Search (187 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.28 
    0.28225923 = product of:
  0.49395365 = sum of:
    0.064395666 = product of:
      0.193187 = sum of:
        0.193187 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.193187 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.193187 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.193187 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.043183967 = weight(_text_:management in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043183967 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.193187 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.193187 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Cox, R.J.: Access in the digital information age and the archival mission : the United States (1998) 0.13 
    0.13270083 = product of:
  0.46445286 = sum of:
    0.19738306 = weight(_text_:united in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19738306 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.86777 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
    0.26706982 = sum of:
      0.19016445 = weight(_text_:states in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19016445 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04054466 = queryNorm
          0.85175437 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
      0.07690538 = weight(_text_:22 in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07690538 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04054466 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    2. 3.1999 9:22:24
  3. Pritchard, J.A.T.: Developments in document management systems (1998) 0.07 
    0.06823674 = product of:
  0.23882857 = sum of:
    0.15067968 = weight(_text_:industry in 440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15067968 = score(doc=440,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.640786 = fieldWeight in 440, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=440)
    0.0881489 = weight(_text_:management in 440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0881489 = score(doc=440,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.6450219 = fieldWeight in 440, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=440)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Brings together some examples of recent developments in the document management industry, giving details of relevant UK trade bodies and exhibition, and outlining the latest offerings from key companies. Telephone numbers and URLs are provided where relevant
    Source
    Information management report. 1998, Mar, S.15-18
  4. Veal, D.C.: Techniques of document management : a review of text retrieval and related technologies (2001) 0.05 
    0.054589394 = product of:
  0.19106287 = sum of:
    0.12054374 = weight(_text_:industry in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12054374 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.07051913 = weight(_text_:management in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07051913 = score(doc=4150,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Present and possible future developments in the techniques of document management are reviewed, the major ones being text retrieval and scanning and OCR. Acquisition, indexing and thesauri, publishing and dissemination and the document management industry are also addressed. The emerging standards are reviewed and the impact of the Internet is analysed.
  5. Koulopoulos, T.M.; Frappaolo, C.: Electronic document management systems : where are they today? (1993) 0.05 
    0.04776572 = product of:
  0.16718002 = sum of:
    0.105475776 = weight(_text_:industry in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105475776 = score(doc=982,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
    0.061704237 = weight(_text_:management in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061704237 = score(doc=982,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a market study to determine the changes that have taken place in text retrieval and imaging systems: the 2 dominant components of electronic document management systems (EDMS). Organizations are focusing on integrated technologies, a sign that imaging and text retrieval are making their way towards the mainstream of information management. Reports data for: text retrieval market revenue by customer segment (industry, government and library); components of an integrated image based EDMS; component platforms of the text retreival system (PC, Macintosh atc.); areas of improvement for current imaging systems; importance of key benefits to implementing text retrieval within the organization; and areas of improvement for current text retrieval systems
  6. Smith, C.: Building an Internet archive system for the British Broadcasting Corporation (2005) 0.05 
    0.04582335 = product of:
  0.16038172 = sum of:
    0.1196322 = weight(_text_:united in 5593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1196322 = score(doc=5593,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.52594805 = fieldWeight in 5593, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5593)
    0.040749524 = product of:
      0.08149905 = sum of:
        0.08149905 = weight(_text_:states in 5593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08149905 = score(doc=5593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 5593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The amount of digital content produced at academic research institutions is large, and libraries and archives at these institutions have a responsibility to bring this digital material under curatorial control in order to manage and preserve it over time. But this is a daunting task with few proven models, requiring new technology, policies, procedures, core staff competencies, and cost models. The MIT Libraries are working with the DSpace(TM) open-source digital repository platform to explore the problem of capturing research and teaching material in any digital format and preserving it over time. By collaborating on this problem with other research institutions using the DSpace platform in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, and other parts of the world, as well as with other important efforts in the digital preservation arena, we are beginning to see ways of managing arbitrary digital content that might make digital preservation an achievable goal.
