Search (122 results, page 6 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Kasperek, G.: Recherchieren - auch mal mit dem Mut zur Lücke : Literaturbezogene Arbeitsweisen bei Naturwissenschaftlern am Beispiel der Biologie (2009) 0.01
    0.008398045 = product of:
      0.041990224 = sum of:
        0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 3020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041990224 = score(doc=3020,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3020, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3020)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2009 13:41:12
  2. Heller, L.: Literatur- und Informationsversorgung in der Spitzenforschung (2009) 0.01
    0.008398045 = product of:
      0.041990224 = sum of:
        0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 3022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041990224 = score(doc=3022,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3022, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3022)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2009 13:40:29
  3. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.01
    0.008398045 = product of:
      0.041990224 = sum of:
        0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041990224 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:22:45
  4. Münch, V.: They have a dream (2019) 0.01
    0.008398045 = product of:
      0.041990224 = sum of:
        0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041990224 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.1, S.25-39
  5. Strecker, D.: Nutzung der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub in Deutschland (2019) 0.01
    0.008398045 = product of:
      0.041990224 = sum of:
        0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041990224 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 1.2020 13:22:34
  6. Kleinz, T.: ¬Die halbe Freiheit : Scanner wie jene von Google haben in Bibliotheken verborgene Schätze - doch Gemeingut werden die dann selten (2007) 0.01
    0.008243595 = product of:
      0.041217975 = sum of:
        0.041217975 = weight(_text_:cd in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041217975 = score(doc=185,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.19340292 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Wie schnell digitalisiertes Wissen verfallen kann, zeigt der Codex Leicester, eine Sammlung von Handschriften Leonardo da Vincis. Microsoft-Gründer Bill Gates hatte den Codex in den 90er Jahren gekauft und auf CD-ROM veröffentlicht. Das Problem: Die 1996 produzierte CD läuft nicht auf aktuellen Rechnern, und eine Neuauflage bleibt aus - allein Besitzer Bill Gates hätte das Recht dazu. Um solche Rückschläge zu vermeiden, hat die Max-Planck-Gesellschaft schon vor drei Jahren die Berliner Erklärung aufgesetzt. Mit ihr versichern die Unterzeichner, wissenschaftliche Arbeiten kostenlos einsehbar zu machen und das Kopieren der Inhalte zu ermöglichen. Doch der Gedanke setzt sich nicht komplett durch; viele Einrichtungen belassen es beim kostenlosen Zugriff für die Allgemeinheit. In den Scanprojekten wie dem von Google sieht Rieger zwar einen Schritt nach vorne. So werden mit der Digitalisierung Bücher geschont: Statt sie ständig in den Leseseal zu liefern und dort Schmutz und Licht auszusetzen, werden die Werke nur einmal eingescannt und müssen nicht mehr aus dem sicheren Archiv entnommen werden. Für die wissenschaftliche Arbeit an Handschriften müsse man jedoch weiter greifen. "Schwarz-Weiß-Scans sind für die Forschung wenig geeignet", sagt die Fachfrau. Zudem sei eine automatische Handhabung der Originalquellen nicht immer möglich: Gerade alte Bücher seien häufig fleckig, für die alten Schrifttypen gibt es selten eine automatische Zeichenerkennung. Dann hilft nur geduldige Handarbeit, um das Wissen den historischen Quellen zu entnehmen. Dieser Aufgabe haben sich auch die Aktiven von Wikisource verschrieben. In einem Schwesterprojekt der Wikipedia sind mehrere hundert Freiwillige damit beschäftigt, mittelalterliche Handschriften und Kulturgüter einzuordnen, zu sortieren und zu transkribieren. In gemeinschaftlicher Arbeit werden mittelalterliche, bis neuzeitliche Quellen gesichtet und in Klartext übersetzt vorn Steckbrief aus dem 17. Jahrhundert bis zu Gesetzestexten aus der Zeit der Nationalsozialisten. "Noch haben die Bibliotheken Bedenken,- uns 'Materialien zur Verfügung zu stellen", sagt Danowski. Er hofft, dass sich die Entscheidungsträger künftig öffnen und auch Hobby-Wissenschaftlern die Arbeit mit den Quellen ermöglichen."
  7. Bayer, M.: ¬Die Gier der Bits und Bytes auf Gutenberg : Elektronisches Publizieren, Drucken und das papierlose E-Book melden sich in Frankfurt zu Wort (2000) 0.01
    0.006998371 = product of:
      0.034991853 = sum of:
        0.034991853 = weight(_text_:22 in 5391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034991853 = score(doc=5391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5391)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  8. Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011) 0.01
    0.006998371 = product of:
      0.034991853 = sum of:
        0.034991853 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034991853 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
  9. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.01
    0.006998371 = product of:
      0.034991853 = sum of:
        0.034991853 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034991853 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  10. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.01
    0.006998371 = product of:
      0.034991853 = sum of:
        0.034991853 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034991853 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17
  11. Taglinger, H.: Ausgevogelt, jetzt wird es ernst (2018) 0.01
    0.006998371 = product of:
      0.034991853 = sum of:
        0.034991853 = weight(_text_:22 in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034991853 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2018 11:38:55
