadata used for managing collections of printed works and other physical materials. While a library may record descriptive metadata regarding a book in its collection, the book will not dissolve into a series of unconnected pages if the library fails to record structural metadata regarding the book's organization, nor will scholars be unable to evaluate the book's worth if the library fails to note that the book was produced using a Ryobi offset press. The Same cannot be said for a digital version of the saure book. Without structural metadata, the page image or text files comprising the digital work are of little use, and without technical metadata regarding the digitization process, scholars may be unsure of how accurate a reflection of the original the digital version provides. For internal management purposes, a library must have access to appropriate technical metadata in order to periodically refresh and migrate the data, ensuring the durability of valuable resources.
-
Willer, M.: Formats and cataloguing rules : developments for cataloguing electronic resources (1999)
0.02
0.024745075 = product of:
0.04949015 = sum of:
0.04949015 = product of:
0.14847045 = sum of:
0.14847045 = weight(_text_:objects in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14847045 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Following a brief history of cataloguing and the MARC record format, describes current challenges in developing suitable international formats and cataloguing rules for dealing with electronic resources. Extensive references to the past and current literature provide an overview of the problems faced. Notes the role of the ISBD, Z39.50 protocol and the integration of Internet objects into the online catalogue
-
Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998)
0.02
0.024168136 = product of:
0.04833627 = sum of:
0.04833627 = product of:
0.09667254 = sum of:
0.09667254 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09667254 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 8.2001 16:22:33
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.02
0.022785937 = product of:
0.045571875 = sum of:
0.045571875 = product of:
0.09114375 = sum of:
0.09114375 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09114375 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.02
0.022785937 = product of:
0.045571875 = sum of:
0.045571875 = product of:
0.09114375 = sum of:
0.09114375 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09114375 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996)
0.02
0.020140113 = product of:
0.040280227 = sum of:
0.040280227 = product of:
0.08056045 = sum of:
0.08056045 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08056045 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 9.1996 18:58:22
-
Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003)
0.02
0.020140113 = product of:
0.040280227 = sum of:
0.040280227 = product of:
0.08056045 = sum of:
0.08056045 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08056045 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2016 12:15:46
-
Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995)
0.02
0.019937696 = product of:
0.039875392 = sum of:
0.039875392 = product of:
0.079750784 = sum of:
0.079750784 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079750784 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 9.1996 19:22:20
- Source
- Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
-
Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989)
0.02
0.016112091 = product of:
0.032224182 = sum of:
0.032224182 = product of:
0.064448364 = sum of:
0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064448364 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.1995 22:40:20
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.02
0.016112091 = product of:
0.032224182 = sum of:
0.032224182 = product of:
0.064448364 = sum of:
0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064448364 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
-
Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997)
0.02
0.016112091 = product of:
0.032224182 = sum of:
0.032224182 = product of:
0.064448364 = sum of:
0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064448364 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
