-
Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000)
0.12
0.1232767 = product of:
0.2465534 = sum of:
0.2465534 = sum of:
0.12653057 = weight(_text_:p in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12653057 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.67415863 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
0.12002283 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12002283 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
18. 6.2000 9:11:22
-
Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993)
0.12
0.11622639 = product of:
0.23245278 = sum of:
0.23245278 = sum of:
0.11929417 = weight(_text_:p in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11929417 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.113158606 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113158606 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
-
Oßwald, A.: Electronic publishing : Auswirkungen auf bibliothekarische und dokumentarische Grundfunktionen (1993)
0.07
0.07264149 = product of:
0.14528298 = sum of:
0.14528298 = sum of:
0.074558854 = weight(_text_:p in 5924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074558854 = score(doc=5924,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 5924, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5924)
0.07072413 = weight(_text_:22 in 5924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07072413 = score(doc=5924,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5924, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5924)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bibliothek - Kultur - Information: Beiträge eines internationalen Kongresses anläßlich des 50jährigen Bestehens der Fachhochschule für Bibliothekswesen Stuttgart vom 20.-22. Okt. 1992. Hrsg.: P. Vodosek
-
Kemp, A. de: Von der Zeitschrift bis zum Dokument : über SGML, electronic publishing, document delivery (1993)
0.07
0.07264149 = product of:
0.14528298 = sum of:
0.14528298 = sum of:
0.074558854 = weight(_text_:p in 5925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074558854 = score(doc=5925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 5925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5925)
0.07072413 = weight(_text_:22 in 5925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07072413 = score(doc=5925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bibliothek - Kultur - Information: Beiträge eines internationalen Kongresses anläßlich des 50jährigen Bestehens der Fachhochschule für Bibliothekswesen Stuttgart vom 20.-22. Okt. 1992. Hrsg.: P. Vodosek
-
Schlitt, G.: Veränderungen im Publikationswesen und ihre Auswirkungen auf die wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken : neue Publikationstechniken, neue Publikationsformen (1993)
0.07
0.07264149 = product of:
0.14528298 = sum of:
0.14528298 = sum of:
0.074558854 = weight(_text_:p in 5927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074558854 = score(doc=5927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 5927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5927)
0.07072413 = weight(_text_:22 in 5927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07072413 = score(doc=5927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5927)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bibliothek - Kultur - Information: Beiträge eines internationalen Kongresses anläßlich des 50jährigen Bestehens der Fachhochschule für Bibliothekswesen Stuttgart vom 20.-22. Okt. 1992. Hrsg.: P. Vodosek
-
Schirmbacher, P.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des elektronischen Publizierens auf der Basis der Open-Access-Prinzipien (2006)
0.06
0.061658196 = product of:
0.12331639 = sum of:
0.12331639 = sum of:
0.073809505 = weight(_text_:p in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073809505 = score(doc=26,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.3932592 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04950689 = score(doc=26,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27.10.2006 14:21:22
- Source
- Vom Wandel der Wissensorganisation im Informationszeitalter: Festschrift für Walther Umstätter zum 65. Geburtstag, hrsg. von P. Hauke u. K. Umlauf
-
Project ELVYN : an experiment in electronic jornal delivery, facts, figures and findings (1995)
0.06
0.058113195 = product of:
0.11622639 = sum of:
0.11622639 = sum of:
0.059647083 = weight(_text_:p in 6685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059647083 = score(doc=6685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 6685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6685)
0.056579303 = weight(_text_:22 in 6685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056579303 = score(doc=6685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 3.1997 18:22:00
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Online and CD notes. 1996, Sept., S.15; Electronic library 14(1996) no.5, S.469-479 (P. Barker)
-
Brusilovsky, P.; Eklund, J.; Schwarz, E.: Web-based education for all : a tool for development adaptive courseware (1998)
0.06
0.058113195 = product of:
0.11622639 = sum of:
0.11622639 = sum of:
0.059647083 = weight(_text_:p in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059647083 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
0.056579303 = weight(_text_:22 in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056579303 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Wakeling, S.; Creaser, C.; Pinfield, S.; Fry, J.; Spezi, V.; Willett, P.; Paramita, M.: Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open-access mega-journal authors : results of a large-scale survey (2019)
0.06
0.055339787 = sum of:
0.036700074 = product of:
0.1468003 = sum of:
0.1468003 = weight(_text_:authors in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1468003 = score(doc=5317,freq=12.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.018639714 = product of:
0.037279427 = sum of:
0.037279427 = weight(_text_:p in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037279427 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Open-access mega-journals (OAMJs) are characterized by their large scale, wide scope, open-access (OA) business model, and "soundness-only" peer review. The last of these controversially discounts the novelty, significance, and relevance of submitted articles and assesses only their "soundness." This article reports the results of an international survey of authors (n = 11,883), comparing the responses of OAMJ authors with those of other OA and subscription journals, and drawing comparisons between different OAMJs. Strikingly, OAMJ authors showed a low understanding of soundness-only peer review: two-thirds believed OAMJs took into account novelty, significance, and relevance, although there were marked geographical variations. Author satisfaction with OAMJs, however, was high, with more than 80% of OAMJ authors saying they would publish again in the same journal, although there were variations by title, and levels were slightly lower than subscription journals (over 90%). Their reasons for choosing to publish in OAMJs included a wide variety of factors, not significantly different from reasons given by authors of other journals, with the most important including the quality of the journal and quality of peer review. About half of OAMJ articles had been submitted elsewhere before submission to the OAMJ with some evidence of a "cascade" of articles between journals from the same publisher.
-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.05
0.052262038 = sum of:
0.023972388 = product of:
0.09588955 = sum of:
0.09588955 = weight(_text_:authors in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09588955 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.028289651 = product of:
0.056579303 = sum of:
0.056579303 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056579303 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
-
Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993)
0.05
0.045729287 = sum of:
0.020975841 = product of:
0.083903365 = sum of:
0.083903365 = weight(_text_:authors in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083903365 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024753446 = product of:
0.04950689 = sum of:
0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04950689 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
- Source
- Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Wouters, P.: Turning working papers into journal articles : an exercise in microbibliometrics (2009)
0.04
0.043584894 = product of:
0.08716979 = sum of:
0.08716979 = sum of:
0.044735312 = weight(_text_:p in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044735312 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
0.042434476 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042434476 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:59:25
-
Nelson, G.M.; Eggett, D.L.: Citations, mandates, and money : author motivations to publish in chemistry hybrid open access journals (2017)
0.04
0.042778984 = sum of:
0.01695104 = product of:
0.06780416 = sum of:
0.06780416 = weight(_text_:authors in 3838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06780416 = score(doc=3838,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 3838, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3838)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.025827946 = product of:
0.051655892 = sum of:
0.051655892 = weight(_text_:p in 3838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051655892 = score(doc=3838,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.27522412 = fieldWeight in 3838, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Hybrid open access refers to articles freely accessible via the Internet but which originate from an academic journal that provides most of its content via subscription. The effect of hybrid open access on citation counts and author behavior in the field of chemistry is something that has not been widely studied. We compared 814 open access articles and 27,621 subscription access articles published from 2006 through 2011 in American Chemical Society journals. As expected, the 2 comparison groups are not equal in all respects. Cumulative citation data were analyzed from years 2-5 following an article's publication date. A citation advantage for open access articles was correlated with the journal impact factor (IF) in low and medium IF journals, but not in high IF journals. Open access articles have a 24% higher mean citation rate than their subscription counterparts in low IF journals (confidence limits 8-42%, p = .0022) and similarly, a 26% higher mean citation rate in medium IF journals (confidence limits 14-40%, p < .001). Open access articles in high IF journals had no significant difference compared to subscription access articles (13% lower mean citation rate, confidence limits -27-3%, p = .10). These results are correlative, not causative, and may not be completely due to an open access effect. Authors of the open access articles were also surveyed to determine why they chose a hybrid open access option, paid the required article processing charge, and whether they believed it was money well spent. Authors primarily chose open access because of funding mandates; however, most considered the money well spent because open access increases information access to the scientific community and the general public, and potentially increases citations to their scholarship.
-
Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009)
0.04
0.03919653 = sum of:
0.017979292 = product of:
0.07191717 = sum of:
0.07191717 = weight(_text_:authors in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07191717 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021217238 = product of:
0.042434476 = sum of:
0.042434476 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042434476 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:22:45
-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.04
0.038117215 = sum of:
0.023972388 = product of:
0.09588955 = sum of:
0.09588955 = weight(_text_:authors in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09588955 = score(doc=4631,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014144826 = product of:
0.028289651 = sum of:
0.028289651 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028289651 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995)
0.04
0.035362065 = product of:
0.07072413 = sum of:
0.07072413 = product of:
0.14144826 = sum of:
0.14144826 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14144826 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
-
Zeng, M.L.; Sula, C.A.; Gracy, K.F.; Hyvönen, E.; Alves Lima, V.M.: JASIST special issue on digital humanities (DH) : guest editorial (2022)
0.03
0.033074625 = sum of:
0.011986194 = product of:
0.047944777 = sum of:
0.047944777 = weight(_text_:authors in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047944777 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021088429 = product of:
0.042176858 = sum of:
0.042176858 = weight(_text_:p in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042176858 = score(doc=462,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.22471954 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- More than 15 years ago, A Companion to Digital Humanities marked out the area of digital humanities (DH) "as a discipline in its own right" (Schreibman et al., 2004, p. xxiii). In the years that followed, there is ample evidence that the DH domain, formed by the intersection of humanities disciplines and digital information technology, has undergone remarkable expansion. This growth is reflected in A New Companion to Digital Humanities (Schreibman et al., 2016). The extensively revised contents of the second edition were contributed by a global team of authors who are pioneers of innovative research in the field. Over this formative period, DH has become a widely recognized, impactful mode of scholarship and an institutional unit for collaborative, transdisciplinary, and computationally engaged research, teaching, and publication (Burdick et al., 2012; Svensson, 2010; Van Ruyskensvelde, 2014). The field of DH has advanced tremendously over the last decade and continues to expand. Meanwhile, competing definitions and approaches of DH scholars continue to spark debate. "Complexity" was a theme of the DH2019 international conference, as it demonstrates the multifaceted connections within DH scholarship today (Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations, 2019). Yet, while it is often assumed that the DH is in flux and not particularly fixed as an institutional or intellectual construct, there are also obviously touchstones within the DH field, most visibly in the relationship between traditional humanities disciplines and technological infrastructures. Thus, it is still meaningful to "bring together the humanistic and the digital through embracing a non-territorial and liminal zone" (Svensson, 2016, p. 477). This is the focus of this JASIST special issue, which mirrors the increasing attention on DH worldwide.
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.03
0.031095866 = sum of:
0.01695104 = product of:
0.06780416 = sum of:
0.06780416 = weight(_text_:authors in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06780416 = score(doc=4051,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014144826 = product of:
0.028289651 = sum of:
0.028289651 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028289651 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The introduction of "altmetrics" as new tools to analyze scientific impact within the reward system of science has challenged the hegemony of citations as the predominant source for measuring scientific impact. Mendeley readership has been identified as one of the most important altmetric sources, with several features that are similar to citations. The purpose of this paper is to perform an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the distributions of Mendeley readership and citations across fields. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two issues by using in each case a common analytical framework for both metrics: the shape of the distributions of readership and citations, and the field normalization problem generated by differences in citation and readership practices across fields. In the first issue the authors use the characteristic scores and scales method, and in the second the measurement framework introduced in Crespo et al. (2013). Findings There are three main results. First, the citations and Mendeley readership distributions exhibit a strikingly similar degree of skewness in all fields. Second, the results on "exchange rates (ERs)" for Mendeley readership empirically supports the possibility of comparing readership counts across fields, as well as the field normalization of readership distributions using ERs as normalization factors. Third, field normalization using field mean readerships as normalization factors leads to comparably good results. Originality/value These findings open up challenging new questions, particularly regarding the possibility of obtaining conflicting results from field normalized citation and Mendeley readership indicators; this suggests the need for better determining the role of the two metrics in capturing scientific recognition.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Ockenfeld, M.: MultiMedia Forum : Konzeption und Erprobung einer elektronischen Mitarbeiterzeitung in einer räumlich verteilten Organisation (1994)
0.03
0.029823542 = product of:
0.059647083 = sum of:
0.059647083 = product of:
0.11929417 = sum of:
0.11929417 = weight(_text_:p in 7420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11929417 = score(doc=7420,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 7420, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7420)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- p
-
Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992)
0.03
0.028289651 = product of:
0.056579303 = sum of:
0.056579303 = product of:
0.113158606 = sum of:
0.113158606 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113158606 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
