Search (468 results, page 1 of 24)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.06 
    0.060326457 = product of:
  0.090489686 = sum of:
    0.012554439 = weight(_text_:in in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012554439 = score(doc=3608,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
    0.07793525 = sum of:
      0.050200403 = weight(_text_:education in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050200403 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051176514 = queryNorm
          0.2082096 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.027734846 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027734846 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051176514 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  2. Brusilovsky, P.; Eklund, J.; Schwarz, E.: Web-based education for all : a tool for development adaptive courseware (1998) 0.05 
    0.051956832 = product of:
  0.1558705 = sum of:
    0.1558705 = sum of:
      0.100400805 = weight(_text_:education in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.100400805 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051176514 = queryNorm
          0.4164192 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
      0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05546969 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051176514 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  3. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.05 
    0.048139296 = product of:
  0.07220894 = sum of:
    0.016739251 = weight(_text_:in in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016739251 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
    0.05546969 = product of:
      0.11093938 = sum of:
        0.11093938 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11093938 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  4. Walsh, J.A.; Cobb, P.J.; Fremery, W. de; Golub, K.; Keah, H.; Kim, J.; Kiplang'at, J.; Liu, Y.-H.; Mahony, S.; Oh, S.G.; Sula, C.A.; Underwood, T.; Wang, X.: Digital humanities in the iSchool (2022) 0.05 
    0.046691053 = product of:
  0.070036575 = sum of:
    0.015693048 = weight(_text_:in in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015693048 = score(doc=463,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
    0.05434353 = product of:
      0.10868706 = sum of:
        0.10868706 = weight(_text_:education in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10868706 = score(doc=463,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.450787 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The interdisciplinary field known as digital humanities (DH) is represented in various forms in the teaching and research practiced in iSchools. Building on the work of an iSchools organization committee charged with exploring digital humanities curricula, we present findings from a series of related studies exploring aspects of DH teaching, education, and research in iSchools, often in collaboration with other units and disciplines. Through a survey of iSchool programs and an online DH course registry, we investigate the various education models for DH training found in iSchools, followed by a detailed look at DH courses and curricula, explored through analysis of course syllabi and course descriptions. We take a brief look at collaborative disciplines with which iSchools cooperate on DH research projects or in offering DH education. Next, we explore DH careers through an analysis of relevant job advertisements. Finally, we offer some observations about the management and administrative challenges and opportunities related to offering a new iSchool DH program. Our results provide a snapshot of the current state of digital humanities in iSchools which may usefully inform the design and evolution of new DH programs, degrees, and related initiatives.
  5. Munoz, J.V.R.: Documentos electronicos y normalizacion : informacion y conocimiento (1997) 0.04 
    0.044626437 = product of:
  0.06693965 = sum of:
    0.016739251 = weight(_text_:in in 2813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016739251 = score(doc=2813,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 2813, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2813)
    0.050200403 = product of:
      0.100400805 = sum of:
        0.100400805 = weight(_text_:education in 2813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.100400805 = score(doc=2813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.4164192 = fieldWeight in 2813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2813)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Information technology is forging new forms of communication among people, generating changes in the way that society is structured in the manner of working, the place in which we live and amuse ourselves and the education of children. In that society, the key to success will be access to knowledge
  6. Keates, S.: New developments in intellectual property rights : protection and access for electronic documents (1995) 0.04 
    0.040200684 = product of:
  0.060301024 = sum of:
    0.016375672 = weight(_text_:in in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016375672 = score(doc=4000,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    0.043925352 = product of:
      0.087850705 = sum of:
        0.087850705 = weight(_text_:education in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087850705 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Examines 2 European Commission projects starting in Dec 95 aimed at managing access and protection for intellectual property. The Intellectual Multimedia Property Rights Model and Terminology for Universal References (IMPRIMATUR) project involves 16 partners with a network server in Italy. The Coordinating Project for Electronic Authors' Right Management Systems (COPEARMS) aims to develop the copyright in Transmitted Electronic Documents (CITED) work. Two other projects are also described: Copyright Ownership Protection in Computer Assisted Training (COPICAT) and MultiMedia Education System for Librarians Introducing Remote Interactive Processing of Electronic Documents (MURIEL)
  7. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.04 
    0.03966052 = product of:
  0.059490778 = sum of:
    0.010462033 = weight(_text_:in in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010462033 = score(doc=3582,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
    0.049028743 = product of:
      0.098057486 = sum of:
        0.098057486 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098057486 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Ein Statistikprofessor im Ruhestand beweist eine berühmte mathematische Vermutung über mehrdimensionale Normalverteilungen - und findet kaum Anklang, weil er nicht in den großen Journals publiziert.
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  8. Wakeling, S.; Spezi, V.; Fry, J.; Creaser, C.; Pinfield, S.; Willett, P.: Academic communities : the role of journals and open-access mega-journals in scholarly communication (2019) 0.04 
    0.039444573 = product of:
  0.059166856 = sum of:
    0.014795548 = weight(_text_:in in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014795548 = score(doc=4627,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
    0.044371307 = product of:
      0.088742614 = sum of:
        0.088742614 = weight(_text_:education in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088742614 = score(doc=4627,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.36806607 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide insights into publication practices from the perspective of academics working within four disciplinary communities: biosciences, astronomy/physics, education and history. The paper explores the ways in which these multiple overlapping communities intersect with the journal landscape and the implications for the adoption and use of new players in the scholarly communication system, particularly open-access mega-journals (OAMJs). OAMJs (e.g. PLOS ONE and Scientific Reports) are large, broad scope, open-access journals that base editorial decisions solely on the technical/scientific soundness of the article. Design/methodology/approach Focus groups with active researchers in these fields were held in five UK Higher Education Institutions across Great Britain, and were complemented by interviews with pro-vice-chancellors for research at each institution. Findings A strong finding to emerge from the data is the notion of researchers belonging to multiple overlapping communities, with some inherent tensions in meeting the requirements for these different audiences. Researcher perceptions of evaluation mechanisms were found to play a major role in attitudes towards OAMJs, and interviews with the pro-vice-chancellors for research indicate that there is a difference between researchers' perceptions and the values embedded in institutional frameworks. Originality/value This is the first purely qualitative study relating to researcher perspectives on OAMJs. The findings of the paper will be of interest to publishers, policy-makers, research managers and academics.
  9. Zhang, Y.; Kudva, S.: E-books versus print books : readers' choices and preferences across contexts (2014) 0.04 
    0.03655556 = product of:
  0.054833338 = sum of:
    0.010462033 = weight(_text_:in in 1335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010462033 = score(doc=1335,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1335, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1335)
    0.044371307 = product of:
      0.088742614 = sum of:
        0.088742614 = weight(_text_:education in 1335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088742614 = score(doc=1335,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.36806607 = fieldWeight in 1335, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1335)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    With electronic book (e-book) sales and readership rising, are e-books positioned to replace print books? This study examines the preference for e-books and print books in the contexts of reading purpose, reading situation, and contextual variables such as age, gender, education level, race/ethnicity, income, community type, and Internet use. In addition, this study aims to identify factors that contribute to e-book adoption. Participants were a nationally representative sample of 2,986 people in the United States from the Reading Habits Survey, conducted by the Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project (http://pewinternet.org/Shared-Content/Data-Sets/2011/December-2011--Reading-Habits.aspx). While the results of this study support the notion that e-books have firmly established a place in people's lives, due to their convenience of access, e-books are not yet positioned to replace print books. Both print books and e-books have unique attributes and serve irreplaceable functions to meet people's reading needs, which may vary by individual demographic, contextual, and situational factors. At this point, the leading significant predictors of e-book adoption are the number of books read, the individual's income, the occurrence and frequency of reading for research topics of interest, and the individual's Internet use, followed by other variables such as race/ethnicity, reading for work/school, age, and education.
  10. Grycz, C.J.: ¬The textbook of the future (1996) 0.04 
    0.03618816 = product of:
  0.054282237 = sum of:
    0.010356884 = weight(_text_:in in 1378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010356884 = score(doc=1378,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 1378, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1378)
    0.043925352 = product of:
      0.087850705 = sum of:
        0.087850705 = weight(_text_:education in 1378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087850705 = score(doc=1378,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 1378, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1378)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Discusses the future of the textbook in the electronic age. Identifies the characteristics of the textbook of the future. It will: be the product of coalitions of experts; be customizable by teacher an student; use dynamic online databases to remain current; be sold in a variety of sizes or durations; be delivered inexpensively via campus or regional replication services; include dynamic interactive segments; offer a suite of helper applications to enhance both teacher/student and student/student relationships; and offer the basis for a permanent ongoing structure for continuing education after completion of formal coursework. Discusses the challenges this future poses to authors; publishers; teachers and students. Considers issues relating to intellectual property, reward and pricing, and how the textbook to tomorrow will affect the act of teaching
  11. Oßwald, A.: Proaktives Wissensmanagement für Fachbereiche, Hochschule und externe Partner : Bibliotheksdienstleistungen als Brücke zur Praxis (2000) 0.04 
    0.03610447 = product of:
  0.054156706 = sum of:
    0.012554439 = weight(_text_:in in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012554439 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
    0.041602265 = product of:
      0.08320453 = sum of:
        0.08320453 = weight(_text_:22 in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08320453 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    27.10.2001 12:22:54
    Source
    Wissenschaft online: Elektronisches Publizieren in Bibliothek und Hochschule. Hrsg. B. Tröger
  12. Olivieri, R.: Academic publishing in transition : the academic publishers response (1995) 0.03 
    0.032976072 = product of:
  0.049464107 = sum of:
    0.014795548 = weight(_text_:in in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014795548 = score(doc=4988,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
    0.034668557 = product of:
      0.069337115 = sum of:
        0.069337115 = weight(_text_:22 in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069337115 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Discusses the changing forces of demand, supply and technical change in the field of academic publishing. Covers electronic publishing; the UnCover document delivery service from B.H. Blackwell; the work of Blackwell Science and Blackwell Publishers and electronic pilot studies
    Source
    IATUL proceedings (new series). 4(1995), S.15-22
  13. Pinfield, S.; Salter, J.; Bath, P.A.: ¬A "Gold-centric" implementation of open access : hybrid journals, the "Total cost of publication," and policy development in the UK and beyond (2017) 0.03 
    0.030143483 = product of:
  0.045215223 = sum of:
    0.01383997 = weight(_text_:in in 3797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01383997 = score(doc=3797,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 3797, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3797)
    0.03137525 = product of:
      0.0627505 = sum of:
        0.0627505 = weight(_text_:education in 3797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0627505 = score(doc=3797,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.260262 = fieldWeight in 3797, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3797)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper reports analysis of data from higher education institutions in the UK on their experience of the open-access (OA) publishing market working within a policy environment favoring "Gold" OA (OA publishing in journals). It models the "total cost of publication"-comprising costs of journal subscriptions, OA article-processing charges (APCs), and new administrative costs-for a sample of 24 institutions. APCs are shown to constitute 12% of the "total cost of publication," APC administration, 1%, and subscriptions, 87% (for a sample of seven publishers). APC expenditure in institutions rose between 2012 and 2014 at the same time as rising subscription costs. There was disproportionately high take up of Gold options for Health and Life Sciences articles. APC prices paid varied widely, with a mean APC of £1,586 in 2014. "Hybrid" options (subscription journals also offering OA for individual articles on payment of an APC) were considerably more expensive than fully OA titles, but the data indicate a correlation between APC price and journal quality (as reflected in the citation rates of journals). The policy implications of these developments are explored, particularly in relation to hybrid OA and potential of offsetting subscription and APC costs.
  14. Oßwald, A.: Electronic publishing : Auswirkungen auf bibliothekarische und dokumentarische Grundfunktionen (1993) 0.03 
    0.03008706 = product of:
  0.045130588 = sum of:
    0.010462033 = weight(_text_:in in 5924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010462033 = score(doc=5924,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 5924, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5924)
    0.034668557 = product of:
      0.069337115 = sum of:
        0.069337115 = weight(_text_:22 in 5924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069337115 = score(doc=5924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5924)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Vgl. die erweiterte Fassung in ZfBB 40(1993) S.326-342
    Source
    Bibliothek - Kultur - Information: Beiträge eines internationalen Kongresses anläßlich des 50jährigen Bestehens der Fachhochschule für Bibliothekswesen Stuttgart vom 20.-22. Okt. 1992. Hrsg.: P. Vodosek
  15. Jensen, M.: Digital structure, digital design : issues in designing electronic publications (1996) 0.03 
    0.029649397 = product of:
  0.044474095 = sum of:
    0.016739251 = weight(_text_:in in 7481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016739251 = score(doc=7481,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 7481, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7481)
    0.027734846 = product of:
      0.05546969 = sum of:
        0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 7481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05546969 = score(doc=7481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7481)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    In print publications, content elements are representable in visual form, but in digital presentation function may be shown through hypertext. Good design must be a tool to illuminate content, not an arbitrary add on. Sets out elements of good digital design. Consideration of the purpose of the publication, the use of the publication, the audience, and the market will help to identify appropriate design choices
    Source
    Journal of scholarly publishing. 28(1996) no.1, S.13-22
  16. Schleim, S.: Warum die Wissenschaft nicht frei ist (2017) 0.03 
    0.029649397 = product of:
  0.044474095 = sum of:
    0.016739251 = weight(_text_:in in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016739251 = score(doc=3882,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
    0.027734846 = product of:
      0.05546969 = sum of:
        0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05546969 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    In der Wissenschaft geht es um die Suche nach Erkenntnissen. Für diese ist der Austausch von Ideen von entscheidender Bedeutung. Neben wissenschaftlichen Meetings und Konferenzen sind Publikationen hierfür das Medium - und diese Publikationen finden heute vor allem in englischsprachigen Fachzeitschriften statt, die das Gutachterprinzip ("Peer Review") anwenden. In diesem Artikel möchte ich erklären, dass dafür theoretisch zwar vieles spricht, dass in der Praxis aber wirtschaftliche Gewinnabsichten ebenso wie persönliche Interessenkonflikte die Freiheit der Wissenschaft einschränken.
    Date
    9.10.2017 15:48:22
  17. Mumenthaler, R.: Neue Dienstleistungen für mobile Lesegeräte? : E-Book-Reader und ihre Auswirkungen auf Bibliotheken (2010) 0.03 
    0.02945905 = product of:
  0.044188574 = sum of:
    0.012813321 = weight(_text_:in in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012813321 = score(doc=4087,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
    0.03137525 = product of:
      0.0627505 = sum of:
        0.0627505 = weight(_text_:education in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0627505 = score(doc=4087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.260262 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Digitale Medien sind auf dem Vormarsch. Das beeindruckendste Beispiel dafür kommt aus den USA-der Computerriese Apple hat im Juni drei Millionen verkaufte Exemplare seines iPads gemeldet, und das nur 80 Tage nach dem Verkaufsstart des Tablet-PCs. Aber egal ob Applikationen für Smartphones oder Rechtemanagement, die Digitalisierung bringt neue Herausforderungen mit sich. Und natürlich reagiert auch die Frankfurter Buchmesse auf diese rasanten Entwicklungen - in diesem Jahr gibt es sechs Sonderflächen auf dem Messegelände, die auf die Präsentation digitaler Produkte zugeschnitten wurden. Diese sogenannten »Hot Spots« sind über die Buchmesse verteilt: In Halle 8.0 ist zum Beispiel der »Devices Hot Spot«angesiedelt, dort werden eReader und Multimedia-Tablets samt Zubehör vorgestellt. Der »Mobile Hot Spot« in Halle 6.0 widmet sich dem Thema Smart-phones, der »Education Hot Spot« in Halle 4.2 befasst sich mit elektronischen Lernspielen und Online-Lernportalen. So ist auch auf der größten Bücherschau der Welt, die in diesem Jahr vom 6. bis zum 10. Oktober stattfinden wird, ein Blick in die Zukunft möglich. Welche Auswirkungen diese Entwicklungen auf Bibliotheken haben und wie sich diese auf die Veränderungen vorbereiten können, erläutert Rudolf Mumenthaler im Folgenden, von den Anfängen der ersten Reader bis zu den heutigen Geräten.
  18. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi (2016) 0.03 
    0.028714774 = product of:
  0.04307216 = sum of:
    0.011696909 = weight(_text_:in in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011696909 = score(doc=3226,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
    0.03137525 = product of:
      0.0627505 = sum of:
        0.0627505 = weight(_text_:education in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0627505 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.260262 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Scholars writing books that are widely used to support teaching in higher education may be undervalued because of a lack of evidence of teaching value. Although sales data may give credible evidence for textbooks, these data may poorly reflect educational uses of other types of books. As an alternative, this article proposes a method to search automatically for mentions of books in online academic course syllabi based on Bing searches for syllabi mentioning a given book, filtering out false matches through an extensive set of rules. The method had an accuracy of over 90% based on manual checks of a sample of 2,600 results from the initial Bing searches. Over one third of about 14,000 monographs checked had one or more academic syllabus mention, with more in the arts and humanities (56%) and social sciences (52%). Low but significant correlations between syllabus mentions and citations across most fields, except the social sciences, suggest that books tend to have different levels of impact for teaching and research. In conclusion, the automatic syllabus search method gives a new way to estimate the educational utility of books in a way that sales data and citation counts cannot.
  19. Joint, N.: Is digitisation the new circulation? : borrowing trends, digitisation and the nature of reading in US and UK libraries (2008) 0.03 
    0.028236419 = product of:
  0.04235463 = sum of:
    0.017254427 = weight(_text_:in in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017254427 = score(doc=1901,freq=34.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.24786183 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
          5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
            34.0 = termFreq=34.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
    0.025100201 = product of:
      0.050200403 = sum of:
        0.050200403 = weight(_text_:education in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050200403 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.2082096 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose - To explore the belief that digital technology has created a steep and irreversible decline in traditional library use, particularly in borrowing from public and higher education library print collections, with a concomitant effect on familiar patterns of reading and reflection. If digital technology has led to a fundamental change in the way young people in HE process information, should traditional assumptions about library use and educational reading habits be abandoned? Design/methodology/approach - This is a comparative analysis of statistics of library use available in the public domain in the USA and UK. Findings - That reading habits shown in the use of public libraries are arguably conservative in nature; and that recent statistics for the circulation of print stock in US and UK university libraries indisputably show year on year increases, not decreases, except where the digitisation of print originals has provided a generous supply of effective digital surrogates for print holdings. The nature of reading has not changed fundamentally in nature. But where copyright law permits large-scale provision of digital collections to be derived from print originals, these will readily displace borrowing from print collections, leading to lower circulation figures of hard copy items. Research limitations/implications - This paper asserts that the restrictive nature of UK copyright law, which is demonstrably backward by international standards, is a major factor inhibiting university teachers from helping their students migrate from print to digital media. This assertion should be researched in greater depth, with a view to using such research to influence the development of future intellectual property legislation in the UK. Practical implications - Because of the essentially conservative nature of reflective reading for educational purposes, digitisation programmes offer an important way forward for academic library service development. Library managers should not underestimate the persistent demand for traditional reading materials: where such materials are provided in digital or print formats, in most cases the digital formats will be preferred; but where high quality educational resources are only available in print, there is no evidence that the format of alternative digital media is in itself sufficient to lure students away from quality content. Originality/value - This paper questions some of the more casual assumptions about the "death" of traditional library services.
  20. Klassen, R.; Kübler, H.-D.: Strukturwandel des wissenschaftlichen Publikationsmarktes : Perspektiven und Aufgaben für die Forschung (2009) 0.03 
    0.02815431 = product of:
  0.042231463 = sum of:
    0.014496619 = weight(_text_:in in 3015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014496619 = score(doc=3015,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 3015, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3015)
    0.027734846 = product of:
      0.05546969 = sum of:
        0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 3015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05546969 = score(doc=3015,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3015, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3015)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Ein Forschungsprojekt des Department Information der HAW Hamburg unter der Leitung von Rainer Klassen und Hans-Dieter Kühler hat sich aufgemacht, Licht in die Situation des wissenschaftlichen Buchmarktes in Deutschland und Europa zu bringen. Die Experten setzen sich mit den Veränderungen für das wissenschaftliche Publizieren auseinander und beleuchten die Rolle, die Hochschulen und ihre Bibliotheken in diesem Zusammenhang spielen (könnten).
    Date
    22. 7.2009 13:09:48

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 270
  • d 195
  • es 1
  • f 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • el 30
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes