-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.05
0.05240287 = sum of:
0.024036987 = product of:
0.09614795 = sum of:
0.09614795 = weight(_text_:authors in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09614795 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.028365882 = product of:
0.056731764 = sum of:
0.056731764 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056731764 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
-
Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993)
0.05
0.045852512 = sum of:
0.021032363 = product of:
0.08412945 = sum of:
0.08412945 = weight(_text_:authors in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08412945 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024820147 = product of:
0.049640294 = sum of:
0.049640294 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049640294 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
- Source
- Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
-
Moebius, R.: ¬Die Zitiercommunity (2019)
0.02
0.019010404 = product of:
0.03802081 = sum of:
0.03802081 = product of:
0.07604162 = sum of:
0.07604162 = weight(_text_:r in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07604162 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Reuß, R.: ¬Der Geist gehört dem Staat : Open Access (2015)
0.02
0.015842004 = product of:
0.031684007 = sum of:
0.031684007 = product of:
0.063368015 = sum of:
0.063368015 = weight(_text_:r in 2512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063368015 = score(doc=2512,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 2512, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2512)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Khalil, M.A.; Jayatilleke, R.: ¬The use of electronic journals in libraries (1996)
0.01
0.012673602 = product of:
0.025347205 = sum of:
0.025347205 = product of:
0.05069441 = sum of:
0.05069441 = weight(_text_:r in 5685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05069441 = score(doc=5685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 5685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gasaway, L.N.: Scholarly publication and copyright in networked electronic publishing (1995)
0.01
0.012018493 = product of:
0.024036987 = sum of:
0.024036987 = product of:
0.09614795 = sum of:
0.09614795 = weight(_text_:authors in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09614795 = score(doc=2438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The publication of scholarly works in a networked electronic environment presents opportunities for solving problems with printed services. At the same time, copyright developed primarily for printed works, has been used to create stumbling blocks both for faculty authors and their institutions. This has accurred because publishers have required a transfer of copyright as a quid pro quo for publication. New models of copyright ownership and management can be developed for electronic publishing of scholarly works and research uses, and ultimately will reduce costs to universities which currently must repurchase faculty produced works from commercial publishers
-
Keates, S.: New developments in intellectual property rights : protection and access for electronic documents (1995)
0.01
0.010516182 = product of:
0.021032363 = sum of:
0.021032363 = product of:
0.08412945 = sum of:
0.08412945 = weight(_text_:authors in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08412945 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines 2 European Commission projects starting in Dec 95 aimed at managing access and protection for intellectual property. The Intellectual Multimedia Property Rights Model and Terminology for Universal References (IMPRIMATUR) project involves 16 partners with a network server in Italy. The Coordinating Project for Electronic Authors' Right Management Systems (COPEARMS) aims to develop the copyright in Transmitted Electronic Documents (CITED) work. Two other projects are also described: Copyright Ownership Protection in Computer Assisted Training (COPICAT) and MultiMedia Education System for Librarians Introducing Remote Interactive Processing of Electronic Documents (MURIEL)
-
"Google Books" darf weitermachen wie bisher : Entscheidung des Supreme Court in den USA (2016)
0.01
0.007511559 = product of:
0.015023118 = sum of:
0.015023118 = product of:
0.06009247 = sum of:
0.06009247 = weight(_text_:authors in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06009247 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- " Im Streit mit Google um Urheberrechte ist eine Gruppe von Buchautoren am Obersten US-Gericht gescheitert. Der Supreme Court lehnte es ab, die google-freundliche Entscheidung eines niederen Gerichtes zur Revision zuzulassen. In dem Fall geht es um die Online-Bibliothek "Google Books", für die der kalifornische Konzern Gerichtsunterlagen zufolge mehr als 20 Millionen Bücher digitalisiert hat. Durch das Projekt können Internet-Nutzer innerhalb der Bücher nach Stichworten suchen und die entsprechenden Textstellen lesen. Die drei zuständigen Richter entschieden einstimmig, dass in dem Fall zwar die Grenzen der Fairness ausgetestet würden, aber das Vorgehen von Google letztlich rechtens sei. Entschädigungen in Milliardenhöhe gefürchtet Die von dem Interessensverband Authors Guild angeführten Kläger sahen ihre Urheberrechte durch "Google Books" verletzt. Dazu gehörten auch prominente Künstler wie die Schriftstellerin und Dichterin Margaret Atwood. Google führte dagegen an, die Internet-Bibliothek kurbele den Bücherverkauf an, weil Leser dadurch zusätzlich auf interessante Werke aufmerksam gemacht würden. Google reagierte "dankbar" auf die Entscheidung des Supreme Court. Der Konzern hatte befürchtet, bei einer juristischen Niederlage Entschädigungen in Milliardenhöhe zahlen zu müssen."
