-
Nguyen, T.-L.; Wu, X.; Sajeev, S.: Object-oriented modeling of multimedia documents (1998)
0.06
0.0558827 = product of:
0.1117654 = sum of:
0.1117654 = sum of:
0.06243237 = weight(_text_:t in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06243237 = score(doc=3598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
0.04933303 = weight(_text_:22 in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04933303 = score(doc=3598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Müller, S.: Schattenbibliotheken : Welche Auswirkungen haben Sci-Hub und Co. auf Verlage und Bibliotheken? (2019)
0.06
0.0558827 = product of:
0.1117654 = sum of:
0.1117654 = sum of:
0.06243237 = weight(_text_:t in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06243237 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
0.04933303 = weight(_text_:22 in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04933303 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2019-05-index.php.
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.5, S.397-404
-
Krüger, N.; Pianos, T.: Lernmaterialien für junge Forschende in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften als Open Educational Resources (OER) (2021)
0.06
0.0558827 = product of:
0.1117654 = sum of:
0.1117654 = sum of:
0.06243237 = weight(_text_:t in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06243237 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
0.04933303 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04933303 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.05
0.052078504 = sum of:
0.023888202 = product of:
0.09555281 = sum of:
0.09555281 = weight(_text_:authors in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09555281 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.028190302 = product of:
0.056380603 = sum of:
0.056380603 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056380603 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
-
Münch, V.: They have a dream (2019)
0.05
0.04789946 = product of:
0.09579892 = sum of:
0.09579892 = sum of:
0.053513464 = weight(_text_:t in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053513464 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.042285454 = weight(_text_:22 in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042285454 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2019-01-index.php.
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.1, S.25-39
-
Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993)
0.05
0.04556869 = sum of:
0.020902177 = product of:
0.08360871 = sum of:
0.08360871 = weight(_text_:authors in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08360871 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024666514 = product of:
0.04933303 = sum of:
0.04933303 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04933303 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
- Source
- Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
-
Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017)
0.04
0.039916217 = product of:
0.079832435 = sum of:
0.079832435 = sum of:
0.044594552 = weight(_text_:t in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044594552 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.03523788 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03523788 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between dissemination of research papers on Twitter and its influence on research impact. Design/methodology/approach Four types of journal Twitter accounts (journal, owner, publisher and no Twitter account) were defined to observe differences in the number of tweets and citations. In total, 4,176 articles from 350 journals were extracted from Plum Analytics. This altmetric provider tracks the number of tweets and citations for each paper. Student's t-test for two-paired samples was used to detect significant differences between each group of journals. Regression analysis was performed to detect which variables may influence the getting of tweets and citations. Findings The results show that journals with their own Twitter account obtain more tweets (46 percent) and citations (34 percent) than journals without a Twitter account. Followers is the variable that attracts more tweets (ß=0.47) and citations (ß=0.28) but the effect is small and the fit is not good for tweets (R2=0.46) and insignificant for citations (R2=0.18). Originality/value This is the first study that tests the performance of research journals on Twitter according to their handles, observing how the dissemination of content in this microblogging network influences the citation of their papers.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009)
0.04
0.03905888 = sum of:
0.017916152 = product of:
0.07166461 = sum of:
0.07166461 = weight(_text_:authors in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07166461 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021142727 = product of:
0.042285454 = sum of:
0.042285454 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042285454 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:22:45
-
DIN 33900: Elektronisches Publizieren in der Fachinformation : T.1: Rechnergestützte Dokumentbearbeitung von Normen. SGML-Syntax und gemeinsamer Teil der Dokumenttypfestlegung (DTD) für Normen - T.2: Spezifischer Teil der Dokumenttypfestlegung (DTD) für DIN-Normen (einschl. DIN-VDE-Normen) - T.3: Spezifischer Teil der Dokumenttypfestlegung (DTD) für Werknormen - Bbl.1: Erläuterung der Elementnamen und typographischen Empfehlungen (1992)
0.04
0.038620014 = product of:
0.07724003 = sum of:
0.07724003 = product of:
0.15448005 = sum of:
0.15448005 = weight(_text_:t in 7123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15448005 = score(doc=7123,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.75387037 = fieldWeight in 7123, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7123)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.04
0.037983354 = sum of:
0.023888202 = product of:
0.09555281 = sum of:
0.09555281 = weight(_text_:authors in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09555281 = score(doc=4631,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014095151 = product of:
0.028190302 = sum of:
0.028190302 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028190302 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Wilson, T.: 'In the beginning was the word' : social and economic factors in scholarly communication (1995)
0.04
0.037227403 = sum of:
0.014930127 = product of:
0.05972051 = sum of:
0.05972051 = weight(_text_:authors in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05972051 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.022297276 = product of:
0.044594552 = sum of:
0.044594552 = weight(_text_:t in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044594552 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the social and economic factors involved in the implementation of the electronic library. Discusses the ways in which the library metaphor may be restricitng thinking and the development of systems that may approach more closely the ideals of scholarly communication. Such a system not only necessitates new models for the concepts of periodical, library and publishing, but also new interpersonal and institutional practices, and a new basis for the economic conditions associated with communication. Electronic communication systems offer the possibility not only of disseminating information over networks but of interpersonal communication among collaborating authors or producers and, perhaps more important, between author, reader, user or consumer of the information. For example, electronic mail forms included in electronic periodicals along data discussed in the articles could lead to the evolution of electronic periodicals into electronic seminars or electronic common rooms. Poses the question of whether commercial publishers will be able to find a role to play in this process and fails to suggest an answer
-
Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995)
0.04
0.03523788 = product of:
0.07047576 = sum of:
0.07047576 = product of:
0.14095151 = sum of:
0.14095151 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14095151 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
-
Pack, T.: Electronic books : the state-of-the-art (1995)
0.03
0.031216186 = product of:
0.06243237 = sum of:
0.06243237 = product of:
0.12486474 = sum of:
0.12486474 = weight(_text_:t in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12486474 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hilberer, T.: Gründung eines elektronischen Hochschulverlages auf Verbund-Ebene : Vorüberlegungen und Thesen (2001)
0.03
0.031216186 = product of:
0.06243237 = sum of:
0.06243237 = product of:
0.12486474 = sum of:
0.12486474 = weight(_text_:t in 6938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12486474 = score(doc=6938,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 6938, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6938)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.03
0.03098666 = sum of:
0.01689151 = product of:
0.06756604 = sum of:
0.06756604 = weight(_text_:authors in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06756604 = score(doc=4051,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014095151 = product of:
0.028190302 = sum of:
0.028190302 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028190302 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The introduction of "altmetrics" as new tools to analyze scientific impact within the reward system of science has challenged the hegemony of citations as the predominant source for measuring scientific impact. Mendeley readership has been identified as one of the most important altmetric sources, with several features that are similar to citations. The purpose of this paper is to perform an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the distributions of Mendeley readership and citations across fields. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two issues by using in each case a common analytical framework for both metrics: the shape of the distributions of readership and citations, and the field normalization problem generated by differences in citation and readership practices across fields. In the first issue the authors use the characteristic scores and scales method, and in the second the measurement framework introduced in Crespo et al. (2013). Findings There are three main results. First, the citations and Mendeley readership distributions exhibit a strikingly similar degree of skewness in all fields. Second, the results on "exchange rates (ERs)" for Mendeley readership empirically supports the possibility of comparing readership counts across fields, as well as the field normalization of readership distributions using ERs as normalization factors. Third, field normalization using field mean readerships as normalization factors leads to comparably good results. Originality/value These findings open up challenging new questions, particularly regarding the possibility of obtaining conflicting results from field normalized citation and Mendeley readership indicators; this suggests the need for better determining the role of the two metrics in capturing scientific recognition.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000)
0.03
0.029900333 = product of:
0.059800666 = sum of:
0.059800666 = product of:
0.11960133 = sum of:
0.11960133 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11960133 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
18. 6.2000 9:11:22
-
Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993)
0.03
0.028190302 = product of:
0.056380603 = sum of:
0.056380603 = product of:
0.11276121 = sum of:
0.11276121 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11276121 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
-
Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992)
0.03
0.028190302 = product of:
0.056380603 = sum of:
0.056380603 = product of:
0.11276121 = sum of:
0.11276121 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11276121 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
-
Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998)
0.03
0.028190302 = product of:
0.056380603 = sum of:
0.056380603 = product of:
0.11276121 = sum of:
0.11276121 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11276121 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
-
Sülzer, T.: ¬Die komplette Rundschau jetzt im Internet : "E-Paper"-Ausgabe mit sämtlichen Beilagen online lesen - für Abonnenten völlig kostenlos (2005)
0.03
0.02794135 = product of:
0.0558827 = sum of:
0.0558827 = sum of:
0.031216186 = weight(_text_:t in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031216186 = score(doc=4026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.15233654 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
0.024666514 = weight(_text_:22 in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024666514 = score(doc=4026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