  12. Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017) 0.01
    0.006998371 = product of:
      0.034991853 = sum of:
        0.034991853 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034991853 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  13. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.01
    0.005829102 = product of:
      0.029145509 = sum of:
        0.029145509 = weight(_text_:cd in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029145509 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.13675651 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
  14. FIZ Karlsruhe unterstützt gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbund (VZG) bei der Einführung der ESCIDOC-Infrastruktur (2008) 0.01
    0.005598697 = product of:
      0.027993483 = sum of:
        0.027993483 = weight(_text_:22 in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027993483 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    7. 4.2008 11:36:22
  15. Woltering, H.: ¬Der automatische Download von Netzpublikationen durch Bibliotheken und ihre Nutzung (2008) 0.01
    0.005598697 = product of:
      0.027993483 = sum of:
        0.027993483 = weight(_text_:22 in 1982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027993483 = score(doc=1982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1982)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Im "Gesetz über die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNBG)" vom 22. Juni 2006 erhielt die Bibliothek nicht nur den Auftrag, wie bisher Medienwerke in körperlicher Form (alle Darstellungen auf Papier, elektronischen Datenträgern und anderen Trägern), sondern auch Medienwerke in unkörperlicher Form (alle Darstellungen in öffentlichen Netzen) zu sammeln. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) will zu diesem Zweck zum Sommer 2008 die Pflichtablieferungsverordnung und die Sammelrichtlinien neu fassen. Diese Vorgaben sehen vor, dass die Sammlung von Online-Publikationen (im Folgenden auch: Netzpublikationen, elektronische Publikationen, E-Publikationen) in einem stufenweisen Verfahren ablaufen soll. Die DNB formulierte diese drei Schritte folgendermaßen: - Direkte Kooperation mit Ablieferern oder Kooperation mit aggregierenden Partnern hinsichtlich der Sammlung einzeln identifizierbarer Online-Publikationen. Entsprechende Verfahren wurden bereits vor Inkrafttreten des Gesetzes über die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek genutzt. Die bisherigen Erfahrungen dienen dazu, Weiterentwicklungen und Verbesserungen auf einer praktischen Basis und mittels gängiger vorhandener Standards voranzutreiben. In die Übelegungen fließen auch Möglichkeiten der Nutzung bestehender Vertriebswege einzelner Sparten ein. - Implementierung einer generell nutzbaren Schnittstelle auf der Website der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek für die Ablieferung einzeln identifizierbarer Netzpublikationen in einem standardisierten Verfahren. Diese Schnittstelle wird bereits seit einigen Jahren genutzt und derzeit für größere Ablieferungsvolumina optimiert. - Erprobung von Harvesting-Methoden für die Sammlung bzw. den Abruf definierter kleinerer oder größerer Domainbereiche. In diese Fragestellung fällt auch das Einsammeln ganzer Objektgruppen wie etwa Websites aller Bundesbehörden oder thematische Sammlungen zu besonderen nationalen Ereignissen wie Bundestagswahlen. Deutlich wird hier jedoch, dass der Prozess der Verfahrensfindung noch im Gange ist. Ebenso augenscheinlich ist, dass zwischen der freiwilligen Ablieferung von E-Publikationen durch die publizierenden Organisationen und der Sicherung ganzer Websites noch die automatisierte Sicherung der einzelnen elektronischen Publikationen von den Organisations-Websites stehen könnte und sollte. Der Download durch Bibliotheken erscheint sinnvoll, da die Ablieferung eigener E-Publikationen oft nicht selbständig durch die Organisationen erfolgt, sondern meist regelmäßig eingefordert werden muss. Hinzu kommt, dass sich der Sammelauftrag der DNB naturgemäß auf die Netzpublikationen deutscher Organisationen bezieht, nicht jedoch auf elektronische Veröffentlichungen außerdeutscher Einrichtungen,die z.B. auch für SSG- Bibliotheken mit regional oder thematisch ausgerichtet m Sammelauftrag interessant wären.
  16. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.01
    0.005598697 = product of:
      0.027993483 = sum of:
        0.027993483 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027993483 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  17. Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017) 0.01
    0.005598697 = product of:
      0.027993483 = sum of:
        0.027993483 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027993483 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  18. Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018) 0.01
    0.005598697 = product of:
      0.027993483 = sum of:
        0.027993483 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027993483 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  19. Sülzer, T.: ¬Die komplette Rundschau jetzt im Internet : "E-Paper"-Ausgabe mit sämtlichen Beilagen online lesen - für Abonnenten völlig kostenlos (2005) 0.00
    0.0048988597 = product of:
      0.024494298 = sum of:
        0.024494298 = weight(_text_:22 in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024494298 = score(doc=4026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  20. Siegle, J.: Programmabsturz : Immer mehr Internet-Zeitschriften stehen vor dem Aus - jüngstes Opfer ist das US-Magazin 'The Industry Standard' (2000) 0.00
    0.0041990224 = product of:
      0.020995112 = sum of:
        0.020995112 = weight(_text_:22 in 6494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020995112 = score(doc=6494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 6494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6494)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22

Years

Languages

  • d 63
  • e 59