Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.12
    0.11762672 = product of:
      0.2940668 = sum of:
        0.0735167 = product of:
          0.22055008 = sum of:
            0.22055008 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22055008 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39242527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22055008 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22055008 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39242527 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.01
    0.013754703 = product of:
      0.068773516 = sum of:
        0.068773516 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068773516 = score(doc=6386,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
  3. Lam-Adesina, A.M.; Jones, G.J.F.: Examining and improving the effectiveness of relevance feedback for retrieval of scanned text documents (2006) 0.01
    0.0123806475 = product of:
      0.06190324 = sum of:
        0.06190324 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06190324 = score(doc=977,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.442117 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Important legacy paper documents are digitized and collected in online accessible archives. This enables the preservation, sharing, and significantly the searching of these documents. The text contents of these document images can be transcribed automatically using OCR systems and then stored in an information retrieval system. However, OCR systems make errors in character recognition which have previously been shown to impact on document retrieval behaviour. In particular relevance feedback query-expansion methods, which are often effective for improving electronic text retrieval, are observed to be less reliable for retrieval of scanned document images. Our experimental examination of the effects of character recognition errors on an ad hoc OCR retrieval task demonstrates that, while baseline information retrieval can remain relatively unaffected by transcription errors, relevance feedback via query expansion becomes highly unstable. This paper examines the reason for this behaviour, and introduces novel modifications to standard relevance feedback methods. These methods are shown experimentally to improve the effectiveness of relevance feedback for errorful OCR transcriptions. The new methods combine similar recognised character strings based on term collection frequency and a string edit-distance measure. The techniques are domain independent and make no use of external resources such as dictionaries or training data.
  4. Mas, S.; Zaher, L'H.; Zacklad, M.: Design and evaluation of multi-viewed knowledge system for administrative electronic document organization (2008) 0.01
    0.012377582 = product of:
      0.06188791 = sum of:
        0.06188791 = weight(_text_:semantic in 2256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06188791 = score(doc=2256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.32156807 = fieldWeight in 2256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2256)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    This paper describes part of a current research investigating the feasibility of creating a faceted and multi-viewed knowledge organization system (KOS) for administrative document organization in online environments. Preliminary findings support the faceted and multi-viewed classification as a promising altemative to the hierarchical paradigm for personal administrative electronic documents organization. Further analysis about identification of semantic relations between facets to reduce number of facet descriptors is required. Technical improvements are also needed to enhance the faceted navigation interface used within the pilot test.
  5. Veal, D.C.: Techniques of document management : a review of text retrieval and related technologies (2001) 0.01
    0.010588376 = product of:
      0.052941877 = sum of:
        0.052941877 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052941877 = score(doc=4150,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Present and possible future developments in the techniques of document management are reviewed, the major ones being text retrieval and scanning and OCR. Acquisition, indexing and thesauri, publishing and dissemination and the document management industry are also addressed. The emerging standards are reviewed and the impact of the Internet is analysed.
  6. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.01
    0.010463557 = product of:
      0.052317787 = sum of:
        0.052317787 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052317787 = score(doc=5863,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
  7. Ehrmann, S.: ¬Die Nadel im Bytehaufen : Finden statt suchen: Text Retrieval, Multimediadatenbanken, Dokumentenmanagement (2000) 0.01
    0.00935889 = product of:
      0.04679445 = sum of:
        0.04679445 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04679445 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  8. Trinkwalder, A.: Wortdetektive : Volltext-Suchmaschinen für Festplatte und Intranet (2000) 0.01
    0.00935889 = product of:
      0.04679445 = sum of:
        0.04679445 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04679445 = score(doc=5318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 5318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5318)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Oft sorgt die eigene Unordentlichkeit dafür, dass wichtige Texte unauffindbar sind, manchmal lässt sich aber auch einfach die schiere Menge nicht bändigen und vernünftig sortieren. Text-Retrieval-Systeme durchforsten das Dickicht und versprechen den schnellen Weg zu wertvollen Informationen
  9. Vasudevan, M.C.; Mohan, M.; Kapoor, A.: Information system for knowledge management in the specialized division of a hospital (2006) 0.01
    0.0065512233 = product of:
      0.032756116 = sum of:
        0.032756116 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032756116 = score(doc=1499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information systems are essential support for knowledge management in all types of enterprises. This paper describes the evolution and development of a specialized hospital information system. The system is designed to integrate for access and retrieval from databases of patients' case records, and related images - CATSCAN, MRI, X-Ray - and to enable online access to full text of relevant papers on the Internet/WWW. The generation of information products and services from the system is briefly described.
  10. Murthy, S.S.: ¬The National Tuberculosis Institute, Bangalore : recent development in library and information services (2006) 0.01
    0.006162302 = product of:
      0.030811511 = sum of:
        0.030811511 = product of:
          0.061623022 = sum of:
            0.061623022 = weight(_text_:web in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061623022 = score(doc=1502,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly describes the information products and services, the related databases, development of digital library and web-resources and web-based services, vocabulary control tools, networking, and other projects of the Library of the National Tuberculosis Institute (NTI), Bangalore. Acknowledges the involvement of and advice and assistance provided by Prof. A. Neelameghan to these programmes and projects.
  11. Krüger, J.D.: Kostenlos und gut : Web-Content-Management-Systeme im Überblick (2003) 0.01
    0.0054467577 = product of:
      0.027233787 = sum of:
        0.027233787 = product of:
          0.054467574 = sum of:
            0.054467574 = weight(_text_:web in 1726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054467574 = score(doc=1726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  12. Toebak, P.: ¬Das Dossier nicht die Klassifikation als Herzstück des Records Management (2009) 0.00
    0.0031356532 = product of:
      0.015678266 = sum of:
        0.015678266 = product of:
          0.031356532 = sum of:
            0.031356532 = weight(_text_:22 in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031356532 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    6.12.2009 17:22:17
  13. Großmann, K.; Schaaf, T.: Datenbankbasiertes Dokumentenmanagementsystem im Versuchswesen (2001) 0.00
    0.0025085227 = product of:
      0.012542613 = sum of:
        0.012542613 = product of:
          0.025085226 = sum of:
            0.025085226 = weight(_text_:22 in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025085226 = score(doc=5868,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    16. 5.2001 12:22:23
  14. Peters, G.; Gaese, V.: ¬Das DocCat-System in der Textdokumentation von G+J (2003) 0.00
    0.0025085227 = product of:
      0.012542613 = sum of:
        0.012542613 = product of:
          0.025085226 = sum of:
            0.025085226 = weight(_text_:22 in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025085226 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2003 11:45:36
  15. Wandeler, J.: Comprenez-vous only Bahnhof? : Mehrsprachigkeit in der Mediendokumentation (2003) 0.00
    0.0025085227 = product of:
      0.012542613 = sum of:
        0.012542613 = product of:
          0.025085226 = sum of:
            0.025085226 = weight(_text_:22 in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025085226 = score(doc=1512,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2003 12:09:10
  16. Dahmen, E.: Klassifikation als Ordnundssystem im elektronischen Pressearchiv (2003) 0.00
    0.0025085227 = product of:
      0.012542613 = sum of:
        0.012542613 = product of:
          0.025085226 = sum of:
            0.025085226 = weight(_text_:22 in 1513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025085226 = score(doc=1513,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1513, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1513)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    28. 4.2003 13:35:22
  17. Schlenkrich, C.: Aspekte neuer Regelwerksarbeit : Multimediales Datenmodell für ARD und ZDF (2003) 0.00
    0.0025085227 = product of:
      0.012542613 = sum of:
        0.012542613 = product of:
          0.025085226 = sum of:
            0.025085226 = weight(_text_:22 in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025085226 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2003 12:05:56