Search (57 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03 
    0.031815942 = product of:
  0.063631885 = sum of:
    0.063631885 = product of:
      0.12726377 = sum of:
        0.12726377 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12726377 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  2. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03 
    0.029996356 = product of:
  0.059992712 = sum of:
    0.059992712 = product of:
      0.119985424 = sum of:
        0.119985424 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119985424 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  3. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03 
    0.02624681 = product of:
  0.05249362 = sum of:
    0.05249362 = product of:
      0.10498724 = sum of:
        0.10498724 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10498724 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  4. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.03 
    0.02624681 = product of:
  0.05249362 = sum of:
    0.05249362 = product of:
      0.10498724 = sum of:
        0.10498724 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10498724 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  5. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.03 
    0.02624681 = product of:
  0.05249362 = sum of:
    0.05249362 = product of:
      0.10498724 = sum of:
        0.10498724 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10498724 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  6. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.03 
    0.02624681 = product of:
  0.05249362 = sum of:
    0.05249362 = product of:
      0.10498724 = sum of:
        0.10498724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10498724 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  7. Kaiser, M.; Lieder, H.J.; Majcen, K.; Vallant, H.: New ways of sharing and using authority information : the LEAF project (2003) 0.02 
    0.024510236 = product of:
  0.049020473 = sum of:
    0.049020473 = product of:
      0.098040946 = sum of:
        0.098040946 = weight(_text_:talking in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098040946 = score(doc=1166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.443239 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.008008 = idf(docFreq=39, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.22119206 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.008008 = idf(docFreq=39, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article presents an overview of the LEAF project (Linking and Exploring Authority Files)1, which has set out to provide a framework for international, collaborative work in the sector of authority data with respect to authority control. Elaborating the virtues of authority control in today's Web environment is an almost futile exercise, since so much has been said and written about it in the last few years.2 The World Wide Web is generally understood to be poorly structured-both with regard to content and to locating required information. Highly structured databases might be viewed as small islands of precision within this chaotic environment. Though the Web in general or any particular structured database would greatly benefit from increased authority control, it should be noted that our following considerations only refer to authority control with regard to databases of "memory institutions" (i.e., libraries, archives, and museums). Moreover, when talking about authority records, we exclusively refer to personal name authority records that describe a specific person. Although different types of authority records could indeed be used in similar ways to the ones presented in this article, discussing those different types is outside the scope of both the LEAF project and this article. Personal name authority records-as are all other "authorities"-are maintained as separate records and linked to various kinds of descriptive records. Name authority records are usually either kept in independent databases or in separate tables in the database containing the descriptive records. This practice points at a crucial benefit: by linking any number of descriptive records to an authorized name record, the records related to this entity are collocated in the database. Variant forms of the authorized name are referenced in the authority records and thus ensure the consistency of the database while enabling search and retrieval operations that produce accurate results. On one hand, authority control may be viewed as a positive prerequisite of a consistent catalogue; on the other, the creation of new authority records is a very time consuming and expensive undertaking. As a consequence, various models of providing access to existing authority records have emerged: the Library of Congress and the French National Library (Bibliothèque nationale de France), for example, make their authority records available to all via a web-based search service.3 In Germany, the Personal Name Authority File (PND, Personennamendatei4) maintained by the German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek, Frankfurt/Main) offers a different approach to shared access: within a closed network, participating institutions have online access to their pooled data. The number of recent projects and initiatives that have addressed the issue of authority control in one way or another is considerable.5 Two important current initiatives should be mentioned here: The Name Authority Cooperative (NACO) and Virtual International Authority File (VIAF).
  8. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.02 
    0.022497267 = product of:
  0.044994533 = sum of:
    0.044994533 = product of:
      0.089989066 = sum of:
        0.089989066 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089989066 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  9. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02 
    0.021210628 = product of:
  0.042421255 = sum of:
    0.042421255 = product of:
      0.08484251 = sum of:
        0.08484251 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08484251 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  10. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02 
    0.021210628 = product of:
  0.042421255 = sum of:
    0.042421255 = product of:
      0.08484251 = sum of:
        0.08484251 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08484251 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  11. Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013) 0.02 
    0.021063378 = product of:
  0.042126756 = sum of:
    0.042126756 = product of:
      0.12638026 = sum of:
        0.12638026 = weight(_text_:themes in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12638026 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35584334 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
  12. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.02 
    0.018747723 = product of:
  0.037495445 = sum of:
    0.037495445 = product of:
      0.07499089 = sum of:
        0.07499089 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07499089 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  13. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.02 
    0.018747723 = product of:
  0.037495445 = sum of:
    0.037495445 = product of:
      0.07499089 = sum of:
        0.07499089 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07499089 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46
  14. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.02 
    0.0185593 = product of:
  0.0371186 = sum of:
    0.0371186 = product of:
      0.0742372 = sum of:
        0.0742372 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0742372 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  15. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.01 
    0.014998178 = product of:
  0.029996356 = sum of:
    0.029996356 = product of:
      0.059992712 = sum of:
        0.059992712 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059992712 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20
  16. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.01 
    0.014998178 = product of:
  0.029996356 = sum of:
    0.029996356 = product of:
      0.059992712 = sum of:
        0.059992712 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059992712 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
  17. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.01 
    0.014998178 = product of:
  0.029996356 = sum of:
    0.029996356 = product of:
      0.059992712 = sum of:
        0.059992712 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059992712 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  18. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.01 
    0.014998178 = product of:
  0.029996356 = sum of:
    0.029996356 = product of:
      0.059992712 = sum of:
        0.059992712 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059992712 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
  19. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.01 
    0.014998178 = product of:
  0.029996356 = sum of:
    0.029996356 = product of:
      0.059992712 = sum of:
        0.059992712 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059992712 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
  20. Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997) 0.01 
    0.014998178 = product of:
  0.029996356 = sum of:
    0.029996356 = product of:
      0.059992712 = sum of:
        0.059992712 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059992712 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382441 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05534947 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 43
  • d 12
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 52
  • s 4
  • b 2
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes