-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.05
0.05487276 = sum of:
0.025169916 = product of:
0.100679666 = sum of:
0.100679666 = weight(_text_:authors in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.100679666 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.029702844 = product of:
0.05940569 = sum of:
0.05940569 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05940569 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
-
Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993)
0.05
0.048013665 = sum of:
0.022023676 = product of:
0.088094704 = sum of:
0.088094704 = weight(_text_:authors in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088094704 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.025989987 = product of:
0.051979974 = sum of:
0.051979974 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051979974 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
- Source
- Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
-
Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009)
0.04
0.04115457 = sum of:
0.018877437 = product of:
0.07550975 = sum of:
0.07550975 = weight(_text_:authors in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07550975 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.022277132 = product of:
0.044554263 = sum of:
0.044554263 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044554263 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:22:45
-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.04
0.040021338 = sum of:
0.025169916 = product of:
0.100679666 = sum of:
0.100679666 = weight(_text_:authors in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.100679666 = score(doc=4631,freq=8.0), product of:
0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014851422 = product of:
0.029702844 = sum of:
0.029702844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029702844 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Munoz, J.V.R.: Documentos electronicos y normalizacion : informacion y conocimiento (1997)
0.04
0.03966583 = product of:
0.07933166 = sum of:
0.07933166 = product of:
0.15866332 = sum of:
0.15866332 = weight(_text_:y in 2813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15866332 = score(doc=2813,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.60155004 = fieldWeight in 2813, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2813)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Morán Suárez, M.A.; Gallego Lorenzo, J.; Rodríguez López, C.; Santos de Paz, L.: ¬El impacto de las sciencias sociales en los distribuidores de revistas electrónicas suscritos por la Universidad de Léon (2007)
0.04
0.03966583 = product of:
0.07933166 = sum of:
0.07933166 = product of:
0.15866332 = sum of:
0.15866332 = weight(_text_:y in 1122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15866332 = score(doc=1122,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.60155004 = fieldWeight in 1122, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
-
Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995)
0.04
0.037128557 = product of:
0.07425711 = sum of:
0.07425711 = product of:
0.14851423 = sum of:
0.14851423 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14851423 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
-
Goldfarb, C.: ¬The SGML handbook (1990)
0.04
0.03505997 = product of:
0.07011994 = sum of:
0.07011994 = product of:
0.14023988 = sum of:
0.14023988 = weight(_text_:y in 7374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14023988 = score(doc=7374,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.53170013 = fieldWeight in 7374, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7374)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Editor
- Rubinsky, Y.
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.03
0.03264924 = sum of:
0.017797818 = product of:
0.07119127 = sum of:
0.07119127 = weight(_text_:authors in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07119127 = score(doc=4051,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014851422 = product of:
0.029702844 = sum of:
0.029702844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029702844 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The introduction of "altmetrics" as new tools to analyze scientific impact within the reward system of science has challenged the hegemony of citations as the predominant source for measuring scientific impact. Mendeley readership has been identified as one of the most important altmetric sources, with several features that are similar to citations. The purpose of this paper is to perform an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the distributions of Mendeley readership and citations across fields. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two issues by using in each case a common analytical framework for both metrics: the shape of the distributions of readership and citations, and the field normalization problem generated by differences in citation and readership practices across fields. In the first issue the authors use the characteristic scores and scales method, and in the second the measurement framework introduced in Crespo et al. (2013). Findings There are three main results. First, the citations and Mendeley readership distributions exhibit a strikingly similar degree of skewness in all fields. Second, the results on "exchange rates (ERs)" for Mendeley readership empirically supports the possibility of comparing readership counts across fields, as well as the field normalization of readership distributions using ERs as normalization factors. Third, field normalization using field mean readerships as normalization factors leads to comparably good results. Originality/value These findings open up challenging new questions, particularly regarding the possibility of obtaining conflicting results from field normalized citation and Mendeley readership indicators; this suggests the need for better determining the role of the two metrics in capturing scientific recognition.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000)
0.03
0.031504624 = product of:
0.06300925 = sum of:
0.06300925 = product of:
0.1260185 = sum of:
0.1260185 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1260185 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
18. 6.2000 9:11:22
-
Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993)
0.03
0.029702844 = product of:
0.05940569 = sum of:
0.05940569 = product of:
0.11881138 = sum of:
0.11881138 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11881138 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
-
Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992)
0.03
0.029702844 = product of:
0.05940569 = sum of:
0.05940569 = product of:
0.11881138 = sum of:
0.11881138 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11881138 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
-
Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998)
0.03
0.029702844 = product of:
0.05940569 = sum of:
0.05940569 = product of:
0.11881138 = sum of:
0.11881138 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11881138 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
-
Marcoux, Y.; Sevigny, M.: Why SGML? Why now? (1997)
0.03
0.028047977 = product of:
0.056095954 = sum of:
0.056095954 = product of:
0.11219191 = sum of:
0.11219191 = weight(_text_:y in 385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11219191 = score(doc=385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.4253601 = fieldWeight in 385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=385)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schifman, R.S.; Heinrich, Y.; Heinrich, G.: Multimedia Design interaktiv! : Von der Idee zum Produkt (1997)
0.03
0.028047977 = product of:
0.056095954 = sum of:
0.056095954 = product of:
0.11219191 = sum of:
0.11219191 = weight(_text_:y in 676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11219191 = score(doc=676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.4253601 = fieldWeight in 676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=676)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017)
0.03
0.026253853 = product of:
0.052507706 = sum of:
0.052507706 = product of:
0.10501541 = sum of:
0.10501541 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10501541 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38
-
Dechsling, R.: Softwaretypen : Datenbank, Hypertext oder linearer Text? (1994)
0.03
0.025989987 = product of:
0.051979974 = sum of:
0.051979974 = product of:
0.10395995 = sum of:
0.10395995 = weight(_text_:22 in 8074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10395995 = score(doc=8074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8074)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Börsenblatt. Nr.50 vom 24.6.1994, S.19-22
-
Electronic publishing and electronic information communication (1996)
0.03
0.025989987 = product of:
0.051979974 = sum of:
0.051979974 = product of:
0.10395995 = sum of:
0.10395995 = weight(_text_:22 in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10395995 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.181-247
-
Schmitz, H.: Lese- und Lernstoff allerwege : NuvoMedia bietet 'RocketBook' an, Bertelsmann ist dabei (1998)
0.03
0.025989987 = product of:
0.051979974 = sum of:
0.051979974 = product of:
0.10395995 = sum of:
0.10395995 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10395995 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 2.1996 22:34:46
-
Swiaczny, F.: Elektronisches Publizieren bei MATEO (1998)
0.02
0.022277132 = product of:
0.044554263 = sum of:
0.044554263 = product of:
0.08910853 = sum of:
0.08910853 = weight(_text_:22 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08910853 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.35-38