  7. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.04 
    0.040361702 = product of:
  0.14126596 = sum of:
    0.11379975 = weight(_text_:management in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11379975 = score(doc=1000,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.83271974 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.027466208 = product of:
      0.054932415 = sum of:
        0.054932415 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054932415 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  8. Milne, C.: Developing information architecture through records management classification techniques (2010) 0.04 
    0.037949897 = product of:
  0.13282463 = sum of:
    0.062330686 = weight(_text_:management in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062330686 = score(doc=3942,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.45609936 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
    0.07049395 = weight(_text_:united in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07049395 = score(doc=3942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This work aims to draw attention to information retrieval philosophies and techniques allied to the records management profession, advocating a wider professional consideration of a functional approach to information management, in this instance in the development of information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws from a hypothesis originally presented by the author that advocated a viewpoint whereby the application of records management techniques, traditionally applied to develop business classification schemes, was offered as an additional solution to organising information resources and services (within a university intranet), where earlier approaches, notably subject- and administrative-based arrangements, were found to be lacking. The hypothesis was tested via work-based action learning and is presented here as an extended case study. The paper also draws on evidence submitted to the Joint Information Systems Committee in support of the University of Abertay Dundee's application for consideration for the JISC award for innovation in records and information management. Findings - The original hypothesis has been tested in the workplace. Information retrieval techniques, allied to records management (functional classification), were the main influence in the development of pre- and post-coordinate information retrieval systems to support a wider information architecture, where the subject approach was found to be lacking. Their use within the workplace has since been extended. Originality/value - The paper advocates that the development of information retrieval as a discipline should include a wider consideration of functional classification, as this alternative to the subject approach is largely ignored in mainstream IR works.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Content architecture: exploiting and managing diverse resources: proceedings of the first national conference of the United Kingdom chapter of the International Society for Knowedge Organization (ISKO)
  9. Martin, P.; Vaillant, S.: ¬Le records management : Concept nouveau? Pratique ancienne? (1998) 0.03 
    0.030528566 = product of:
  0.106849976 = sum of:
    0.07965982 = weight(_text_:management in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07965982 = score(doc=2430,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.5829038 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
    0.027190158 = product of:
      0.054380316 = sum of:
        0.054380316 = weight(_text_:22 in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054380316 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Records management has appeared lately in France to designate the management of organizational documents and electronic data an enterprise must retain as proof of its activities and transactions. An international standard is under discussion to address issues concerned with retention. At the same time, some information professionals are finding themselves increasingly involved with active company records, since the role of records manager requires skills found in the professions of archivists, information scientist and quality controller. Presents examples which pose the question, is records management in fact a new profession or simply a new form of a familiar job?
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    31.12.1998 15:32:22
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Records management: new concept or old practice?
  10. Barbat, P.; Neste, E. van den; Drouhet, G.: Records management et archivistique française (1998) 0.03 
    0.030528566 = product of:
  0.106849976 = sum of:
    0.07965982 = weight(_text_:management in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07965982 = score(doc=2988,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.5829038 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
    0.027190158 = product of:
      0.054380316 = sum of:
        0.054380316 = weight(_text_:22 in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054380316 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    An article in documentaliste 35(1998) no.1, presented the concept and contexts for the application of records management. This article, devoted to the experience of archivists, continues to focus on professional active and semi-active records management practices and their evolution in different countries and eras. P. Barbat analyzes the discovery in France in the 1960s of active records and the invlovement of both archivists and the departments actually generating the records in their management, and the impact this development has had on archival practices. Also discusses the impact that the international standard now being drafted by ISO will have on the profession. A government and a company archivist also describe their experience
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    21. 2.1999 15:22:35
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Records management and French archival practices
  11. Taylor, P.: Perception and change in records management : rethinking the fundamentals (1997) 0.03 
    0.030425515 = product of:
  0.1064893 = sum of:
    0.08726296 = weight(_text_:management in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08726296 = score(doc=2787,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.6385391 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
    0.019226344 = product of:
      0.03845269 = sum of:
        0.03845269 = weight(_text_:22 in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03845269 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Identifies some of the fundamental issues for the future records management, and assesses their relevance for the future. Considers traditional records management and suggests a new record keeping approach which impacts directly upon the organization by ensuring records are properly created according to the organization's needs. Stresses the importance of making better use of new technologies. Important issues are: the myth of the information manager, implementation of records management standards, replacing the life cycle approach with one of a records continuum, new relationships between the archival and records management community, and development of competency based standards
    Date
    24. 1.1999 12:22:46
    Source
    Records management bulletin. 1997, no.82, S.11-15,18
  12. Hare, C.E.; McLeaod, J.; King, L.A.: Continuing professional development for the information discipline of records management : pt.1: context and initial indications of current activities (1996) 0.03 
    0.02825319 = product of:
  0.09888616 = sum of:
    0.07965982 = weight(_text_:management in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07965982 = score(doc=5049,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.5829038 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
    0.019226344 = product of:
      0.03845269 = sum of:
        0.03845269 = weight(_text_:22 in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03845269 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Explores the newly emerging information discipline of records management, focusing on its current status in the UK where it is represented by a range of sector specific and general organizations for information professionals. While records management involves some skills and knowledge which are different from those already mastered by library and information professionals, there are significant overlaps in terms of cataloguing, classification, indexing, identifying and meeting user needs and the challenge of dealing with information in electronic form. Concludes that, in the changing and sometimes shrinking market of of some of the more traditional library sectors, records management may offer the opportunity for information professionals to develop or shift their career path while remaining within the discipline of information management
    Source
    Librarian career development. 4(1996) no.2, S.22-27
  13. Electronic recordkeeping issues and perspectives (1994) 0.03 
    0.026865944 = product of:
  0.0940308 = sum of:
    0.061071347 = weight(_text_:management in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061071347 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
    0.032959446 = product of:
      0.06591889 = sum of:
        0.06591889 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06591889 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Content
    Issues devoted in part to the topic of: Electronic recordkeeping issues and perspectives; covering techniques of records management involving electronic archival materials
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.14-135
  14. Heijst, A.L.M. v.: Records management : the art of making choices (1995) 0.03 
    0.026426312 = product of:
  0.09249209 = sum of:
    0.07051913 = weight(_text_:management in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07051913 = score(doc=3355,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
    0.021972965 = product of:
      0.04394593 = sum of:
        0.04394593 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04394593 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Discusses the problems associated with electronic archiving and draws attention to work by the University of Pittsburgh on developing a standard for archiving electronic documents. Examines elements of effective archival and records management and considers the problems associated with archives such as backlogs and time taken to search for information. The basis of good records management lies in making responsible choices
    Date
    22. 2.1996 9:30:18
  15. Gonzalez, A.C.: Analisis y diseno de sistemas de gestion electronica de documentacion en grandes entidades (1997) 0.03 
    0.026426312 = product of:
  0.09249209 = sum of:
    0.07051913 = weight(_text_:management in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07051913 = score(doc=2923,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
    0.021972965 = product of:
      0.04394593 = sum of:
        0.04394593 = weight(_text_:22 in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04394593 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The successful implementation of Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) requires a previous design based on a methodology that includes key steps as follows: capture of critical information and analysis of the current document situation: functional and/or technical options that involve the treatment of the document fonds considered; document management applications design (data, text, images, audio, video) under a functional, technical and economic focus; global and modular project defined as a strategic EDMS plan
    Date
    11. 2.1999 21:02:22
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Analysis and design of electronic document management systems in large enterprises
  16. Toebak, P.: ¬Das Dossier nicht die Klassifikation als Herzstück des Records Management (2009) 0.02 
    0.024487538 = product of:
  0.08570638 = sum of:
    0.07197328 = weight(_text_:management in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07197328 = score(doc=3220,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
    0.013733104 = product of:
      0.027466208 = sum of:
        0.027466208 = weight(_text_:22 in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027466208 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Die September/Oktober-Ausgabe 2009 der IWP ist eine Schwerpunktausgabe zum Records Management. Es ist interessant, dass einmal aus fachlich ganz anderer Perspektive auf diese Management- Disziplin geschaut wird. Viele Aspekte werden angesprochen: Terminologie, Rolle des Archivwesens, Interdisziplinarität, Langzeitaufbewahrung und Standardisierung. Im Artikel "Wissensorganisation und Records Management. Was ist der 'state of the art'?" steht die Wissensorganisation als Schwachstelle des Records Management zentral. Dies zu Recht: Das logische Datenmodell von DOMEA - das Gleiche gilt für GEVER und ELAK - entspricht beispielsweise nicht in allen Hinsichten der Geschäftsrealität. Daraus entstehen für die Mitarbeitenden im Arbeitsalltag öfters mehr Verständnisprobleme als sie bewältigen können oder wollen. Die systemische Unterstützung der eingesetzten EDRMS (nicht alle Produkte verdienen übrigens diesen Namen) wird dadurch geschwächt. Die Wissensorganisation genügt in vielen Fällen (noch) nicht. Das Problem liegt allerdings weniger bei der Klassifikation (Aktenplan), wie Ulrike Spree meint. Auch hier kommen Anomalien vor. Ein Ordnungssystem im Records Management umfasst mehr als nur die Klassifikation. Zudem dürfen die prinzipiellen, inhärenten Unterschiede zwischen Records Management einerseits und Wissens- und Informationsmanagement andererseits nicht vergessen gehen. Nicht die Klassifikation ist beim Records Management das zentrale Werkzeug der Informationsrepräsentation und -organisation, sondern die saubere Dossierbildung und die stringente, strukturstabile Umsetzung davon im Datenmodell. Hierauf geht die Autorin nicht ein. Ich werde aus dieser Sicht auf ihren Beitrag in der Schwerpunktausgabe reagieren.
    Date
    6.12.2009 17:22:17
  17. Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014) 0.02 
    0.023159413 = product of:
  0.08105794 = sum of:
    0.06732484 = weight(_text_:management in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06732484 = score(doc=1632,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.49264365 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
    0.013733104 = product of:
      0.027466208 = sum of:
        0.027466208 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027466208 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.2, S.134-155
  18. Pemberton, J.M.: Who put the 'management' in records management? (1995) 0.02 
    0.022991022 = product of:
  0.16093715 = sum of:
    0.16093715 = weight(_text_:management in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16093715 = score(doc=4560,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        1.1776435 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    There is confusion about the conceptual origins of records management. It is often wrongly associated with archival management. Records management however should be associated with management as its core paradigm is that of information management. Traces the rise of management and the emergence of management information, prior to the 2nd World War
    Source
    Records management quarterly. 29(1995) no.4, S.68-73
  19. McLeod, J.; Hare, C.H.; Webster, B.: Records management today (1998) 0.02 
    0.022729028 = product of:
  0.07955159 = sum of:
    0.057578623 = weight(_text_:management in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057578623 = score(doc=3627,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.42132655 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
    0.021972965 = product of:
      0.04394593 = sum of:
        0.04394593 = weight(_text_:22 in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04394593 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Examines the challenges associated with records management in an electronic environment. These include: the impact of professionalization; the explosion of information created and disseminated in electronic form; increased personal responsibility and the creation of ethical codes regulating the coduct of records managers; commitment to and recognition by society at large; and the need to redefine the skills and knowledge required to fulfil the new role of records manager
    Date
    15. 5.1999 20:22:49
  20. Cory, K.A.: ¬The imaging industry wants us! (1992) 0.02 
    0.021309327 = product of:
  0.14916529 = sum of:
    0.14916529 = weight(_text_:industry in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14916529 = score(doc=535,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.6343458 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Paper-based manual filing systems are inadequate to handle the flood of information found in most commercial offices and government agencies. Examples are included to delineate the dimensions of the problem. In response, imaging technology, which converts information in paper format to computer-readable binary format, is creating a multitude of electronic databases. However, imaging vendors are minimizing the difficulties of database organization. The author, drawing on personal experience, recounts instances of inadequate database organization. Because classification and indexing principles are only imparted in schools of library and/or information science, the imaging industry is highly dependent upon expertise possessed by library science graduates. In order to take advantage of this new job market, recommendations for library science students and faculty are included.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 124
  • d 56
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 150
  • m 24
  • x 8
  • s 4
  • r 2
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications