-
Oßwald, A.: Proaktives Wissensmanagement für Fachbereiche, Hochschule und externe Partner : Bibliotheksdienstleistungen als Brücke zur Praxis (2000)
0.09
0.085915595 = product of:
0.17183119 = sum of:
0.17183119 = sum of:
0.08691883 = weight(_text_:b in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691883 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
0.08491236 = weight(_text_:22 in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08491236 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27.10.2001 12:22:54
- Source
- Wissenschaft online: Elektronisches Publizieren in Bibliothek und Hochschule. Hrsg. B. Tröger
-
Solomon, D.J.; Björk, B.-C.: Publication fees in open access publishing : sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2012)
0.05
0.054826938 = sum of:
0.036718845 = product of:
0.14687538 = sum of:
0.14687538 = weight(_text_:authors in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14687538 = score(doc=754,freq=12.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01810809 = product of:
0.03621618 = sum of:
0.03621618 = weight(_text_:b in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03621618 = score(doc=754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Open access (OA) journals distribute their content at no charge and use other means of funding the publication process. Publication fees or article-processing charges (APC)s have become the predominant means for funding professional OA publishing. We surveyed 1,038 authors who recently published articles in 74 OA journals that charge APCs stratified into seven discipline categories. Authors were asked about the source of funding for the APC, factors influencing their choice of a journal and past history publishing in OA and subscription journals. Additional information about the journal and the authors' country were obtained from the journal website. A total of 429 (41%) authors from 69 journals completed the survey. There were large differences in the source of funding among disciplines. Journals with impact factors charged higher APCs as did journals from disciplines where grant funding is plentiful. Fit, quality, and speed of publication were the most important factors in the authors' choice of a journal. OA was less important but a significant factor for many authors in their choice of a journal to publish. These findings are consistent with other research on OA publishing and suggest that OA publishing funded through APCs is likely to continue to grow.
-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.05
0.05228877 = sum of:
0.02398465 = product of:
0.0959386 = sum of:
0.0959386 = weight(_text_:authors in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0959386 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02830412 = product of:
0.05660824 = sum of:
0.05660824 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05660824 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
-
Björk, B.-C.: ¬The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles : a failed experiment? (2012)
0.05
0.04716927 = sum of:
0.025439564 = product of:
0.10175826 = sum of:
0.10175826 = weight(_text_:authors in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10175826 = score(doc=366,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021729708 = product of:
0.043459415 = sum of:
0.043459415 = weight(_text_:b in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043459415 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Since 2004, mainstream scholarly publishers have been offering authors publishing in their subscription journals the option to free their individual articles from access barriers against a payment (hybrid OA). This has been marketed as a possible gradual transition path between subscription and open access to the scholarly journal literature, and the publishers have pledged to decrease their subscription prices in proportion to the uptake of the hybrid option. The number of hybrid journals has doubled in the past couple of years and is now over 4,300; the number of such articles was around 12,000 in 2011. On average only 1-2% of eligible authors utilize the OA option, due mainly to the generally high price level of typically 3,000 USD. There are, however, a few publishers and individual journals with a much higher uptake. This article takes a closer look at the development of hybrid OA and discusses, from an author-centric viewpoint, the possible reasons for the lack of success of this business model.
-
Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993)
0.05
0.045752674 = sum of:
0.020986568 = product of:
0.08394627 = sum of:
0.08394627 = weight(_text_:authors in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08394627 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024766104 = product of:
0.04953221 = sum of:
0.04953221 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04953221 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
- Source
- Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
-
Digital libraries: current issues : Digital Libraries Workshop DL 94, Newark, NJ, May 19-20, 1994. Selected papers (1995)
0.04
0.042957798 = product of:
0.085915595 = sum of:
0.085915595 = sum of:
0.043459415 = weight(_text_:b in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043459415 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
0.04245618 = weight(_text_:22 in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04245618 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.1996 18:26:45
- Footnote
- Rez. in: ABI-Technik 15(1995) H.4, S.499-500 (B. Dugall)
-
Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009)
0.04
0.039216578 = sum of:
0.017988488 = product of:
0.07195395 = sum of:
0.07195395 = weight(_text_:authors in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07195395 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02122809 = product of:
0.04245618 = sum of:
0.04245618 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04245618 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:22:45
-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.04
0.03813671 = sum of:
0.02398465 = product of:
0.0959386 = sum of:
0.0959386 = weight(_text_:authors in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0959386 = score(doc=4631,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01415206 = product of:
0.02830412 = sum of:
0.02830412 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02830412 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995)
0.04
0.03538015 = product of:
0.0707603 = sum of:
0.0707603 = product of:
0.1415206 = sum of:
0.1415206 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1415206 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.03
0.03111177 = sum of:
0.01695971 = product of:
0.06783884 = sum of:
0.06783884 = weight(_text_:authors in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06783884 = score(doc=4051,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01415206 = product of:
0.02830412 = sum of:
0.02830412 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02830412 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The introduction of "altmetrics" as new tools to analyze scientific impact within the reward system of science has challenged the hegemony of citations as the predominant source for measuring scientific impact. Mendeley readership has been identified as one of the most important altmetric sources, with several features that are similar to citations. The purpose of this paper is to perform an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the distributions of Mendeley readership and citations across fields. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two issues by using in each case a common analytical framework for both metrics: the shape of the distributions of readership and citations, and the field normalization problem generated by differences in citation and readership practices across fields. In the first issue the authors use the characteristic scores and scales method, and in the second the measurement framework introduced in Crespo et al. (2013). Findings There are three main results. First, the citations and Mendeley readership distributions exhibit a strikingly similar degree of skewness in all fields. Second, the results on "exchange rates (ERs)" for Mendeley readership empirically supports the possibility of comparing readership counts across fields, as well as the field normalization of readership distributions using ERs as normalization factors. Third, field normalization using field mean readerships as normalization factors leads to comparably good results. Originality/value These findings open up challenging new questions, particularly regarding the possibility of obtaining conflicting results from field normalized citation and Mendeley readership indicators; this suggests the need for better determining the role of the two metrics in capturing scientific recognition.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000)
0.03
0.030021055 = product of:
0.06004211 = sum of:
0.06004211 = product of:
0.12008422 = sum of:
0.12008422 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12008422 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
18. 6.2000 9:11:22
-
Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993)
0.03
0.02830412 = product of:
0.05660824 = sum of:
0.05660824 = product of:
0.11321648 = sum of:
0.11321648 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11321648 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
-
Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992)
0.03
0.02830412 = product of:
0.05660824 = sum of:
0.05660824 = product of:
0.11321648 = sum of:
0.11321648 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11321648 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
-
Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998)
0.03
0.02830412 = product of:
0.05660824 = sum of:
0.05660824 = product of:
0.11321648 = sum of:
0.11321648 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11321648 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
-
Hobert, A.; Jahn, N.; Mayr, P.; Schmidt, B.; Taubert, N.: Open access uptake in Germany 2010-2018 : adoption in a diverse research landscape (2021)
0.03
0.026478797 = sum of:
0.011992325 = product of:
0.0479693 = sum of:
0.0479693 = weight(_text_:authors in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0479693 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014486472 = product of:
0.028972944 = sum of:
0.028972944 = weight(_text_:b in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028972944 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- This study investigates the development of open access (OA) to journal articles from authors affiliated with German universities and non-university research institutions in the period 2010-2018. Beyond determining the overall share of openly available articles, a systematic classification of distinct categories of OA publishing allowed us to identify different patterns of adoption of OA. Taking into account the particularities of the German research landscape, variations in terms of productivity, OA uptake and approaches to OA are examined at the meso-level and possible explanations are discussed. The development of the OA uptake is analysed for the different research sectors in Germany (universities, non-university research institutes of the Helmholtz Association, Fraunhofer Society, Max Planck Society, Leibniz Association, and government research agencies). Combining several data sources (incl. Web of Science, Unpaywall, an authority file of standardised German affiliation information, the ISSN-Gold-OA 3.0 list, and OpenDOAR), the study confirms the growth of the OA share mirroring the international trend reported in related studies. We found that 45% of all considered articles during the observed period were openly available at the time of analysis. Our findings show that subject-specific repositories are the most prevalent type of OA. However, the percentages for publication in fully OA journals and OA via institutional repositories show similarly steep increases. Enabling data-driven decision-making regarding the implementation of OA in Germany at the institutional level, the results of this study furthermore can serve as a baseline to assess the impact recent transformative agreements with major publishers will likely have on scholarly communication.
-
Anderson, R.; Birbeck, M.; Kay, M.; Livingstone, S.; Loesgen, B.; Martin, D.; Mohr, S.; Ozu, N.; Peat, B.; Pinnock, J.; Stark, P.; Williams, K.: XML professionell : behandelt W3C DOM, SAX, CSS, XSLT, DTDs, XML Schemas, XLink, XPointer, XPath, E-Commerce, BizTalk, B2B, SOAP, WAP, WML (2000)
0.03
0.02597927 = product of:
0.05195854 = sum of:
0.05195854 = sum of:
0.03073045 = weight(_text_:b in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03073045 = score(doc=729,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.16607635 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
0.02122809 = weight(_text_:22 in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02122809 = score(doc=729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2005 15:12:11
-
Smith, B.; O'Hea, K.: Perspektiven des elektronischen Publizierens 1998-2002 (1997)
0.03
0.025351325 = product of:
0.05070265 = sum of:
0.05070265 = product of:
0.1014053 = sum of:
0.1014053 = weight(_text_:b in 6022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1014053 = score(doc=6022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 6022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6022)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
¬The electronic journal : the future of serials-based information (1993)
0.03
0.025351325 = product of:
0.05070265 = sum of:
0.05070265 = product of:
0.1014053 = sum of:
0.1014053 = weight(_text_:b in 8749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1014053 = score(doc=8749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 8749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Editor
- Cook, B.
-
Wingert, B.: Hypertext Conference 2000 in San Antonio (2000)
0.03
0.025351325 = product of:
0.05070265 = sum of:
0.05070265 = product of:
0.1014053 = sum of:
0.1014053 = weight(_text_:b in 2250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1014053 = score(doc=2250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 2250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2250)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ritchie, I.: New media publishing (1996)
0.03
0.025351325 = product of:
0.05070265 = sum of:
0.05070265 = product of:
0.1014053 = sum of:
0.1014053 = weight(_text_:b in 7032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1014053 = score(doc=7032,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 7032, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7032)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Online information 96: 20th International online information meeting, Proceedings, London, 3-5 December 1996. Ed.: D.I. Raitt u. B. Jeapes
