Search (83 results, page 2 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Zhang, Y.; Kudva, S.: E-books versus print books : readers' choices and preferences across contexts (2014) 0.00 
    0.0031961226 = product of:
  0.006392245 = sum of:
    0.006392245 = product of:
      0.01278449 = sum of:
        0.01278449 = weight(_text_:e in 1335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01278449 = score(doc=1335,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.263354 = fieldWeight in 1335, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1335)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    With electronic book (e-book) sales and readership rising, are e-books positioned to replace print books? This study examines the preference for e-books and print books in the contexts of reading purpose, reading situation, and contextual variables such as age, gender, education level, race/ethnicity, income, community type, and Internet use. In addition, this study aims to identify factors that contribute to e-book adoption. Participants were a nationally representative sample of 2,986 people in the United States from the Reading Habits Survey, conducted by the Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project (http://pewinternet.org/Shared-Content/Data-Sets/2011/December-2011--Reading-Habits.aspx). While the results of this study support the notion that e-books have firmly established a place in people's lives, due to their convenience of access, e-books are not yet positioned to replace print books. Both print books and e-books have unique attributes and serve irreplaceable functions to meet people's reading needs, which may vary by individual demographic, contextual, and situational factors. At this point, the leading significant predictors of e-book adoption are the number of books read, the individual's income, the occurrence and frequency of reading for research topics of interest, and the individual's Internet use, followed by other variables such as race/ethnicity, reading for work/school, age, and education.
    Language
    e
    Object
    E-Book
  2. Erkal, E.: Allegations linking Sci-Hub with Russian intelligence (2019) 0.00 
    0.0027256624 = product of:
  0.005451325 = sum of:
    0.005451325 = product of:
      0.01090265 = sum of:
        0.01090265 = weight(_text_:e in 4625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01090265 = score(doc=4625,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.22458905 = fieldWeight in 4625, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4625)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  3. Lamerz, L.: E-Books in der Wissenschaft - Fluch oder Segen? : Eine Untersuchung der Nutzungsstatistiken der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf im Bereich E-Books (2012) 0.00 
    0.002698268 = product of:
  0.005396536 = sum of:
    0.005396536 = product of:
      0.010793072 = sum of:
        0.010793072 = weight(_text_:e in 560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010793072 = score(doc=560,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 560, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=560)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Seit 2009 werden an der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf (ULBD) Statistiken zu den Downloadzahlen der abonnierten E-Books geführt. Um sich diesen Statistiken und deren Aussagegehalt zu nähern, werden nach einer kurzen Einleitung zunächst die vielfältigen Probleme thematisiert, die im Bereich der Nutzungsstatistiken von Bibliotheken vorkommen. Danach werden die Statistiken der drei größten E-Book-Anbieter an der ULBD vorgestellt und diskutiert. Die bisher vorliegenden Daten von zwei Jahren erlauben dabei nur eine vorläufige Analyse.
  4. Academic publishing : No peeking (2014) 0.00 
    0.002698268 = product of:
  0.005396536 = sum of:
    0.005396536 = product of:
      0.010793072 = sum of:
        0.010793072 = weight(_text_:e in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010793072 = score(doc=805,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  5. Martin, K.; Quan-Haase, A.: Are e-books replacing print books? : tradition, serendipity, and opportunity in the adoption and use of e-books for historical research and teaching (2013) 0.00 
    0.002360493 = product of:
  0.004720986 = sum of:
    0.004720986 = product of:
      0.009441972 = sum of:
        0.009441972 = weight(_text_:e in 748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009441972 = score(doc=748,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.19449982 = fieldWeight in 748, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=748)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article aims to understand the adoption of e-books by academic historians for the purpose of teaching and research. This includes an investigation into their knowledge about and perceived characteristics of this evolving research tool. The study relied on Rogers's model of the innovation-decision process to guide the development of an interview guide. Ten semistructured interviews were conducted with history faculty between October 2010 and December 2011. A grounded theory approach was employed to code and analyze the data. Findings about tradition, cost, teaching innovations, and the historical research process provide the background for designing learning opportunities for the professional development of historians and the academic librarians who work with them. While historians are open to experimenting with e-books, they are also concerned about the loss of serendipity in digital environments, the lack of availability of key resources, and the need for technological transparency. The findings show that Rogers's knowledge and persuasion stages are cyclical in nature, with scholars moving back and forth between these two stages. Participants interviewed were already weighing the five characteristics of the persuasion stage without having much knowledge about e-books. The study findings have implications for our understanding of the diffusion of innovations in academia: both print and digital collections are being used in parallel without one replacing the other.
    Language
    e
  6. Fallaw, C.; Dunham, E.; Wickes, E.; Strong, D.; Stein, A.; Zhang, Q.; Rimkus, K.; ill Ingram, B.; Imker, H.J.: Overly honest data repository development (2016) 0.00 
    0.002336769 = product of:
  0.004673538 = sum of:
    0.004673538 = product of:
      0.009347076 = sum of:
        0.009347076 = weight(_text_:e in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009347076 = score(doc=3371,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.19254501 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  7. Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Dobránszki, J.: Do open access data files represent an academic Risk? (2015) 0.00 
    0.0023128013 = product of:
  0.0046256026 = sum of:
    0.0046256026 = product of:
      0.009251205 = sum of:
        0.009251205 = weight(_text_:e in 2253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009251205 = score(doc=2253,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 2253, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2253)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  8. Kliegl, R.: ¬A vision of scientific communication (2016) 0.00 
    0.0023128013 = product of:
  0.0046256026 = sum of:
    0.0046256026 = product of:
      0.009251205 = sum of:
        0.009251205 = weight(_text_:e in 3249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009251205 = score(doc=3249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 3249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  9. Bauer, B.; Budroni, P.; Ferus, A.; Ganguly, R.; Ramminger, E.; Sánchez Solís, B.: E-Infrastructures Austria 2015 : Bericht über das zweite Jahr des Hochschulraumstrukturmittelprojekts für den koordinierten Aufbau und die kooperative Weiterentwicklung von Repositorieninfrastrukturen PDF (2016) 0.00 
    0.0019273345 = product of:
  0.003854669 = sum of:
    0.003854669 = product of:
      0.007709338 = sum of:
        0.007709338 = weight(_text_:e in 3038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007709338 = score(doc=3038,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 3038, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3038)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Im zweiten Projektjahr hat sich das HRSM-Projekt e-Infrastructures Austria nicht nur zu einer breit akzeptierten Plattform für Vernetzungsforen, Sitzungen und Weiterbildungseinheiten etabliert, sondern es stehen auch erste Deliverables zur Verfügung, die dem Gesamtziel, dem Aufbau von nachhaltigen Archivinfrastrukturen und der Konsolidierung von Wissen im Bereich Sicherung und Bereitstellung von digitalen Daten, dienlich sind. Anfang 2015 wurde im Rahmen des Projekts eine Befragung durchgeführt, welche das wissenschaftliche und künstlerisch-wissenschaftliche Personal 20 öffentlicher Universitäten sowie drei außeruniversitärer Forschungseinrichtungen in Österreich umfasste. Ziel war es, den praktischen Umgang mit Forschungsdaten zu erheben und das Serviceangebot in diesem Bereich auf die vorhandenen Bedürfnisse abzustimmen. Die Befragungsergebnisse zeigen einen deutlichen Nachholbedarf im Bereich des Datenmanagements. Der Aufbau der technischen Infrastruktur im Bereich Dokumentenserver (Projektsäule A) ist bei allen Partnern weit vorangeschritten, daher wird die Konzentration im letzten Projektjahr vor allem auf Säule B (Forschungsdaten) liegen. Der Forschungsdaten-Abschlussbericht bildet die Basis für eine ExpertInnengruppe, die sich mit der Frage der strategischen Ausrichtung für den Umgang mit Forschungsdaten und Forschungsdatenmanagement in Österreich beschäftigt. Projektsäule C (Wissensnetzwerk) erfährt insofern eine Stärkung, als für das letzte Projektjahr eine zentral organisierte, viertägige Veranstaltung "Fortbildungsseminar für Forschungsdaten und e-Infrastrukturen" für alle Projektpartner konzipiert wird.
  10. Hänger, C.; Kaldenberg, B.; Pfeffer, M.: Präsentation von E-Books mit Primo (2010) 0.00 
    0.0018883945 = product of:
  0.003776789 = sum of:
    0.003776789 = product of:
      0.007553578 = sum of:
        0.007553578 = weight(_text_:e in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007553578 = score(doc=3687,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.15559986 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Man versetze sich für einen kurzen Augenblick in ein Wohnheimzimmer einer Studentin, die eine Hausarbeit in Politologie zum Thema "Der Sozialstaat in der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland von 1990 bis 2010" schreibt. Es ist zwei Uhr nachts, die Universitätsbibliothek hat geschlossen und die Studentin muss bis spätestens 14 Uhr am gleichen Tag die Arbeit einreichen. Verzweifelt sucht sie im Online-Katalog nach weiterer Literatur, um die Forschungsdiskussion in den Fußnoten weiter zu differenzieren. Sie findet auch die entsprechenden gedruckten Publikationen, auf die sie leider nicht zugreifen kann, da die Bibliothek geschlossen hat. Dabei hat "ihre" Universitätsbibliothek E-Books lizenziert, die sie allerdings nicht gefunden hat, da die E-Books nicht im Online-Katalog erfasst, sondern nur auf der Homepage der Einrichtung verlinkt sind. Bei der Rückgabe der Arbeit erfährt die Studentin, dass sie eine bessere Note erhalten hätte, wenn sie nur die Forschungsdiskussion differenziert dargestellt hätte. Eine vollständige Einbindung der lizenzierten E-Books im Online-Katalog ist der Wunsch vieler Bibliotheken. Insbesondere mit der vermehrten Verfügbarkeit konsortial oder national lizenzierter Sammlungen und Pakete ist das Angebot zusehends unübersichtlicher geworden und die bisherige Praxis, elektronische Dokumente parallel zu den gedruckten Exemplaren manuell formal und inhaltlich zu erschließen, stößt an organisatorische und ressourcenbedingte Grenzen. Einer direkten maschinellen Verarbeitung steht das Problem entgegen, dass die bibliografischen Metadaten der E-Books häufig im Format MARC 21 geliefert werden, die lokalen Bibliothekssysteme in der Regel aber mit den Formaten MAB2 und Pica arbeiten und Daten in anderen Formaten nicht verarbeiten können. Ein Lösungsansatz besteht darin, die bibliografischen Metadaten an zentraler Stelle zu konvertieren und zu harmonisieren und den Bibliotheken im Format MAB2 zur Verfügung zu stellen. Dieser Ansatz ist allerdings nur für statische E-BookSammlungen praktizierbar und durch den Aufwand der Konversion in "saubere" MAB2-Daten mit einem deutlichen zeitlichen Verzug verbunden.
  11. Budroni, P.; Ganguly, R.: E-Infrastructure Austria : eine Referenzarchitektur zur dauerhaften Bereitstellung von Daten aus der Forschung als Aufgabe für wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken (2015) 0.00 
    0.0016691206 = product of:
  0.0033382413 = sum of:
    0.0033382413 = product of:
      0.0066764825 = sum of:
        0.0066764825 = weight(_text_:e in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066764825 = score(doc=2612,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.13753214 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Im Jänner 2014 wurde das nationale dreijährige HRSM-Projekt e-Infrastructures Austria initiiert. Gesamtziel ist der koordinierte Aufbau und die Weiterentwicklung von Repositorieninfrastrukturen für Forschung und Lehre in ganz Österreich sowie ein effizientes und nachhaltiges Forschungsdatenmanagement an allen teilnehmenden 20 Universitäten und fünf weiteren außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen. Das Projekt gliedert sich in drei Teilprojekte, die thematisch ineinander übergreifen und/oder aufeinander aufbauen. Die Koordination erfolgt durch die Universität Wien. Bis Ende 2016 sollen drei Ziele realisiert werden: - Teilprojekt A (Ziel 1): Aufbau von Dokumentenservern auf lokaler Ebene an den Partneruniversitäten. Zweck: Aufstellung von institutionellen Repositorien an allen teilnehmenden Einrichtungen (alle österreichischen Universitäten mit Ausnahme der Medizinischen Universität Innsbruck) - Teilprojekt B (Ziel 2): Erarbeitung eines strategischen Konzepts für das zukünftige Forschungsdatenmanagement in Österreich - Teilprojekt C (Ziel 3): Aufbau einer Wissensinfrastruktur ("knowledge infrastructure") für alle 25 Projektpartner.
    In der jetzigen Phase des Projekts e-Infrastructures Austria erfolgt eine Fokussierung auf den Aufbau von Repositorien, darunter die Kategorie der sogenannten Dokumentenserver (unter denen sich bislang die unterschiedlichen institutional repositories österr. Einrichtungen aufzählen lassen). Nun verhält es sich jedoch so, dass für bestimmte Daten weitere Lösungen gefragt sind. Diese Lösungen können auch Formen jenseits der Repositorienlandschaft annehmen. Hierbei
  12. Rodrigues, R.S.; Abadal, E.: Scientific journals in Brazil and Spain : alternative publishing models (2014) 0.00 
    0.0016353976 = product of:
  0.003270795 = sum of:
    0.003270795 = product of:
      0.00654159 = sum of:
        0.00654159 = weight(_text_:e in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00654159 = score(doc=1504,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  13. Salminen, A.; Jauhiainen, E.; Nurmeksela, R.: ¬A life cycle model of XML documents (2014) 0.00 
    0.0016353976 = product of:
  0.003270795 = sum of:
    0.003270795 = product of:
      0.00654159 = sum of:
        0.00654159 = weight(_text_:e in 1553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00654159 = score(doc=1553,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 1553, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  14. Hu, B.; Dong, X.; Zhang, C.; Bowman, T.D.; Ding, Y.; Milojevic, S.; Ni, C.; Yan, E.; Larivière, V.: ¬A lead-lag analysis of the topic evolution patterns for preprints and publications (2015) 0.00 
    0.0016353976 = product of:
  0.003270795 = sum of:
    0.003270795 = product of:
      0.00654159 = sum of:
        0.00654159 = weight(_text_:e in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00654159 = score(doc=2337,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  15. Bläsi, C.: Literary studies, business studies - and information science? : Yes, it's a key discipline for the empowerment of publishing studies for the digital age (2015) 0.00 
    0.0015418675 = product of:
  0.003083735 = sum of:
    0.003083735 = product of:
      0.00616747 = sum of:
        0.00616747 = weight(_text_:e in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00616747 = score(doc=2986,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  16. Tozer, J.: How long is the perfect book? : Bigger really is better. What the numbers say (2019) 0.00 
    0.0015418675 = product of:
  0.003083735 = sum of:
    0.003083735 = product of:
      0.00616747 = sum of:
        0.00616747 = weight(_text_:e in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00616747 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  17. Mumenthaler, R.: Neue Dienstleistungen für mobile Lesegeräte? : E-Book-Reader und ihre Auswirkungen auf Bibliotheken (2010) 0.00 
    0.0013628312 = product of:
  0.0027256624 = sum of:
    0.0027256624 = product of:
      0.005451325 = sum of:
        0.005451325 = weight(_text_:e in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005451325 = score(doc=4087,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    E-Book
  18. Laakso, M.; Björk, B.-C.: Delayed open access : an overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature (2013) 0.00 
    0.0013628312 = product of:
  0.0027256624 = sum of:
    0.0027256624 = product of:
      0.005451325 = sum of:
        0.005451325 = weight(_text_:e in 944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005451325 = score(doc=944,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 944, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=944)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Delayed open access (OA) refers to scholarly articles in subscription journals made available openly on the web directly through the publisher at the expiry of a set embargo period. Although a substantial number of journals have practiced delayed OA since they started publishing e-versions, empirical studies concerning OA have often overlooked this body of literature. This study provides comprehensive quantitative measurements by identifying delayed OA journals and collecting data concerning their publication volumes, embargo lengths, and citation rates. Altogether, 492 journals were identified, publishing a combined total of 111,312 articles in 2011; 77.8% of these articles were made OA within 12 months from publication, with 85.4% becoming available within 24 months. A journal impact factor analysis revealed that delayed OA journals have citation rates on average twice as high as those of closed subscription journals and three times as high as immediate OA journals. Overall, the results demonstrate that delayed OA journals constitute an important segment of the openly available scholarly journal literature, both by their sheer article volume and by including a substantial proportion of high-impact journals.
    Language
    e
  19. Spezi, V.; Wakeling, S.; Pinfield, S.; Creaser, C.; Fry, J.; Willett, P.: Open-access mega-journals : the future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? a review (2017) 0.00 
    0.0013628312 = product of:
  0.0027256624 = sum of:
    0.0027256624 = product of:
      0.005451325 = sum of:
        0.005451325 = weight(_text_:e in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005451325 = score(doc=3548,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose Open-access mega-journals (OAMJs) represent an increasingly important part of the scholarly communication landscape. OAMJs, such as PLOS ONE, are large scale, broad scope journals that operate an open access business model (normally based on article-processing charges), and which employ a novel form of peer review, focussing on scientific "soundness" and eschewing judgement of novelty or importance. The purpose of this paper is to examine the discourses relating to OAMJs, and their place within scholarly publishing, and considers attitudes towards mega-journals within the academic community. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a review of the literature of OAMJs structured around four defining characteristics: scale, disciplinary scope, peer review policy, and economic model. The existing scholarly literature was augmented by searches of more informal outputs, such as blogs and e-mail discussion lists, to capture the debate in its entirety. Findings While the academic literature relating specifically to OAMJs is relatively sparse, discussion in other fora is detailed and animated, with debates ranging from the sustainability and ethics of the mega-journal model, to the impact of soundness-only peer review on article quality and discoverability, and the potential for OAMJs to represent a paradigm-shifting development in scholarly publishing. Originality/value This paper represents the first comprehensive review of the mega-journal phenomenon, drawing not only on the published academic literature, but also grey, professional and informal sources. The paper advances a number of ways in which the role of OAMJs in the scholarly communication environment can be conceptualised.
    Language
    e
  20. Rowley, J.; Johnson, F.; Sbaffi, L.; Frass, W.; Devine, E.: Academics' behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals (2017) 0.00 
    0.0013628312 = product of:
  0.0027256624 = sum of:
    0.0027256624 = product of:
      0.005451325 = sum of:
        0.005451325 = weight(_text_:e in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005451325 = score(doc=3597,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e

Authors

Languages

  • e 60
  • d 22

Types

  • a 80
  • el 15
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications