Search (334 results, page 16 of 17)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Cox, J.: ¬The role of the paper based journal in an era of electronic information (1997) 0.00
    0.004038437 = product of:
      0.01211531 = sum of:
        0.01211531 = product of:
          0.03634593 = sum of:
            0.03634593 = weight(_text_:online in 802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03634593 = score(doc=802,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 802, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=802)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the changes in publishing methods that electronic publishing and distribution will involve. Presents a publisher's view of the methodology needed to exploit the potential that online and othe electronic technologies offer. Discusses the role of the paper based journal in an era of electronic publication, and the ambivalence of scholars and of learned societies toward electronic information. Also examines the role of universities as they become partners of publishers in delivering published material to customers on the Internet: by hosting servers, by providing access to bandwidth, and by adding value through participation in the publishing process
  2. Grycz, C.J.: ¬The textbook of the future (1996) 0.00
    0.004038437 = product of:
      0.01211531 = sum of:
        0.01211531 = product of:
          0.03634593 = sum of:
            0.03634593 = weight(_text_:online in 1378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03634593 = score(doc=1378,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 1378, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1378)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the future of the textbook in the electronic age. Identifies the characteristics of the textbook of the future. It will: be the product of coalitions of experts; be customizable by teacher an student; use dynamic online databases to remain current; be sold in a variety of sizes or durations; be delivered inexpensively via campus or regional replication services; include dynamic interactive segments; offer a suite of helper applications to enhance both teacher/student and student/student relationships; and offer the basis for a permanent ongoing structure for continuing education after completion of formal coursework. Discusses the challenges this future poses to authors; publishers; teachers and students. Considers issues relating to intellectual property, reward and pricing, and how the textbook to tomorrow will affect the act of teaching
  3. Hickey, T.B.: Using SGML and TeX for an interactive chemical encyclopedia (1989) 0.00
    0.004038437 = product of:
      0.01211531 = sum of:
        0.01211531 = product of:
          0.03634593 = sum of:
            0.03634593 = weight(_text_:online in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03634593 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    National online meeting. Proc. 1989, New York, 9-11 May 1989. Ed.: C. Nixon et al
  4. Ergül, A.; Böhm, A.; Schmidt, E.; Hissen, S.; Sariklis, T.: Erfolgsfaktoren für die Durchsetzung von PDF/A als weltweiter Standard für elektronische Langzeitarchivierung (2012) 0.00
    0.004038437 = product of:
      0.01211531 = sum of:
        0.01211531 = product of:
          0.03634593 = sum of:
            0.03634593 = weight(_text_:online in 4794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03634593 = score(doc=4794,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 4794, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4794)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Der Artikel befasst sich mit der historischen Entwicklung der Langzeitarchivierung und den damit verbundenen Ansprüchen und Problemen. Insbesondere geht es um die rechtlichen Aspekte, die Dokumentenechtheit, die Revisionssicherheit, die Plattformunabhängigkeit und die Kostenkalkulation der zu archivierenden Daten. Auf dieser Basis werden die Erfolgsfaktoren für die Etablierung des PDF/A-Formats in Zusammenhang mit der digitalen Langzeitarchivierung dargestellt. Aus den Ergebnissen der eigens erstellten Online-Befragung auf der "PDF-Association"- Website zum Thema Kundenzufriedenheit werden Nutzen und Probleme der Anwender zusammengefasst.
  5. Kemp, A. de: Electronic information : solving old or creating new problems? (1994) 0.00
    0.004011904 = product of:
      0.012035711 = sum of:
        0.012035711 = product of:
          0.03610713 = sum of:
            0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610713 = score(doc=1211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1211)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic publishing seems to be the future for efficient and fast information dissemination. Describes a variety of new projects, products and services. In addition, concentrates on the development of information systems: relational, object-oriented and hybrid databases, that will have a major impact on the way we handle internal and external information in our organisations. Springer-Verlag carried out an extensive international survey on the future use of information, external such as information from publishers, as well as internal information such as technical documents. New systems like Right-Pages and integrated information and document management systems like DocMan will be the next generation for information handling, dissemination and retrieval
  6. Rossiter, B.N.; Sillitoe, T.J.; Heather, M.A.: Database support for very large hypertexts (1990) 0.00
    0.004011904 = product of:
      0.012035711 = sum of:
        0.012035711 = product of:
          0.03610713 = sum of:
            0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610713 = score(doc=48,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Current hypertext systems have been widely and effectively used on relatively small data volumes. Explores the potential of database technology for aiding the implementation of hypertext systems holding very large amounts of complex data. Databases meet many requirements of the hypermedium: persistent data management, large volumes, data modelling, multi-level architecture with abstractions and views, metadata integrated with operational data, short-term transaction processing and high-level end-user languages for searching and updating data. Describes a system implementing the storage, retrieval and recall of trails through hypertext comprising textual complex objects (to illustrate the potential for the use of data bases). Discusses weaknesses in current database systems for handling the complex modelling required
  7. Lobin, H.; Witt, A.: Semantic and thematic navigation in electronic encyclopedias (1999) 0.00
    0.004011904 = product of:
      0.012035711 = sum of:
        0.012035711 = product of:
          0.03610713 = sum of:
            0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610713 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  8. Stern, D.: the implications for data discovery, collection development, and the changing role of the librarian : New knowledge management systems (2003) 0.00
    0.004011904 = product of:
      0.012035711 = sum of:
        0.012035711 = product of:
          0.03610713 = sum of:
            0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610713 = score(doc=1275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1275)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The papers presented at the 2002 Tri-Society Symposium an Chemical Information highlight questions we should consider as we develop new paradigms for information storage and retrieval systems. These new knowledge management systems will require novel approaches for data discovery, collection development, and the changing role of the librarian. This introductory essay discusses new and challenging integrated tools for data manipulation, the confusing and embryonic differential pricing and package deals for journal materials, and the changing role of the librarian in this rapidly transforming industry.
  9. Bayer, M.: ¬Die Gier der Bits und Bytes auf Gutenberg : Elektronisches Publizieren, Drucken und das papierlose E-Book melden sich in Frankfurt zu Wort (2000) 0.00
    0.0038404856 = product of:
      0.011521457 = sum of:
        0.011521457 = product of:
          0.03456437 = sum of:
            0.03456437 = weight(_text_:22 in 5391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03456437 = score(doc=5391,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5391, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5391)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  10. Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011) 0.00
    0.0038404856 = product of:
      0.011521457 = sum of:
        0.011521457 = product of:
          0.03456437 = sum of:
            0.03456437 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03456437 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
  11. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.00
    0.0038404856 = product of:
      0.011521457 = sum of:
        0.011521457 = product of:
          0.03456437 = sum of:
            0.03456437 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03456437 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  12. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.00
    0.0038404856 = product of:
      0.011521457 = sum of:
        0.011521457 = product of:
          0.03456437 = sum of:
            0.03456437 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03456437 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17
  13. Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017) 0.00
    0.0038404856 = product of:
      0.011521457 = sum of:
        0.011521457 = product of:
          0.03456437 = sum of:
            0.03456437 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03456437 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  14. Corthouts, J.; Philips, R.: SGML: a librarian's perception (1996) 0.00
    0.0034615172 = product of:
      0.010384551 = sum of:
        0.010384551 = product of:
          0.031153653 = sum of:
            0.031153653 = weight(_text_:online in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031153653 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The SGML is an international standard (ISO 8879) allowing the logical structure of electronic documents to be represented rigorously and independent of applications. Proposes a strategy that libraries can consider when implementing SGML applications on top of existing products, or when embedding these in innovative end user services. Discusses experiences of SGML, within the VUBIS-Antwerpen Library Network (Belgium). VUBIS-Antwerpen has adopted SGML as a key standard for the exploitation of its bibliograpical data (union catalogues, document ordering, online contents, current awareness, publishing on the WWW). With the move towards electronic publication and distribution of documents, SGML tends to become a crucial standard for digital libraries. Projects such as TEI, ELSA, DECOMATE and ELVYN now focus on access to and elivery of full text electronic documents, using SGML to manipulate, process and transform documents for the purpose of full text searching or hypertext navigation
  15. Mizzaro, S.: Quality control in scholarly publishing : a new proposal (2003) 0.00
    0.0034615172 = product of:
      0.010384551 = sum of:
        0.010384551 = product of:
          0.031153653 = sum of:
            0.031153653 = weight(_text_:online in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031153653 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet has fostered a faster, more interactive and effective model of scholarly publishing. However, as the quantity of information available is constantly increasing, its quality is threatened, since the traditional quality control mechanism of peer review is often not used (e.g., in online repositories of preprints, and by people publishing whatever they want an their Web pages). This paper describes a new kind of electronic scholarly journal, in which the standard submission-reviewpublication process is replaced by a more sophisticated approach, based an judgments expressed by the readers: in this way, each reader is, potentially, a peer reviewer. New ingredients, not found in similar approaches, are that each reader's judgment is weighted an the basis of the reader's skills as a reviewer, and that readers are encouraged to express correct judgments by a feedback mechanism that estimates their own quality. The new electronic scholarly journal is described in both intuitive and formal ways. Its effectiveness is tested by several laboratory experiments that simulate what might happen if the system were deployed and used.
  16. Veltman, K.H.: Von der aufgezeichneten Welt zur Aufzeichnung der Welten (2007) 0.00
    0.0034615172 = product of:
      0.010384551 = sum of:
        0.010384551 = product of:
          0.031153653 = sum of:
            0.031153653 = weight(_text_:online in 200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031153653 = score(doc=200,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 200, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=200)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2007, Nr.91, S.15 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 60(2007) H.3]
  17. Ortega, J.L.: Classification and analysis of PubPeer comments : how a web journal club is used (2022) 0.00
    0.0034615172 = product of:
      0.010384551 = sum of:
        0.010384551 = product of:
          0.031153653 = sum of:
            0.031153653 = weight(_text_:online in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031153653 = score(doc=544,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study explores the use of PubPeer by the scholarly community, to understand the issues discussed in an online journal club, the disciplines most commented on, and the characteristics of the most prolific users. A sample of 39,985 posts about 24,779 publications were extracted from PubPeer in 2019 and 2020. These comments were divided into seven categories according to their degree of seriousness (Positive review, Critical review, Lack of information, Honest errors, Methodological flaws, Publishing fraud, and Manipulation). The results show that more than two-thirds of comments are posted to report some type of misconduct, mainly about image manipulation. These comments generate most discussion and take longer to be posted. By discipline, Health Sciences and Life Sciences are the most discussed research areas. The results also reveal "super commenters," users who access the platform to systematically review publications. The study ends by discussing how various disciplines use the site for different purposes.
  18. Bradley, N.: SGML concepts (1992) 0.00
    0.0034387745 = product of:
      0.0103163235 = sum of:
        0.0103163235 = product of:
          0.03094897 = sum of:
            0.03094897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03094897 = score(doc=5917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5917)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The abbreviation SGML stands for Standard Generalized Markup Language. Markup refers to adding style and formatting information to text prior to publication. It is a standard because SGML has been accepted and published by the ISO, and is not owned by any manufacturer or software vendor. It is generalized because SGML is powerful and flexible, allowing it to be used in many applications. And it is a language that embodies a specification for creation of a set of rules to define the structure of a document. SGML has been designed to easily cross incompatible computer platforms, and its 'open' nature allows for relatively simple access and manipulation of an SGML conforming document by both people and computers. Above all, SGML proposes a new way of thinking about document creation and presentation, by shifting document style considerations to the publication process rather than the creation process. This is done by dividing the document into names, logical elements, to which any style can be later applied. A byproduct of this approach is the effective creation of a flexible database, providing further access to the data for information retrieval or for re-publication
  19. Computer - Neue Medien - Elektronisches Publizieren (1993) 0.00
    0.0032635499 = product of:
      0.00979065 = sum of:
        0.00979065 = product of:
          0.029371947 = sum of:
            0.029371947 = weight(_text_:online in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029371947 = score(doc=5906,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.18968134 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die folgenden Beiträge: RIESENHUBER, H.: Am Ende steht das Wort: Kultur und Technik als Verbündete - ein Plädoyer; STEIDEL, M.: Von Bindestrich-Informatik bis Chaostheorie (Hüthig); HEMPELMANN, G.: Laudatio für das Arbeitsbuch (Markt & Technik); GÖTZ, B.: Voll daneben: sind Computerbücher noch immer anwendergerecht?; SCHOLZ, H.-W.: Das Buch lernt sprechen, singen und tanzen (Langenscheidt); STUMPF, P.: Der Laptop als Gourmet-Führer (Rossipaul); BURNELEIT, H.-D.: Wer zu früh kommt, den bestraft der Markt (C.H. Beck); KEMP, A. de: Erzfeind oder Kumpel: das ist nicht die Frage (Springer); SCHOLZ, I.: Alles digital (Elektronisches Publizieren); MERTENS, E.: Wichtig ist die Einführung beim Kunden (Olms); SCHRÖDER, M.: Database publishing; GRUNDMANN, U.: Champagner von der CD (EMS/Econ); PRIBILLA, P.: Any to any (Siemens); HEKER, H.: Rechtsfragen der elektronischen Textkommunikation; PLENZ, R.: Verlegen mit Äpfeln und Quark (DTP); PLENZ, R.: Typographische Qualifikation entscheidet (DTP); LIEDER, R.: Cover mit der Maus (Sybex); STYRNOL, H.: Kompetenz schlägt heiße Nadel; KAETZ, R.: Akzente mit Butterfly (Laden-Präsentation); RINKA, M.: Flankierende Maßnahmen Zeitschriften; ZEBOLD, P.: Tools für den Verkauf (Zeitschriften); STEINBECK, P.: Lose-Disketten-Werk; STEINHAUS, I.: Man trägt Diskette; BORISCH, M.: Kompetenter Partner auch für fun und action; KESSLER, C.: Schneller schlau (Wissenssoftware, MSPI); KRAPP, S.: Computer am Dienstag (CAD), Chaos am Mittwoch (CAM), oder: wieviel EDV braucht der Azubi?; STEINBRINK, B.: Multimedia: Standards für die Verlagswelt (Markt & Technik); MONDEL, N.: Der Krieg der Systeme findet nicht statt (Tewi); FERCHL, I.: Online in den Markt (Springer); FERCHL, I.: Nicht hurtig, HÜthig; BLAHACEK, R.: Alle Stückerln (Erb-Verl.); MENZEL, M.: Porsche oder Goggo (Rossipaul); MENZEL, M.: Sharebären und MS-Dosen (Systhema); MENZEL, M.: Populär, aber nicht platt (Tewi); MENZEL, M.: Von Funk zu Fuzzy (Franzis); GRUNDMANN, U.: Aktive Lebenshilfe: und das möglichst preisgünstig (Data-Becker); GRUNDMANN, U.: Die roten Dreiecke bleiben sich treu (Addison-Wesley); GRUNDMANN, U.: Große Bücher für wenig Geld (BHV); GRUNDMANN, U.: ... nämlich ein Dos-Buch genauso zu vermarkten wie 'Scarlet' (Sybex); MENZEL, M.: Langsam einsickern (dtv/Beck); SCHMITZ, A.: Le style c'est l'homme (Rowohlt); SCHINZEL, W.H.: CD-ROM: eine Erfolgsstory; QUEISSER, M.: Kataloge auf der Silberscheibe; SOMMERFELD, B.: Ran an Eunet; LESSMAN, F. u. H. KELLER: Online mit KNO; ZAAG, J.: Vorreiter (KNO); SCHÖDER, M.: Arno Schmidts anderer Zettelkasten (Relationale Datenbanken); WIESNER, M.: One world of informations: OSI und EDI; WEIGEL, F.: Intermezzo mit X12, Libe für EDI (Harrassowitz);
  20. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.00
    0.0030723885 = product of:
      0.009217165 = sum of:
        0.009217165 = product of:
          0.027651496 = sum of:
            0.027651496 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027651496 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.

Years

Languages

  • d 224
  • e 107
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 277
  • el 37
  • m 29
  • s 12
  • x 3
  • r 2
  • d 1
  • i 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications