-
Münch, V.: Geballte Forschungskraft : Wissenschaftler wollen ihre Literaturversorgung aktiv gestalten (1996)
0.10
0.10229941 = product of:
0.20459881 = sum of:
0.20459881 = sum of:
0.13489321 = weight(_text_:v in 3301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13489321 = score(doc=3301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.5382217 = fieldWeight in 3301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3301)
0.069705606 = weight(_text_:22 in 3301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069705606 = score(doc=3301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3301)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cogito. 12(1996) H.3, S.20-22
-
Wakeling, S.; Creaser, C.; Pinfield, S.; Fry, J.; Spezi, V.; Willett, P.; Paramita, M.: Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open-access mega-journal authors : results of a large-scale survey (2019)
0.07
0.06989485 = sum of:
0.036171544 = product of:
0.14468618 = sum of:
0.14468618 = weight(_text_:authors in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14468618 = score(doc=5317,freq=12.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.033723302 = product of:
0.067446604 = sum of:
0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067446604 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Open-access mega-journals (OAMJs) are characterized by their large scale, wide scope, open-access (OA) business model, and "soundness-only" peer review. The last of these controversially discounts the novelty, significance, and relevance of submitted articles and assesses only their "soundness." This article reports the results of an international survey of authors (n = 11,883), comparing the responses of OAMJ authors with those of other OA and subscription journals, and drawing comparisons between different OAMJs. Strikingly, OAMJ authors showed a low understanding of soundness-only peer review: two-thirds believed OAMJs took into account novelty, significance, and relevance, although there were marked geographical variations. Author satisfaction with OAMJs, however, was high, with more than 80% of OAMJ authors saying they would publish again in the same journal, although there were variations by title, and levels were slightly lower than subscription journals (over 90%). Their reasons for choosing to publish in OAMJs included a wide variety of factors, not significantly different from reasons given by authors of other journals, with the most important including the quality of the journal and quality of peer review. About half of OAMJ articles had been submitted elsewhere before submission to the OAMJ with some evidence of a "cascade" of articles between journals from the same publisher.
-
Münch, V.: They have a dream (2019)
0.06
0.06137964 = product of:
0.12275928 = sum of:
0.12275928 = sum of:
0.08093592 = weight(_text_:v in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08093592 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04182336 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.1, S.25-39
-
Siler, K.; Larivière, V.: Varieties of diffusion in academic publishing : how status and legitimacy influence growth trajectories of new innovations (2024)
0.06
0.059300452 = sum of:
0.025577148 = product of:
0.10230859 = sum of:
0.10230859 = weight(_text_:authors in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10230859 = score(doc=1206,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.033723302 = product of:
0.067446604 = sum of:
0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067446604 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Open Access (OA) publishing has progressed from an initial fringe idea to a still-growing, major component of modern academic communication. The proliferation of OA publishing presents a context to examine how new innovations and institutions develop. Based on analyses of 1,296,304 articles published in 83 OA journals, we analyze changes in the institutional status, gender, age, citedness, and geographical locations of authors over time. Generally, OA journals tended towards core-to-periphery diffusion patterns. Specifically, journal authors tended to decrease in high-status institutional affiliations, male and highly cited authors over time. Despite these general tendencies, there was substantial variation in the diffusion patterns of OA journals. Some journals exhibited no significant demographic changes, and a few exhibited periphery-to-core diffusion patterns. We find that although both highly and less-legitimate journals generally exhibit core-to-periphery diffusion patterns, there are still demographic differences between such journals. Institutional and cultural legitimacy-or lack thereof-affects the social and intellectual diffusion of new OA journals.
-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.05
0.051509395 = sum of:
0.023627155 = product of:
0.09450862 = sum of:
0.09450862 = weight(_text_:authors in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09450862 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.027882243 = product of:
0.055764485 = sum of:
0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055764485 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
-
Fry, J.; Spezi, V.; Probets, S.; Creaser, C.: Towards an understanding of the relationship between disciplinary research cultures and open access repository behaviors (2016)
0.05
0.048490275 = sum of:
0.0147669725 = product of:
0.05906789 = sum of:
0.05906789 = weight(_text_:authors in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05906789 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.033723302 = product of:
0.067446604 = sum of:
0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067446604 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article explores the cultural characteristics of three open access (OA)-friendly disciplines (physics, economics, and clinical medicine) and the ways in which those characteristics influence perceptions, motivations, and behaviors toward green OA. The empirical data are taken from two online surveys of European authors. Taking a domain analytic approach, the analysis draws on Becher and Trowler's (2001) and Whitley's (2000) theories to gain a deeper understanding of why OA repositories (OAR) play a particularly important role in the chosen disciplines. The surveys provided a unique opportunity to compare perceptions, motivations, and behaviors of researchers at the discipline level with the parent metadiscipline. It should be noted that participants were not drawn from a stratified sample of all the different subdisciplines that constitute each discipline, and therefore the generalizability of the findings to the discipline may be limited. The differential role of informal and formal communication in each of the three disciplines has shaped green OA practices. For physicists and economists, preprints are an essential feature of their respective OAR landscapes, whereas for clinical medics final published articles have a central role. In comparing the disciplines with their parent metadisciplines there were some notable similarities/differences, which have methodological implications for studying research cultures.
-
Henze, V.: "SGML" - a solution for your digital library of the future? (1996)
0.05
0.047212623 = product of:
0.094425246 = sum of:
0.094425246 = product of:
0.18885049 = sum of:
0.18885049 = weight(_text_:v in 3710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18885049 = score(doc=3710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 3710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3710)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993)
0.05
0.045070723 = sum of:
0.020673761 = product of:
0.082695045 = sum of:
0.082695045 = weight(_text_:authors in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082695045 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024396962 = product of:
0.048793923 = sum of:
0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048793923 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
- Source
- Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
-
Verlegen im Netz : Zur Diskussion um die Zukunft des wissenschaftlichen Buches (1997)
0.04
0.04046796 = product of:
0.08093592 = sum of:
0.08093592 = product of:
0.16187184 = sum of:
0.16187184 = weight(_text_:v in 7144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16187184 = score(doc=7144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.64586604 = fieldWeight in 7144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Editor
- Klostermann, V.
-
Gerhardt, V.: Methodischer Optimismus vor digitaler Zukunft (2016)
0.04
0.04046796 = product of:
0.08093592 = sum of:
0.08093592 = product of:
0.16187184 = sum of:
0.16187184 = weight(_text_:v in 3255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16187184 = score(doc=3255,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.64586604 = fieldWeight in 3255, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3255)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009)
0.04
0.038632046 = sum of:
0.017720366 = product of:
0.07088146 = sum of:
0.07088146 = weight(_text_:authors in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07088146 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02091168 = product of:
0.04182336 = sum of:
0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04182336 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:22:45
-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.04
0.037568275 = sum of:
0.023627155 = product of:
0.09450862 = sum of:
0.09450862 = weight(_text_:authors in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09450862 = score(doc=4631,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.013941121 = product of:
0.027882243 = sum of:
0.027882243 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027882243 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995)
0.03
0.034852803 = product of:
0.069705606 = sum of:
0.069705606 = product of:
0.13941121 = sum of:
0.13941121 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13941121 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
-
Bode, V.; Beutel, S.: Einzug der elektronische Medien (1993)
0.03
0.033723302 = product of:
0.067446604 = sum of:
0.067446604 = product of:
0.13489321 = sum of:
0.13489321 = weight(_text_:v in 6208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13489321 = score(doc=6208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.5382217 = fieldWeight in 6208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6208)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bode, V.: ¬Der Markt expandiert (1994)
0.03
0.033723302 = product of:
0.067446604 = sum of:
0.067446604 = product of:
0.13489321 = sum of:
0.13489321 = weight(_text_:v in 8139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13489321 = score(doc=8139,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.5382217 = fieldWeight in 8139, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8139)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Brakel, P.A. v.: Electronic journals : publishing via Internet's Wolrd Wide Web (1995)
0.03
0.033723302 = product of:
0.067446604 = sum of:
0.067446604 = product of:
0.13489321 = sum of:
0.13489321 = weight(_text_:v in 2386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13489321 = score(doc=2386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.5382217 = fieldWeight in 2386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2386)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.03
0.030648042 = sum of:
0.016706921 = product of:
0.066827685 = sum of:
0.066827685 = weight(_text_:authors in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066827685 = score(doc=4051,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.013941121 = product of:
0.027882243 = sum of:
0.027882243 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027882243 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The introduction of "altmetrics" as new tools to analyze scientific impact within the reward system of science has challenged the hegemony of citations as the predominant source for measuring scientific impact. Mendeley readership has been identified as one of the most important altmetric sources, with several features that are similar to citations. The purpose of this paper is to perform an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the distributions of Mendeley readership and citations across fields. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two issues by using in each case a common analytical framework for both metrics: the shape of the distributions of readership and citations, and the field normalization problem generated by differences in citation and readership practices across fields. In the first issue the authors use the characteristic scores and scales method, and in the second the measurement framework introduced in Crespo et al. (2013). Findings There are three main results. First, the citations and Mendeley readership distributions exhibit a strikingly similar degree of skewness in all fields. Second, the results on "exchange rates (ERs)" for Mendeley readership empirically supports the possibility of comparing readership counts across fields, as well as the field normalization of readership distributions using ERs as normalization factors. Third, field normalization using field mean readerships as normalization factors leads to comparably good results. Originality/value These findings open up challenging new questions, particularly regarding the possibility of obtaining conflicting results from field normalized citation and Mendeley readership indicators; this suggests the need for better determining the role of the two metrics in capturing scientific recognition.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000)
0.03
0.029573586 = product of:
0.05914717 = sum of:
0.05914717 = product of:
0.11829434 = sum of:
0.11829434 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11829434 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
18. 6.2000 9:11:22
-
Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993)
0.03
0.027882243 = product of:
0.055764485 = sum of:
0.055764485 = product of:
0.11152897 = sum of:
0.11152897 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11152897 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
-
Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992)
0.03
0.027882243 = product of:
0.055764485 = sum of:
0.055764485 = product of:
0.11152897 = sum of:
0.11152897 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11152897 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
