-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.05
0.046909127 = product of:
0.093818255 = sum of:
0.016039573 = weight(_text_:information in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016039573 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.07777868 = sum of:
0.032647457 = weight(_text_:technology in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032647457 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.04513122 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04513122 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.363-374
-
Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011)
0.03
0.0318287 = product of:
0.0636574 = sum of:
0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008101207 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.055556197 = sum of:
0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02331961 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032236587 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1614-1628
-
Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016)
0.03
0.0318287 = product of:
0.0636574 = sum of:
0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008101207 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.055556197 = sum of:
0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02331961 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032236587 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:11:17
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.412-431
-
Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Dobránszki, J.: Do open access data files represent an academic Risk? (2015)
0.02
0.023713216 = product of:
0.047426432 = sum of:
0.0194429 = weight(_text_:information in 2253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0194429 = score(doc=2253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2253)
0.027983533 = product of:
0.055967066 = sum of:
0.055967066 = weight(_text_:technology in 2253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055967066 = score(doc=2253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 2253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2253)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.11, S.2390-2391
-
D'Ambra, J.; Wilson, C.S.; Akter, S.: Application of the task-technology fit model to structure and evaluate the adoption of E-books by Academics (2013)
0.02
0.02129614 = product of:
0.04259228 = sum of:
0.0140317045 = weight(_text_:information in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0140317045 = score(doc=529,freq=6.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
0.028560575 = product of:
0.05712115 = sum of:
0.05712115 = weight(_text_:technology in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05712115 = score(doc=529,freq=12.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.40302482 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Increasingly, e-books are becoming alternatives to print books in academic libraries, thus providing opportunities to assess how well the use of e-books meets the requirements of academics. This study uses the task-technology fit (TTF) model to explore the interrelationships of e-books, the affordances offered by smart readers, the information needs of academics, and the "fit" of technology to tasks as well as performance. We propose that the adoption of e-books will be dependent on how academics perceive the fit of this new medium to the tasks they undertake as well as what added-value functionality is delivered by the information technology that delivers the content. The study used content analysis and an online survey, administered to the faculty in Medicine, Science and Engineering at the University of New South Wales, to identify the attributes of a TTF construct of e-books in academic settings. Using exploratory factor analysis, preliminary findings confirmed annotation, navigation, and output as the core dimensions of the TTF construct. The results of confirmatory factor analysis using partial least squares path modeling supported the overall TTF model in reflecting significant positive impact of task, technology, and individual characteristics on TTF for e-books in academic settings; it also confirmed significant positive impact of TTF on individuals' performance and use, and impact of using e-books on individual performance. Our research makes two contributions: the development of an e-book TTF construct and the testing of that construct in a model validating the efficacy of the TTF framework in measuring perceived fit of e-books to academic tasks.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.1, S.48-64
-
Nobarany, S.; Booth, K.S.: Understanding and supporting anonymity policies in peer review (2017)
0.02
0.018312696 = product of:
0.036625393 = sum of:
0.016838044 = weight(_text_:information in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016838044 = score(doc=3533,freq=6.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
0.019787349 = product of:
0.039574698 = sum of:
0.039574698 = weight(_text_:technology in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039574698 = score(doc=3533,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Design of peer-review support systems is shaped by the policies that define and govern the process of peer review. An important component of these are policies that deal with anonymity: The rules that govern the concealment and transparency of information related to identities of the various stakeholders (authors, reviewers, editors, and others) involved in the peer-review process. Anonymity policies have been a subject of debate for several decades within scholarly communities. Because of widespread criticism of traditional peer-review processes, a variety of new peer-review processes have emerged that manage the trade-offs between disclosure and concealment of identities in different ways. Based on an analysis of policies and guidelines for authors and reviewers provided by publication venues, we developed a framework for understanding how disclosure and concealment of identities is managed. We discuss the appropriate role of information technology and computer support for the peer-review process within that framework.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.4, S.957-971
-
Xia, J.: ¬A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors toward open-access journal publishing (2010)
0.02
0.016181652 = product of:
0.032363303 = sum of:
0.016039573 = weight(_text_:information in 3429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016039573 = score(doc=3429,freq=4.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3429, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3429)
0.016323728 = product of:
0.032647457 = sum of:
0.032647457 = weight(_text_:technology in 3429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032647457 = score(doc=3429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 3429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3429)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This research applies statistical time series analysis to examine the changing pattern of scholars' attitudes toward open-access (OA) journal publishing from the early 1990s. By synthesizing survey results in existing studies, this research focuses on representative aspects of the attitudes and behaviors recorded through the years. It finds that although an increase in the publishing and awareness rates of scholars with regard to OA journals has been observed, scholars have been consistently concerned with the low prestige of such journals and their lack of peer review, which is not the case in practice. It is hoped that the findings will provide useful information for the improvement of OA advocacy.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.3, S.615-624
-
García, J.A.; Rodriguez-Sánchez, R.; Fdez-Valdivia, J.: ¬The principal-agent problem in peer review : an interactionist perspective on everyday use of biomedical information (2015)
0.02
0.015751816 = product of:
0.031503633 = sum of:
0.019843826 = weight(_text_:information in 1638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019843826 = score(doc=1638,freq=12.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 1638, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1638)
0.011659805 = product of:
0.02331961 = sum of:
0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 1638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02331961 = score(doc=1638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 1638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1638)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In economics, the principal-agent problem is the difficulty in motivating one party (the agent), to act in the best interests of another (the principal) rather than in his own interests. We consider the example of a journal editor (the principal) wondering whether his or her reviewer (the agent) is recommending rejection of a manuscript because it does not have enough quality to be published or because the reviewer dislikes effort and he/she must work to acquire in-depth knowledge of the content of the manuscript. The reviewer's effort provides him or her with superior information about a manuscript's quality. If this information is not correctly communicated, the reviewer has more information when compared with the journal editor. This inherently leads to an encouragement of moral hazard, where the editor will not know whether the reviewer has done his or her job in accordance to the editor's interest. Prescriptions need to be given as to how the journal editor should control the reviewers to curb self-interest. Besides the associate editors monitoring the peer-review process, incentives can be employed to limit moral hazard on the part of the reviewer. Drawing on agency theory, we examine the incentives motivating the reviewers to expend effort to generate information about the quality of submissions. This model predicts that for reviewers early in their careers, promotion-based incentives may mean there is no need for within-job incentives, but also that within-job rewards for a referee's performance should depend on individual differences in ability and promotion opportunities.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.2, S.297-308
-
Salminen, A.; Jauhiainen, E.; Nurmeksela, R.: ¬A life cycle model of XML documents (2014)
0.02
0.015414905 = product of:
0.03082981 = sum of:
0.016838044 = weight(_text_:information in 1553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016838044 = score(doc=1553,freq=6.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 1553, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1553)
0.013991767 = product of:
0.027983533 = sum of:
0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 1553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027983533 = score(doc=1553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Electronic documents produced in business processes are valuable information resources for organizations. In many cases they have to be accessible long after the life of the business processes or information systems in connection with which they were created. To improve the management and preservation of documents, organizations are deploying Extensible Markup Language (XML) as a standardized format for documents. The goal of this paper is to increase understanding of XML document management and provide a framework to enable the analysis and description of the management of XML documents throughout their life. We followed the design science approach. We introduce a document life cycle model consisting of five phases. For each of the phases we describe the typical activities related to the management of XML documents. Furthermore, we also identify the typical actors, systems, and types of content items associated with the activities of the phases. We demonstrate the use of the model in two case studies: one concerning the State Budget Proposal of the Finnish government and the other concerning a faculty council meeting agenda at a university.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.12, S.2564-2580
-
Rodrigues, R.S.; Abadal, E.: Scientific journals in Brazil and Spain : alternative publishing models (2014)
0.01
0.0147544 = product of:
0.0295088 = sum of:
0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00972145 = score(doc=1504,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
0.019787349 = product of:
0.039574698 = sum of:
0.039574698 = weight(_text_:technology in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039574698 = score(doc=1504,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper describes high-quality journals in Brazil and Spain, with an emphasis on the distribution models used. It presents the general characteristics (age, type of publisher, and theme) and analyzes the distribution model by studying the type of format (print or digital), the type of access (open access or subscription), and the technology platform used. The 549 journals analyzed (249 in Brazil and 300 in Spain) are included in the 2011 Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases. Data on each journal were collected directly from their websites between March and October 2012. Brazil has a fully open access distribution model (97%) in which few journals require payment by authors thanks to cultural, financial, operational, and technological support provided by public agencies. In Spain, open access journals account for 55% of the total and have also received support from public agencies, although to a lesser extent. These results show that there are systems support of open access in scientific journals other than the "author pays" model advocated by the Finch report for the United Kingdom.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.10, S.2145-2151
-
Abella, A.; Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M.; De-Pablos-Heredero, C.: ¬The process of open data publication and reuse (2019)
0.01
0.013869986 = product of:
0.027739972 = sum of:
0.013748205 = weight(_text_:information in 4989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013748205 = score(doc=4989,freq=4.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4989, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4989)
0.013991767 = product of:
0.027983533 = sum of:
0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 4989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027983533 = score(doc=4989,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4989, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4989)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Open data movement advocates support to public authorities by making available to society the public information they manage. The data released are identified as open government data and the creation of open data portals supports their commitment through open government policies. The worldwide increase of the open data publication is making more necessary the modelling of its impact on society. This research analyses the process of open data publication starting in the internal systems of the organization and reaching the actual reuse of data in reuser's ecosystem surrounding the open data portals. Different reuser's profiles are identified and described within the reuser's ecosystem. Some key elements of the publication process are presented in order to guarantee sustainability of open data initiatives and to further analyse the social and economic impact.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.3, S.296-300
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: SlideShare presentations, citations, users, and trends : a professional site with academic and educational uses (2017)
0.01
0.012845755 = product of:
0.02569151 = sum of:
0.0140317045 = weight(_text_:information in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0140317045 = score(doc=3766,freq=6.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
0.011659805 = product of:
0.02331961 = sum of:
0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02331961 = score(doc=3766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- SlideShare is a free social website that aims to help users distribute and find presentations. Owned by LinkedIn since 2012, it targets a professional audience but may give value to scholarship through creating a long-term record of the content of talks. This article tests this hypothesis by analyzing sets of general and scholarly related SlideShare documents using content and citation analysis and popularity statistics reported on the site. The results suggest that academics, students, and teachers are a minority of SlideShare uploaders, especially since 2010, with most documents not being directly related to scholarship or teaching. About two thirds of uploaded SlideShare documents are presentation slides, with the remainder often being files associated with presentations or video recordings of talks. SlideShare is therefore a presentation-centered site with a predominantly professional user base. Although a minority of the uploaded SlideShare documents are cited by, or cite, academic publications, probably too few articles are cited by SlideShare to consider extracting SlideShare citations for research evaluation. Nevertheless, scholars should consider SlideShare to be a potential source of academic and nonacademic information, particularly in library and information science, education, and business.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.8, S.1989-2003
-
Rowley, J.; Johnson, F.; Sbaffi, L.; Frass, W.; Devine, E.: Academics' behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals (2017)
0.01
0.012295332 = product of:
0.024590664 = sum of:
0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008101207 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
0.016489455 = product of:
0.03297891 = sum of:
0.03297891 = weight(_text_:technology in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03297891 = score(doc=3597,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- While there is significant progress with policy and a lively debate regarding the potential impact of open access publishing, few studies have examined academics' behavior and attitudes to open access publishing (OAP) in scholarly journals. This article seeks to address this gap through an international and interdisciplinary survey of academics. Issues covered include: use of and intentions regarding OAP, and perceptions regarding advantages and disadvantages of OAP, journal article publication services, peer review, and reuse. Despite reporting engagement in OAP, academics were unsure about their future intentions regarding OAP. Broadly, academics identified the potential for wider circulation as the key advantage of OAP, and were more positive about its benefits than they were negative about its disadvantages. As regards services, rigorous peer review, followed by rapid publication were most valued. Academics reported strong views on reuse of their work; they were relatively happy with noncommercial reuse, but not in favor of commercial reuse, adaptations, and inclusion in anthologies. Comparing science, technology, and medicine with arts, humanities, and social sciences showed a significant difference in attitude on a number of questions, but, in general, the effect size was small, suggesting that attitudes are relatively consistent across the academic community.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.5, S.1201-1211
-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.01
0.012109751 = product of:
0.024219502 = sum of:
0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008101207 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.016118294 = product of:
0.032236587 = sum of:
0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032236587 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.6, S.614-635
-
Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017)
0.01
0.012109751 = product of:
0.024219502 = sum of:
0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008101207 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.016118294 = product of:
0.032236587 = sum of:
0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032236587 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.6, S.674-687
-
Dalen, H.P. van; Henkens, K.: Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture : a worldwide survey (2012)
0.01
0.011856608 = product of:
0.023713216 = sum of:
0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00972145 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
0.013991767 = product of:
0.027983533 = sum of:
0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027983533 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.7, S.1282-1293
-
Bias, R.G.; Larson, K.; Huang, S.-C.; Aumer-Ryan, P.R.; Montesclaros, C.: ¬An exploratory study of visual and psychological correlates of preference for onscreen subpixel-rendered text (2010)
0.01
0.011856608 = product of:
0.023713216 = sum of:
0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00972145 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
0.013991767 = product of:
0.027983533 = sum of:
0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027983533 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.4, S.745-757
-
Solomon, D.J.; Björk, B.-C.: ¬A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)
0.01
0.011856608 = product of:
0.023713216 = sum of:
0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00972145 = score(doc=365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
0.013991767 = product of:
0.027983533 = sum of:
0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027983533 = score(doc=365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.8, S.1485-1495
-
Björk, B.-C.: ¬The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles : a failed experiment? (2012)
0.01
0.011856608 = product of:
0.023713216 = sum of:
0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00972145 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.013991767 = product of:
0.027983533 = sum of:
0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027983533 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.8, S.1496-1504
-
Hu, B.; Dong, X.; Zhang, C.; Bowman, T.D.; Ding, Y.; Milojevic, S.; Ni, C.; Yan, E.; Larivière, V.: ¬A lead-lag analysis of the topic evolution patterns for preprints and publications (2015)
0.01
0.011856608 = product of:
0.023713216 = sum of:
0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00972145 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.013991767 = product of:
0.027983533 = sum of:
0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027983533 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.12, S.2643-2656
